Deep phenotyping of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 2 by magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim was to define the radiological picture of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 2 (FSHD2) in comparison with FSHD1 and to explore correlations between imaging and clinical/molecular data. METHODS: Upper girdle and/or lower limb muscle magnetic resonance imaging scans of 34 molecularly confirmed FSHD2 patients from nine European neuromuscular centres were analysed. T1-weighted and short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences were used to evaluate the global pattern and to assess the extent of fatty replacement and muscle oedema. RESULTS: The most frequently affected muscles were obliquus and transversus abdominis, semimembranosus, soleus and gluteus minimus in the lower limbs; trapezius, serratus anterior, latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major in the upper girdle. Iliopsoas, popliteus, obturator internus and tibialis posterior in the lower limbs and subscapularis, spinati, sternocleidomastoid and levator scapulae in the upper girdle were the most spared. Asymmetry and STIR hyperintensities were consistent features. The pattern of muscle involvement was similar to that of FSHD1, and the combined involvement of trapezius, abdominal and hamstring muscles, together with complete sparing of iliopsoas and subscapularis, was detected in 91% of patients. Peculiar differences were identified in a rostro-caudal gradient, a predominant involvement of lower limb muscles compared to the upper girdle, and in the higher percentage of STIR hyperintensities in FSHD2. CONCLUSION: This multicentre study defines the pattern of muscle involvement in FSHD2, providing useful information for diagnostics and clinical trial design. Both similarities and differences between FSHD1 and FSHD2 were detected, which is also relevant to better understand the pathogenic mechanisms underlying the FSHD-related disease spectrum.

Phenotype and genotype of muscle ryanodine receptor rhabdomyolysis-myalgia syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: Rhabdomyolysis and myalgia are common conditions, and mutation in the ryanodine receptor 1 gene (RYR1) is suggested to be a common cause. Due to the large size of RYR1, however, sequencing has not been widely accessible before the recent advent of next-generation sequencing technology and limited phenotypic descriptions are therefore available. MATERIAL & METHODS: We present the medical history, clinical and ancillary findings of patients with RYR1 mutations and rhabdomyolysis and myalgia identified in Denmark, France and The Netherlands. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with recurrent rhabdomyolysis (CK > 10 000) or myalgia with hyperCKemia (>1.5 × ULN) and a RYR1 mutation were identified. One had mild wasting of the quadriceps muscle, but none had fixed weakness. Symptoms varied from being restricted to intense exercise to limiting ADL function. One patient developed transient kidney failure during rhabdomyolysis. Two received immunosuppressants on suspicion of myositis. None had episodes of malignant hyperthermia. Muscle biopsies were normal, but CT/MRI showed muscle hypertrophy in most. Delay from first symptom to diagnosis was 12 years on average. Fifteen different dominantly inherited mutations were identified. Ten were previously described as pathogenic and 5 were novel, but rare/absent from the background population, and predicted to be pathogenic by in silico analyses. Ten of the mutations were reported to give malignant hyperthermia susceptibility. CONCLUSION: Mutations in RYR1 should be considered as a significant cause of rhabdomyolysis and myalgia syndrome in patients with the characteristic combination of rhabdomyolysis, myalgia and cramps, creatine kinase elevation, no weakness and often muscle hypertrophy.

Muscle involvement in limb-girdle muscular dystrophy with GMPPB deficiency (LGMD2T).

OBJECTIVE: In this study, muscle involvement assessed by MRI and levels of GMPPB and glycosylation of α-dystroglycan expression in muscle were examined in patients with limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD) type 2T. METHODS: Six new patients with genetically verified mutations in GMPPB were studied. T1-weighted magnetic resonance images were obtained in 4 participants. Muscle strength and potential involvement of extramuscular organs were examined. Glycosylation of α-dystroglycan in muscle was studied, and GMPPB and α-dystroglycan expression was analyzed by Western blotting. Prevalence of LGMD2T was calculated from the total LGMD population in Denmark. GMPPB was sequenced in all unclassified cases. RESULTS: Two patients carried 3 new mutations in GMPPB. The other 4 patients carried previously described pathogenic mutations in GMPPB. MRI showed that the paraspinal muscles were the most affected, followed by involvement of hamstrings. Our results showed a loss of glycosylation of α-dystroglycan as well as secondary loss of merosin expression on Western blotting. The prevalence of LGMD2T in the Danish cohort of patients with LGMD is 1.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The new findings of this study are (1) the consistent finding of a preferential affection of paraspinal and hamstring muscles in LGMD2T, (2) 3 new mutations in GMPPB, (3) variable loss of glycosylation tested with IIH6 and VIA4 antibodies, and (4) a prevalence of LGMD2T of 1.5% in a well-characterized Danish LGMD cohort.

Endocrine function over time in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) have an increased incidence of endocrine dysfunction. In this study, the temporal evolution of endocrine dysfunction in patients with DM1 was investigated. METHODS: Endocrine function was assessed in 68 patients with DM1, in whom endocrine function had been followed, on average, for 8 years. The endocrine function was assessed by measuring the concentration of hormones and metabolites in blood and by validating libido with questionnaires. RESULTS: At baseline, 30 of the 68 patients presented with at least one hormonal dysfunction. When re-evaluated after 8 years, 57 of 68 patients had endocrine dysfunction. Diabetic patients had increased from one to four. At follow-up, hyperparathyroidism occurred in 25% and abnormal thyroid-stimulating hormone in 21%, compared with 14% and 9% at baseline. Sixteen of 33 men had increased luteinizing hormone levels compared with seven at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that endocrine abnormalities amongst patients with DM1 increase over time. Based on these findings it is suggested that correctable endocrine abnormalities should be monitored periodically in this patient group.