Rare metastasis in a patient with BRAF-mutated rectal cancer: choroidal metastasis - case report and literature review.

Purpose: Colorectal cancers are common and have high mortality, and metastasis is common in follow up. Choroidal metastasis is encountered rarely in rectum cancers, and there is no previous case reported from Turkey. We present our patient who developed choroidal metastasis in his cancer follow-up. Case report: A 74-year-old male patient had undergone operation due to the diagnosis of rectum cancer two years ago, and lung (L) metastasis developed in the 4th month after the adjuvant therapy, but he refused to receive treatment and remained out of follow-up. The patient presented with complaints of decreased vision and light flashes in his eye 21 months after the diagnosis. Management and outcome: Ocular examination revealed a choroidal mass and radiologically choroidal and multiple brain metastases were detected. In our case, whole-brain radiotherapy was administered in the treatment since there were also multiple brain metastases. However, as the ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status of the patient was 3-4 after radiotherapy, systemic treatment was not considered appropriate, and the best supportive care was given. The patient died 2 months after the diagnosis of choroidal metastasis. Conclusion: Currently, there are few suggestions in case reports regarding appropriate treatment approaches for the treatment of rectal cancerchoroidal metastases. Multidisciplinary approaches may be effective for local and systemic treatment. Our case highlights a pathological entity with poor prognosis, which is rarely encountered during the course of rectal adenocarcinomas, and it is the first case of choroidal metastasis reported from our country. However, we believe that it will be important to draw attention to the fact that it is the first reported case of choroid metastasis in a rectal cancer patient with a BRAF V600 E mutation, and patients with BRAF V600 E mutation may develop metastasis to atypical areas due to their aggressive biology.

Comparison of clinicopathological and prognostic features of breast cancer patients younger than 40 years and older than 65 years.

PURPOSE: This study aims to compare the clinicopathological and prognostic features of women aged 40 years and younger and 65 years and older with breast cancer. METHODS: Between January 2011 and December 2021, 136 female cases aged 40 years and younger and 223 female cases aged 65 and over were identified among all cases (1395 cases) registered as breast cancer in the file archives of Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology for the study. A Chi-square (× 2) test was used for categorical variables, and an independent sample t-test for continuous variables. Log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier plots were used for survival analysis. For the statistical evaluation, p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Both overall survival (p < 0.01) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) (p = 0.01) were significantly worse in the older group. BCSS were significantly worse in the older group in Luminal B (HER2-) (p = 0.013) and HR- HER2+ (p = 0.015) subtypes detected. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, only the presence of metastases at diagnosis or follow-up (p < 0.001) and ECOG PS 2-3 status (p = 0.001) were associated with an increased risk of breast cancer-specific death. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, no study directly compares these two groups. In our study, similar to many studies, more aggressive tumor features were found in young patients, but unlike many studies, mortality was found to be significantly higher in older patients. The presence of metastasis and poor ECOG PS were found to be the most influential factors in breast cancer-specific death risk.

Treatment efficacy of ribociclib or palbociclib plus letrozole in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

Background: Ribociclib, palbociclib and abemaciclib are currently approved CDK4/6 inhibitors along with aromatase inhibitors as the first-line standard-of-care for patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Methods: The authors report retrospective real-life data for 600 patients with estrogen receptor- and/or progesterone receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer who were treated with ribociclib and palbociclib in combination with letrozole. Results & conclusion: The results demonstrated that the combination of palbociclib or ribociclib with letrozole has similar progression-free survival and overall survival benefit in real life for the patient group with similar clinical features. Specifically, endocrine sensitivity may be a factor to be considered in the treatment preference.

A New Prognostic Index in Young Breast Cancer Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic role of pan immune-inflammation value (PIV) in young breast cancer patients. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Department of Medical Oncology, Afyon University of Health Sciences, School of Medicine Hospital, Turkey, between January 2010 and December 2020. METHODOLOGY: Patients who were under the age of 40 years at the time of diagnosis were included. Patients' characteristics and disease parameters were recorded. PIV was calculated according to (neutrophil x platelet x monocyte/lymphocyte, i.e. NxPxM/L) formula. Since a cut-off value with max sensitivity and specificity could not be obtained with ROC analysis, the median value of PIV was used as cut-off value. The relationship between PIV and pathological parameters was evaluated by ROC curves. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for OS and the log-rank test was used to evaluate the survival differences between the two groups, according to the optimal cut-off point. RESULTS: Based on the PIV cut-off value of 121 (49.8%) patients were in the low PIV and 122 (50.2%) patients were in the high PIV group. The patients in the high PIV group had a statistically significantly more advanced AJCC stage, and were younger patients. In the survival analysis, it was observed that the survival was worse in the high PIV group but this difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.112). CONCLUSION: Higher PIV levels at the time of diagnosis can be another prognostic marker. However, to clarify the PIV prognostic value, it needs to be validated in larger, multi-centre prospective clinical studies. Key Words: Breast cancer, Pan immune-inflammation value (PIV), Prognosis, Young women.