Management and Outcomes of Patients at a Specialty Clinic for Clostridioides difficile Infection.

Vancomycin and fidaxomicin taper regimens were the most common treatment strategies employed but nearly half of patients (40/83) referred to our Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) clinic did not require further treatment. The overall 60-day CDI recurrence rate was 16.9% (11/65). CDI management at a dedicated clinic may improve clinical outcomes.

Commonly Reported Mosquito-Borne Viruses in the United States: A Primer for Pharmacists.

Mosquito-borne diseases are a public health concern. Pharmacists are often a patient's first stop for health information and may be asked questions regarding transmission, symptoms, and treatment of mosquito borne viruses (MBVs). The objective of this paper is to review transmission, geographic location, symptoms, diagnosis and treatment of MBVs. We discuss the following viruses with cases in the US in recent years: Dengue, West Nile, Chikungunya, LaCrosse Encephalitis, Eastern Equine Encephalitis Virus, and Zika. Prevention, including vaccines, and the impact of climate change are also discussed.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of cefiderocol for the treatment of multidrug resistant Gram-negative infections.

INTRODUCTION: Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin antibiotic and first of its kind approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) and hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP) in patients 18 years or older caused by susceptible organisms. Cefiderocol's unique mechanism of iron chelation improves Gram-negative membrane penetration as the bacteria's iron uptake mechanism recognizes the chelated iron antibiotic and iron for entry. This also allows for the evasion of cefiderocol from cell entry-related resistance mechanisms. AREAS COVERED: This review covers the mechanism of action, resistance mechanisms, pharmacokinetics in various patient populations, and pharmacodynamics. Relevant literature evaluating efficacy and safety are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Limited treatment options are available for the treatment of carbapenem-resistantorganisms. Clinical trials have demonstrated that cefiderocol is no worse than alternative treatment options for cUTIs and HABP/VABP, but more data are currently available to support the use of beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitor agents, where susceptible. Mortality differences demonstrated in patients with pneumonia and bloodstream infections must further be explored and logistical and practical considerations regarding susceptibility testing and use as monotherapy vs. combination therapy must be considered prior to confidently recommending cefiderocol for regular use in systemic infections.

A Tapered-pulsed Fidaxomicin Regimen Following Treatment in Patients With Multiple Clostridioides difficile Infection Recurrences.

We treated 46 patients with multiple recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections (mrCDI) using a tapered-pulsed (T-P) fidaxomicin regimen, the majority of whom failed prior T-P vancomycin treatment. Sustained clinical response rates at 30 and 90 days were 74% (34/46) and 61% (28/46). T-P fidaxomicin shows promise for management of mrCDI.

Efficacy of oritavancin alone and in combination against vancomycin-susceptible and -resistant enterococci in an in-vivo Galleria mellonella survival model.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal therapy for serious enterococcal infections, especially vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), remains unclear, although combination therapy is often recommended. Oritavancin has demonstrated in-vitro activity against VRE, but data evaluating oritavancin in combination with other agents and in in-vivo systems are lacking. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of oritavancin alone and in combination with ceftriaxone, daptomycin, gentamicin, linezolid and rifampin against vancomycin-susceptible enterococci and VRE in an in-vivo Galleria mellonella survival model. METHODS: Five enterococcal strains were used: three clinical isolates (VRE S38141, VRE H19570, VRE W21579), Enterococcus faecium ATCC 700221 and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212. G. mellonella larvae were inoculated with the test strain followed by the test drug at humanized weight-based dose alone or in combination within 1 h of inoculation. After injection, larvae were incubated at 37°C and survival was measured daily for 7 days. Survival was plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between groups were determined via the log-rank test. Mean survival times were also determined. RESULTS: Each single agent improved survival significantly compared with the untreated control strain. Oritavancin was the most efficacious single agent, and led to a significant increase in survival compared with ceftriaxone, gentamicin and daptomycin. Compared with oritavancin alone, none of the oritavancin combinations tested were significantly better, and mean survival times were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Oritavancin monotherapy had the highest survival rate at 7 days, and none of the combinations tested showed improved survival over oritavancin alone. These data add to the body of literature rebutting the routine use of combination therapy with oritavancin for the treatment of infections due to VRE.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of meropenem and vaborbactam for the treatment of urinary tract infection.

INTRODUCTION: Meropenem/vaborbactam (M/V) represents the first carbapenem and ß-lactamase inhibitor combination approved for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), including pyelonephritis. Vaborbactam is a novel boronic acid, ß-lactamase inhibitor with a high affinity for serine ß-lactamases, including Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC). This combination, Vabomere™, was approved in August 2017 by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of cUTIs in patients 18 years or older, including pyelonephritis, caused by the following susceptible microorganisms: Escherichia coli, K. pneumoniae, and Enterobacter cloacae species complex. Areas covered: Relevant literature regarding microbiology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical trials evaluating efficacy, safety, and tolerability will be discussed. Expert opinion: Current treatment options for KPC-producing infections such as aminoglycosides, polymyxins, fosfomycin, and tigecycline are associated with concerns regarding efficacy, toxicities, optimal dosing, and/or development of resistance. Additionally, resistance to the new combination product of ceftazidime/avibactam has also emerged. Current clinical evidence supporting the use of M/V for KPC-producing infections is limited to an open-label, randomized, phase III study in a small number of patients with serious infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Although M/V is not approved for KPC-producing infections, we believe that M/V will become a preferred agent for KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae infections.

Phase I Study To Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Two Dosing Regimens of Oral Fosfomycin Tromethamine in Healthy Adult Participants.

The pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of two repeated dosing regimens of oral fosfomycin tromethamine were evaluated in 18 healthy adult subjects. Subjects received 3 g every other day (QOD) for 3 doses and then every day (QD) for 7 doses, or vice versa, in a phase I, randomized, open-label, two-period-crossover study. Serial blood (n = 11) and urine (n = 4 collection intervals) samples were collected before and up to 24 h after dosing on days 1 and 5, along with predose concentrations on days 3 and 7. PK parameters were similar between days 1 and 5 within and between dosing regimens. The mean (± standard deviation [SD]) PK parameters for fosfomycin in plasma on day 5 during the respective QOD and QD dosing regimens were as follows: maximum concentration of drug in serum (Cmax) = 24.4 ± 6.2 versus 23.8 ± 5.6 µg/ml, time to Cmax (Tmax) = 2.2 ± 0.7 versus 2.0 ± 0.4 h, apparent volume of distribution (V/F) = 141 ± 67.9 versus 147 ± 67.6 liters, apparent clearance (CL/F) = 21.4 ± 8.0 versus 20.4 ± 5.3 liters/h, renal clearance (CLR) = 7.5 ± 4.1 versus 7.3 ± 3.5 liters/h, area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24) = 151.6 ± 35.6 versus 156.6 ± 42.5 µg · h/ml, and elimination half-life (t1/2) = 4.5 ± 1.1 versus 5.0 ± 1.7 h. Urine concentrations peaked at approximately 600 µg/ml through the 0- to 8-h urine collection intervals but displayed significant interindividual variability. Roughly 35 to 40% of the 3-g dose was excreted in the urine by 24 h postdose. No new safety concerns were identified during this study. The proportion of diarrhea-free days during the study was significantly lower with the QD regimen than with the QOD regimen (61% versus 77%; P < 0.0001). Further studies to establish the clinical benefit/risk ratio for repeated dosing regimens of oral fosfomycin tromethamine are warranted. (This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02570074.).

Impact of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoint changes on susceptibility rates of cephalosporins in uncomplicated urinary tract infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae.

Breakpoint changes may impact cephalosporin susceptibility rates in uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs). Applying the ≤16-mg/L breakpoint to urine cultures from adult women in an academic health system resulted in cefazolin being the most active uUTI antimicrobial, with 86.9% susceptibility, compared to levofloxacin (80%), nitrofurantoin (76.5%), and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (72.6%).

Pharmacokinetics of Telavancin at Fixed Doses in Normal-Body-Weight and Obese (Classes I, II, and III) Adult Subjects.

A recommended total-body-weight (TBW) dosing strategy for telavancin may not be optimal in obese patients. The primary objective of this study was to characterize and compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) of telavancin across four body size groups: normal to overweight and obese classes I, II, and III. Healthy adult subjects (n = 32) received a single, weight-stratified, fixed dose of 500 mg (n = 4), 750 mg (n = 8), or 1,000 mg (n = 20) of telavancin. Noncompartmental PK analyses revealed that subjects with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥40 kg/m2 had a higher volume of distribution (16.24 ± 2.7 liters) than subjects with a BMI of <30 kg/m2 (11.71 ± 2.6 liters). The observed area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) ranged from 338.1 to 867.3 mg · h/liter, with the lowest exposures being in subjects who received 500 mg. AUC0-∞ values were similar among obese subjects who received 1,000 mg. A two-compartment population PK model best described the plasma concentration-time profile of telavancin when adjusted body weight (ABW) was included as a predictive covariate. Fixed doses of 750 mg and 1,000 mg had similar target attainment probabilities for efficacy as doses of 10 mg/kg of body weight based on ABW and TBW, respectively. However, the probability of achieving a target area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 h of ≥763 mg · h/liter in association with acute kidney injury was highest (19.7%) with TBW-simulated dosing and lowest (0.4%) at the 750-mg dose. These results suggest that a fixed dose of 750 mg is a safe and effective alternative to telavancin doses based on TBW or ABW for the treatment of obese patients with normal renal function and Staphylococcus aureus infections. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02753855.).

Clinical use of the polymyxins: the tale of the fox and the cat.

BACKGROUND: There is a need to identify practice patterns of polymyxin use, quantify gaps in knowledge, and recognize areas of persistent confusion. METHODS: A structured electronic survey was distributed to physicians, pharmacists and microbiologists. Demographic information was obtained, along with data regarding availability, stewardship principles, therapeutic usage, dosing, microbiological testing, and knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding the polymyxins. RESULTS: In total, there were 420 respondents with a median of 8 (interquartile range 4-15) years of experience in infectious diseases (52.5%) and critical care (35%). Of the respondents who reported that only one polymyxin was available for use, 17.1% used polymyxin B. Over half (52.5%) of the respondents utilized a loading dose very often/always, and 66.8% dosed both polymyxins in milligrams, with the most common doses of colistin and polymyxin B being 2.5 mg/kg twice daily (60.3%) and 1.5 mg/kg twice daily (65%), respectively, for patients with normal renal function. Polymyxins were most often used for respiratory infections (63%) in combination with a carbapenem (63.6%). Approximately 85% of respondents reported their knowledge level to be fair, good or very good, although 34.9% answered two of the three knowledge questions incorrectly. More than 70% of respondents agreed that confusion exists in all surveyed areas of polymyxin use. Almost all respondents (91.2%) agreed that a polymyxin guideline would be a helpful resource. CONCLUSIONS: This survey revealed objective and subjective variability in the use and perception of the polymyxins, and identified several areas in which they were being used contrary to the available evidence. The information provided herein lays the framework to harmonize clinical practice, guide future research and shape consensus guidelines.

Economic Barriers in the Treatment of Clostridium difficile Infection With Oral Vancomycin.

Vancomycin is an increasingly important option for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection, but economic barriers to its use remain significant in the outpatient setting. Generic vancomycin capsules are still inexplicably expensive and not universally covered by insurers. This report highlights the potential adverse consequences of cost-related nonadherence to vancomycin therapy and the challenges that clinicians face when prescribing oral vancomycin.

Compatibility of Ceftazidime-Avibactam, Ceftolozane-Tazobactam, and Piperacillin-Tazobactam with Vancomycin in Dextrose 5% in Water.

Objectives: The compatibility of vancomycin with existing and novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitors at clinically relevant concentrations in 5% dextrose in water has not been fully explored to date. Methods: Vancomycin concentrations tested ranged from 5 to 20 mg/mL. Ceftazidime-avibactam was tested at 8, 20, and 40 mg/mL, ceftolozane-tazobactam at 15 mg/mL, and piperacillin-tazobactam at 28 mg/mL. Compatibility of drug admixtures were tested via both simulated and actual y-site infusion. For the simulated y-site compatibility assessment, 1:1 mixtures of each respective drug were analyzed over 24 hours. Actual y-site infusion followed a 4-hour extended-infusion protocol, with aliquots tested hourly for 4 hours. At all time points, the compatibility of each admixture was determined using 6 different methods: visual, microscopic, Tyndall beam, nephelometric, pH, and microbiologic bioassay assessment. If any admixture failed any one of these 6 assays, it was considered incompatible. Any combination deemed incompatible was filtered through a 0.22 µm filter and reanalyzed to assess impact of particle size. Results: There were no differences in compatibility categorizations between simulated and actual y-site infusion. There were no changes in compatibility over the time course of any experiment. Ceftazidime-avibactam at 8 mg/mL was incompatible with vancomycin at 5 mg/mL. The maximum compatible vancomycin concentrations were 5 mg/mL and 10 mg/mL with 20 and 40 mg/mL of ceftazidime-avibactam, respectively. Ceftolozane-tazobactam 15 mg/mL was compatible with vancomycin concentrations up to 10 mg/mL. The maximum compatible vancomycin concentration with piperacillin-tazobactam 28 mg/mL was 5 mg/mL. None of the ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitors tested were compatible with 15 or 20 mg/mL of vancomycin. None of the admixtures considered incompatible by other methods displayed any decrease in antimicrobial activity as assessed by bioassay. After filtration, all admixtures originally deemed incompatible maintained their visual turbidity and microscopic particulate matter. Conclusions: Ceftazidime-avibactam prepared at the lowest concentration recommended in the package insert is incompatible with vancomycin. Ceftolozane-tazobactam did not display incompatibility until vancomycin concentrations above 10 mg/mL were tested. Piperacillin-tazobactam at a typical extended-infusion concentration is compatible with vancomycin in D5W. To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess compatibility of antibiotic admixtures via direct measurement of antimicrobial activity. The lack of any decrement in antibacterial activity of any apparently incompatible admixture and maintenance of incompatibility after passage through a 0.22 µm filter may suggest a lack of clinically relevant adverse effects when co-administered. Future compatibility studies should incorporate appropriate methods to accurately assess both efficacy and safety of co-administered drug products.

Pharmacokinetics and Dialytic Clearance of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in a Critically Ill Patient on Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration.

Ceftazidime-avibactam administered at 1.25 g every 8 h was used to treat multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia in a critically ill patient on continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH). Prefiltration plasma drug concentrations of ceftazidime and avibactam were measured at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h along with postfiltration and ultrafiltrate concentrations at h 2 and h 6. Plasma pharmacokinetic parameters of ceftazidime and avibactam, respectively, were as follows: maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), 61.10 and 14.54 mg/liter; minimum plasma concentration (Cmin), 31.96 and 8.45 mg/liter; half-life (t1/2), 6.07 and 6.78 h; apparent volume of distribution at the steady state (Vss), 27.23 and 30.81 liters; total clearance at the steady state (CLss), 2.87 and 2.95 liters/h; area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 h (AUC0-8), 347.87 and 85.69 mg · h/liter. Concentrations of ceftazidime in plasma exceeded the ceftazidime-avibactam MIC (6 mg/liter) throughout the 8-h dosing interval. Mean CVVH extraction ratios for ceftazidime and avibactam were 14.44% and 11.53%, respectively, and mean sieving coefficients were 0.96 and 0.93, respectively. The calculated mean clearance of ceftazidime by CVVH was 1.64 liters/h and for avibactam was 1.59 liters/h, representing 57.1% of the total clearance of ceftazidime and 54.3% of the total clearance of avibactam. Further data that include multiple patients and dialysis modes are needed to verify the optimal ceftazidime-avibactam dosing strategy during critical illness and CVVH.

Pharmacokinetic drug evaluation of ceftobiprole for the treatment of MRSA.

INTRODUCTION: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), while decreasing in overall incidence, is still a prominent concern world-wide. New agents coming to market in the last 10 years allow practitioners to optimize treatment for MRSA infections. Ceftobiprole is a cephalosporin agent with MRSA activity, currently approved in selected countries for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and hospital-acquired pneumonia. Areas covered: Relevant literature regarding spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical trials will be discussed. Expert opinion: Ceftobiprole is an addition to a growing number of antimicrobials with activity against MRSA. Concern for appropriate dosing in critically ill patients remains due to its ineffectiveness for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). While ceftobiprole has activity against gram-negative organisms, the allowance for use of an additional agent for gram-negative infections in clinical trials limits recommendations for monotherapy for empirical treatment of HAP. Ceftobiprole's place in therapy will lie in its activity against gram positive organisms, such as Streptococcus spp. and Staphylococcus spp.

A Quantitative Analysis of FDA Adverse Event Reports with Oral Bisphosphonates and Clostridium difficile.

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown associations between Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and non-antimicrobial medications including proton pump inhibitors, osteoporosis medications, and antidepressants. OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective was to evaluate oral bisphosphonates and reported CDI adverse drug reactions in the United States using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System data (FAERS). METHODS: We performed a disproportionality analysis evaluating the proportion of reports with bisphosphonates and CDI compared with other adverse drug reactions in the database. A relatively increased number of reports for a given adverse drug reaction (ADR) is termed a "signal." Four major measures of association are used to describe reports: reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, information component, and empirical Bayes geometric mean. Drugs with statistically significant safety signals were stratified by age (18-40, 41-65, and 65+ years) and gender. RESULTS: Alendronate had 0.4% (103/23,603) reports with CDI. There were 0.4% (16/3672) and 0.2% (17/7945) of reports for risedronate and ibandronate, respectively. Alendronate (Fosamax) was the only drug with a significant signal using all four calculation methods. For reports with gender available, alendronate CDI ADRs were more common for women (0.45% [93/20,586]) versus men (0.25% [4/1568]), and a signal was detected with all four methods. For reports with age available, there were limited alendronate reports for those 18-39 years of age, and CDI reports were present in 0.50% (27/5350) of cases of 40-64 years and 0.49% (42/8525) of cases aged 65 or older. CONCLUSION: Alendronate was associated with a high number of CDI ADRs relative to other drugs in FAERS. This signal was strongest for women and those 40 years or older. This interesting finding should be interpreted with caution, and further research is warranted.

Inhaled Antibiotics for Gram-Negative Respiratory Infections.

Gram-negative organisms comprise a large portion of the pathogens responsible for lower respiratory tract infections, especially those that are nosocomially acquired, and the rate of antibiotic resistance among these organisms continues to rise. Systemically administered antibiotics used to treat these infections often have poor penetration into the lung parenchyma and narrow therapeutic windows between efficacy and toxicity. The use of inhaled antibiotics allows for maximization of target site concentrations and optimization of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic indices while minimizing systemic exposure and toxicity. This review is a comprehensive discussion of formulation and drug delivery aspects, in vitro and microbiological considerations, pharmacokinetics, and clinical outcomes with inhaled antibiotics as they apply to disease states other than cystic fibrosis. In reviewing the literature surrounding the use of inhaled antibiotics, we also highlight the complexities related to this route of administration and the shortcomings in the available evidence. The lack of novel anti-Gram-negative antibiotics in the developmental pipeline will encourage the innovative use of our existing agents, and the inhaled route is one that deserves to be further studied and adopted in the clinical arena.

I.V. minocycline revisited for infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms.

PURPOSE: The evidence supporting the potential use of i.v. minocycline for serious infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) is summarized. SUMMARY: Minocycline achieves good tissue penetration and excellent oral absorption. Minocycline achieves serum concentrations comparable to other tetracyclines, with peak serum concentrations ranging from 3 to 8.75 mg/L following i.v. administration of 200 mg. Minocycline retains antimicrobial activity against methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus as well as many gram-negative pathogens, such as Acinetobacter species, Citrobacter species, Enterobacter species, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Serratia marcescens, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Minocycline has been used to treat respiratory infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii and bloodstream infections. The majority of these gram-negative infections were treated with combination therapy, with results similar to those seen with first-line agents. The ability to switch from parenteral to oral therapy and its favorable tissue penetration make minocycline an attractive option for severe respiratory or skin and skin structure infections. For A. baumannii infections, minocycline is the second most active agent in vitro and may be the only therapeutic option in certain cases. The overall clinical experience with minocycline supports its use to treat A. baumannii infections alone or in combination with other agents. Minocycline could be used to treat other MDRO gram-negative infections but only as an agent of last resort due to the limited data available. CONCLUSION: The available pharmacokinetic and clinical data support the use of i.v. minocycline for the treatment of MDRO infections, including infections due to S. aureus coagulase-negative and gram-negative pathogens.

Microbiological Assessment of Polymyxin B Components Tested Alone and in Combination.

We investigated the antimicrobial activity of four polymyxin B components, B1, B2, B3, and isoleucine (Ile)-B1, individually and in combination. B3 was the most active agent against all organisms tested except Acinetobacter baumannii, for which Ile-B1 was most active. One combination met the criteria for synergy, B3 plus Ile-B1. No combinations exhibited antagonism. The dominant components of polymyxin B products (B1 and B2) were associated with the lowest probability of improved antibacterial activity when combined.