Operative and non-operative management for intestinal emergencies: findings from a single-centre retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with an intestinal emergency who do not have surgery are poorly characterised. This study used electronic healthcare records to provide a rapid insight into the number of patients admitted with an intestinal emergency and compare short-term outcomes for non-operative and operative management. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary NHS hospital (from 1 December 2013 to 31 January 2020). Patients were identified using diagnosis codes for intestinal emergencies, based on the inclusion criteria for the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit. Relevant data were extracted from electronic healthcare records (n=3,997). RESULTS: Nearly half of patients admitted with an intestinal emergency received nonoperative management (43.7%). Of those who underwent surgery, 63.7% were started laparoscopically. The non-operative group had a shorter hospital stay (median: 5.4 days vs 8.2 days [started laparoscopically] or 16.8 days [started open]) and fewer unintended intensive care admissions than the surgical group (2.4% vs 8.7% [started laparoscopically] 21.1% [started open]). However, 30-day mortality for non-operative treatment was double that for surgery (22.4% vs 10.1%). The 30-day mortality rate was found to be even higher for non-operative management (50.3%) compared with surgery (19.5%) in a sub-analysis of patients with admission National Early Warning Score ≥4 (n=683). CONCLUSION: The proportion of patients with intestinal emergencies who do not have surgery is greater than expected, and it appears that many respond well to non-operative treatment. However, 30-day mortality for non-operative management was high, and the low number of admissions to intensive care suggests that major invasive treatment was not appropriate for most in this group.

Novel predictors of mortality in emergency bowel surgery: a single-centre cohort study.

Pre-operative risk stratification is a key part of the care pathway for emergency bowel surgery, as it facilitates the identification of high-risk patients. Several novel risk scores have recently been published that are designed to identify patients who are frail or significantly unwell. They can also be calculated pre-operatively from routinely collected clinical data. This study aimed to investigate the ability of these scores to predict 30-day mortality after emergency bowel surgery. A single centre cohort study was performed using our local data from the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit database. Further data were extracted from electronic hospital records (n = 1508). The National Early Warning Score, Laboratory Decision Tree Early Warning Score and Hospital Frailty Risk Score were then calculated. The most abnormal National or Laboratory Decision Tree Early Warning Score in the 24 or 72 h before surgery was used in analysis. Individual scores were reasonable predictors of mortality (c-statistic 0.699-0.740) but all were poorly calibrated. A National Early Warning Score ≥ 4 was associated with a high overall mortality rate (> 10%). A logistic regression model was developed using age, National Early Warning Score, Laboratory Decision Tree Early Warning Score and Hospital Frailty Risk Score as predictor variables, and its performance compared with other established risk models. The model demonstrated good discrimination and calibration (c-statistic 0.827) but was marginally outperformed by the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit score (c-statistic 0.861). All other models compared performed less well (c-statistics 0.734-0.808). Pre-operative patient vital signs, blood tests and markers of frailty can be used to accurately predict the risk of 30-day mortality after emergency bowel surgery.

Routine ultrasound for suspected appendicitis in children: a single-centre retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Appendicitis continues to be a common surgical emergency in children, but its diagnosis remains challenging. Use of diagnostic imaging to confirm appendicitis has gained popularity in some countries because it is associated with lower negative appendicectomy rates. This study reports our centre's experience of adopting routine ultrasound for the investigation of suspected appendicitis in children. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective cohort study was performed investigating all children aged 5-16 years admitted under surgeons with suspected appendicitis, in January-December 2019. Primary outcomes were the rate of ultrasound use, its accuracy in diagnosing/excluding appendicitis and negative appendicectomy rate. Other outcomes were treatment received, length of stay and complications. RESULTS: The majority of the 193 children with suspected appendicitis underwent a diagnostic ultrasound (87.5%). Ultrasound was highly sensitive (0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-0.96) and specific (1.0, 95% CI 0.96-1.0) for appendicitis in this study. Negative appendicectomy rate was extremely low (1.4%). Laparoscopic appendicectomy was the preferred management (75/86), with one case started open and no conversions to open. A minority of cases of simple appendicitis (10/86) were treated primarily with antibiotics. Rates of complex appendicitis and postoperative complications were similar to other studies. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound can be highly sensitive and specific for appendicitis. Its routine use to confirm appendicitis prior to surgery is associated with a low negative appendicectomy rate. This is a major change in practice for a general surgical unit in the United Kingdom.

The impact of laparoscopy on emergency surgery for adhesional small bowel obstruction: prospective single centre cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic adhesiolysis is increasingly being used to treat adhesional small bowel obstruction (ASBO) as it has been associated with reduced postoperative length of stay (LOS) and faster recovery. However, concerns regarding limited working space, iatrogenic bowel injury and failure to relieve the obstruction have limited its uptake. This study reports our centre's experience of adopting laparoscopy as the standard operative approach. METHODS: A single-centre prospective cohort study was performed incorporating local data from the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit Database; January 2015 to December 2019. All patients undergoing surgery for ASBO were included. Patient demographic, operative and inhospital outcomes data were compared between different surgical approaches. Linear regression analysis was performed for LOS. RESULTS: A total of 299 cases were identified. Overall, 76.3% of cases were started laparoscopically and 52.2% were completed successfully. Patients treated laparoscopically had lower Portsmouth - Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enuMeration of Mortality and morbidity (P-POSSUM) predicted mortality (median 2.1 (interquartile range (IQR) 1.3-5.0) vs 5.7 (IQR 2.0-12.4), p=<0.001) and shorter postoperative LOS compared with open (median 4.2 days (IQR 2.5-8.2) vs 11.3 days (IQR 7.3-16.6), p=0.000). Inhospital mortality was lower in the laparoscopic group (2 vs 7 deaths, p=<0.001). In regression analysis, laparoscopic surgery was found to have the strongest association with postoperative LOS (ß -8.51 (-13.87 to -3.16) p=0.002) compared with open surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy is a safe and feasible approach for adhesiolysis in the majority of patients with ASBO. It is associated with reduced LOS with no impact on complications or mortality.