Mindfulness therapy for patients with coronary heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a prevalent cardiovascular disease with high mortality rates worldwide. Patients with CHD often experience adverse psychological stress related to the disease's diagnosis, treatment and recovery phases. This stress can hurt sleep quality and overall quality of life. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have been studied as a psychotherapeutic approach to alleviating the psychological stress associated with CHD. This study aimed to determine the effectives of MBIs for health outcomes in patients with CHD. METHODS: A total of eight English-language databases were searched, and eight relevant studies were included in the analysis. The included studies were assessed for literature quality, and data were extracted and analysed using Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS: A total of eight studies involving 802 participants were included in the analysis. Compared to control groups, MBIs significantly reduced anxiety, depression, perceived stress, and systolic blood pressure. However, there was no significant effect on diastolic blood pressure, quality of life or body mass index. One study reported that MBIs significantly improved sleep quality in patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention but had no significant effect on body mass index. CONCLUSION: MBIs had significant effects on anxiety and depression in patients with CHD, reduced perceived stress and were associated with reductions in systolic blood pressure and improvements in sleep quality. However, they did not significantly affect diastolic blood pressure, quality of life or body mass index.

Nutritional management interventions and multi-dimensional outcomes in frail and pre-frail older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Frailty, a prevalent geriatric syndrome, presents challenges exacerbated by malnutrition. Nutritional Management Interventions (NMIs) offer hope in frailty reversal, necessitating exploration of their multi-dimensional outcomes. OBJECTIVES: Assess NMIs' impact on frail and pre-frail older adults across diverse outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 studies (2012-2023) evaluated NMIs' effects on physical, dietary, psychological, and frailty aspects. Literature quality was assessed, and data analyzed with Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies involving participants were included in the analysis. Participants numbered 968, with the intervention group averaging 77.05±0.77 years and the control group 78.75±0.8 years. Compared to control groups,NMIs significantly increased body weight (SMD = 0.26, P = 0.03) and improved gait speed (SMD = 0.18, P = 0.03). Protein intake showed significance for interventions≤12 weeks (SMD = 1.04, P < 0.001). No significant differences in energy intake (SMD = 0.20, P = 0.60), but >12 weeks NMIs reduced energy intake (SMD = -0.73, P = 0.006). No significant differences in depressive symptoms, frailty scores, BMI, TUG, Handgrip Strength, or SPPB. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis underscores NMIs' potential benefits for frail and pre-frail older adults. Personalized, multidimensional interventions are recommended despite study limitations, emphasizing extended interventions and diverse assessments for holistic care.