Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Psychotraumatol ; 14(2): 2228151, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37534932

RESUMO

Background: Post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) following childbirth are common within a stressful environment and are mitigated by social support. During the COVID-19 pandemic, an increase in such symptoms has been reported. The current study aims to longitudinally model the influence of general and pandemic-specific risk and protective factors on the temporal unfolding of symptoms among postpartum women.Methods: Participants were 226 women following a liveborn, term birth during the first lockdown in Israel. Participants completed questionnaires 10 weeks (T1) and 6 months (T2) after delivery. PATH analyses included predictors of symptoms in T1: demographics, exposure to traumatic events, medical complications during delivery or pregnancy, exposure to COVID-19-related events and their subjective impact, fear of COVID-19, and social support. Predictors of symptoms in T2 were: T1 predictors, both as direct effects and mediated by T1 PTSS, as well as predictors measured again in T2.Results: Results showed the suggested model fit the data. The effect of COVID-19-related fear and subjective impact at T1 on symptoms at T2 were fully mediated by PTSS in T1, as were the effects of marriage and high social support at T1. COVID-19-related fear at T2 positively predicted symptoms at T2, while social support at T2 had the opposite effect. Medical complications during pregnancy negatively predicted symptoms in T2 only.Discussion: Persistent fear appears to be a risk factor and supports a consistent buffer in postpartum PTSS during the COVID-19 pandemic. Medical complications during pregnancy served as a protective factor, possibly due to habituation to medical settings.


Post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) following childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic may unfold in a unique manner, relating to pandemic-related stressors and fears.Women who experience stressful pandemic-related events are not at heightened risk of developing PTSS within the six months following birth, but those reporting COVID-19 related fears are.Women who had medical complications during pregnancy, but not delivery, are at lower risk of developing subsequent PTSS, perhaps due to their ongoing contact with medical facilities despite the pandemic.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/diagnóstico , Pandemias , Análise de Mediação , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Período Pós-Parto , Medo
2.
J Clin Med ; 11(12)2022 Jun 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35743558

RESUMO

COVID-19 impacted the childbirth experience and increased the rates of postpartum depression (PPD). We assessed the longitudinal effects of the pandemic on the rates of PPD and evaluated the PPD causes and symptoms among women who delivered during the first COVID-19 quarantine in Israel. The participants completed online questionnaires 3 (T1) and 6 months (T2) following delivery. We used the 'COVID-19 exposure' questionnaire, while PPD symptoms, situational anxiety, and social support were evaluated with the EPDS, STAI, and MSPSS questionnaires. The mean EPDS scores increased between T1 and T2 (6.31 ± 5.6 vs. 6.92 ± 5.9, mean difference −0.64 ± 4.59 (95% CI (−1.21)−(−0.06)); t (244) = −2.17, p = 0.031), and the STAI scores decreased (45.35 ± 16.4 vs. 41.47 ± 14.0, t(234) = 4.39, p = 0.000). Despite the exposure to an increased number of COVID-19 events (3.63 ± 1.8 vs. (6.34 ± 2.3)), the impact of exposure decreased between T1 and T2 (8.91 ± 4.6 vs. 7.47 ± 4.1), p < 0.001). In the MSPSS, significant differences were noted on the family scale between the T1 (6.10 ± 1.3) and T2 (5.91 ± 1.4) scores; t (216) = 2.68, p = 0.0008. A regression analysis showed three statistically significant variables that correlated with increased EPDS scores: the MSPSS family subscale (F (1212.00) = 4.308, p = 0.039), the STAI scores (F (1212.00) = 31.988, p = 0.000), and the impact of exposure to COVID-19 (F (1212.00) = 5.038, p = 0.026). The rates of PPD increased for women who delivered during the first COVID-19 lockdown. Further research is warranted to help reduce PPD among these women.

3.
Eur Psychiatry ; 64(1): e34, 2021 05 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33941294

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: New recommendations regarding the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) during delivery have changed the maternal birth experience. In this study, we investigated the mental perceived impact of PPE use during delivery on the development of maternal postpartum depression (PPD) and post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study concerning women who delivered during the COVID-19 pandemic first lockdown period in Israel. Postpartum women were approached and asked to complete a comprehensive online questionnaire. Impact of PPE was graded on a scale of 1-5, and Impact of PPE ≥4 was considered high. PPD and PTSS were assessed using the EPDS and City BiTS questionnaires. RESULTS: Of 421 parturients, 36 (9%) reported high Impact of PPE. Parturients with high Impact of PPE had significantly higher PPD and PTSS scores)EPDS 8.4 ± 5.8 vs. 5.7 ± 5.3; City BiTS 9.2 ± 10.3 vs. 5.8 ± 7.8, p < 0.05 for both). Following adjustment for socio-demographic and delivery confounders and fear of COVID-19 (using Fear of COVID19 scale), Impact of PPE remained positively correlated with PPD symptoms (ß = 0.103, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.029-1.006, p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: When examining the risk factors for developing postpartum PTSS-experiences during labor and PPE were found to be significant variables. As the use of PPE is crucial in this era of COVID-19 pandemic in order to protect both parturients and caregivers, creative measures should be taken in order to overcome the communication gap it poses.


Assuntos
COVID-19/psicologia , Depressão Pós-Parto/etiologia , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/efeitos adversos , Período Pós-Parto/psicologia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/etiologia , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Depressão Pós-Parto/diagnóstico , Depressão Pós-Parto/psicologia , Medo , Feminino , Humanos , Israel , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
4.
Pregnancy Hypertens ; 17: 133-137, 2019 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31487630

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine factors that predict the need for antihypertensive treatment during early postpartum period among women with preeclampsia or gestational hypertension. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort of 358 women. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic, clinical and laboratory data of 63 women diagnosed with preeclampsia or gestational hypertension during a singleton pregnancy and who needed antihypertensive agents during early postpartum period were compared to 295 who did not. RESULTS: No difference was found between groups regarding age, parity, body mass index, or weight gain (p = 0.95, 0.19, 0.56, and 0.078, respectively). Early onset preeclampsia or gestational hypertension was diagnosed among 28.6% of the women who subsequently needed antihypertensive treatment, as compared to 4.1% who did not (p < 0.001). Antepartum, mean maximum blood pressure in the treated vs. untreated group was 165/109 mmHg vs. 150/100 mmHg, respectively (p = 0.001). Groups did not differ regarding symptoms of preeclampsia (38.7% vs. 31.5%, p = 0.273) or laboratory abnormalities. The group that received antihypertensive treatment during early postpartum period, had more preterm deliveries (p < 0.001) and Cesarean deliveries (p < 0.001), and more received magnesium sulfate during labor (p < 0.001). During the early postpartum period, mean maximum blood pressure was higher among the treated group (167/106 vs. 143/92, p = 0.001), as were symptoms of preeclampsia (p = 0.001). The groups were similar regarding laboratory abnormalities that define preeclampsia. CONCLUSIONS: Early onset preeclampsia or gestational hypertension, severe antepartum hypertension, magnesium sulfate during labor, preterm, and Cesarean delivery might be good predictors of the need for antihypertensive treatment during early postpartum period.


Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Pré-Eclâmpsia , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal , Transtornos Puerperais/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Anti-Hipertensivos/administração & dosagem , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Hipertensão/fisiopatologia , Hipertensão Induzida pela Gravidez , Período Pós-Parto , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Gravidez , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Transtornos Puerperais/diagnóstico , Transtornos Puerperais/fisiopatologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA