DIALOR (DIgitAL cOaching for fRailty): protocol for a single-arm mixed-methods feasibility study of a digital health coaching intervention for older people with frailty in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Multidomain interventions in older adults offer the best opportunity to prevent, delay or reverse existing symptoms in the earlier stages of frailty and improve independence but can be costly, and difficult to deliver at scale. However, digital health interventions enable personalised care and empowerment through self-management of long-term conditions, used at any time and when combined with health coaching offer the potential to enhance well-being and facilitate the achievement of health-related goals. We aim to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a digital health platform for long-term disease management combined with health coaching for people living with mild-moderate frailty, targeting self-identified goals-activity, nutrition, mood, enhancing social engagement and well-being. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a non-randomised feasibility, single-group, pretest/post-test study, using qualitative and quantitative methods. The digital health coaching intervention (DIALOR-DIgitAL cOaching for fRailty) has been developed for implementation to older adults, aged 65 years or older with mild to moderate frailty and diagnosis of one or more long-term health conditions in the community. Participants will receive 12 weeks of health coaching and have access to a mobile health platform for 6 months. The primary outcome measure is the acceptability and feasibility of DIALOR along with a range of secondary outcome measures (including frailty, functioning measures, quality of life, social engagement, diet quality and self-reported indicators) collected at baseline and at 6 months. The findings will inform whether a wider effectiveness trial is feasible and if so, how it should be designed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been granted by the Southeast Scotland Research Ethics Committee 02 (reference: 22/SS/0064). Research findings will be disseminated in a range of different ways to engage different audiences, including publishing in open-access peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations, social media, dissemination workshop with patients, carers, and healthcare professionals and on institution websites.

"Beyond Feasibility": A Qualitative Study of Patients, Their Whanau (Family) and Staff Perspectives and Experiences of a Non- Pharmacological Delirium-Prevention Intervention in Two Aotearoa/New Zealand Hospices.

CONTEXT: Delirium is prevalent in the hospice population. Despite causing significant distress to patients and families, delirium is under-recognised. There is a need to better understand delirium prevention and outcomes in this population including people's experiences of delirium-prevention strategies in different cultural contexts. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the "PRESERVE Aotearoa" delirium prevention intervention was feasible and acceptable for Maori (indigenous peoples of Aotearoa/ New Zealand) and non-Maori patients with advanced cancer, their families (called whanau in this paper), and clinical staff. METHODS: A qualitative semistructured interview substudy of a cohort PRESERVE Aotearoa feasibility study codesigned with a Maori partner to ensure inclusion of Maori-centred values. The study was underpinned conceptually by He Awa Whiria (braided rivers)-combining Western and Maori knowledges. Data were analysed using Hopwood and Srivasta's framework. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients and their whanau, 21 clinical staff and five researchers from two stand-alone hospices in the North Island, Aotearoa/New Zealand. Finding showed that, for the most part, participants considered the study interventions feasible and acceptable. Inductive analysis resulted in four themes highlighting the importance to whanau of their participation in the study: benefits of learning about delirium; the affirmation of the caregiver role and whanau-centred care; valuing fundamentals of care; and research as legacy. CONCLUSION: This qualitative study found that it is feasible and acceptable to study multicomponent nonpharmacological delirium-prevention interventions in Aotearoa/New Zealand hospice inpatient units. The study also highlights the value of Maori-centred approaches and whanau involvement in these settings.

A high quality Aotearoa New Zealand dietary pattern adapting a Mediterranean diet for metabolic health: a feasibility study.

AIM: To assess the feasibility of a family-based dietary intervention study using a meal kit home delivery service, in people at risk of cardio-metabolic disease. METHODS: A 12-week dietary intervention feasibility study of adults (termed the index participants) at increased risk of metabolic and cardiovascular disease, enriched for Maori who are indigenous New Zealanders. The study sample also included the household/whanau members living with the index participant. All participants received a 12 week intervention using weekly home delivery of meal kits and groceries consistent with a Mediterranean dietary pattern. Outcomes were the metabolic syndrome severity score (MetSSS); feasibility and acceptability of the intervention; dietary intake; and other clinical and anthropometric measures. RESULTS: There were 29 index participants recruited and in addition, 50 household/whanau members took part in the feasibility study. The mean (SD) household/whanau size was 3.45 (1.4) people, and the mean (SD) number of people in each household/whanau who participated in the study was 2.84 (1.2). The feasibility of intervention to households/whanau was proven in this context. The mean (SD) change in MetSSS was 0.03 (0.33), N = 27, P = 0.69 and there was a statistically significant decrease in body weight of 1.37 kg (95% CI 0.11 to 2.62), p = 0.034. The food deliveries were well received, the dinner kits more so than the grocery items. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to recruit individuals and households/whanau to a family-based dietary intervention. Use of a meal kit home delivery service to provide food which is consistent with the intervention dietary pattern was well received. This feasibility study identified improvements to be made such as nutrition behaviour change support, more variety in food provided, more recipes, and better matching of food quantity to family size. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ANZCTR-ACTRN12621000856819p registered 2.JUN.2021 https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=382021&isReview=true.

He Rourou Whai Painga, an Aotearoa New Zealand dietary pattern for metabolic health and whanau wellbeing: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Background: Cardiometabolic diseases are highly prevalent in Aotearoa New Zealand. Dietary intake is a modifiable risk factor for such diseases and certain dietary patterns, specifically the Mediterranean diet (MedDiet), are associated with improved metabolic health. This study aims to test whether an intervention including a Mediterranean dietary pattern incorporating high quality New Zealand foods (NZMedDiet pattern) and behavior change science can improve the metabolic health of participants and their household/whanau. Methods and analysis: This is a multi-center, three-stage trial with two parallel group superiority randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and a longitudinal cohort study embedded within the trial design. The first RCT (RCT 1) is a comparison of the NZMedDiet pattern compared to usual diet for 12 weeks. The Behavior Change Wheel was used to select and implement strategies to support participant adherence to the NZMedDiet, such as web-based nutrition education on healthy shopping and cooking. The second (RCT 2) compares online social support to no online social support for 12 weeks, administered to participants immediately following RCT 1. The third stage is a longitudinal cohort study where all participants are followed from the beginning of their start of the active intervention for 12 months in total. The primary outcome measure for each stage is the metabolic syndrome severity score (MetSSS). The duration of enrolment is 12-15 months. The total recruitment target is 200 index participants and their household/whanau members who participate with them, and the primary analyses will be intention to treat on index participants. Discussion: The trial will test whether the NZMedDiet pattern and behavior change support improves the cardiometabolic health of people in Aotearoa New Zealand. Clinical trial registration: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Default.aspx, identifier ACTRN12622000906752 and https://www.isrctn.com/, identifier ISRCTN89011056 (Spirit 2).

Systematic Review of Models of Effective Community Specialist Palliative Care Services for Evidence of Improved Patient-Related Outcomes, Equity, Integration, and Health Service Utilization.

Background: The benefits of palliative care programs are well documented. However, the effectiveness of specialist palliative care services is not well established. The previous lack of consensus on criteria for defining and characterizing models of care has restrained direct comparison between these models and limited the evidence base to inform policy makers. A rapid review for studies published up to 2012 was unable to find an effective model. Aim: To identify effective models of community specialist palliative care services. Design: A mixed-method synthesis design reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. Prospero: CRD42020151840. Data sources: Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched in September 2019 for primary research and review articles from 2012 to 2019. Supplementary search was conducted on Google in 2020 for policy documents to identify additional relevant studies. Results: The search yielded 2255 articles; 36 articles satisfied the eligibility criteria and 6 additional articles were identified from other sources. Eight systematic reviews and 34 primary studies were identified: observational studies (n = 24), randomized controlled trials (n = 5), and qualitative studies (n = 5). Community specialist palliative care was found to improve symptom burden/quality of life and to reduce secondary service utilization across cancer and noncancer diagnoses. Much of this evidence relates to face-to-face care in home-based settings with both round-the-clock and episodic care. There were few studies addressing pediatric populations or minority groups. Findings from qualitative studies revealed that care coordination, provision of practical help, after-hours support, and medical crisis management were some of the factors contributing to patients' and caregivers' positive experience. Conclusion: Strong evidence exists for community specialist palliative care to improve quality of life and reducing secondary service utilization. Future research should focus on equity outcomes and the interface between generalist and specialist care.

Protecting school communities from COVID-19 and other infectious disease outbreaks: the urgent need for healthy schools in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Nil.

Community specialist palliative care services in New Zealand: a survey of Aotearoa hospices.

AIM: Community specialist palliative care (SPC) in Aotearoa New Zealand is provided by independent hospices. Substantial increase in demand for palliative care is projected in the next 20 years. We aimed to describe the current landscape of SPC services across Aotearoa whilst incorporating an equity lens. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional survey was undertaken to describe aspects of hospice service and populations served. Survey links were emailed to clinical, or service leads of hospices identified via Hospice New Zealand Website. RESULTS: All eligible hospices (n=32) completed the online survey. All hospices provided care at home, with 94% (n=30) also providing care for patients in aged residential care facilities. All 32 hospices provided symptom management, family and carer support and bereavement care. Six hospices (19%) did not provide afterhours cover. Fifteen (47%) hospices did not have Maori cultural position and median full time equivalent across all hospices for such position was one day per week. Only nine (28%) hospices provided palliative medicine specialist training. CONCLUSION: Areas of inconsistency were highlighted including afterhours access and cultural support for Maori. The capacity of the present system to address current and future shortages of palliative medicine specialist is questioned.

A kia ora, a wave and a smile: an urban marae-led response to COVID-19, a case study in manaakitanga.

BACKGROUND: When COVID-19 emerged, there were well-founded fears that Maori (indigenous peoples of Aotearoa (New Zealand)) would be disproportionately affected, both in terms of morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 itself and through the impact of lock-down measures. A key way in which Kokiri (a Maori health provider) responded was through the establishment of a pataka kai (foodbank) that also provided a gateway to assess need and deliver other support services to whanau (in this case, client). Maori values were integral to this approach, with manaakitanga (kindness or providing care for others) at the heart of Kokiri's actions. We sought to identify how Kokiri operated under the mantle of manaakitanga, during Aotearoa's 2020 nationwide COVID-19 lockdown and to assess the impact of their contributions on Maori whanau. METHODS: We used qualitative methods underpinned by Maori research methodology. Twenty-six whanau interviews and two focus groups were held, one with eight kaimahi (workers) and the other with seven rangatahi (youth) kaimahi. Data was gathered between June and October 2020 (soon after the 2020 lockdown restrictions were lifted), thematically analysed and interpreted using a Maori worldview. RESULTS: Three key themes were identified that aligned to the values framework that forms the practice model that Kokiri kaimahi work within. Kaitiakitanga, whanau and manaakitanga are also long-standing Maori world values. We identified that kaitiakitanga (protecting) and manaakitanga (with kindness) - with whanau at the centre of all decisions and service delivery - worked as a protective mechanism to provide much needed support within the community Kokiri serves. CONCLUSIONS: Maori health providers are well placed to respond effectively in a public-health crisis when resourced appropriately and trusted to deliver. We propose a number of recommendations based on the insights generated from the researchers, kaimahi, and whanau. These are that: Maori be included in pandemic planning and decision-making, Maori-led initiatives and organisations be valued and adequately resourced, and strong communities with strong networks be built during non-crisis times.

iSelf-Help: a co-designed, culturally appropriate, online pain management programme in Aotearoa.

INTRODUCTION: Current best practice recommends group-based pain management programmes for long-term improvements in persistent pain-related disability. However, there are barriers for people to access in-person delivered pain management programmes in Aotearoa. AIMS: To develop a co-designed, culturally responsive, online group-based pain management programme (iSelf-help) for people with persistent pain. METHODS: A modified participatory action research (PAR) framework was used to co-design contents and cultural-appropriateness of iSelf-help. The PAR team included: (1) seven end-users living with persistent pain, who had previously attended an in-person delivered group pain management programme, (2) two pain management clinicians, (3) two health researchers, (4) two digital health experts, and (5) a health literacy expert. Five meetings were held with the PAR group and a Nominal Group Technique was used to rank order the preferred features of content delivery. In parallel, to ensure cultural appropriateness of iSelf-help, three focus groups (n = 15) were held with Maori (the Indigenous population of Aotearoa) living with persistent pain in collaboration with a Maori community health trust. All contents were reviewed by a Maori Health literacy expert and core contents were translated into Te Reo (Maori language). All contents were finalised by iterative discussion among the PAR team and consultation with Maori stakeholders. The preliminary version of iSelf-help was pilot tested with the PAR group participants and Maori community members living with persistent pain and their feedback was included. The iterative co-design process occurred over a period of nine months. RESULTS: The finalised version of iSelf-help included a total of 130 resources organised in to 12 content relevant online modules plus a dedicated welcoming page and an online community forum. Each module included: short videos, animations explaining main concepts, patient stories, written content to accompany visual content, podcasts of relaxation techniques, illustrated texts, and evidence-summaries. A dedicated module of videos demonstrating cardiovascular and strengthening exercises of varying intensity was also included. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first co-created, culturally appropriate, on-line group pain management programme for people with persistent pain, developed in Aotearoa. The next step is to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of iSelf-help compared to in-person delivered pain management programme.

Pain management programmes delivered in a group format are best practice to support people living with persistent non-cancer pain to live well. Some people can find accessing these programmes hard due to lack of referral, transportation costs and lack of trained health professionals. Further, people from Indigenous and non-Western backgrounds are poorly represented in these programmes despite having a high prevalence of persistent pain. One way of improving access is delivering services via technology. We aimed to co-design an online version of an existing hospital-based pain management programme (iSelf-help) and to ensure cultural appropriateness of the iSelf-help for Maori. Maori are the Indigenous population of Aotearoa (an accepted Maori word to describe New Zealand). We used a modified participatory action research (PAR) framework for our co-design process. This framework actively encouraged people with lived experience of pain and community partners to have a voice in the content design. The PAR team included: (1) seven end-users living with persistent pain, who had previously attended hospital-based pain management programme, (2) two pain management clinicians, (3) two health researchers, (4) two digital health experts, and (5) a health literacy expert. Five meetings were held with the PAR team. We used a Nominal Group Technique, whereby PAR team members ranked their preferences on content design and delivery, until concensus was reached. In parallel, three focus groups (n = 15) were held with Maori living with persistent pain in collaboration with a Maori community health trust. All contents were reviewed by a Maori Health literacy expert and core contents were translated into Te Reo (Maori language). The finalised version of iSelf-help included 130 resources, tested for accessibility, organised in to 12 online modules plus a dedicated welcoming page and an online community forum. Each module included: short videos, animations, patient stories, podcasts of relaxation techniques, illustrated texts, and evidence-summaries. This is the first co-created, culturally appropriate, on-line group pain management programme for people with persistent pain, developed in Aotearoa. We are currently evaluating if iSelf-help is acceptable to users, and clinically and cost effective as compared to the hospital-based pain management programme.

'That house was a home': Qualitative evidence from New Zealand on the connections between rental housing eviction and poor health outcomes.

ISSUE ADDRESSED: Eviction, or a forced move from rental housing, is a common experience for New Zealand renters, yet we know very little about its effects. This research investigated how eviction affects people's lives and health. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 27 people who had experienced eviction. We coded the transcripts and grouped them into themes using template analysis. RESULTS: Participant experienced grief at the loss of the home. Moving out and searching for a new home was highly stressful on participants and on their relationships. After being evicted, people became homeless, often staying with family and friends and lived in poor quality or unaffordable housing. They reported health issues as a result of these circumstances. CONCLUSIONS: Eviction harms health through causing stress, grief and a move to a risky living situation. Increasing the supply of housing and funding wide-ranging support services can help minimise the harm caused by eviction. SO WHAT?: Reducing the incidence and impact of eviction should be a priority for health promotion.

Food, nutrition and cancer: perspectives and experiences of New Zealand cancer survivors.

AIM: This research sought to understand and describe cancer survivors' perspectives and post-diagnosis experiences of food and nutrition, with a particular focus on barriers to healthy eating, health equity, and Maori and Pacific perspectives. METHOD: Data were collected using semi-structured interviews with cancer survivors from three different ethnic groups (Maori, Pacific Peoples, and New Zealand European). Thematic analysis was undertaken to identify both similar and contrasting experiences and perspectives in relation to topics of interest. Data analysis also sought to identify any trends indicating differences between ethnic groups. RESULTS: Limited awareness of the role nutrition has in cancer recovery or prevention, combined with little or no access to nutrition advice/support, meant that healthy dietary change was not a focus for some cancer survivors in this study, whereas others invested considerable time and money accessing nutrition information and support outside of cancer care services. Financial limitations (eg, cost of healthy food and low income) and lack of practical support were also important barriers to post-diagnosis healthy eating. CONCLUSION: There is a need for more widely available cancer-specific nutrition advice and support in New Zealand. Interventions to address financial barriers and increase access to cancer-related nutrition advice and support have the potential to improve cancer outcomes and reduce inequities in cancer outcomes.

Are we just dishing out pills constantly to mask their pain? Kaiawhina Maori health workers' perspectives on pain management for Maori.

AIM: To explore kaiawhina (Maori community health workers) perspectives on supporting whanau Maori with chronic pain, and to understand their views on the use of online resources for pain management. METHOD: A Maori-centred, qualitative design using focus groups as the primary data collection method. Analysis using the general inductive approach. RESULTS: Thirteen kaiawhina working in the Greater Wellington region took part in the focus groups. Four key themes were identified: (1) treatment of chronic pain in primary health relies exclusively on medication, (2) health literacy approaches to pain management are urgently required, (3) Maori have significant unmet need for culturally responsive pain management, and (4) the availability of, and referral practices to, specialist pain services are inadequate for Maori communities. CONCLUSION: Current chronic pain management was predominantly biomedical, and educational strategies lack health literacy approaches. Primary health services exclude traditional Maori methods of treating chronic pain and do not focus on whanau wellbeing. The lack of referral for Maori to specialist services highlights the existing health inequities for Maori. Developing new initiatives (both in-person and online) to address chronic pain management for Maori must be Maori-led and co-designed with whanau to result in holistic solutions for Maori.

Disparities in post-operative mortality between Maori and non-Indigenous ethnic groups in New Zealand.

AIM: To describe disparities in post-operative mortality experienced by Indigenous Maori compared to non-Indigenous New Zealanders. METHODS: We completed a national study of all those undergoing a surgical procedure between 2005 and 2017 in New Zealand. We examined 30-day and 90-day post-operative mortality for all surgical specialties and by common procedures. We compared age-standardised rates between ethnic groups (Maori, Pacific, Asian, European, MELAA/Other) and calculated hazard ratios (HRs) using Cox proportional hazards regression modelling adjusted for age, sex, deprivation, rurality, comorbidity, ASA score, anaesthetic type, procedure risk and procedure specialty. RESULTS: From nearly 3.9 million surgical procedures (876,976 acute, 2,990,726 elective/waiting list), we observed ethnic disparities in post-operative mortality across procedures, with the largest disparities occurring between Maori and Europeans. Maori had higher rates of 30- and 90-day post-operative mortality across most broad procedure categories, with the disparity between Maori and Europeans strongest for elective/waiting list procedures (eg, elective/waiting list musculoskeletal procedures, 30-day mortality: adj. HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.56-2.39). CONCLUSIONS: The disparities we observed are likely driven by a combination of healthcare system, process and clinical team factors, and we have presented the key mechanisms within these factors.

Life during lockdown: a qualitative study of low-income New Zealanders' experience during the COVID-19 pandemic.

AIM: This research explores the experience of low-income New Zealanders during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown and their advice to the Government about addressing future pandemics. New Zealand had a rapid and effective lockdown that meant the virtual elimination of community transmission. METHOD: Twenty-seven semi-structured interviews were undertaken with low-income people in June-July 2020 immediately after lockdown was lifted. RESULTS: Life during lockdown was challenging for study participants. They were fearful of the virus and experienced mental distress and isolation. Most participants felt safe at home and reported coping financially while still experiencing financial stress. Participants were resourceful and resilient. They coped with lockdown by using technology, self-help techniques and support from others. New Zealand's welfare state ensured participants had access to health services and welfare payments, but there were challenges. Welfare payments did not fully meet participants' needs, and support from charitable organisations was critical. Participants were overwhelmingly positive about the Government's response and advised the Government to take the same approach in the future. This is a particularly reassuring finding from some of the most vulnerable New Zealanders. CONCLUSIONS: An early and hard lockdown, the welfare state, compassion and clearly communicated leadership were keys to a successful lockdown for the low-income people in this study. Research of the experience of low-income people during pandemics is critical to ensuring inequities in pandemic impact are mitigated.

New Zealand COPD Guidelines: Quick Reference Guide.

The purpose of the Asthma and Respiratory Foundation of New Zealand's COPD Guidelines: Quick Reference Guide is to provide simple, practical, evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis, assessment, and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in clinical practice. The intended users are health professionals responsible for delivering acute and chronic COPD care in community and hospital settings, and those responsible for the training of such health professionals.

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of an online-delivered group-based pain management programme in improving pain-related disability for people with persistent pain-protocol for a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial (iSelf-help trial).

INTRODUCTION: Persistent non-cancer pain affects one in five adults and is more common in Maori-the Indigenous population of New Zealand (NZ), adults over 65 years, and people living in areas of high deprivation. Despite the evidence supporting multidisciplinary pain management programmes (PMPs), access to PMPs is poor due to long waiting lists. Although online-delivered PMPs enhance access, none have been codesigned with patients or compared with group-based, in-person PMPs. This non-inferiority trial aims to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a cocreated, culturally appropriate, online-delivered PMP (iSelf-help) compared with in-person PMP in reducing pain-related disability. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Mixed-methods, using a modified participatory action research (PAR) framework, involving three phases. Phase I involved cocreation and cultural appropriateness of iSelf-help by PAR team members. Phase II: The proposed iSelf-help trial is a pragmatic, multicentred, assessor-blinded, two-arm, parallel group, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial. Adults (n=180, age ≥18 years) with persistent non-cancer pain eligible for a PMP will be recruited and block randomised (with equal probabilities) to intervention (iSelf-help) and control groups (in-person PMP). The iSelf-help participants will participate in two 60-minute video-conferencing sessions weekly for 12 weeks with access to cocreated resources via smartphone application and a password-protected website. The control participants will receive group-based, in-person delivered PMP. Primary outcome is pain-related disability assessed via modified Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire at 6 months post intervention. Secondary outcomes include anxiety, depression, stress, pain severity, quality of life, acceptance, self-efficacy, catastrophising and fear avoidance. Data will be collected at baseline, after the 12-week intervention, and at 3 and 6 months post intervention. We will conduct economic analyses and mixed-method process evaluations (Phase IIA). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Health and Disability Ethics Committee approved the study protocol (HDEC18/CEN/162). Phase III involves dissemination of findings guided by the PAR team as outcomes become apparent. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN 12619000771156.

A Mobile- and Web-Based Health Intervention Program for Diabetes and Prediabetes Self-Management (BetaMe/Melon): Process Evaluation Following a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Technology-assisted self-management programs are increasingly recommended to patients with long-term conditions such as diabetes. However, there are a number of personal and external factors that affect patients' abilities to engage with and effectively utilize such programs. A randomized controlled trial of a multi-modal online program for diabetes self-management (BetaMe/Melon) was conducted in a primary care setting, and a process evaluation was completed at the end of the study period. OBJECTIVE: This process evaluation aimed to examine the utilization patterns of BetaMe/Melon, identify which components participants found most (and least) useful, and identify areas of future improvement. METHODS: Process evaluation data were collected for intervention arm participants from 3 sources: (1) the mobile/web platform (to identify key usage patterns over the 16-week core program), (2) an online questionnaire completed during the final study assessment, and (3) interviews conducted with a subset of participants following the study period. Participants were classified as "actively engaged" if any usage data was recorded for the participant (in any week), and patterns were reported by age, gender, ethnicity, and diabetes/prediabetes status. The online questionnaire asked participants about the usefulness of the program and whether they would recommend BetaMe/Melon to others according to a 5-point Likert Scale. Of 23 invited participants, 18 participated in a digitally recorded, semistructured telephone interview. Interview data were thematically analyzed. RESULTS: Out of the 215 participants, 198 (92%) received an initial health coaching session, and 160 (74%) were actively engaged with the program at some point during the 16-week core program. Engagement varied by demographic, with women, younger participants, and ethnic majority populations having higher rates of engagement. Usage steadily declined from 50% at Week 0 to 23% at Week 15. Participants ranked component usefulness as education resources (63.7%), health coaches (59.2%), goal tracking (48.8%), and online peer support (42.1%). Although 53% agreed that the program was easy to use, 64% would recommend the program to others. Interview participants found BetaMe/Melon useful overall, with most identifying beneficial outcomes such as increased knowledge, behavioral changes, and weight loss. Barriers to engagement were program functionality, internet connectivity, incomplete delivery of all program components, and participant motivation. Participants suggested a range of improvements to the BetaMe/Melon program. CONCLUSIONS: The program was generally well received by participants; active engagement was initially high, although it declined steadily. Maintaining participant engagement over time, individualizing programs, and addressing technical barriers are important to maximize potential health benefits from online diabetes self-management programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12617000549325; https://tinyurl.com/y622b27q.

Impact of a comprehensive digital health programme on HbA1c and weight after 12 months for people with diabetes and prediabetes: a randomised controlled trial.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this RCT was to evaluate the effectiveness of a digital health programme (BetaMe/Melon) vs usual care in improving the control of type 2 diabetes and prediabetes in a primary care population. METHODS: We conducted a randomised parallel-group two-arm single-blinded superiority trial in the primary care setting in two regions of New Zealand. Eligible participants were identified through Primary Health Organisations and participating practices. Eligibility criteria were as follows: age 18-75 years, HbA1c 41-70 mmol/mol (5.9-8.6%), not taking insulin, and daily access to the internet. BetaMe/Melon is a 12 month mobile-device and web-based programme with four components: health coaching; evidence-based resources; peer support; and goal tracking. Participants were randomised into the intervention or control arm (1:1 allocation) based upon baseline HbA1c (prediabetes or diabetes range), stratified by practice and ethnicity. Research nurses and the study biostatistician were blind to study arm. Primary outcomes of the study were changes in HbA1c and weight at 12 months, using an intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-nine individuals were recruited between 20 June 2017 and 11 May 2018 (n = 215 intervention arm, n = 214 control arm), most of whom were included in analyses of co-primary outcomes (n = 210/215, 97.7% and n = 213/214, 99.5%). HbA1c levels at 12 months did not differ between study arms: mean difference was -0.9 mmol/mol (95% CI -2.9, 1.1) (-0.1% [95% CI -0.3, 0.1]) for the diabetes group and was 0.0 mmol/mol (95% CI -0.9, 0.9) (0.0% [95% CI -0.1, 0.1]) for the prediabetes group. Weight reduced slightly at 12 months for participants in both study arms, with no difference between arms (mean difference -0.4 kg [95% CI -1.3, 0.5]). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: This study did not demonstrate clinical effectiveness for this particular programme. Given their high costs, technology-assisted self-management programmes need to be individually assessed for their effectiveness in improving clinical outcomes for people with diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.anzctr.org.au ACTRN12617000549325 (universal trial number U1111-1189-9094) FUNDING: This study was funded by the Health Research Council of New Zealand, the Ministry of Health New Zealand and the Healthier Lives National Science Challenge. Graphical abstract.

Wessex Acute Frailty Audit: applying quality improvement methodology to design and implement a regional frailty audit using a collaborative, multiprofessional approach.

INTRODUCTION: An acute hospital stay increases the risk of negative outcomes for those living with frailty. This paper describes the application of quality improvement methodology to design and implement a regional audit to gain an understanding of care provision. METHODS: Small scale tests of change (Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles) were used to design the audit structure and questions. Data collectors met face to face with 2-3 multiprofessional clinicians on 58 wards in 10 hospitals across the region, using an electronic tool to gather data. Outcomes were analysed manually in Excel by extracting from the electronic audit tool. RESULTS: 58 wards across 10 hospitals participated in the audit, which identified three key themes: lack of awareness and frailty training outside medicine for older people specialties, and significant variability of both frailty identification and comprehensive geriatric assessment. CONCLUSION: Combining quality improvement methodology with a collaborative, regional approach to design and implementation of a frailty audit creates a reliable tool ensuring all stakeholders are considering improvement from the outset. The results have facilitated an agreed regional approach on how best to use local resources to improve and standardise frailty care provision. By highlighting areas of good practice and significant gaps in frailty identification, personalised care planning and hospital wide provision of frailty training, this region of the UK will now be able to drive up standards of care.