Noise levels and annoyance among staff in a tertiary care hospital in North India: A cross-sectional study.

Hospital noise has remained a low priority problem in India. An area of not less than 100 meters around a hospital is considered a silence zone, with guidelines restricting noise levels at 50dBA during daytime and 40dBA during the night. World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines also stipulate an average of 30dBA and a maximum of 40dbA. Annoyance is a known effect of noise exposure. However, very few studies have attempted to explore the hospital soundscape and the annoyance among staff related to it. Noise data was collected from 30 sites, using a Digital Integrating Sound Level Meter, LutronSL-4035SD (ISO-9001,CE,IEC1010) meeting IEC61672 standards. Stratified random sampling of staff was done on basis of noise exposure. A pre-designed, semi-structured questionnaire collected information on sociodemographic and work profile. Annoyance was defined as a stress reaction to environmental noise and was measured using standardized general purpose noise reaction questionnaire (ISO-TS/15666). Data was analyzed in SPSS. The mean LAeq 24 h across all the sites was 69.5dBA (SD ±5.8dBA) for the weekdays and 66.2dBA (SD ±4.6dBA) for the weekends. Noise levels were higher during the day than during the night, and higher during the weekdays as compared to the weekends. 332(73.8%) study participants were found to be annoyed due to hospital noise. Annoyance among study participants was significantly associated with LAeq 24 h > 80 dBA during the weekdays [aOR = 5.08 (1.17-22.06)] and LAeq 24 h of 65-80 dBA during the weekends [aOR = 2.71 (1.46-5.01)]. Noise levels in the hospital far exceeded WHO and Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) guidelines recommended for indoor hospital noise, as well as the national guidelines for sensitive zones. Almost three-fourth of the study participants were annoyed due to hospital noise. Significant association was found between annoyance among staff and higher noise levels of their workplace. Similar studies need to be conducted in hospitals across India to generate evidence on the current situtation and identify solutions.

Satisfaction among patients seeking services at an urban health training center during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Delhi, India.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has posed challenges to the provision of routine health services. As we continue providing non-COVID services, it is essential that the community perceives them to be satisfactory and safe to ensure optimum uptake. The objective of the study was to determine the satisfaction and perceived safety among patients availing services at an urban health training center (UHTC) during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Delhi. Methods: UHTC, Aliganj caters to a population of over 6000, in an urbanized village of South Delhi. A pre-designed, semi-structured questionnaire incorporating the North Indian OPD Satisfaction Scale along with questions on sociodemographic details and perception of safety was used. Systematic random sampling was used to select the patients from the study population which included those above 18 years attending UHTC from November-December 2020. Exit interviews were done by a trained independent interviewer to reduce bias. Data were analyzed in SPSS using Chi-square and Fisher's Exact tests. Results: Out of 218 patients, 161 (73.7%) were satisfied, 174 (79.8%) felt safe to visit UHTC during the pandemic and 143 (65.6%) felt both satisfied and safe. Patients were dissatisfied with screening for COVID-19 (29.5%), amenities (47.1%), cleanliness (51.8%), and waiting and registration (62.9%). Conclusion: The majority of patients were satisfied and found the UHTC services safe. A large proportion of patients found location, doctor-patient interaction, and COVID-appropriate behavior at the center to be satisfactory, but there was scope to improve waiting and registration, cleanliness, and effectiveness of screening for COVID.

Association of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Multimorbidity Among Older Adults: Insights From the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI), First Wave.

Introduction Population ageing is expected to be accompanied by an increase in multi-morbidity, i.e. the co-occurrence of multiple chronic conditions simultaneously. Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a non-malignant disease prevalent in ageing men. Both BPH and multi-morbidity are known to have a significant impact on quality of life. The objective of this study was to determine the association between BPH and multimorbidity among older adults and the elderly population in India. Methods This is an analytical cross-sectional study involving secondary data from the nationally representative Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) Wave I 2017-18. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to study the association between BPH and multimorbidity while accounting for other associated factors. Results Compared to those having no co-morbidities, the odds of having BPH increased with the increasing number of co-morbidities. Those with at least two co-morbidities were twice as likely (aOR=2.19; 95%CI 1.78-2.72), and those with at least four co-morbidities were almost six times as likely (aOR=5.78; 95%CI 2-16.72) to have BPH as compared to those with no co-morbidities. The association was stronger among males >60 years. Conclusion Self-reported benign prostatic hyperplasia was found to be strongly associated with multi-morbidity. The need of the hour is the inclusion of BPH within the framework of a national health programme. Health technology assessment of high-risk screening strategies for BPH may be conducted among patients with multimorbidity. Research into the impact on the quality of life of those affected by both BPH and multimorbidity will help highlight this as a priority problem for decision-makers.

COVID Appropriate Behavior Compliance and Vaccine Hesitancy: Findings From a COVID-19 Health Education Campaign in a Government Tertiary Care Hospital in Delhi, India.

Public health measures remain the best available approach to tackle the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, little is currently known about the compliance and acceptance of these measures by people in India. The Department of Community Medicine at Vardhman Mahavir Medical College (VMMC), and Safdarjung Hospital, a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi, organized a health education campaign for raising awareness on COVID-19 in the hospital premises over a period of 15 d in May 2021. Educational and interactive sessions were conducted by medical residents, interns, and staff. Data on compliance to public health measures were collected and analyzed using SPSS 21. All quantitative variables were descriptively analyzed while qualitative data were narratively analyzed. A total of 84 (12.57%) of those observed were wearing their mask incorrectly. Social distancing was inadequate at 16 sites. Sixty-nine (10.33%) reported to have received single or both doses of vaccine. Common reasons for not getting vaccinated included doubts about vaccine efficacy, eligibility, adverse events, availability, and accessibility. Mask use was universal, but directives on correct protocol of wearing masks needs to be widely circulated. Credible information about vaccine safety, efficacy, availability, and accessibility needs to be available to the community to build confidence in COVID-19 vaccination.