Comparative characteristics of older people with type 1 diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion or insulin injection therapy: data from the German/Austrian DPV registry.

AIM: To compare clinical characteristics and outcomes in adults with type 1 diabetes aged ≥ 60 years using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) vs. insulin injection therapy. Further, to determine the percentage of older adults with type 1 diabetes using CSII. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Retrospective study using data of the Diabetes Prospective Follow-up Registry (DPV). Including percentage CSII use from 2008 to 2018, and the characteristics of 9547 individuals extracted from the DPV in March 2019 (N = 1404 CSII; N = 8143 insulin injection therapy). Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables to compare clinical characteristics of people using CSII vs. insulin injection therapy. Adjusted analyses used generalized linear models to compare diabetes-related outcomes. RESULTS: CSII usage has increased in older adults (from 12% in 2008 to 23% in 2018). After adjustment, CSII was associated with lower HbA1c [60.7 mmol/mol (7.7 ± 0.1%) vs. 62.8% (7.9 ± 0.1%)], lower daily insulin dose (0.49 ± 0.02 vs. 0.61 ± 0.01 IU/kg), fewer days in hospital (8.1 ± 0.12 vs. 11.2 ± 0.11 days/person-year), fewer severe hypoglycaemic events (0.16 ± 0.02 vs. 0.21 ± 0.03 events/person-year) and fewer diabetic ketoacidosis (0.06 ± 0.01 vs. 0.08 ± 0.01 events/person-year). Individuals on CSII showed lower rates of microalbuminuria and also have a diagnosis of depression and neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS: A growing number of older adults are using insulin pumps. Older age in itself should not be seen as a contraindication for CSII.

Daily insulin doses and injection frequencies of neutral protamine hagedorn (NPH) insulin, insulin detemir and insulin glargine in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a multicenter analysis of 51 964 patients from the German/Austrian DPV-wiss database.

BACKGROUND: We performed a comparative analysis of the use of long-acting insulin (analogues) neutral protamine hagedorn (NPH), detemir (Det) and glargine (Gla), and quantified injection frequencies and daily insulin doses in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes in daily practice. METHODS: A total number of 51 964 patients from 336 centres in Germany and Austria with type 1 and 2 diabetes with exclusive insulin therapy were retrospectively analysed. RESULTS: A total number of 42.1%/75.9% (type 1/type 2) of patients used NPH, 19.9%/6.7% Det and 38.0%/17.4% Gla, with similar glycaemic control and proportion of severe hypoglycaemia for NPH/Det/Gla in type 1 (Mean HbA(1c) 7.98%/7.98%/8.07%; mean proportion of severe hypoglycaemia 11.06%/11.93%/10.86%) and type 2 diabetes (Mean HbA(1c) 7.61%/7.78%/7.61%; mean proportion of severe hypoglycaemia 5.66%/4.48%/5.03%). In type 1 diabetes, the mean daily injection frequencies of NPH versus Det versus Gla were 1.9 vs 1.8 vs 1.1, and total daily insulin injections were 5.3 vs 5.6 vs 5.0. The adjusted mean daily basal insulin doses were 0.36, 0.39 and 0.31 IU/kg, mean daily total insulin dose was lowest for Gla (0.74 IU/kg), followed by NPH (0.76 IU/kg) and Det (0.81 IU/kg). In type 2 diabetes patients, mean daily injection frequencies were 1.6 for NPH, 1.4 for Det and 1.1 for Gla, total daily insulin injections were 4.0 vs 4.1 vs 3.6. The mean daily basal insulin dosages were 0.30 IU/kg (NPH), 0.33 IU/kg (Det) and 0.29 IU/kg (Gla), mean total insulin doses per day were 0.63 IU/kg (NPH), 0.77 IU/kg (Det) and 0.67 IU/kg (Gla). CONCLUSIONS: In a 'real-world' setting, the injection frequencies and doses of basal and total insulin per day are lowest with the use of insulin glargine compared with NPH-insulin or insulin detemir at similar glycaemic control and rates of severe hypoglycaemia.

Association of antidiabetic therapies to glycemic control and to body weight in type 2 diabetes: a German multicenter analysis on 9294 patients.

Glycemic and body weight control are two outstanding goals in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes that often are not appropriately achieved. This observational study evaluates whether treatment by quality controlled diabetes centers generates an improvement in this regard and focuses on associations with different therapies. Data of 9.294 type 2 diabetic patients (mean age 66.9±11.6 years, mean diabetes duration 12.4±9.2 years) from 103 German diabetes centers were assessed by a standardized, prospective, computer-based diabetes care and outcome documentation system (DPV-Wiss-database). Therapeutic concepts included lifestyle intervention (n=1.813), oral antidiabetics (OAD, n=1.536), insulin (n=4.504) and insulin plus OAD (n=1.441). HbA1c and body weight were compared before and after a stable therapeutical period of 1.07±0.3 years. Change in HbA1c (%): all patients 7.4±1.6-7.0±1.3, lifestyle intervention 7.5±1.9-6.9±1.5, OAD 6.7±1.1-6.5±1.0, insulin 7.6±1.6-7.2±1.4, insulin plus OAD 7.5±1.5-7.2±1.3; each p≤0.05. Change in body weight (kg): all patients +0.08±0.07, n. s.; lifestyle intervention -0.28±0.20, OAD -0.56±0.13, each p<0.05 [metfomin -0.77±0.21, sulfonylurea drugs -0.75±0.34, each p<0.05; glitazones +0.62±0.70, α-glucosidase inhibitors -0.22±0.76, each n. s.], insulin +0.27±0.10, insulin plus OAD +0.63±0.14, each n. s. In summary, lifestyle, metformin or sulfonylurea drug treatment resulted in HbA1c-values below 7.0% plus a significant weight reduction. Insulin treatment-associated concepts resulted in HbA1c-values slightly above 7.0% without body weight alterations. These "real life" data underline that a specialised and quality controlled diabetes care is able to achieve significant treatment results even in patients with disease progression and a high proportion of insulin therapies.

Is the frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose related to long-term metabolic control? Multicenter analysis including 24,500 patients from 191 centers in Germany and Austria.

Blood glucose measurements are generally accepted components of a modern diabetes self-management. The value of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is, however, discussed controversially and only a few studies addressed the efficacy of SMBG under real-life conditions so far. In order to investigate whether the frequency of SMBG is related to long-term metabolic control, data from the DPV-Wiss-database, a standardized,prospective, computer-based documentation of diabetes care and outcome, were analyzed for patients with type 1(n = 19,491) and type 2 (n = 5,009) diabetes from 191 centers in Germany and Austria. Local HbA1c reference ranges were mathematically adjusted to the DCCT reference. For each patient, data from the most recent year of diabetes care were used. On average,patients with type 1 diabetes performed 4.4 blood glucose measurements/day. Corrected for age, gender, diabetes duration,on intensified (>or=4 daily injections or CSII) therapy (HbA1c reduction of 0.32% for one additional SMBG/day) compared to patients on conventional (1-3 daily injections) therapy(HbA1c-reduction of 0.16% for one additional SMBG/day). In 2,021 patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (2.7 measurements/day), more frequent SMBG was associated with better metabolic control (HbA1c-reduction of 0.16% for one additionalSMBG/day, p < 0.0001), while in 2,988 patients on OAD or diet alone (2.0 measurements/day), more frequent blood glucose measurements were associated with higher HbA1c-levels(HbA1c-increase of 0.14% for one additional SMBG/day,p < 0.0001). These data indicate that more frequent SMBG are associated with better metabolic control in both, patients with type 1 and insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. Since no benefit ofSMBG on metabolic control was found in patients with type 2 diabetes on OAD or diet alone, SMBG should primarily be recommended for those patients with suboptimal metabolic control whereas the benefit of SHBG in non-insulin-treated patients with adequate HbA1c-levels remains uncertain.insulin therapy and center difference, the SMBG frequency was associated with better metabolic control (HbA1c-reduction of0.26% for one additional SMBG/day, p < 0.0001). HbA1c-reduction with higher frequency of SMBG was more pronounced in patients Blood glucose measurements are generally accepted components of a modern diabetes self-management. The value of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is, however, discussed controversially and only a few studies addressed the efficacy of SMBG under real-life conditions so far. In order to investigate whether the frequency of SMBG is related to long-term metabolic control, data from the DPV-Wiss-database, a standardized,prospective, computer-based documentation of diabetes care and outcome, were analyzed for patients with type 1(n = 19,491) and type 2 (n = 5,009) diabetes from 191 centers in Germany and Austria. Local HbA1c reference ranges were mathematically adjusted to the DCCT reference. For each patient, data from the most recent year of diabetes care were used. On average,patients with type 1 diabetes performed 4.4 blood glucose measurements/day. Corrected for age, gender, diabetes duration,insulin therapy and center difference, the SMBG frequency wasassociated with better metabolic control (HbA1c-reduction of 0.26% for one additional SMBG/day, p < 0.0001). HbA1c-reduction with higher frequency of SMBG was more pronounced in patients on intensified (>or= 4 daily injections or CSII) therapy (HbA1c reduction of 0.32% for one additional SMBG/day) compared to patients on conventional (1-3 daily injections) therapy(HbA1c-reduction of 0.16% for one additional SMBG/day). In 2,021 patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (2.7 measurements/day), more frequent SMBG was associated with better metabolic control (HbA1c-reduction of 0.16% for one additionalSMBG/day, p < 0.0001), while in 2,988 patients on OAD or diet alone (2.0 measurements/day), more frequent blood glucose measurements were associated with higher HbA1c-levels(HbA1c-increase of 0.14% for one additional SMBG/day, p < 0.0001). These data indicate that more frequent SMBG are associated with better metabolic control in both, patients with type 1 and insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. Since no benefit of SMBG on metabolic control was found in patients with type 2 diabetes on OAD or diet alone, SMBG should primarily be recommended for those patients with suboptimal metabolic control whereas the benefit of SHBG in non-insulin-treated patients with adequate HbA1c-levels remains uncertain.

[Hypotension and shock in pheochromocytoma]. / Hypotension und Schock beim Phäochromozytom.

A 22-year-old woman was admitted to hospital in shock, the admission diagnosis being lobar pneumonia with septic shock. Ultrasound demonstrated a tumour in the region of the left adrenal, but because of the absence of hypertensive symptoms and hypoglycaemia this was interpreted as a non-contributory finding. Despite intensive therapeutic measures the patient died within a few hours. At autopsy a phaeochromocytoma of the left adrenal gland was found. "Catecholamine myocarditis" resulting in acute cardiac failure, was demonstrated histologically. Phaeochromocytoma with predominant adrenaline or dopamine secretions often takes a normotensive or hypotensive course. Sudden excessive catecholamine release can, as in the described case, cause so-called adrenaline shock. The catecholamine-induced hypoxic-toxic myocardial changes determine the likely outcome.