RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Trigeminal Neuralgia (NT) is a common pathology in Neurosurgery. It can be classified as idiopathic or secondary to other pathologies, such as Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Several surgical treatments have been described, some of them being replaced by more modern techniques. Partial sensory rhizotomy (PSR), described by Dandy is a technique replaced by other techniques due to its permanent side effects. We present our experience with this technique in patients with recurrent NT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective review is carried out on five patients who underwent surgery at our center from 2018 to 2023 using the PSR technique. RESULTS: All the patients intervened showed significant clinical improvement, except one patient who required reintervention due to uncontrolled pain. According to the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) scale, 80% (4/5) of patients showed improvement from grade V to grades I/II except for one of them. This patient suffered from MS. Additionally, one patient presented a corneal ulcer after surgery due to impairment of the corneal reflex. CONCLUSION: In our experience, PSR is a valid treatment option in selected patients with recurrent TN. It has a low incidence of complications with an adequate surgical technique and anatomical knowledge of the region. To the best of our knowledge, we are one of the few centers in Spain to publish our results with PSR in the last ten years. We report good results in pain control withdrawing medication in 80% (4/5) of the operated patients.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The large number of infected patients requiring mechanical ventilation has led to the postponement of scheduled neurosurgical procedures during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. The aims of this study were to investigate the factors that influence the decision to postpone scheduled neurosurgical procedures and to evaluate the effect of the restriction in scheduled surgery adopted to deal with the first outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain on the outcome of patients awaiting surgery. DESIGN: This was an observational retrospective study. SETTINGS: A tertiary-level multicentre study of neurosurgery activity between 1 March and 30 June 2020. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 680 patients awaiting any scheduled neurosurgical procedure were enrolled. 470 patients (69.1%) were awaiting surgery because of spine degenerative disease, 86 patients (12.6%) due to functional disorders, 58 patients (8.5%) due to brain or spine tumours, 25 patients (3.7%) due to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) disorders and 17 patients (2.5%) due to cerebrovascular disease. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was mortality due to any reason and any deterioration of the specific neurosurgical condition. Second, we analysed the rate of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: More than one-quarter of patients experienced clinical or radiological deterioration. The rate of worsening was higher among patients with functional (39.5%) or CSF disorders (40%). Two patients died (0.4%) during the waiting period, both because of a concurrent disease. We performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine independent covariates associated with maintaining the surgical indication. We found that community SARS-CoV-2 incidence (OR=1.011, p<0.001), degenerative spine (OR=0.296, p=0.027) and expedited indications (OR=6.095, p<0.001) were independent factors for being operated on during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Patients awaiting neurosurgery experienced significant collateral damage even when they were considered for scheduled procedures.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Humanos , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Espanha/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on the outcome of neurosurgical patients in Spain. SETTINGS: The initial flood of COVID-19 patients overwhelmed an unprepared healthcare system. Different measures were taken to deal with this overburden. The effect of these measures on neurosurgical patients, as well as the effect of COVID-19 itself, has not been thoroughly studied. PARTICIPANTS: This was a multicentre, nationwide, observational retrospective study of patients who underwent any neurosurgical operation from March to July 2020. INTERVENTIONS: An exploratory factorial analysis was performed to select the most relevant variables of the sample. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of mortality and postoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: Sixteen hospitals registered 1677 operated patients. The overall mortality was 6.4%, and 2.9% (44 patients) suffered a perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection. Of those infections, 24 were diagnosed postoperatively. Age (OR 1.05), perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR 4.7), community COVID-19 incidence (cases/105 people/week) (OR 1.006), postoperative neurological worsening (OR 5.9), postoperative need for airway support (OR 5.38), ASA grade ≥3 (OR 2.5) and preoperative GCS 3-8 (OR 2.82) were independently associated with mortality. For SARS-CoV-2 postoperative infection, screening swab test <72 hours preoperatively (OR 0.76), community COVID-19 incidence (cases/105 people/week) (OR 1.011), preoperative cognitive impairment (OR 2.784), postoperative sepsis (OR 3.807) and an absence of postoperative complications (OR 0.188) were independently associated. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection in neurosurgical patients was associated with an increase in mortality by almost fivefold. Community COVID-19 incidence (cases/105 people/week) was a statistically independent predictor of mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CEIM 20/217.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espanha/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Intracranial aneurysm rupture is associated with a high mortality and disability despite modern medical care. Multiple aneurysms occur in nearly 16% of patients, and imaging studies of naturally occurring multiple aneurysms are valuable for computational fluid dynamics studies. In this study, we describe and analyze the hemodynamic changes produced in a distal aneurysm after the treatment of a proximal aneurysm. METHODS: Between January 2008 and December 2017, 24 cases of multiple intracranial aneurysms of the same vascular tree were treated in our center. Full carotid segmentations from digital subtraction angiography, computed tomography angiography, or magnetic resonance angiography were obtained, and transient pulsatile simulations were performed using computational fluid dynamics software. Output variables included maximum peak systole wall shear stress (WSS), minimum mid-diastolic WSS, maximum systolic pressure, low shear area, and high shear area both before and after treatment of the proximal aneurysm. RESULTS: The mean size of ruptured and unruptured aneurysms was 7.05 and 5.23 mm, respectively (P = 0.035), with respective aspect ratios of 1.22 and 2.04 (P = 0.001). Maximum peak systole WSS was lower and minimum mid-diastolic WSS was higher in unruptured aneurysms (P = 0.04 and 0.034, respectively). After treatment of the proximal aneurysm, low shear area in the distal aneurysm increased from 54.15% to 56.93% (P = 0.02). The opposite effect is noted in aneurysms with an interaneurysmal distance <10 mm. Posttreatment peak systole pressure was also increased significantly (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The hemodynamic changes in a distal aneurysm after treatment of a proximal aneurysm showed an unfavorable profile associated with an increased theoretical risk of bleeding.