Utility of Genome Sequencing After Nondiagnostic Exome Sequencing in Unexplained Pediatric Epilepsy.

Importance: Epilepsy is the most common neurological disorder of childhood. Identifying genetic diagnoses underlying epilepsy is critical to developing effective therapies and improving outcomes. Most children with non-acquired (unexplained) epilepsy remain genetically unsolved, and the utility of genome sequencing after nondiagnostic exome sequencing is unknown. Objective: To determine the diagnostic (primary) and clinical (secondary) utility of genome sequencing after nondiagnostic exome sequencing in individuals with unexplained pediatric epilepsy. Design: This cohort study performed genome sequencing and comprehensive analyses for 125 participants and available biological parents enrolled from August 2018 to May 2023, with data analysis through April 2024 and clinical return of diagnostic and likely diagnostic genetic findings. Clinical utility was evaluated. Setting: Pediatric referral center. Participants: Participants with unexplained pediatric epilepsy and previous nondiagnostic exome sequencing; biological parents when available. Exposures: Short-read genome sequencing and analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome measures were the diagnostic yield of genome sequencing, defined as the percentage of participants receiving a diagnostic or likely diagnostic genetic finding, and the unique diagnostic yield of genome sequencing, defined as the percentage of participants receiving a diagnostic or likely diagnostic genetic finding that required genome sequencing. The secondary outcome measure was clinical utility of genome sequencing, defined as impact on evaluation, treatment, or prognosis for the participant or their family. Results: 125 participants (58 [46%] female) were enrolled with median age at seizure onset 3 [IQR 1.25, 8] years, including 44 (35%) with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies. The diagnostic yield of genome sequencing was 7.2% (9/125), with diagnostic genetic findings in five cases and likely diagnostic genetic findings in four cases. Among the solved cases, 7/9 (78%) required genome sequencing for variant detection (small copy number variant, three noncoding variants, and three difficult to sequence small coding variants), for a unique diagnostic yield of genome sequencing of 5.6% (7/125). Clinical utility was documented for 4/9 solved cases (44%). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that genome sequencing can have diagnostic and clinical utility after nondiagnostic exome sequencing and should be considered for patients with unexplained pediatric epilepsy.

Analysis of DNA from brain tissue on stereo-EEG electrodes reveals mosaic epilepsy-related variants.

Somatic mosaic variants contribute to focal epilepsy, but genetic analysis has been limited to patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) who undergo surgical resection, as the variants are mainly brain-limited. Stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) has become part of the evaluation for many patients with focal DRE, and sEEG electrodes provide a potential source of small amounts of brain-derived DNA. We aimed to identify, validate, and assess the distribution of potentially clinically relevant mosaic variants in DNA extracted from trace brain tissue on individual sEEG electrodes. We enrolled a prospective cohort of eleven pediatric patients with DRE who had sEEG electrodes implanted for invasive monitoring, one of whom was previously reported. We extracted unamplified DNA from the trace brain tissue on each sEEG electrode and also performed whole-genome amplification for each sample. We extracted DNA from resected brain tissue and blood/saliva samples where available. We performed deep panel and exome sequencing on a subset of samples from each case and analysis for potentially clinically relevant candidate germline and mosaic variants. We validated candidate mosaic variants using amplicon sequencing and assessed the variant allele fraction (VAF) in amplified and unamplified electrode-derived DNA and across electrodes. We extracted DNA from >150 individual electrodes from 11 individuals and obtained higher concentrations of whole-genome amplified vs unamplified DNA. Immunohistochemistry confirmed the presence of neurons in the brain tissue on electrodes. Deep sequencing and analysis demonstrated similar depth of coverage between amplified and unamplified samples but significantly more called mosaic variants in amplified samples. In addition to the mosaic PIK3CA variant detected in a previously reported case from our group, we identified and validated four potentially clinically relevant mosaic variants in electrode-derived DNA in three patients who underwent laser ablation and did not have resected brain tissue samples available. The variants were detected in both amplified and unamplified electrode-derived DNA, with higher VAFs observed in DNA from electrodes in closest proximity to the electrical seizure focus in some cases. This study demonstrates that mosaic variants can be identified and validated from DNA extracted from trace brain tissue on individual sEEG electrodes in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy and in both amplified and unamplified electrode-derived DNA samples. Our findings support a relationship between the extent of regional genetic abnormality and electrophysiology, and suggest that with further optimization, this minimally invasive diagnostic approach holds promise for advancing precision medicine for patients with DRE as part of the surgical evaluation.

"It's hard to wait": Provider perspectives on current genomic care in safety-net NICUs.

PURPOSE: Critically ill infants from marginalized populations disproportionately receive care in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) that lack access to state-of-the-art genomic care, leading to inequitable outcomes. We sought provider perspectives to inform our implementation study (VIGOR) providing rapid genomic sequencing within these settings. METHODS: We conducted semistructured focus groups with neonatal and genetics providers at 6 NICUs at safety-net hospitals, informed by the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework, which incorporates evidence, context, and facilitation domains. We iteratively developed codes and themes until thematic saturation was reached. RESULTS: Regarding evidence, providers felt that genetic testing benefits infants and families. Regarding context, the major barriers identified to genomic care were genetic testing cost, lack of genetics expertise for disclosure and follow-up, and navigating the complexity of selecting and ordering genetic tests. Providers had negative feelings about the current status quo and inequity in genomic care across NICUs. Regarding facilitation, providers felt that a virtual support model such as VIGOR would address major barriers and foster family-centered care and collaboration. CONCLUSION: NICU providers at safety-net hospitals believe that access to state-of-the-art genomic care is critical for optimizing infant outcomes; yet, substantial barriers exist that the VIGOR study may address.

The spectrum of movement disorders in young children with ARX-related epilepsy-dyskinesia syndrome.

Children with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies often present with co-occurring dyskinesias. Pathogenic variants in ARX cause a pleomorphic syndrome that includes infantile epilepsy with a variety of movement disorders ranging from focal hand dystonia to generalized dystonia with frequent status dystonicus. In this report, we present three patients with severe movement disorders as part of ARX-associated epilepsy-dyskinesia syndrome, including a patient with a novel pathogenic missense variant (p.R371G). These cases illustrate diagnostic and management challenges of ARX-related disorder and shed light on broader challenges concerning epilepsy-dyskinesia syndromes.

Consensus reporting guidelines to address gaps in descriptions of ultra-rare genetic conditions.

Genome-wide sequencing and genetic matchmaker services are propelling a new era of genotype-driven ascertainment of novel genetic conditions. The degree to which reported phenotype data in discovery-focused studies address informational priorities for clinicians and families is unclear. We identified reports published from 2017 to 2021 in 10 genetics journals of novel Mendelian disorders. We adjudicated the quality and detail of the phenotype data via 46 questions pertaining to six priority domains: (I) Development, cognition, and mental health; (II) Feeding and growth; (III) Medication use and treatment history; (IV) Pain, sleep, and quality of life; (V) Adulthood; and (VI) Epilepsy. For a subset of articles, all subsequent published follow-up case descriptions were identified and assessed in a similar manner. A modified Delphi approach was used to develop consensus reporting guidelines, with input from content experts across four countries. In total, 200 of 3243 screened publications met inclusion criteria. Relevant phenotypic details across each of the 6 domains were rated superficial or deficient in >87% of papers. For example, less than 10% of publications provided details regarding neuropsychiatric diagnoses and "behavioural issues", or about the type/nature of feeding problems. Follow-up reports (n = 95) rarely contributed this additional phenotype data. In summary, phenotype information relevant to clinical management, genetic counselling, and the stated priorities of patients and families is lacking for many newly described genetic diseases. The PHELIX (PHEnotype LIsting fiX) reporting guideline checklists were developed to improve phenotype reporting in the genomic era.

Genomic testing and molecular diagnosis among infants with congenital heart disease in the neonatal intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patterns of genetic testing among infants with CHD at a tertiary care center. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of infants in the NICU with suspicion of a genetic disorder. 1075 of 7112 infants admitted to BCH had genetic evaluation including 329 with CHD and 746 without CHD. 284 of 525 infants with CHD admitted to CMHH had genetic evaluation. Patterns of testing and diagnoses were compared. RESULTS: The rate of diagnosis after testing was similar for infants with or without CHD (38% [121/318] vs. 36% [246/676], p = 0.14). In a multiple logistic regression, atrioventricular septal defects were most high associated with genetic diagnosis (odds ratio 29.99, 95% confidence interval 2.69-334.12, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Infants with suspicion of a genetic disorder with CHD had similar rates of molecular diagnosis as those without CHD. These results support a role for genetic testing among NICU infants with CHD.

Implementation of rapid genomic sequencing in safety-net neonatal intensive care units: protocol for the VIrtual GenOme CenteR (VIGOR) proof-of-concept study.

INTRODUCTION: Rapid genomic sequencing (rGS) in critically ill infants with suspected genetic disorders has high diagnostic and clinical utility. However, rGS has primarily been available at large referral centres with the resources and expertise to offer state-of-the-art genomic care. Critically ill infants from racial and ethnic minority and/or low-income populations disproportionately receive care in safety-net and/or community settings lacking access to state-of-the-art genomic care, contributing to unacceptable health equity gaps. VIrtual GenOme CenteR is a 'proof-of-concept' implementation science study of an innovative delivery model for genomic care in safety-net neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We developed a virtual genome centre at a referral centre to remotely support safety-net NICU sites predominantly serving racial and ethnic minority and/or low-income populations and have limited to no access to rGS. Neonatal providers at each site receive basic education about genomic medicine from the study team and identify eligible infants. The study team enrols eligible infants (goal n of 250) and their parents and follows families for 12 months. Enrolled infants receive rGS, the study team creates clinical interpretive reports to guide neonatal providers on interpreting results, and neonatal providers return results to families. Data is collected via (1) medical record abstraction, (2) surveys, interviews and focus groups with neonatal providers and (3) surveys and interviews with families. We aim to examine comprehensive implementation outcomes based on the Proctor Implementation Framework using a mixed methods approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is approved by the institutional review board of Boston Children's Hospital (IRB-P00040496) and participating sites. Participating families are required to provide electronic written informed consent and neonatal provider consent is implied through the completion of surveys. The results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and data will be made accessible per National Institutes of Health (NIH) policies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05205356/clinicaltrials.gov.

Somatic Mosaicism in PIK3CA Variant Correlates With Stereoelectroencephalography-Derived Electrophysiology.

Objectives: Brain-limited pathogenic somatic variants are associated with focal pediatric epilepsy, but reliance on resected brain tissue samples has limited our ability to correlate epileptiform activity with abnormal molecular pathology. We aimed to identify the pathogenic variant and map variant allele fractions (VAFs) across an abnormal region of epileptogenic brain in a patient who underwent stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) and subsequent motor-sparing left frontal disconnection. Methods: We extracted genomic DNA from peripheral blood, brain tissue resected from peri-sEEG electrode regions, and microbulk brain tissue adherent to sEEG electrodes. Samples were mapped based on an anatomic relationship with the presumed seizure onset zone (SOZ). We performed deep panel sequencing of amplified and unamplified DNA to identify pathogenic variants with subsequent orthogonal validation. Results: We detect a pathogenic somatic PIK3CA variant, c.1624G>A (p.E542K), in the brain tissue samples, with VAF inversely correlated with distance from the SOZ. In addition, we identify this variant in amplified electrode-derived samples, albeit with lower VAFs. Discussion: We demonstrate regional mosaicism across epileptogenic tissue, suggesting a correlation between variant burden and SOZ. We also validate a pathogenic variant from individual amplified sEEG electrode-derived brain specimens, although further optimization of techniques is required.