From Consensus to Validation: A Multicenter Study for Design and Development of a Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Hydrogel Simulation Platform.

Background: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) has emerged as a new gold standard for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia; however, its steep learning curve hinders generalization of this technique. Therefore, there is a need for a benchtop HoLEP simulator to reduce this learning curve and provide training. We have developed a nonbiohazardous HoLEP simulator using modern education theory and validated it in a multicenter study. Materials and Methods: Six experts established key components for a HoLEP simulator through a Delphi consensus over three rounds including 250 questions. After consensus, a digital design was created and approved by experts, then used to fabricate a physical prototype using three-dimensional printing and hydrogel molding. After a process of iterative prototype testing, experts completed a survey assessing the simulator with a 5-point Likert scale for final approval. The approved model was validated with 56 expert and novice participants at seven institutions using subjective and objective performance metrics. Results: Consensus was reached on 85 of 250 questions, and experts found the physical model to adequately replicate 82.5% of required features. Objective metrics were statistically significant (p < 0.0001) when comparing experts and novices for enucleation time (37.4 ± 8.2 vs 16.7 ± 6.8 minutes), adenoma weight (79.6 ± 20.4 vs 36.2 ± 9.9 g), and complications (6 vs 22), respectively. Conclusion: We have effectively completed a multicenter study to develop and validate a nonbiohazardous benchtop simulator for HoLEP through modern education theory. A training curriculum including this simulator is currently under development.

Characterizing the biofilm of artificial urinary sphincters (AUS).

Background: There is a paucity of data regarding the bacterial colonization on artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) devices following revision surgery. We aim to evaluate the microbial compositions of explanted AUS devices identified on standard culture at our institution. Methods: Twenty-three AUS devices explanted were included in this study. During revision surgery, aerobic and anaerobic culture swabs are taken from the implant, capsule, fluid surrounding the device, and biofilm, if present. Culture specimens are sent to the hospital laboratory for routine culture evaluation immediately upon case completion. Differences in number of microorganism species detected across samples (richness) against demographic variables were determined through backwards selection of all variables using analysis of variance (ANOVA). We assessed the prevalence (how many times each species occurred) of microbial culture species. Statistical analyses were performed using the statistical package in R (version 4.2.1). Results: Cultures reported positive results in 20 (87%) cases. Coagulase-negative staphylococci were the most commonly identified bacteria among explanted AUS devices (n=16, 80%). Among two of the four infected/eroded implants, more virulent organisms such as Escherichia coli and fungal species such as Candida albicans were identified. The mean number of species identified amongst culture positive devices was 2.15±0.49. The number of unique bacteria identified per sample was not significantly associated with demographic variables including race, ethnicity, age at revision, smoking history, duration of implantation, etiology for explantation, and concomitant medical comorbidities. Conclusions: The majority of AUS devices removed for non-infectious reasons harbor organisms on traditional culture at the time of explantation. The most commonly identified bacteria in this setting is coagulase-negative staphylococci, which may be a result of bacterial colonization introduced at the time of implant. Conversely, infected implants may harbor microorganisms with higher virulence including fungal elements. Bacterial colonization or biofilm formation on implants may not necessarily equate to clinically infected devices. Future studies with more sophisticated technology, such as next-generation sequencing or extended cultures, may evaluate microbial compositions of biofilm at a more granular level to understand its role in device infections.

Water Vapor Thermal Therapy: Minimally Invasive Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Water vapor thermal therapy is a minimally invasive treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) that uses steam to ablate prostatic tissue to relieve lower urinary tract symptoms associated with BPH. It is an option for 30 to 80 g prostates in well-selected patients, and may avoid sexual side effects seen in other more invasive BPH treatments. It is a simple procedure with a short learning curve that can be performed in-office under local and oral anesthesia. Water vapor therapy should be offered to ideal candidates along with information regarding its risks, benefits, and outcomes.

In-situ interfacial compatibilization via edge-sulfurated few layer graphene during the formation of crosslinked graphene-rubber nanocomposites.

Herein, we report various physico-chemical approaches to probe the nature of the interface between few layers graphene (FLG) and carboxylated nitrile rubber (XNBR) nanocomposites prepared through efficient blending of XNBR latex with an aqueous dispersion of FLG. The extent of physical interaction between FLG and XNBR was investigated using Lorentz-Park and Cunneen-Russell models. The chemical interface between FLG and sulfur crosslinked XNBR was studied using model reactions between sulfur and graphene in presence of zinc 2-mercaptobenzothiazole (ZMBT). We propose that an edge sulfurated FLG is formed, which could chemically bond with XNBR during the vulcanization process. Density Functional Theory (DFT) was employed to unravel the mechanistic insights, which support this hypothesis and suggest a kinetically favorable sulfuration of both XNBR and FLG. The formation of a chemical bond between edge-FLG and XNBR through the proposed intermediacy of sulfurated FLG leads to the observed improvement in mechanical properties of the nanocomposites.

Conversion of Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate to Open Prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and predictive factors for conversion to an open procedure during Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate (HoLEP). METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on files of all patients that underwent HoLEP at our institution between 2013 and 2020. Data collected included demographics, pre-operative estimated prostate size, intraoperative data, pathologic data, and functional baseline. A univariate and multivariate comparison between the pre-operative data of converted and un-converted cases was conducted. RESULTS: Among a total of 807 HoLEP procedure performed during the above period, 20 cases were converted to open procedures (2.4%). Median pre-operative estimated prostate size in cases of conversion was 228ml compared to 95ml for unconverted cases (P <.001). The reasons for conversion were anatomical in 8 cases (40%), bleeding that was difficult to control endoscopically in 4 cases (20%), expected procedure to be too long due to large prostate size in 6 cases (30%), one case of morcellation technical malfunction, and one case with very large bladder stones not suitable for endoscopic treatment. Prostate size was the only factor that was found to be associated with conversion in univariate and multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The risk of conversion of HoLEP to open procedures is size-dependent. The risk for conversion to open prostatectomy/cystotomy must be communicated to patients who choose HoLEP to improve the informed consent process and provide the highest quality of patient care and transparency. Open prostatectomy/cystotomy should be a part of the armamentarium of every HoLEP surgeon operating on large prostates.

Urinary undiversion by conversion of the incontinent ileovesicostomy to augmentation ileocystoplasty in spinal cord injured patients.

Context: Spinal cord injury (SCI) patients with neurogenic bladder and the inability to self-catheterize may require incontinent diversion to provide low-pressure drainage while avoiding the use of indwelling catheters. We demonstrate that in patients with significant functional improvement, the ileovesicostomy can be a reversible form of diversion, with simultaneous bladder augmentation using the same segment of ileum utilized for the ileovesicostomy. Multidisciplinary management should be utilized to assure mastery of intermittent catheterization before urinary undiversion. This technique allows for transition to a regimen of intermittent self-catheterization with excellent functional and urodynamic outcomes.Design: Case Series.Setting: Tertiary care hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Participants: Three individuals with an SCI.Interventions: Conversion of bladder management from an incontinent ileovesicostomy to an augmentation ileocystoplasty, with intermittent catheterization.Outcome Measures: Ability to regain urinary continence with preservation of renal function as determined by serum creatinine and renal ultrasound.Results: Three SCI patients who had an incontinent ileovesicostomy developed sufficient functional improvement to intermittently self-catheterize reliably and underwent conversion of ileovesicostomy to ileocystoplasty. For each, the ileovesicostomy channel was taken down and detubularized, then used to create an ileal patch for augmentation ileocystoplasty. Intermittent catheterization was then used for periodic bladder drainage. All achieved large capacity, low-pressure bladders with complete continence and stable creatinine.Conclusion: In motivated SCI patients, it is possible to regain continence by converting the ileovesicostomy into augmentation ileocystoplasty, avoiding the disadvantages of a urostomy. A multidisciplinary collaborative approach facilitates the optimal rehabilitation of SCI individuals.

Case report: Bilateral emphysematous pyelonephritis with pneumatosis intestinalis.

Emphysematous pyelonephritis is a severe and rare gas producing infection in the renal parenchyma or collecting system. Diabetes mellitus is an established risk factor. Treatment options include antibiotics, minimally invasive management such as percutaneous drainage, or nephrectomy. This case report describes a 40-year-old female with newly diagnosed diabetes and cirrhosis who presented with left sided emphysematous pyelonephritis. After initial management with intravenous antibiotics and drainage of the collecting system, this patient's clinical condition worsened, and subsequent repeat imaging revealed bilateral emphysematous pyelonephritis as well as pneumatosis intestinalis.

Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Following Previous Prostatic Urethral Lift.

Purpose: To determine the feasibility and operative challenges of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in patients with previous prostatic urethral lift (PUL) procedure. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was performed on files of all patients that underwent HoLEP at our institution between 2013 and 2021. Seven hundred ninety-three consecutive HoLEP cases were identified. Data collected included demographics, the time elapsed since previous PUL, number of PUL implants, preoperative prostate size, intraoperative complications/challenges, and postoperative follow-up. Results: Twenty-two men with a mean preoperative prostate size of 90 g (range 32-180 g) underwent HoLEP at a median of 14.4 months (range 2.8-48) after PUL. 63.6% (14/22) of cases involved prostates with preoperative sizes ≥80 g. Three cases involved PUL implant jamming of morcellator blades, which required replacing the blades. Fifteen cases (68.2%) required using a grasper or a basket device to remove free PUL implants or adenoma parts with PUL implants embedded in them. One patient needed a second procedure to remove a relatively large piece of calcified adenoma. Nonpost-PUL HoLEP was more time efficient than post-PUL HoLEP (0.77 vs 0.55 mL/minute respectively). There was no difference in functional outcome between post-PUL and nonpost-PUL HoLEP cases. Conclusions: While HoLEP can be performed safely and effectively in the PUL failure population, unique challenges arise. PUL implants may distort prostate anatomy, jam morcellator blades, and may be encountered in aberrant locations. Patients with borderline indications for PUL should be aware of the possibility of performing HoLEP in case of PUL failure.

Incidental prostate cancer at holmium laser enucleation of prostate.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to describe the current incidence, risk factors, and management of incidental diagnosis of prostate cancer (iPCa) among patients who underwent holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP) and have no history of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who underwent HoLEP in our institution between 2013-2020. All patients were offered a PSA screening according to the latest guidelines. We gathered demographic data, perioperative information, and pathologic evaluation. For patients diagnosed with iPCa, we gathered work up, management, and oncologic outcome. We then conducted a univariate and multivariate analysis to find predictive factors for the diagnosis of incidental cancer. RESULTS: The cohort included 777 patients, among them 55 (7.1%) patients with iPCa. The median age of the entire cohort was 71 years, median PSA was 3.9 mg/dL, and median prostate volume of 96 mL. Of those with iPCa, 34 (61.8%) patients had grade-group (GG) 1. Larger prostate size was found to be protective against iPCa, with a 13% risk reduction for every increment of 10 mL in prostate size. For prostates smaller than 100 mL, iPCa rate was 12.6%. Older age and smaller prostate volume were found to predict GG2-and-above iPCa. CONCLUSIONS: iPCa at HoLEP is rare, with clinically significant cancer being even rarer. Smaller preoperative prostate was found to be a predictive factor for iPCa. Our results provide an insight into the current risk and predictive factors to iPCa and can be used to guide surgeons and patients in the preoperative recommendations and informed consent process.

UroLift and Rezum: minimally invasive surgical therapies for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

INTRODUCTION Minimally invasive surgical therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are popular alternatives to the gold standard transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). These procedures have fewer discernable side effects on urinary and sexual function, when compared to TURP, making it a desirable option for many patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We provide an updated literature review on the current landscape of minimally invasive modalities, specifically the prostatic urethral lift (UroLift) and water vapor thermal therapy (Rezum), for the surgical treatment of BPH. RESULTS: Both UroLift and Rezum have demonstrated excellent efficacy and durability in relieving lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in the BPH patient. When compared to TURP, these minimally invasive therapies can be performed in an outpatient setting, with decreased hospitalization, operative and catheterization times, which minimizes overall healthcare costs. Moreover, these therapies have no discernable adverse effects on sexual function (both ejaculatory and erectile) or sexual satisfaction, making it a desirable option for many patients. CONCLUSIONS: Both the UroLift and Rezum are office-based, minimally invasive techniques capable of providing durable, and significant relief of LUTS secondary to BPH. In select patients, they demonstrate comparable efficacy to TURP with the added advantage of preserving sexual function and minimizing patient morbidity and healthcare cost. An individualized, shared decision-making approach is essential in selecting the optimal treatment option for each patient.

HoLEP: the new gold standard for surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

INTRODUCTION Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) was considered the "gold standard" surgical treatment for medication-refractory benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) for decades. With the desire to reduce hospital stay, complications, and cost, less invasive procedures gained usage in the 1990's. With the advent of a soft tissue morcellator, holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) was introduced as an efficacious alternative to TURP and due to its advantageous side effect profile compared to TURP, has grown in popularity ever since. HoLEP has become a size-independent guideline endorsed procedure of choice for the surgical treatment of BPH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We provide a review on the evolution of HoLEP as a gold standard compared to the historical reference procedures for BPH, and provide a review of emerging laser technologies. RESULTS: A growing body of literature has shown HoLEP to be a safe and efficient procedure for the treatment of BPH for all prostate sizes. Long term studies have proven the durability of HoLEP, as a first line surgical therapy for BPH. CONCLUSIONS: HoLEP is a proven modality for the surgical treatment of BPH. It can be performed on patients with high risk for postoperative bleeding, or after previous prostate reducing procedures. HoLEP is the only procedure that is AUA guideline-endorsed for all prostate sizes for the surgical treatment of BPH. Given these considerations, HoLEP has become the new gold-standard for the surgical treatment of BPH.

HoLEP techniques - lessons learned.

INTRODUCTION Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) with mechanical tissue morcellation is one of the most effective surgical modalities for the treatment of symptomatic BPH. HoLEP has many advantages over the historical gold standards open prostatectomy (OP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). HoLEP is an AUA guideline endorsed surgical treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), independent of prostate size. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We provide a detailed presentation of our experience in performing HoLEP in a teaching university hospital, with an emphasis on the surgical technique and its evolution. RESULTS: HoLEP is an efficient and durable procedure, although it is very equipment sensitive and has a relatively long learning curve. HoLEP can be performed by several surgical approaches that can be used according to the specific anatomy of the patient. Advances in laser technology, endoscopic morcellators, and surgical technique has improved the HoLEP procedure in efficiency, hemostasis, and safety. CONCLUSIONS: The HoLEP procedure, first introduced in 1998, has undergone significant changes including advancements in laser technology, endoscopic morcellation devices, and modifications to the surgical technique. These advancements have made HoLEP a more effective, more efficient, easier to perform, and easier to learn technique for the surgical management of BPH. The modified 2-lobe and the en-bloc techniques are a natural progression from the classic 3-lobe technique.

Aquablation of the prostate: a review and update.

INTRODUCTION Historically, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) was considered the endoscopic "gold standard" surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Over the years, several other endoscopic procedures emerged, including the size-independent holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). In an effort to reduce the cost and morbidity associated with traditional endoscopic techniques, novel minimally invasive techniques have been developed, one of which is Aquablation. This review is an update of a previously published review article looking at the most recently published available data on Aquablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This review article covers the technical aspects of Aquablation and provides an update on the recently published literature regarding Aquablation compared to TURP and HoLEP. RESULTS: At up to 3 years of follow up, Aquablation performs favorably when compared to TURP in terms of alleviation of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and preservation of sexual function compared to TURP. Safety profile was similar between Aquablation and TURP. CONCLUSIONS: Aquablation is a safe and effective method of treating LUTS associated with BPH. At up to 3 years of follow up, it has shown a durable with efficacy similar to TURP.

Management of neurogenic detrusor overactivity.

INTRODUCTION Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) refers to altered function of the urinary bladder, bladder outlet, and external urinary sphincter related to a confirmed neurologic disorder. Neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) is a subset of NLUTD that frequently results in incontinence and may be associated with elevated bladder storage and voiding pressures resulting in upper urinary tract damage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This article provides an update on the evaluation and management of patients with NDO. Basic bladder physiology as well as classification of NLUTD, initial urologic evaluation, and management options ranging from the most conservative to surgical interventions will be covered. RESULTS: NDO may be managed by conservative, pharmacologic, and surgical methods. Untreated or inadequately managed NDO may result in significant urologic morbidity and mortality, making careful evaluation and lifelong management necessary to optimize quality of life and prevent secondary complications. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NDO should have life-long urologic surveillance and follow up. The extent of regular evaluation and testing should be based on the principal of risk stratification. Treatment for NDO should be considered not only for clinical symptoms such as incontinence, but also aimed at preserving renal function.

Management of urinary incontinence following treatment of prostate disease.

INTRODUCTION Men who undergo treatment for prostate disease are at increased risk of urinary incontinence (UI). UI has a known negative impact on patient quality of life. Once a thorough evaluation has been performed, there are effective modalities for treatment that can be tailored to the patient. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This review article provides the most recent evidence-based work up and management for men with incontinence after prostate treatment (IPT). Etiology, prophylactic measures, work up, surgical treatments, and patient considerations will be covered. The more recent adjustable balloon device is included in this publication as well as more traditional treatments like the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) and male urethral sling. RESULTS: IPT can result from treatment of either benign or malignant prostate disease whether surgery or radiotherapy are utilized. Stress urinary incontinence (SUI), urge urinary incontinence (UUI), or mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) are all possibilities. SUI after radical prostatectomy (RP) is the most common form of IPT. Patient education and implementation of pelvic therapy as well as modern surgical techniques have greatly improved continence results. AUS remains the gold standard of SUI treatment with the broadest category of patient eligibility. Patients experiencing UUI should be treated according to the overactive bladder guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: For men with IPT, it is crucial to first take a thorough patient history and delineate the exact nature of UI symptoms which will determine the options for management. Patient factors and preferences must also be taken into consideration when ultimately choosing the appropriate intervention.

Next-generation DNA sequencing for infected genitourinary implants: How I do it.

Infection of artificial urinary sphincters or inflatable penile prostheses is one of the most devastating complications after prosthetic surgery and can have a significant impact on a quality of life. Patients undergoing revision surgery with or without device replacement may have increased risk for infection when compared to initial primary surgery. As such, surgeons may utilize traditional culture results to direct antimicrobial therapy for these patients. Unfortunately, culture results can be inconclusive in up to one-third of the time even in the setting of active device infection. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of DNA is an emerging technology capable of sequencing entire bacterial genomes and has the potential to identify microbial composition in explanted devices. Herein, we describe our institutional experience on NGS utilization in patients with genitourinary prostheses. We also highlight our methods and techniques to inform readers on the potential practices that can enhance the utility and diagnostic yield of this new and upcoming technology.

Peyronie's disease: what do we know and how do we treat it?

INTRODUCTION: Peyronie's disease is a common, benign condition characterized by an acquired penile abnormality due to fibrosis of the tunica albuginea. This may lead to penile curvature, deformity, discomfort, pain, and erectile dysfunction, resulting in emotional and psychosocial effects on patients. Therefore, it is important for urologists to thoroughly evaluate the extent of the patient's bother and discuss treatment goals, therapeutic options, and expectations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We provide a review of the current landscape for the diagnosis, management, and treatment of Peyronie's disease, including oral, topical, intralesional, external energy, and surgical therapies. RESULTS: The hallmark of managing Peyronie's disease is attentive patient counseling. Patients may be hesitant to discuss their symptoms unless inquired directly and may not be aware that treatments exist. It is not uncommon for Peyronie's disease to be diagnosed incidentally during a routine or unrelated healthcare visit, with reported rates of incidental diagnosis as high as 16%. Treatment options are stratified by disease phase which is defined by whether symptoms (e.g. penile deformity and discomfort) are actively changing or have stabilized. Conservative therapy is the most common recommendation during the active phase with more invasive treatments reserved for the passive phase. Conservative therapy may include oral or topical medication, intralesional injection, and external energy therapy. These treatments may also have a role in improving symptoms during the passive phase prior to undergoing more definitive surgical treatment. Surgical interventions include tunical plication, plaque incision or excision with or without grafting, and penile prosthesis implantation. Despite the variety of treatment options available to patients, each has a distinct efficacy and adverse effect profile, warranting thorough discussion to meet patients' goals and manage expectations. CONCLUSION: Peyronie's disease is a common condition that is underdiagnosed and undertreated. Patients with Peyronie's disease will benefit from a comprehensive evaluation and in-depth counseling so that they may become familiar with the natural disease course and have appropriate expectations of each treatment option.