Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
In Vivo ; 34(3 Suppl): 1685-1694, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32503830

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIM: Despite the large amount of clinical data available of Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19), not many studies have been conducted about the psychological toll on Health Care Workers (HCWs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicentric descriptive study, surveys were distributed among 4 different Breast Cancer Centers (BCC). BCCs were distinguished according to COVID-19 tertiary care hospital (COVID/No-COVID) and district prevalence (DP) (High vs. Low). DASS-21 score, PSS score and demographic data (age, sex, work) were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 51 HCWs were analyzed in the study. Age, work and sex did not demonstrate statistically significant values. Statistically significant distribution was found between DASS-21-stress score and COVID/No-COVID (p=0.043). No difference was found in the remaining DASS-21 and PSS scores, dividing the HCWs according to COVID-19-hospital and DP. CONCLUSION: Working in a COVID-19-hospital represents a factor that negatively affects psychosocial well-being. However, DP seems not to affect the psychosocial well-being of BCC HCWs. During the outbreak, psychological support for low risk HCWs should be provided regardless DP.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Institutos de Câncer , Infecções por Coronavirus/psicologia , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Recursos Humanos em Hospital/psicologia , Pneumonia Viral/psicologia , Adulto , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/transmissão , Depressão/epidemiologia , Depressão/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estresse Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Estresse Ocupacional/etiologia , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/transmissão , Prevalência , Equipamentos de Proteção/provisão & distribuição , Sistemas de Apoio Psicossocial , Cidade de Roma , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Incerteza , Carga de Trabalho
2.
In Vivo ; 34(3): 1125-1132, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32354901

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIM: In 2016, in the United States, more than 50% of breast cancer (BC) cases were diagnosed in patients older than 60 years of age. Our study aimed to estimate the risk of locoregional recurrence (LR) in patients who underwent breast-conservative treatment (BCT), according to age. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective monocentric study analyzed 613 cases of patients who underwent BCT between 2003 and 2014. Patients were divided into groups according to age: Under70 (under 70 years old) and Over70 (above 70 years old). Margins width, histology results, prognostic and predictive factors were compared. Subgroup analysis was performed for patients who experienced LR. RESULTS: LR Incidence among Under70 and Over70 was 5.4% and 1.7%, respectively (p<0.01). Group Over70 is characterized by larger tumors and a lower Ki67 index (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Operation time reduction, better aesthetic results and reduced LR risk support BCT. The Over70 group exhibited better outcomes in terms of LR despite larger tumor dimensions.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores Tumorais , Neoplasias da Mama/etiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Mastectomia Segmentar , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Prognóstico , Receptores de Estrogênio/metabolismo , Estudos Retrospectivos , Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA