Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 22
Filtrar
1.
Wilderness Environ Med ; 35(2): 173-182, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38613339

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: From April 1 to May 31, 2022, Grand Canyon National Park received increased acute gastroenteritis reports. Pooled portable toilet specimens identified norovirus genogroups I and II. We sought to determine outbreak transmission contributors and individual risk factors while rafting or backpacking in the park. METHODS: Grand Canyon rafters and backpackers were surveyed online from June 13-July 8, 2022, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify predictors associated with illness and adjusted for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: Among 762 surveys, 119 cases and 505 well persons submitted complete survey data. Illness among rafters was associated with interaction with ill persons during the trip (adjusted hazard ratio [adjHR] = 3.4 [95%CI 2.3-5.0]) and lack of any hand hygiene (1.2 [0.7-1.9]) or use of only sanitizer or water (1.6 [1.04-2.6]) before snacks. Younger rafters had higher illness rates compared to those ≥60 y (1.5 [1.2-1.8] for ages 40-59 and 2.2 [1.4-3.5] for ages <40 y). CONCLUSIONS: Person-to-person transmission likely accounted for the widespread outbreak. Future outbreak mitigation efforts on river trips could focus on symptom screening before the trip starts, prompt separation of ill and well passengers, strict adherence to hand hygiene with soap and water, minimizing social interactions among rafting groups, and widespread outbreak notices and education to all park users.


Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças , Gastroenterite , Humanos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gastroenterite/epidemiologia , Gastroenterite/virologia , Masculino , Feminino , Colorado/epidemiologia , Infecções por Caliciviridae/epidemiologia , Infecções por Caliciviridae/transmissão , Infecções por Caliciviridae/virologia , Adulto Jovem , Fatores de Risco , Parques Recreativos , Idoso , Natação , Norovirus , Adolescente
2.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 29(8): 1663-1667, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37486231

RESUMO

We identified 2 fatal cases of persons infected with hantavirus in Arizona, USA, 2020; 1 person was co-infected with SARS-CoV-2. Delayed identification of the cause of death led to a public health investigation that lasted ≈9 months after their deaths, which complicated the identification of a vector or exposure.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doenças Transmissíveis , Infecções por Hantavirus , Orthohantavírus , Humanos , Arizona/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemias , Infecções por Hantavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Hantavirus/epidemiologia
3.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 72(17): 452-457, 2023 Apr 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37104168

RESUMO

West Nile virus (WNV) is a mosquitoborne disease primarily transmitted through bites of infected Culex species mosquitos (1). In the United States, WNV is the leading domestically acquired arboviral disease; it can cause severe illness affecting the brain and spinal cord with an associated case fatality rate of 10% (2,3). On September 2, 2021, Maricopa County Environmental Services Department, Vector Control Division (MCESD-VCD) notified the Maricopa County Department of Public Health (MCDPH) and the Arizona Department of Health Services (ADHS) that the WNV vector index (VI), a measure of infected Culex mosquitoes, was substantially elevated. By that date, at least 100 WNV cases had already been reported among Maricopa County residents to MCDPH by health care providers and laboratories. Within 2 weeks, the VI reached its highest ever recorded level (53.61), with an associated tenfold increase in the number of human disease cases. During 2021, a total of 1,487 human WNV cases were identified; 956 (64.3%) patients had neuroinvasive disease, and 101 (6.8%) died. MCESD-VCD conducted daily remediation efforts to mitigate elevated VI and address mosquito-related complaints from residents (i.e., large numbers of outdoor mosquitoes from an unknown source and unmaintained swimming pools potentially breeding mosquitoes). MCDPH increased outreach to the community and providers through messaging, education events, and media. This was the largest documented focal WNV outbreak in a single county in the United States (4). Despite outreach efforts to communities and health care partners, clinicians and patients reported a lack of awareness of the WNV outbreak, highlighting the need for public health agencies to increase prevention messaging to broaden public awareness and to ensure that health care providers are aware of recommended testing methods for clinically compatible illnesses.


Assuntos
Culex , Culicidae , Febre do Nilo Ocidental , Vírus do Nilo Ocidental , Animais , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Arizona/epidemiologia , Febre do Nilo Ocidental/epidemiologia , Mosquitos Vetores , Surtos de Doenças
5.
Am J Public Health ; 113(5): 504-508, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36893362

RESUMO

With increasing mpox cases in Maricopa County, Arizona, the county's health department launched a survey on July 11, 2022, to gather eligibility and contact data and provide clinic information to those interested in JYNNEOS as postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) or expanded postexposure prophylaxis(PEP++). Survey data were matched to case and vaccination data. Overall, 343 of the 513 respondents (66.9%) who reported close contact with an mpox case patient received PEP and 1712 of the 3379 respondents (50.7%) who were unsure of their contact status received PEP++. This outreach intervention connected potential close contacts unknown to MCDPH with PEP or PEP++. (Am J Public Health. 2023;113(5):504-508. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2023.307224).


Assuntos
Mpox , Vacina Antivariólica , Vacinas , Humanos , Arizona
6.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 71(38): 1207-1211, 2022 Sep 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36136954

RESUMO

On May 11, 2022, the National Park Service (NPS) Office of Public Health (OPH) and Coconino County Health and Human Services (CCHHS) in Flagstaff, Arizona contacted CDC about a rising number of acute gastroenteritis cases among backcountry visitors to Grand Canyon National Park (Grand Canyon). The agencies reviewed illness report forms, assessed infection prevention and control (IPC) practices, and distributed a detailed survey to river rafters and hikers with backcountry permits (backpackers) who visited the Grand Canyon backcountry. During April 1-June 17, a total of 191 rafters and 31 backpackers reported symptoms consistent with acute gastroenteritis. Specimens from portable toilets used by nine river rafting trip groups were tested using real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and test results were positive for norovirus. Norovirus-associated acute gastroenteritis is highly transmissible in settings with close person-to-person contact and decreased access to hand hygiene, such as backpacking or rafting. IPC assessments led to recommendations for regular disinfection of potable water spigots throughout the backcountry, promotion of proper handwashing with soap and water when possible, and separation of ill persons from those who are not ill. Prevention and control of acute gastroenteritis outbreaks in the backcountry requires rapid reporting of illnesses, implementing IPC guidelines for commercial outfitters and river rafting launch points, and minimizing interactions among rafting groups.


Assuntos
Infecções por Caliciviridae , Água Potável , Gastroenterite , Norovirus , Infecções por Caliciviridae/epidemiologia , Surtos de Doenças , Gastroenterite/epidemiologia , Gastroenterite/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Parques Recreativos , Sabões
7.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(1): e20-e26, 2022 08 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35413107

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Short-term rehabilitation units present unique infection control challenges because of high turnover and medically complex residents. In June 2021, the Maricopa County Department of Public Health was notified of a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Delta outbreak in a skilled nursing facility short-term rehabilitation unit. We describe the outbreak and assess vaccine effectiveness (VE). METHODS: Facility electronic medical records were reviewed for residents who spent > 1 night on the affected unit between June 10 and July 23, 2021, to collect demographics, SARS-CoV-2 test results, underlying medical conditions, vaccination status, and clinical outcomes. Coronavirus disease 2019 VE estimates using Cox proportional hazards models were calculated. RESULTS: Forty (37%) of 109 short-stay rehabilitation unit residents who met inclusion criteria tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. SARS-CoV-2-positive case-patients were mostly male (58%) and White (78%) with a median age of 65 (range, 27-92) years; 11 (27%) were immunocompromised. Of residents, 39% (10 cases, 32 noncases) received 2 doses and 9% (4 cases, 6 noncases) received 1 dose of messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine. Among nonimmunocompromised residents, adjusted 2-dose primary-series mRNA VE against symptomatic infection was 80% (95% confidence interval, 15-95). More cases were hospitalized (33%) or died (38%) than noncases (10% hospitalized; 16% died). CONCLUSIONS: In this large SARS-CoV-2 Delta outbreak in a high-turnover short-term rehabilitation unit, a low vaccination rate and medically complex resident population were noted alongside severe outcomes. VE of 2-dose primary-series mRNA vaccine against symptomatic infection was the highest in nonimmunocompromised residents. Health departments can use vaccine coverage data to prioritize facilities for assistance in preventing outbreaks.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Arizona , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , RNA Mensageiro , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem , Eficácia de Vacinas , Vacinas Sintéticas , Vacinas de mRNA
8.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 70(4): 960-967, 2022 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35141874

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Adult residents of skilled nursing facilities (SNF) have experienced high morbidity and mortality from SARS-CoV-2 infection and are at increased risk for severe COVID-19 disease. Use of monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatment improves clinical outcomes among high-risk outpatients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19, but information on mAb effectiveness in SNF residents with COVID-19 is limited. We assessed outcomes in SNF residents with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 associated with an outbreak in Arizona during January-February 2021 that did and did not receive a mAb. METHODS: Medical records were reviewed to describe the effect of bamlanivimab therapy on COVID-19 mortality. Secondary outcomes included referral to an acute care setting and escalation of medical therapies at the SNF (e.g., new oxygen requirements). Residents treated with bamlanivimab were compared to residents who were eligible for treatment under the FDA's Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) but were not treated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine association between outcomes and treatment status. RESULTS: Seventy-five residents identified with COVID-19 during this outbreak met eligibility for mAb treatment, of whom 56 received bamlanivimab. Treated and untreated groups were similar in age and comorbidities associated with increased risk of severe COVID-19 disease. Treatment with bamlanivimab was associated with reduced 21-day mortality (adjusted OR = 0.06; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.39) and lower odds of initiating oxygen therapy (adjusted OR = 0.07; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.34). Referrals to acute care were not significantly different between treated and untreated residents. CONCLUSIONS: mAb therapy was successfully administered to SNF residents with COVID-19 in a large outbreak setting. Treatment with bamlanivimab reduced 21-day mortality and reduced initiation of oxygen therapy. As the COVID-19 pandemic evolves and newer immunotherapies gain FDA authorization, more studies of the effectiveness of mAb therapies for treating emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern in high-risk congregate settings are needed.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Arizona , Humanos , Imunoterapia , Pandemias , Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem
9.
Am J Public Health ; 112(2): 216-219, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35080951

RESUMO

The Maricopa County Department of Public Health in Arizona investigated three COVID-19 outbreaks associated with club sports, two in tournaments and one in a hockey league. During September through November 2020, 195 team-associated and 69 secondary household contact cases were identified among 2093 athletes, coaches, and staff members; the team attack rate ranged from 6% to 72%. Outbreaks occurred during high community transmission periods in Maricopa County. Identification of contacts and characterization of prevention strategies were challenging because of limited cooperation from athletes, families, and staff. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(2):216-219. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306579).


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Surtos de Doenças , Esportes Juvenis , Arizona/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , SARS-CoV-2 , Inquéritos e Questionários
10.
J Clin Microbiol ; 60(1): e0174221, 2022 01 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34705535

RESUMO

Point-of-care antigen tests are an important tool for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Antigen tests are less sensitive than real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (rRT-PCR). Data on the performance of the BinaxNOW antigen test compared to rRT-PCR and viral culture by symptom and known exposure status, timing during disease, or exposure period and demographic variables are limited. During 3 to 17 November 2020, we collected paired upper respiratory swab specimens to test for SARS-CoV-2 by rRT-PCR and Abbott BinaxNOW antigen test at two community testing sites in Pima County, Arizona. We administered a questionnaire to capture symptoms, known exposure status, and previous SARS-CoV-2 test results. Specimens positive by either test were analyzed by viral culture. Previously we showed overall BinaxNOW sensitivity was 52.5%. Here, we showed BinaxNOW sensitivity increased to 65.7% among currently symptomatic individuals reporting a known exposure. BinaxNOW sensitivity was lower among participants with a known exposure and previously symptomatic (32.4%) or never symptomatic (47.1%) within 14 days of testing. Sensitivity was 71.1% in participants within a week of symptom onset. In participants with a known exposure, sensitivity was highest 8 to 10 days postexposure (75%). The positive predictive value for recovery of virus in cell culture was 56.7% for BinaxNOW-positive and 35.4% for rRT-PCR-positive specimens. Result reporting time was 2.5 h for BinaxNOW and 26 h for rRT-PCR. Point-of-care antigen tests have a shorter turnaround time than laboratory-based nucleic acid amplification tests, which allows for more rapid identification of infected individuals. Antigen test sensitivity limitations are important to consider when developing a testing program.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Antígenos Virais , Humanos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
11.
Am J Public Health ; 112(1): 38-42, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34936397

RESUMO

We conducted a community seroprevalence survey in Arizona, from September 12 to October 1, 2020, to determine the presence of antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We used the seroprevalence estimate to predict SARS-CoV-2 infections in the jurisdiction by applying the adjusted seroprevalence to the county's population. The estimated community seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections was 4.3 times greater (95% confidence interval = 2.2, 7.5) than the number of reported cases. Field surveys with representative sampling provide data that may help fill in gaps in traditional public health reporting. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(1):38-42. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306568).


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Teste Sorológico para COVID-19 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Arizona/epidemiologia , Criança , Características da Família , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prática de Saúde Pública , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos
12.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 70(39): 1372-1373, 2021 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34591830

RESUMO

CDC recommends universal indoor masking by students, staff members, faculty, and visitors in kindergarten through grade 12 (K-12) schools, regardless of vaccination status, to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19 (1). Schools in Maricopa and Pima Counties, which account for >75% of Arizona's population (2), resumed in-person learning for the 2021-22 academic year during late July through early August 2021. In mid-July, county-wide 7-day case rates were 161 and 105 per 100,000 persons in Maricopa and Pima Counties, respectively, and 47.6% of Maricopa County residents and 59.2% of Pima County residents had received at least 1 dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. School districts in both counties implemented variable mask policies at the start of the 2021-22 academic year (Table). The association between school mask policies and school-associated COVID-19 outbreaks in K-12 public noncharter schools open for in-person learning in Maricopa and Pima Counties during July 15-August 31, 2021, was evaluated.


Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Surtos de Doenças/estatística & dados numéricos , Máscaras/estatística & dados numéricos , Política Organizacional , Instituições Acadêmicas/organização & administração , Adolescente , Arizona/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos
15.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 42(11): 1345-1350, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33536099

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify a threshold number of Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI) for acute-care hospitals (ACHs) to notify public health agencies of outbreaks and we aimed to determine whether thresholds can be used with existing surveillance strategies to further infection reduction goals. DESIGN: Descriptive analysis of laboratory-identified CDI reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network by Colorado and Tennessee ACH inpatient units in 2018. METHODS: Threshold levels of ≥2, ≥3, and ≥4 CDI events per calendar month per unit (unit month) were assessed to identify units that would trigger facility reporting to public health. Values meeting thresholds were defined as alerts. Recurrent alerts were defined as alerts from units meeting the threshold ≥2 times within 12 months. The presence of alerts was compared to the number of excess infections to identify high-burden facilities. RESULTS: At an alert threshold of ≥2 CDI events per unit month, 204 alerts occurred among 43 Colorado ACHs and 290 among 78 Tennessee ACHs. At a threshold of ≥3, there were 59 and 61 alerts, and at a threshold of ≥4, there were 17 and 10 alerts in Colorado and Tennessee, respectively. In both Colorado and Tennessee, at a threshold of ≥3 nearly 50% of alerts were recurrent, and facilities with at least one alert in 2018 accounted for ∼85% of the statewide excess infections. CONCLUSIONS: An alert threshold of ≥3 CDI events per unit month is feasible for rapid identification of outbreaks in ACHs. This threshold can facilitate earlier assessments and interventions in high-burden facilities.


Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium , Infecção Hospitalar , Clostridioides , Infecções por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Infecções por Clostridium/epidemiologia , Colorado , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Hospitais , Humanos , Saúde Pública , Tennessee/epidemiologia
16.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 70(3): 100-105, 2021 Jan 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33476316

RESUMO

Rapid antigen tests, such as the Abbott BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Card (BinaxNOW), offer results more rapidly (approximately 15-30 minutes) and at a lower cost than do highly sensitive nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) (1). Rapid antigen tests have received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for use in symptomatic persons (2), but data are lacking on test performance in asymptomatic persons to inform expanded screening testing to rapidly identify and isolate infected persons (3). To evaluate the performance of the BinaxNOW rapid antigen test, it was used along with real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing to analyze 3,419 paired specimens collected from persons aged ≥10 years at two community testing sites in Pima County, Arizona, during November 3-17, 2020. Viral culture was performed on 274 of 303 residual real-time RT-PCR specimens with positive results by either test (29 were not available for culture). Compared with real-time RT-PCR testing, the BinaxNOW antigen test had a sensitivity of 64.2% for specimens from symptomatic persons and 35.8% for specimens from asymptomatic persons, with near 100% specificity in specimens from both groups. Virus was cultured from 96 of 274 (35.0%) specimens, including 85 (57.8%) of 147 with concordant antigen and real-time RT-PCR positive results, 11 (8.9%) of 124 with false-negative antigen test results, and none of three with false-positive antigen test results. Among specimens positive for viral culture, sensitivity was 92.6% for symptomatic and 78.6% for asymptomatic individuals. When the pretest probability for receiving positive test results for SARS-CoV-2 is elevated (e.g., in symptomatic persons or in persons with a known COVID-19 exposure), a negative antigen test result should be confirmed by NAAT (1). Despite a lower sensitivity to detect infection, rapid antigen tests can be an important tool for screening because of their quick turnaround time, lower costs and resource needs, high specificity, and high positive predictive value (PPV) in settings of high pretest probability. The faster turnaround time of the antigen test can help limit transmission by more rapidly identifying infectious persons for isolation, particularly when used as a component of serial testing strategies.


Assuntos
Teste Sorológico para COVID-19 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Arizona/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
17.
J Trop Pediatr ; 66(3): 327-338, 2020 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31598714

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy-associated malaria (PAM) has been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes like preterm birth (PTB) and low birthweight (LBW), which are among the leading causes of infant mortality globally. Rates of PTB and LBW are high in countries with a high burden of malaria. PAM may be a contributing factor to PTB and LBW, but is not well understood. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies examining the relationship between PAM and PTB or LBW using PubMed. The title and abstract of all studies were screened by two reviewers, and the full text of selected studies was reviewed to ensure they met inclusion criteria. Information regarding study characteristics and of PTB and LBW births among women with and without PAM was abstracted for included studies. RESULTS: Our search terms yielded 2237 articles, of which 18 met our final inclusion criteria. Eight studies examined associations between PAM and PTB, and 10 examined associations between PAM and LBW (population size ranging from 35 to 9956 women). The overall risk of LBW was 63% higher among women with PAM compared with women without PAM (95% CI = 1.48-1.80) and the risk of PTB was 23% higher among women with PAM compared with women without PAM (95% CI = 1.07-1.41). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that infection with PAM is associated with PTB and LBW. Further understanding of the pathogenesis of disease and the immunologic changes that occur during pregnancy is essential for reducing the disproportional effects this disease has on this vulnerable population.


Assuntos
Antimaláricos/uso terapêutico , Mortalidade Infantil , Malária/complicações , Nascimento Prematuro , Natimorto , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido de Baixo Peso , Recém-Nascido , Malária/tratamento farmacológico , Malária/prevenção & controle , Gravidez , Complicações Parasitárias na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações Parasitárias na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Resultado da Gravidez , Fatores de Risco
18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31636071

RESUMO

Community-onset bloodstream infections (CO-BSI) are major causes of severe febrile illness and death worldwide. In light of new data and the growing problem of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among pathogens causing BSI, we undertook a systematic review of hospital-based studies of CO-BSI among patients hospitalized with fever. Without restriction to language or country, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus for prospective hospital-based studies of culture-confirmed CO-BSI among febrile inpatients. We determined by study the prevalence of BSI among participants, the pathogens responsible for BSI, and the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of pathogens causing BSI, according to place and time. Thirty-four (77.3%) of 44 eligible studies recruited 29,022 participants in Africa and Asia combined. Among participants in these two regions, the median prevalence of BSI was 12.5% (range, 2.0 to 48.4%); of 3,220 pathogens isolated, 1,119 (34.8%) were Salmonella enterica, 425 (13.2%) Streptococcus pneumoniae, and 282 (8.8%) Escherichia coli Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was reported in 16 (36.4%) studies. When isolates collected prior to 2008 were compared to those collected in the period of 2008 through 2018, the proportions of typhoidal Salmonella and Staphylococcus aureus isolates resistant to several clinically relevant antimicrobials increased over time, while S. pneumoniae susceptibility was stable. CO-BSI remain a major cause of severe febrile illness among hospitalized patients in Africa and Asia, with S. enterica, S. pneumoniae, and E. coli predominating. There is a concerning increase in AMR among serious infections caused by community-onset pathogens. Ongoing surveillance is needed to inform empirical management and strategies to control AMR.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , África , Ásia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalência , Salmonella enterica/efeitos dos fármacos , Streptococcus pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos
19.
Trop Med Int Health ; 24(12): 1369-1383, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31633858

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Hospital-based studies of community-onset bloodstream infections (CO-BSI) are less resource-intensive to carry out than population-based incidence studies. We examined several metrics capturing the potential role of Salmonella Typhi as a cause of CO-BSI for making inferences about incidence. METHODS: We systematically reviewed three databases for hospital-based studies of CO-BSI. We determined, by study, the prevalence and rank order of Salmonella among pathogenic bloodstream isolates, and the prevalence ratio of Salmonella Typhi to Escherichia coli (S:E ratio). We then describe these hospital-based study metrics in relation to population-based typhoid fever incidence data from a separate systematic review. RESULTS: Forty-four studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 23 (52.3%) isolated Salmonella Typhi at least once. Among studies isolating Salmonella Typhi, the median (interquartile range) prevalence and rank order of Salmonella Typhi compared to other pathogens isolated in BSI was 8.3% (3.2-37.9%) and 3 (1-6), respectively. The median (interquartile range) S:E ratio was 1.0 (0.4-3.0). With respect to incidence, in Pemba Island, Tanzania, prevalence, rank order, S:E ratio, and incidence was 64.8%, 1, 9.2 and 110 cases per 100 000, respectively, and in Boulkiemdé, Burkina Faso, was 13.3%, 3, 2.3 and 249 cases per 100 000. CONCLUSIONS: We describe considerable variation in place and time for Salmonella Typhi prevalence, rank order, and S:E ratio among hospital-based studies of CO-BSI. Data from simultaneous typhoid prevalence and incidence studies are limited. We propose that hospital-based study metrics warrant evaluation for making inference about typhoid incidence and as covariates in typhoid incidence models.


OBJECTIFS: Les études hospitalières d'infections d'origine sanguine acquises dans la communauté (IS-AC) consomment moins de ressources que les études d'incidence basées sur la population. Nous avons examiné plusieurs paramètres permettant de déterminer le rôle de Salmonella typhi comme cause des IS-AC pour permettre des déductions sur l'incidence. MÉTHODES: Nous avons systématiquement passé en revue trois bases de données sur des études hospitalières d'IS-AC. Par étude, nous avons déterminé la prévalence et l'ordre de classement de Salmonella parmi les isolats de pathogènes sanguins, ainsi que le rapport de prévalence de Salmonella typhi et Escherichia coli (rapport S:E). Nous décrivons ensuite ces résultats d'étude en milieu hospitalier en relation avec les données d'incidence de la fièvre typhoïde basées sur la population, tirées d'une revue systématique distincte. RÉSULTATS: Quarante-quatre études remplissaient les critères d'inclusion, dont 23 (52,3%) avaient isolé au moins une fois Salmonella typhi. Parmi les études isolant Salmonella typhi, la prévalence médiane (intervalle interquartile) et l'ordre de classement de Salmonella typhi par rapport aux autres agents pathogènes isolés de sangs étaient de 8,3% (3,2 à 37,9%) et de 3 (1-6), respectivement. Le rapport S:E médian (intervalle interquartile) était de 1,0 (0,4 à 3,0). En ce qui concerne l'incidence, sur l'île de Pemba, en Tanzanie, la prévalence, l'ordre de classement, le rapport S:E et l'incidence étaient respectivement de 64,8% ; 1 ; 9,2 et 110 cas pour 100.000, et dans le Boulkiemdé, au Burkina Faso, de 13,3% ; 3 ; 2,3 et 249 cas pour 100.000 habitants. CONCLUSIONS: Nous décrivons une variation considérable selon le lieu et le moment de la prévalence, de l'ordre de classement et du rapport S:E de Salmonella typhi parmi les études hospitalières sur les IS-AC. Les données provenant d'études simultanées sur la prévalence et l'incidence de la typhoïde sont limitées. Au vu des variations, nous proposons que les métriques d'étude en milieu hospitalier soient évaluées en tant que covariables dans les modèles de détermination de l'incidence de la typhoïde.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Salmonella typhi/isolamento & purificação , Febre Tifoide/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Burkina Faso/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Prevalência , Tanzânia/epidemiologia , Febre Tifoide/etiologia , Febre Tifoide/microbiologia
20.
Br J Gen Pract ; 69(684): e444-e453, 2019 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31208974

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The overall clinical impression ('clinical gestalt') is widely used for diagnosis but its accuracy has not been systematically studied. AIM: To determine the accuracy of clinical gestalt for the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), acute rhinosinusitis (ARS), acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (ABRS), and streptococcal pharyngitis, and to contrast it with the accuracy of clinical decision rules (CDRs). DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review and meta-analysis of outpatient diagnostic accuracy studies in ambulatory care. METHOD: PubMed and Google were searched for studies in outpatients that reported sufficient data to calculate accuracy of the overall clinical impression and that used the same reference standard. Study quality was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2), and measures of accuracy calculated using bivariate meta-analysis. RESULTS: The authors identified 16 studies that met the inclusion criteria. The summary estimates for the positive (LR+) and negative likelihood ratios (LR-) were LR+ 7.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 4.8 to 11.5, and LR- 0.54, 95% CI = 0.42 to 0.65 for CAP in adults, LR+ 2.7, 95% CI = 1.1 to 4.3 and LR- 0.63, 95% CI = 0.20 to 0.98 for CAP in children, LR+ 3.0, 95% CI = 2.1 to 4.4 and LR- 0.37, 95% CI = 0.29 to 0.46 for ARS in adults, LR+ 3.9, 95% CI = 2.4 to 5.9 and LR- 0.33, 95% CI = 0.20 to 0.50 for ABRS in adults, and LR+ 2.1, 95% CI = 1.6 to 2.8 and LR- 0.47, 95% CI = 0.36 to 0.60 for streptococcal pharyngitis in adults and children. The diagnostic odds ratios were highest for CAP in adults (14.2, 95% CI = 9.0 to 21.0), ARS in adults (8.3, 95% CI = 4.9 to 13.1), and ABRS in adults (13.0, 95% CI = 5.0 to 27.0), as were the C-statistics (0.80, 0.77, and 0.84 respectively). CONCLUSION: The accuracy of the overall clinical impression compares favourably with the accuracy of CDRs. Studies of diagnostic accuracy should routinely include the overall clinical impression in addition to individual signs and symptoms, and research is needed to optimise its teaching.


Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/diagnóstico , Faringite/diagnóstico , Pneumonia/diagnóstico , Rinite/diagnóstico , Sinusite/diagnóstico , Infecções Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Doença Aguda , Regras de Decisão Clínica , Humanos , Razão de Chances , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA