Comparison of the incidence of smell and taste disorders between influenza and COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: Smell and taste disorders among patients with COVID-19 has become increasingly reported in the literature, however the prevalence varies. Post-infectious respiratory dysfunction has also been linked to influenza. In this study, we aimed to compare the rates of smell and taste disorders between COVID-19 and Influenza in unvaccinated patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: TriNetX research network. METHODS: Two queries were made on 7/1/2023 to include Influenza without a diagnosis of COVID-19 and a COVID-19 without a diagnosis of Influenza. The queries included patients from January 1 to December 31, 2022 from 102 Healthcare Organizations. The resultant population of patients with ICD-10 codes for COVID-19 and Influenza were matched using demographic characteristics to evaluate the risk of smell disorders. RESULTS: The overall 3-month incidence of smell and taste disorders was 0.73 % in the COVID-19 population and 0.1 % in the influenza population. The 3-month matched risk ratios were 11.1 [95 % CI (8.8,13.8)]; p < 0.001) times higher for disorders of the smell and taste secondary to COVID-19 compared to influenza. CONCLUSIONS: Disorders of the smell and taste are more common among patients with COVID-19 compared to patients with Influenza. Beyond smell loss, patients experience additional nasal and sinus-related rhinological symptoms, pointing to COVID-19's and influenza's wider impact on overall rhinological health. We believe that due to the transient nature of these disorders, they might go underreported.

Olfactory dysfunction incidence and resolution amongst 608 patients with COVID-19 infection.

PURPOSE: Olfactory dysfunction (OD) is a common presenting sign of coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) infection and remains persistent in up to 7 % of patients one year after diagnosis. However, demographic, socioeconomic, and medical risk factors for persistent OD are not well understood. This study aims to determine risk factors for development and persistence of OD amongst patients with COVID-19 infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, observational questionnaire study was performed at a tertiary-level, academic center. Patients with history of a positive COVID-19 diagnosis were sent an online questionnaire. Patients' self-reported survey responses for OD and resolution were assessed for associations with demographic variables, socioeconomic factors, and clinical data. RESULTS: In total, 608 of 26,094 patients (77.6 % women, mean age 42.7 ± 17.4 years, range 9 months-92 years) completed the survey. OD was reported by 220 (36.2 %) patients, and 139 (63.2 %) patients achieved resolution. Patients with OD were more likely to have other sinonasal and flu-like symptoms, and had a hospitalization rate of 2.7 %. There were no significant differences in age, gender, occupational or residential factors, or medical comorbidities incidence of OD development. Women reported higher rates of persistent OD (88.9 % vs 77.0 %, p = 0.045). The OD recovery rates amongst active and resolved COVID-19 infections was 27.0 % and 70.0 %, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There was a low hospitalization rate amongst patients reporting OD. One-third of patients with COVID-19 self-reported OD, and two-thirds of patients achieve OD resolution. Survey respondents with active COVID-19 infection and female gender were more likely to report persistent OD.

Revision Rates and Symptom Trends Following Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: Impact of Race on Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of demographics and sinonasal comorbidities on the revision rate of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). BACKGROUND: Although endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is often successful in providing long-term relief for patients suffering from CRS, revision surgery can occur. There is conflicting literature on the impact of race on FESS outcomes. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study of patients that underwent FESS for CRS between January 1, 2015 and June 1, 2021 at a single tertiary care academic center. RESULTS: A total of 682 patients between the ages of 18 and 89 underwent primary ESS between January 1, 2015 and June 1, 2021 and were included in this study. Of these patients, 388 (56.9%) were female, with an average age of 48.6 ± 16.7. Thirty-eight patients (5.6%) underwent revision sinus surgery during the study period. Patients that identified as White had significantly lower rates of revision sinus surgery (4.1%) than non-White patients (10.7%), including those identifying as Asian, Black, multiracial, or other. On multivariate analysis, non-White race (OR 4.933), polyposis (3.175), and high preoperative SNOT-22 scores (OR 1.029) were independently associated with revision sinus surgery. The mean preoperative SNOT-22 for all participants was 39.1 ± 22.0, whereas the mean postoperative SNOT-22 was 20.6 ± 17.5 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Race plays an important role in outcomes following revision sinus surgery that is independent of location and insurance status. More studies are required to assess the reason race plays an important role in outcomes following revision sinus surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3 Laryngoscope, 133:2878-2884, 2023.

Chronic Invasive Fungal Sinusitis With Negative Histopathology: A Diagnostic Challenge.

Although the diagnosis of chronic invasive fungal sinusitis relies chiefly on identification of invasive fungi on histology, the insidious nature of the disease can preclude detection of fungal organisms. Here, we present a case of chronic invasive fungal sinusitis with negative histopathologic findings and a definitive diagnosis made through fungal DNA detection. Clinicians should consider polymerase chain reaction an important complement to histology and culture in the diagnosis of chronic invasive fungal sinusitis.

The Use of 0° and 70° Endoscopes in Maxillary Antrostomy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Performing an effective maxillary antrostomy is critical to improving chronic maxillary sinusitis symptomatology. Incomplete dissection of the uncinate process and failure to incorporate the natural drainage pathway may lead to recirculation and need for revision surgery. The purpose of this study is to determine if 70° endoscopes provide added value in determining incomplete dissection or residual disease. METHODS: Prospective study of 35 sinuses from 18 patients undergoing FESS for Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) between 11/1/2020 and 4/30/2021. Two fellowship trained Rhinologists initially performed maxillary antrostomies exclusively using a 0° endoscope, then transitioned to a 70° endoscope. Surgeons completed a survey to assess completion of the antrostomy prior to use of 70° endoscope, sino-nasal anatomy, and difficulty of the operation. Intraoperative photographs before and after using a 70° endoscope were evaluated by a third party. Pre-operative CT scans were used to evaluate the sphenoid keel-caudal septum-nasolacrimal duct (SK-CS-NL) angle. RESULTS: Of 35 sinuses from 18 patients all 35 sinuses had CRS with 48.5% having nasal polyposis and 42.9% having active infection. There was residual inflammatory tissue in the anterior maxillary sinus, including polypoid tissue and uncinate process prior to using the 70° endoscope in 82.9% of sinuses. The natural drainage pathway was not incorporated into the dissection in 28.6% of sinuses before converting to 70° endoscope. Incomplete dissection with 0° endoscope was not associated with nasal polyposis (P = .086) or uncinate position (0.741). Narrow SK-CS-NL angles were associated with incomplete dissection of the anterior maxillary sinus with 0° endoscope (16.0° ± 3.0° vs 20.6° ± 3.2°; P = .013). CONCLUSION: Use of 70° endoscope in maxillary antrostomy may be beneficial in identifying and resecting disease within the anterior maxillary sinus that may otherwise be difficult to find using a 0° endoscope. This is especially true in patients with narrow nasolacrimal duct positioning.

Impact of body mass index in patulous Eustachian tube: Does rapid weight loss influence symptom improvement?

OBJECTIVES: Weight loss has been proposed as risk factor for patulous Eustachian tube (PET), however, it has not been well-characterized how this subpopulation responds to standard treatments. This study aimed to evaluate PET symptom improvement in the setting of and absence of rapid weight loss. METHODS: This retrospective case series included patients diagnosed with PET at an academic institution. Demographic characteristics, medical comorbidities, presenting symptoms, treatment, and outcomes of symptom improvement were reviewed. Univariate analysis modeled the likelihood of symptom improvement between rapid weight loss and non-rapid weight loss patients. RESULTS: A total of 124 patients (median age 55 years, 61 % female) were included. At diagnosis, 7 (5.6 %) patients were underweight, 40 (32.3 %) were normal weight, 32 (25.8 %) were overweight, and 45 (36/3 %) were obese. There were 39 (31.5 %) patients who had history of weight loss prior to presentation; of these, 22 (17.7 %) noted rapid weight loss and 17 (13.7 %) had non-rapid weight loss. There were 62 (50.0 %) patients who were recommended conservative treatment, and 62 (50.0 %) who underwent medical and/or surgical treatment. Symptom resolution was achieved in 49 (39.5 %) patients. On univariate analysis, patients with rapid weight loss were significantly more likely to experience improvement (p = 0.006) than non-rapid weight loss. Rapid weight loss patients had a four-fold increased likelihood of symptom improvement compared to non-rapid weight loss patients (OR = 4.8, p = 0.053). CONCLUSIONS: While rapid weight loss and bariatric surgery are reported risk factors for the development of PET, our findings suggest that patients with rapid weight loss are significantly more likely to achieve symptom improvement than non-rapid weight loss.

Assessing Telehealth Through the Lens of the Provider: Considerations for the Post-COVID-19 Era.

Introduction: Following the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic restrictions, many health care systems turned to telehealth as an alternative to in-person care. Current literature describes sustained patient satisfaction levels with virtual care throughout the pandemic era. However, provider opinions on the transforming landscape are largely unknown. Objectives: The aim of this study is to better understand provider intentions and limitations to telehealth adoption, along with preferences by various specialties and in various settings. Methods: A mixed-methods study design was used. An attitudinal survey was sent to 2,633 health care providers at a large, quaternary, integrated health system. The survey collected deidentified quantitative and qualitative data on factors influencing provider use, satisfaction, and concerns with telehealth during and after the initial pandemic-era restrictions. Results: Five hundred eighteen providers participated in the survey. Utilization of telehealth was largely motivated by (1) improving patient access (mean 29.3%; range 28-31.6%) and (2) patient interest (mean 23%; range 17.1-28.8%). Barriers included (1) technology limitations (mean 16.1%; range 12.4-23.8%) and (2) reimbursement uncertainties (mean 15.2%; range 4.8-18.8%). Preference for virtual care was reported to be highest in ambulatory settings, including direct-to-patient care and outpatient care. Discussion: Provider preference for telehealth, regardless of specialty or health care setting, revolves around a consumer-centric care delivery model, with increased access to care being a central theme. While provider values are patient oriented, this study found that concerns included connectivity, quality, and patient privacy. Amid changing care standards and regulations, provider preference is supportive of virtual care platforms, both now and postpandemic.

Digital Health: Unlocking Value in a Post-Pandemic World.

The COVID-19 pandemic has forever changed health care, spurring a revolution in digital health technologies. Across the world, hundreds of thousands of health care systems are considering a central question: how do we connect with our patients? Digital health has been used as a stopgap in many cases to continue the essential functions of health systems. As the post-pandemic world and our "new normal" come into focus, further needs will have to be met with a digital patient interaction, with an eye toward value transformation. One barrier to fully leveraging digital tools is the lack of a framework for classifying the type of digital health care. This can limit our ability to design, deploy, evaluate, and communicate through digital means. This article presents 3 categories of digital health and their relationships to value metrics: (1) telehealth or direct care delivery, (2) digital access tools, and (3) digital monitoring. An evidence-based discussion reveals past successes, current promises, and future challenges in reducing defects in value through digital care. In the coming years, value transformation will become more crucial to the success of health care systems. By using the taxonomy in this article, health systems can better implement digital tools with a value-driven purpose. Defining the role of digital health in the post-pandemic world is needed to assist health systems and practices to build a bridge to value-based care.

Nasal Packing in the Emergency Department: A Practical Review for Emergency Providers.

We performed a narrative review of epistaxis management in the emergency department. First, we examined the pathophysiology, the current types of treatment that are available to emergency clinicians. When nasal packing is indicated, we examined the efficacy of nasal packing in addition to other topical treatment such as tranexamic acid and the evidence of prophylactic antibiotics. We detailed current studies involving tranexamic acid and prophylactic antibiotics for nasal packing. Finally, we introduced an epistaxis clinical care pathway, based on current evidence, to aid emergency clinicians with their clinical decision-making processes.

The power of a checklist: Decrease in emergency department epistaxis transfers after clinical care pathway implementation.

BACKGROUND: Annually, epistaxis costs US hospitals over $100 million dollars. Many patients visit emergency departments (ED) with variable treatment, thus providing opportunity for improvement. OBJECTIVE: To implement an epistaxis clinical care pathway (CCP) in the ED, and analyze its effects on treatment and ED transfers. METHODS: An interdisciplinary team developed the CCP to be implemented at a tertiary hospital system with 11 satellite EDs. The analysis included matched eight-month periods prior to pathway implementation and after pathway implementation. Subjects included patients with ICD-10 code diagnosis of epistaxis. Patients under 18 years old, recent surgery or trauma, or bleeding disorders were excluded. There were 309 patients from the pre-implementation cohort, 53 of which were transferred and 37 met inclusion criteria; 322 from the post-implementation cohort, 37 of which were transferred, and 15 met inclusion criteria. Outcome measures included epistaxis intervention by ED providers and otolaryngologists before and after pathway implementation. RESULTS: CCP implementation resulted in a 61% reduction in patient transfers (p < 0.001). ED providers showed a 51% increase in documentation of anterior rhinoscopy with proper equipment, 34% increased use of topical vasoconstrictors, 40% increased use of absorbable packing, 7% decrease in use of unilateral non-absorbable packing, and 17% decrease in use of bilateral non-absorbable packing. CONCLUSIONS: Prior to CCP implementation, ED treatment of epistaxis varied significantly. CCP resulted in standardized treatment and significant reduction in transfers. A CCP checklist is an effective way to standardize care and prevent unnecessary hospital transfers.

Patient satisfaction with telemedicine in rhinology during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has forced the rapid integration of telemedicine services across several specialties, especially in Otolaryngology where risk of transmission is very high. Studies before and during the COVID-19 pandemic have shown that Otolaryngology is generally amenable to telemedicine. However, few studies have assessed patient satisfaction with telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic, and fewer have focused on patient satisfaction with telehealth in Rhinology. OBJECTIVES: To determine if patients believe the benefits of virtual live synchronous telemedicine visits out-weigh the drawbacks when compared to in-person clinical visits. METHODS: Single center retrospective case series and survey study of patients presenting to a tertiary care Rhinology practice between 3/15/2020 and 6/1/2020. All patients had previous in-person encounters with Rhinology (n = 45). RESULTS: Twenty-nine participants (64.4%) had audio-video visits while 16 (35.6%) had audio visits. 36 (80%) patients stated that their needs were met during their telemedicine visit while 32 (71.1%) patients felt that nothing was missed or not addressed during the virtual visit. The most commonly cited advantage to telemedicine visits was convenience (22.2%) and provider availability (20.0%). While most participants did not disclose a disadvantage to a virtual visit besides the lack of a physical exam (68.9%), the most commonly cited disadvantage to a virtual visit was technological difficulties (17.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Virtual telemedicine visits were shown to effectively meet the needs of established patients and address concerns in a convenient time efficient manner. However, patients indicated that limited technology and a less personalized feel hindered the telemedicine experience in Rhinology.

Systematic Review of Telehealth Cost Minimization for Patients and Health Systems in Otolaryngology.

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in telehealth becoming commonplace in many health care fields. Telehealth benefits include improving access, decreasing costs, and elevating patient's experience. A review of cost minimization (CM) analyses was performed in order to explore scientific studies associated with integrating tele-otolaryngology in clinical practice. Our primary objective was to evaluate published literature for cost related to the implementation of telemedicine across otolaryngology, and to determine CM when compared to in-person visits. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic Literature Review. METHODS: We performed a systematic review using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane in May 2020, to identify studies with a cost analysis of tele-otolaryngology care. Inclusion criteria focused on articles citing CM data from telehealth services. Literature quality was assessed using the MINORS scoring system. RESULTS: From 380 original articles screened only nine evaluated cost in otolaryngology. CM in the US ranged from $68 to $900 per visit. Cost was evaluated in general otolaryngology, sleep medicine, otology, and head and neck cancer surgery, the latter had the most benefit. The most common types of telehealth visits were routine follow-up and screening. Data were insufficient for meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine has been trialed across various otolaryngology subspecialties; its incorporation is projected to have a meaningful impact on access to specialty care. This research suggests that the delivery of virtual care reduces cost with the potential of increasing net revenue across multiple otolaryngology subspecialties. Further studies are needed to better discern the entirety of cost savings and the best settings for integration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:1741-1748, 2021.

Use of Telemedicine to Improve Interfacility Communication and Aid in Triage of Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Pilot Study.

INTRODUCTION: Over the past several years there has been a dramatic increase in the implementation of telemedicine technology to aid in the delivery of care across community, inpatient, and emergency settings. This technology has proved valuable for acute life-threatening clinical scenarios. We aimed to pilot a novel neurosurgical telemedicine program within an academic tertiary care center to assist in consultation of patients with high-grade intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (ICH score 4, 5). METHODS: A quality improvement conceptual framework was developed. Subsequently, a process map and improvement interventions were created. Patients in community hospitals with high-grade ICH or pre-existing Do Not Resuscitate/Do Not Intubate orders with an admitting diagnosis of ICH triggered a TeleNeurosurgery consultation. Patients who met the inclusion criteria, with consent of their decision makers, were enrolled in the study. Post-encounter physician surveys were used to evaluate overall satisfaction with the implementation. RESULTS: This 18-month pilot study proved feasible, with an enrollment of 63.6% (n = 14 of 22) of patients who met criteria. All patients who were enrolled in the study and participated in TeleNeurosurgery consultation remained at the presenting facility for end-of-life care and palliative medicine consultation. Both community emergency physicians and subspecialists who performed the consultations reported satisfaction with the TeleNeurosurgery consultation process and a perceived benefit both to patients, families, and emergency medicine physicians. CONCLUSIONS: The program proved feasible and several areas in need of improvement within the health system were identified. Emergency physicians reported comfort with the process, program effectiveness, and improved access to care by implementation of this program.

Telemedicine in Otolaryngology: A Systematic Review of Image Quality, Diagnostic Concordance, and Patient and Provider Satisfaction.

OBJECTIVES: Telemedicine allows for the remote delivery of patient care and has been found to have a wide range of uses in otolaryngology. In order to achieve best practices in telemedicine, a platform must be effective and both patients and providers must be satisfied with the use of technology. As telemedicine becomes more widely used in otolaryngology clinics, particularly in the face of the current COVID-19 pandemic, it is important to assess its applicability in this field. The goal of this study was to evaluate existing literature on telemedicine and assess overall image quality, diagnostic concordance, and patient and provider satisfaction with telemedicine technologies. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted on PubMed and MEDLINE according to the PRISMA 2009 guidelines for articles from 1982 to 2019 relating to telemedicine in otolaryngology. English language studies with primary or secondary endpoints pertaining to image quality, diagnostic concordance, or patient or provider satisfaction were included. Descriptive studies, editorials, and literature reviews were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 32 studies were included in our review. Studies assessing imaging quality and diagnostic concordance reported adequate results but with some heterogeneity. Patient and provider satisfaction were consistently high. CONCLUSIONS: The literature supports telemedicine delivery of otorhinolaryngologic care as having achieved high rates of patient and provider satisfaction with adequate image quality and heterogeneity in diagnostic concordance. Variability in diagnostic accuracy was reported, but appears improved given proper clinical context. More standardized studies are needed specific to telemedicine in the field of otolaryngology.

"Hot Zones" for Otolaryngologists: Assessing the geographic distribution of aerosol-generating procedures amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: Given high COVID-19 viral load and aerosolization in the head and neck, otolaryngologists are subject to uniquely elevated viral exposure in most of their inpatient and outpatient procedures and interventions. While elective activity has halted across the board nationally, the slow plateau of COVID-19 case rates prompts the question of timing of resumption of clinical activity. We sought to prospectively predict geographical "hot zones" for otolaryngological exposure to COVID-19 based on procedural volumes data from 2013 to 2017. METHODS: Otolaryngologic CPT codes were stratified based on risk-level, according to recently published specialty-specific guidelines. Using the Medicare POSPUF database, aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) were mapped based on hospital referral regions, against up-to-date COVID-19 case distribution data, as of April 24, 2020. RESULTS: The most common AGPs were diagnostic flexible laryngoscopy, diagnostic nasal endoscopy, and flexible laryngoscopy with stroboscopy. The regions with the most AGPs per otolaryngologist were Iowa City, IA, Detroit, MI, and Burlington, VT, while the states with the most COVID-19 cases as of April 24th are New York, New Jersey, and Massachusetts. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides a model for predicting possible "hot zones" for otolaryngologic exposure based on both COVID-19 case density and AGP-density. As the focus shifts to resuming elective procedures, these potential "hot zones" need to be evaluated for appropriate risk-based decision-making, such as "reopening strategies" and allocation of resources.

Geospatial analysis of COVID-19 and otolaryngologists above age 60.

OBJECTIVE: The 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) is disproportionately impacting older individuals and healthcare workers. Otolaryngologists are especially susceptible with the elevated risk of aerosolization and corresponding high viral loads. This study utilizes a geospatial analysis to illustrate the comparative risks of older otolaryngologists across the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Demographic and state population data were extracted from the State Physician Workforce Reports published by the AAMC for the year 2018. A geospatial heat map of the United States was then constructed to illustrate the location of COVID-19 confirmed case counts and the distributions of ENTs over 60 years for each state. RESULTS: In 2018, out of a total of 9578 practicing U.S. ENT surgeons, 3081 were older than 60 years (32.2%). The states with the highest proportion of ENTs over 60 were Maine, Delaware, Hawaii, and Louisiana. The states with the highest ratios of confirmed COVID-19 cases to the number of total ENTs over 60 were New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Michigan. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our models, New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Michigan represent states where older ENTs may be the most susceptible to developing severe complications from nosocomial transmission of COVID-19 due to a combination of high COVID-19 case volumes and a high proportion of ENTs over 60 years.

Improving efficiency in epistaxis transfers in a large health system: Analyzing emergency department treatment variability as pretext for a clinical care pathway.

INTRODUCTION: Epistaxis is a common condition with an estimated $100 million in health care costs annually. A significant portion of this stems from Emergency Department (ED) management and hospital transfers. Currently there is no data in the literature clearly depicting the differences in treatment of epistaxis between Emergency Medicine (EM) physicians and Otolaryngologists. Clinical care pathways (CCP) are a way to standardize care and increase efficiency. Our goal was to evaluate the variability in epistaxis management between EM and Otolaryngology physicians in order to determine the potential impact of a system wide clinical care pathway. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective case study was conducted of all patients transferred between emergency departments for epistaxis over an 18-month period. Exclusion criteria comprised patients under 18 years old, recent sinonasal surgery, bleeding disorders, and recent facial trauma. RESULTS: 73 patients met inclusion criteria. EM physicians used nasal cautery in 8%, absorbable packing in 1% and non-absorbable packing in 92% (with 33% being bilateral). In comparison, Otolaryngologists used nasal cautery in 37%, absorbable packing in 34%, and non-absorbable packing in 23%. Eighty percent of patients treated by an Otolaryngology physician required less invasive intervention than previously performed by EM physicians prior to transfer. CONCLUSIONS: Epistaxis management varied significantly between Emergency Medicine and Otolaryngology physicians. Numerous patients were treated immediately with non-absorbable packing. On post-transfer Otolaryngology evaluation, many of these patients required less invasive interventions. This study highlights the variability of epistaxis treatment within our hospital system and warrants the need for a standardized care pathway.

Technical notes on the endoscopic endonasal approach to the craniovertebral junction for odontoidectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Odontoidectomy can help decompress ventral compression of the brainstem and upper cervical spinal cord in the presence of bony abnormalities of the craniovertebral junction (CVJ), e.g., an odontoid pannus. Endonasal approaches have been shown to be associated with lower morbidity compared with traditional transoral approaches. We demonstrated an entirely endonasal approach to the CVJ. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We presented our technique for performing an endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy. RESULTS: The patient underwent an open posterior cervical spinal fusion to stabilize the CVJ due to destabilization that occurs with odontoidectomy either as part of a single procedure or in a staged manner, depending on the surgeon's preference. By using a two-surgeon, multihanded technique in collaboration with neurosurgery, the anterior CVJ was safely approached endoscopically through the nasopharynx. A midline incision was created and the soft tissue was lateralized widely. The first cervical vertebra (C1) arch was removed with a drill exposing the odontoid process and any associated pannus, which were then resected. Because this approach was entirely extradural, no reconstruction was necessary. Closure was accomplished by placing absorbable packing material in the defect and medializing the nasopharyngeal tissues. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy offers excellent exposure and less morbidity than traditional transoral approaches. This technique should be considered in appropriately selected patients.