Pathophysiological profile of non-ventilated lung injury in healthy female pigs undergoing mechanical ventilation.

BACKGROUND: Lung regions excluded from mechanical insufflation are traditionally assumed to be spared from ventilation-associated lung injury. However, preliminary data showed activation of potential mechanisms of injury within these non-ventilated regions (e.g., hypoperfusion, inflammation). METHODS: In the present study, we hypothesized that non-ventilated lung injury (NVLI) may develop within 24 h of unilateral mechanical ventilation in previously healthy pigs, and we performed extended pathophysiological measures to profile NVLI. We included two experimental groups undergoing exclusion of the left lung from the ventilation with two different tidal volumes (15 vs 7.5 ml/kg) and a control group on bilateral ventilation. Pathophysiological alteration including lung collapse, changes in lung perfusion, lung stress and inflammation were measured. Lung injury was quantified by histological score. RESULTS: Histological injury score of the non-ventilated lung is significantly higher than normally expanded lung from control animals. The histological score showed lower intermediate values (but still higher than controls) when the tidal volume distending the ventilated lung was reduced by 50%. Main pathophysiological alterations associated with NVLI were: extensive lung collapse; very low pulmonary perfusion; high inspiratory airways pressure; and higher concentrations of acute-phase inflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-1ß and TNF-α and of Angiopoietin-2 (a marker of endothelial activation) in the broncho-alveolar lavage. Only the last two alterations were mitigated by reducing tidal volume, potentially explaining partial protection. CONCLUSIONS: Non-ventilated lung injury develops within 24 h of controlled mechanical ventilation due to multiple pathophysiological alterations, which are only partially prevented by low tidal volume.

Respiratory failure that occurs in cases of atelectasis, pneumonia and acute hypoxemic respiratory failure a machine called a mechanical ventilator is used to move air in and out of the patient's lungs. We know that the use of a mechanical ventilator can induce lung injury, but complete exclusion from ventilation might not be safe. Using pig lungs to mimic the patient's lungs, we evaluated the use of a ventilator against non-use. We find that the lungs sustained injury regardless of ventilator use. The non-ventilated lung injury consisted of collapse (lack of expansion), low amount of blood flow, high ventilation pressure and inflammatory response. Physicians should be aware that also the regions of the lung not receiving ventilation are at risk of injury.

Inhaled CO2 vs. Hypercapnia Obtained by Low Tidal Volume or Instrumental Dead Space in Unilateral Pulmonary Artery Ligation: Any Difference for Lung Protection?

Background: Unilateral ligation of the pulmonary artery (UPAL) induces bilateral lung injury in pigs undergoing controlled mechanical ventilation. Possible mechanisms include redistribution of ventilation toward the non-ligated lung and hypoperfusion of the ligated lung. The addition of 5% CO2 to the inspiratory gas (FiCO2) prevents the injury, but it is not clear whether lung protection is a direct effect of CO2 inhalation or it is mediated by plasmatic hypercapnia. This study aims to compare the effects and mechanisms of FiCO2 vs. hypercapnia induced by low tidal volume ventilation or instrumental dead space. Methods: Healthy pigs underwent left UPAL and were allocated for 48 h to the following: Volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) with VT 10 ml/kg (injury, n = 6); VCV plus 5% FiCO2 (FiCO2, n = 7); VCV with VT 6 ml/kg (low VT, n = 6); VCV plus additional circuit dead space (instrumental VD, n = 6). Histological score, regional compliance, wet-to-dry ratio, and inflammatory infiltrate were assessed to evaluate lung injury at the end of the study. To investigate the mechanisms of protection, we quantified the redistribution of ventilation to the non-ligated lung, as the ratio between the percentage of tidal volume to the right and to the left lung (VTRIGHT/LEFT), and the hypoperfusion of the ligated lung as the percentage of blood flow reaching the left lung (PerfusionLEFT). Results: In the left ligated lung, injury was prevented only in the FiCO2 group, as indicated by lower histological score, higher regional compliance, lower wet-to-dry ratio and lower density of inflammatory cells compared to other groups. For the right lung, the histological score was lower both in the FiCO2 and in the low VT groups, but the other measures of injury showed lower intensity only in the FiCO2 group. VTRIGHT/LEFT was lower and PerfusionLEFT was higher in the FiCO2 group compared to other groups. Conclusion: In a model of UPAL, inhaled CO2 but not hypercapnia grants bilateral lung protection. Mechanisms of protection include reduced overdistension of the non-ligated and increased perfusion of the ligated lung.

Pathophysiology and Clinical Meaning of Ventilation-Perfusion Mismatch in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains an important clinical challenge with a mortality rate of 35-45%. It is being increasingly demonstrated that the improvement of outcomes requires a tailored, individualized approach to therapy, guided by a detailed understanding of each patient's pathophysiology. In patients with ARDS, disturbances in the physiological matching of alveolar ventilation (V) and pulmonary perfusion (Q) (V/Q mismatch) are a hallmark derangement. The perfusion of collapsed or consolidated lung units gives rise to intrapulmonary shunting and arterial hypoxemia, whereas the ventilation of non-perfused lung zones increases physiological dead-space, which potentially necessitates increased ventilation to avoid hypercapnia. Beyond its impact on gas exchange, V/Q mismatch is a predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with ARDS; more recently, its role in ventilation-induced lung injury and worsening lung edema has been described. Innovations in bedside imaging technologies such as electrical impedance tomography readily allow clinicians to determine the regional distributions of V and Q, as well as the adequacy of their matching, providing new insights into the phenotyping, prognostication, and clinical management of patients with ARDS. The purpose of this review is to discuss the pathophysiology, identification, consequences, and treatment of V/Q mismatch in the setting of ARDS, employing experimental data from clinical and preclinical studies as support.