Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Oncol ; 41(12): 2269-2280, 2023 04 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36623247

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To improve skin cancer screening among survivors of childhood cancer treated with radiotherapy where skin cancers make up 58% of all subsequent neoplasms. Less than 30% of survivors currently complete recommended skin cancer screening. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled comparative effectiveness trial evaluated patient and provider activation (PAE + MD) and patient and provider activation with teledermoscopy (PAE + MD + TD) compared with patient activation alone (PAE), which included print materials, text messaging, and a website on skin cancer risk factors and screening behaviors. Seven hundred twenty-eight participants from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (median age at baseline 44 years), age > 18 years, treated with radiotherapy as children, and without previous history of skin cancer were randomly assigned (1:1:1). Primary outcomes included receiving a physician skin examination at 12 months and conducting a skin self-examination at 18 months after intervention. RESULTS: Rates of physician skin examinations increased significantly from baseline to 12 months in all three intervention groups: PAE, 24%-39%, relative risk [RR], 1.65, 95% CI, 1.32 to 2.08; PAE + MD, 24% to 39%, RR, 1.56, 95% CI, 1.25 to 1.97; PAE + MD + TD, 24% to 46%, RR, 1.89, 95% CI, 1.51 to 2.37. The increase in rates did not differ between groups (P = .49). Similarly, rates of skin self-examinations increased significantly from baseline to 18 months in all three groups: PAE, 29% to 50%, RR, 1.75, 95% CI, 1.42 to 2.16; PAE + MD, 31% to 58%, RR, 1.85, 95% CI, 1.52 to 2.26; PAE + MD + TD, 29% to 58%, RR, 1.95, 95% CI, 1.59 to 2.40, but the increase in rates did not differ between groups (P = .43). CONCLUSION: Although skin cancer screening rates increased more than 1.5-fold in each of the intervention groups, there were no differences between groups. Any of these interventions, if implemented, could improve skin cancer prevention behaviors among childhood cancer survivors.


Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Envio de Mensagens de Texto , Criança , Humanos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/prevenção & controle , Sobreviventes , Fatores de Risco
2.
BMC Cancer ; 21(1): 371, 2021 Apr 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33827477

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nodular (NM) and superficial spreading melanoma (SSM) show different disease trajectories, with more rapid development in NM and fewer opportunities for early detection often resulting in worse outcomes. Our study described the patient-identified early signs of thin NM via comparisons to thin (≤ 2 mm) SSM and thick (> 2 mm) NM. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with NM and SSM patients and analyzed the data using thematic analysis. RESULTS: We enrolled 34 NM and 32 SSM patients. Melanoma early signs uniquely identified by patients with thin NM included white, blue or black coloration, "dot-like" size, fast changes in shape and color observed over 2 weeks, elevation and texture or "puffiness" over 6-12 months, and the sensation that the mole "did not feel right". Early signs reported by both thin NM and thin SSM patients included round or oblong shape, "jagged" border, pink/red, brown/reddish or dark coloration, "elevated like a pimple" or "tiny bump", fast color darkening, diameter growth, and border irregularity, and mole feeling "really itchy". CONCLUSIONS: We found evidence that early signs of NM can be self-identified, which has important implications for the earlier detection of this most aggressive type of melanoma by both health professionals and patients.


Assuntos
Melanoma/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Adulto Jovem , Melanoma Maligno Cutâneo
4.
J Invest Dermatol ; 139(9): 1898-1905.e2, 2019 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30959042

RESUMO

Because rates of skin cancer are greater among adult survivors of childhood cancer who received radiation therapy than among the general population, the National Cancer Institute recommends skin self-examinations and annual physician examination. There has been no comprehensive assessment of survivors' adherence to the skin cancer screening guidelines associated with skin self-examination (SSE) and physician whole-body skin examination (PSE). We conducted a cross-sectional survey of radiation-treated, adult 5-year survivors of childhood cancer, diagnosed between 1970 and 1986, in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort. Multivariate multinomial logit regression investigated the association between demographic, cancer diagnosis, patient activation, cancer treatment characteristics, and skin cancer screening practice. Among 728 survivors, 13.1% reported performing SSE in the prior 2 months plus receiving PSE in the prior 12 months, and 16.4% and 11.0% reported performing only an SSE or a PSE, respectively; 59.5% of survivors reported having had neither. Participants at the highest patient activation score were most likely to report SSE plus PSE compared with neither (adjusted relative risk ratio = 4.16, 95% confidence interval = 1.34-12.85). Most adult survivors of childhood cancer who had radiation therapy do not practice strategies that promote early detection of skin cancer. Interventions designed to activate survivors to increase their participation in screening are needed.


Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Autoexame/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Sobreviventes de Câncer/psicologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Visita a Consultório Médico/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Autoexame/psicologia , Pele/efeitos da radiação , Neoplasias Cutâneas/etiologia , Adulto Jovem
5.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 20(12): 1434-1441, 2018 11 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29145626

RESUMO

Background: Lower rates of smoking cessation are a major reason for the higher prevalence of smoking among socioeconomically disadvantaged adults. Because barriers to quitting are both more numerous and severe, socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers may benefit from more intensive intervention. We sought to determine whether a smoking cessation intervention delivered by public housing residents trained as Tobacco Treatment Advocates (TTAs) could increase utilization of cessation resources and increase abstinence. Methods: We conducted a group-randomized trial among Boston public housing residents who were interested in quitting smoking. Participants at control sites received standard cessation materials and a one-time visit from a TTA who provided basic counseling and information about cessation resources. Participants at intervention sites were eligible for multiple visits by a TTA who employed motivational interviewing, cessation counseling, and navigation to encourage smokers to utilize cessation treatment (Smokers' Quitline and clinic-based programs). Utilization and 7-day and 30-day point prevalence abstinence were assessed at 12 months. Self-reported abstinence was biochemically verified. Results: Intervention participants (n = 121) were more likely than control participants (n = 129) to both utilize treatment programs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.15; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93-4.91) and 7-day and 30-day point prevalence abstinence (aOR: 2.60 (1.72-3.94); 2.98 (1.56-5.68), respectively). Mediation analysis indicated that the higher level of utilization did not explain the intervention effect. Conclusions: An intervention delivered by peer health advocates was able to increase utilization of treatment programs and smoking abstinence among public housing residents. Future studies of similar types of interventions should identify the key mechanisms responsible for success. Implications: In order to narrow the large and growing socioeconomic disparity in smoking rates, more effective cessation interventions are needed for low-income smokers. Individual culturally-relevant coaching provided in smokers' residences may help overcome the heightened barriers to cessation experienced by this group of smokers. In this study among smokers residing in public housing, an intervention delivered by peer health advocates trained in motivational interviewing, basic smoking cessation skills, and client navigation significantly increased abstinence at 12 months. Future research should address whether these findings are replicable in other settings both within and outside of public housing.


Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/métodos , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/tendências , Habitação Popular/tendências , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Fumar Tabaco/tendências , Fumar Tabaco/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Boston/epidemiologia , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/economia , Aconselhamento/economia , Aconselhamento/métodos , Aconselhamento/tendências , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Entrevista Motivacional/economia , Entrevista Motivacional/métodos , Entrevista Motivacional/tendências , Pobreza/economia , Pobreza/tendências , Saúde Pública/economia , Saúde Pública/métodos , Saúde Pública/tendências , Habitação Popular/economia , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/economia , Fatores de Tempo , Fumar Tabaco/economia , Fumar Tabaco/epidemiologia , Dispositivos para o Abandono do Uso de Tabaco/economia , Dispositivos para o Abandono do Uso de Tabaco/tendências , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
6.
Trials ; 16: 109, 2015 Mar 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25873142

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Advances in treatment have increased childhood cancer 5-year survival rates to greater than 80%. However, children previously treated with radiation are at significantly increased risk of developing subsequent neoplasms, the most common of which are skin cancers. The National Cancer Institute and Children's Oncology Group have issued recommendations for survivors treated with radiation to perform monthly skin self-examinations and receive a physician skin examination at least annually, as early detection has demonstrated markedly improved outcomes in the diagnosis and treatment of skin cancers. The goal of the present study is to increase rates of skin self-examinations and clinical skin examinations among adult survivors of childhood cancer treated with radiation. METHODS/DESIGN: This randomized controlled trial uses a 3-group comparative effectiveness design comparing: (1) Patient Activation and Education (PAE) including text messaging, print and web-based tutorials over 12 months; (2) PAE plus physician activation (PAE + MD) adding physician activation/educational materials about survivors' increased skin cancer risk and conducting full-body skin exams; and (3) PAE plus physician activation, plus teledermoscopy (PAE + MD + TD) adding participant receipt of a dermatoscope intended to empower them to photograph suspect moles or lesions for review by the study dermatologist. DISCUSSION: The current study addresses barriers to screening in this population by providing educational and motivational information for both survivors and physicians regarding the value of periodic skin examinations. It also utilizes innovative mobile health technology to encourage and motivate (that is activate) survivors to conduct skin self-examinations, request physician exams, and obtain treatment when worrisome lesions are found. Finally, as a comparative effectiveness trial, this study isolates the effects of adding specific components to the patient activation intervention to test the most effective intervention for enhancing skin examination vigilance among this high-risk group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02046811 ; Registration date: 22 January 2014.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/etiologia , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/etiologia , Sobreviventes/psicologia , Canadá , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade , Dermoscopia/métodos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Humanos , Internet , Motivação , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/diagnóstico , Folhetos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Projetos de Pesquisa , Fatores de Risco , Autoexame , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico , Telepatologia/métodos , Envio de Mensagens de Texto , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA