Association of Geographic Distance and Hospital Characteristics With Use of Interhospital Transfer by Air: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: Interhospital transfer by air (IHTA) represents the majority of helicopter air ambulance transports in the United States, but the evaluation of what factors are associated with utilization has been limited. We aimed to assess the association of geographic distance and hospital characteristics (including patient volume) with the use of IHTA. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective study of helicopter flight request data from 2018 provided by a convenience sample of 4 critical care transport medicine programs in 3 US census regions. Nonfederal referring hospitals located in the home state of the associated critical care transport medicine program and within 100 miles of the primary receiving facility in the region were included if complete data were available. We fit a Poisson principal component regression model incorporating geographic distance, the number of emergency department visits, the number of hospital discharges, case mix index, the number of intensive care unit beds, and the number of general beds and tested the association of the variables with helicopter emergency medical services utilization. RESULTS: A total of 106 referring hospitals were analyzed, 21 of which were hospitals identified as having a consistent request pattern. Using the hospitals with a consistent referral pattern, geographic distance had a significant positive association with flight request volume. Other variables, including emergency department visit volume, were not associated. Overall, the included variables offered poor explanatory power for the observed variation between referring facilities in the use of IHTA (r2 = 0.09). Predicted flights based on the principal component regression model for all referring hospitals suggested the majority of referring hospitals used multiple flight programs. CONCLUSION: Geographic distance is associated with the use of IHTA. Unexpectedly, most basic hospital characteristics are not associated with the use of IHTA, and the degree of variation between referring facilities that is explained by patient volume is limited. The evaluation of nonhospital factors, such as the density and availability of critical care or advanced life support ground emergency medical services resources, is needed.

The association between arterial-end-tidal carbon dioxide difference and outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

AIM: We sought to determine if the difference between PaCO2 and ETCO2 is associated with hospital mortality and neurologic outcome following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients who achieved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after OHCA over 3 years. The primary exposure was the PaCO2-ETCO2 difference on hospital arrival. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. The secondary outcome was favorable neurologic status at discharge. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to determine discrimination threshold and multivariate logistic regression to examine the association between the PaCO2-ETCO2 difference and outcome. RESULTS: Of 698 OHCA patients transported to the hospitals, 381 had sustained ROSC and qualifying ETCO2 and PaCO2 values. Of these, 160 (42%) survived to hospital discharge. Mean ETCO2 was 39 mmHg among survivors and 43 mmHg among non-survivors. Mean PaCO2-ETCO2 was 6.8 mmHg and 9.0 mmHg (p < 0.05) for survivors and non-survivors. After adjustment for Utstein characteristics, a higher PaCO2-ETCO2 difference on hospital arrival was not associated with hospital mortality (OR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.97-1.0) or neurological outcome. Area under the ROC curve or PaCO2-ETCO2 difference was 0.56 (95% CI 0.51-0.62) compared with 0.58 (95% CI 0.52-0.64) for ETCO2. CONCLUSION: Neither PaCO2-ETCO2 nor ETCO2 were strong predictors of survival or neurologic status at hospital discharge. While they may be useful to guide ventilation and resuscitation, these measures should not be used for prognostication after OHCA.

Cardiac Arrest in Flight: A Retrospective Chart Review of 92 Patients Transported by a Critical Care Air Medical Service.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of cardiac arrest in the air medical environment so that we can begin to understand predictors of in-flight cardiac arrest and identify opportunities to improve care. METHODS: This retrospective observational study was undertaken at Airlift Northwest from 2013 to 2017. Descriptive statistics of adult patients with medical and traumatic etiologies of cardiac arrest were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: Of the 13,915 adult patients transported during the study period, fewer than 1% (N = 92) had a cardiac arrest during transport. Of those, 42% in the overall cohort had return of spontaneous circulation on arrival at the destination hospital. Medical etiologies of cardiac arrest were more common than traumatic (65% vs. 35%), more likely to have an initial shockable rhythm (30% vs. 3%, P = .004), and more frequently arrived at the receiving hospital with return of spontaneous circulation (57% vs. 31%, P = .03). Rearrest in transport occurred frequently (39%). Most patients were hypotensive before cardiac arrest, and peri-intubation cardiac arrest occurred in 12% of patients. CONCLUSION: Cardiac arrest during air medical transport is a rare event that requires a high level of critical care to treat refractory cardiac arrests, hemodynamic instability, and airway compromise.

Management of Acute Aortic Dissection During Critical Care Air Medical Transport.

Acute aortic dissection is a time-critical emergency that air medical teams must be capable of transporting. Aortic dissections can manifest a myriad of complications in which prompt recognition and tailored treatments may mitigate additional physiological burden and limit dissection flap propagation. The purpose of this review is to discuss specific critical scenarios that air medical providers may be faced with and to equip them with a pathophysiological understanding of the disease and best practices for the management of acute aortic dissections.

Targeted Temperature Management at 33 Versus 36 Degrees: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the association between targeted temperature management goal temperature of 33°C versus 36°C and neurologic outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. DESIGN: This was a retrospective, before-and-after, cohort study. SETTING: Urban, academic, level 1 trauma center from 2010 to 2017. PATIENTS: Adults with nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who received targeted temperature management. INTERVENTIONS: Our primary exposure was targeted temperature management goal temperature, which was changed from 33°C to 36°C in April of 2014 at the study hospital. Primary outcome was neurologically intact survival to discharge. Secondary outcomes included hospital mortality and care processes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 782 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients transported to the study hospital, 453 (58%) received targeted temperature management. Of these, 258 (57%) were treated during the 33°C period (targeted temperature management 33°C) and 195 (43%) were treated during the 36°C period (targeted temperature management 36°C). Patients treated during targeted temperature management 33°C were older (57 vs 52 yr; p < 0.05) and had more arrests of cardiac etiology (45% vs 35%; p < 0.05), but otherwise had similar baseline characteristics, including initial cardiac rhythm. A total of 40% of patients treated during targeted temperature management 33°C survived with favorable neurologic outcome, compared with 30% in the targeted temperature management 36°C group (p < 0.05). After adjustment for demographic and cardiac arrest characteristics, targeted temperature management 33°C was associated with increased odds of neurologically intact survival to discharge (odds ratio, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.09-2.94). Targeted temperature management 33°C was not associated with significantly improved hospital mortality. Targeted temperature management was implemented faster (1.9 vs 3.5 hr from 911 call; p < 0.001) and more frequently in the emergency department during the targeted temperature management 33°C period (87% vs 55%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Comatose, adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients treated during the targeted temperature management 33°C period had higher odds of neurologically intact survival to hospital discharge compared with those treated during the targeted temperature management 36°C period. There was no significant difference in hospital mortality.