Improvements in hematologic markers and decreases in fatigue with pegcetacoplan for patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria and mild or moderate anemia (hemoglobin ≥10 g/dL) who had received eculizumab or were naive to complement inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Although complement component 5 inhibitors (C5is) eculizumab and ravulizumab improve paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) outcomes, patients may experience persistent anemia. This post hoc analysis investigated whether the complement component 3-targeted therapy pegcetacoplan also improved hematologic outcomes and reduced fatigue in patients with PNH and mild/moderate anemia. METHODS: Patients with PNH and hemoglobin ≥10.0 g/dL at baseline of PADDOCK (N = 6), PRINCE (N = 8), and PEGASUS (N = 11) were included. Before receiving pegcetacoplan, PADDOCK and PRINCE patients were C5i-naive; PEGASUS patients had hemoglobin <10.5 g/dL despite stably dosed eculizumab. Hemoglobin concentrations, percentages of patients with concentrations ≥12 g/dL, and sex-specific normalization were assessed at baseline and after 16 weeks of pegcetacoplan, as were absolute reticulocyte counts (ARCs) and normalization and fatigue scores and normalization. RESULTS: From baseline to week 16, mean (SD) hemoglobin concentrations increased in C5i-naive patients (PADDOCK: 10.5 [0.4] to 12.7 [1.1] g/dL; PRINCE: 11.3 [1.0] to 14.0 [1.3] g/dL) and those with suboptimal eculizumab responses (PEGASUS: 10.2 [0.2] to 12.8 [2.6] g/dL). Percentage of patients with hemoglobin ≥12 g/dL increased (PADDOCK: 0 to 60.0% [3 of 5 patients]; PRINCE: 25.0% [2 of 8] to 87.5% [7 of 8]; PEGASUS: 0 to 72.7% [8 of 11]). Sex-specific hemoglobin normalization at week 16 occurred in 40.0% (2 of 5) (PADDOCK), 62.5% (5 of 8) (PRINCE), and 63.6% (7 of 11) (PEGASUS). In all studies, mean ARCs decreased from above normal to normal and ARC normalization increased. Mean Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scores improved from below to above or near normal. Two patients had serious adverse events (PEGASUS: post-surgery sepsis, breakthrough hemolysis); breakthrough hemolysis resolved without study discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Patients with PNH and mild/moderate anemia who were C5i-naive or who had suboptimal hemoglobin concentrations despite eculizumab treatment had improved hematologic outcomes and reduced fatigue after initiating or switching to pegcetacoplan. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration numbers: PADDOCK (NCT02588833), PRINCE (NCT04085601; EudraCT, 2018-004220-11), PEGASUS (NCT03500549).

Oral azacitidine compared with standard therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular helper T-cell lymphoma (ORACLE): an open-label randomised, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Follicular helper T-cell lymphomas (TFHL) harbour frequent alterations in genes that regulate DNA methylation. Preliminary reports suggest that treatment with 5-azacitidine has clinical activity in patients with relapsed or refractory TFHL. We aimed to compare the oral form of azacitidine with investigator's choice standard therapy (ICT; ie, gemcitabine, bendamustine, or romidepsin) in patients with relapsed or refractory TFHL. METHODS: Patients older than 18 years with relapsed or refractory TFHL (angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, or nodal T-cell lymphoma with phenotype, ie, positive with two or more markers among CD10, BCL6, CXCL13, PD1, or ICOS) based on the 2017 WHO classification of haematological neoplasms, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-3, were recruited in university hospitals from five European countries and from Japan. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to treatment with either azacitidine given at a dose of 300 mg once a day (200 mg in Japanese patients) for 14 days in a 28-day cycle or gemcitabine, bendamustine, or romidepsin according to the investigator's choice. Random assignment was stratified by the number of previous lines of therapy and by the presence of previous or concomitant myeloid malignancy. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, presented in the intention-to-treat population. This Article is the final analysis of this trial, registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Europe NCT03593018 and Japan NCT03703375). FINDINGS: 86 patients (median age 69 years [IQR 62-76], 50 patients were male, 36 were female) were enrolled between Nov 9, 2018, to Feb 22, 2021; 42 in the azacitidine group and 44 in the ICT group. With a median follow-up of 27·4 months (IQR 20·2-32·9), the median progression-free survival was 5·6 months (95% CI 2·7 -8·1) in the azacitidine group versus 2·8 months (1·9-4·8) in the ICT group (hazard ratio of 0·63 (95% CI 0·38-1·07); 1-sided p=0·042). Grade 3-4 adverse events were reported in 32 (76%) of 42 patients in the azacitidine group versus 42 (98%) of 43 patients in the ICT group. The most adverse grade 3 or worse adverse events were haematological (28 [67%] of 42 patients vs 40 [93%] of 43 patients), infection (8 [19%] and 14 [33%]), and gastrointestinal (5 [12%] vs 1 [2%] for azacitidine and ICT, respectively). There were two treatment-related deaths in the azacitidine group (one endocarditis and one candidiasis) and three in the ICT group (one heart failure, one COVID-19, and one cause unknown). INTERPRETATION: Although the pre-specified primary outcome of the trial was not met, the favourable safety profile suggests that azacitidine could add to the treatment options in these difficult to treat diseases especially in combination with other drugs. Trials with combination are in preparation in a platform trial. FUNDING: Bristol-Myers Squibb. TRANSLATION: For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.