Preferences and experiences of women with epilepsy regarding sexual and reproductive healthcare provision.

RATIONALE: Women with epilepsy (WWE) have unique disease-specific considerations regarding their sexual and reproductive health (SRH), which impact decision-making around pregnancy and contraception. Understanding their perspectives, preferences, and experiences regarding SRH care contributes to optimizing patient-centered clinical practice. METHODS: We conducted individual semi-structured interviews with WWE aged 18-45 years, exploring their SRH care experiences and preferences. We audio-recorded and transcribed all interviews. Two coders used both inductive and deductive strategies to perform thematic analysis and identify key themes and representative quotes. RESULTS: Twenty WWE completed interviews (median age 23 years; range 18-43 years). Key themes included: 1) SRH counseling from neurologists often did not occur, was limited in scope, or contained misinformation, especially during adolescence and early adulthood. In particular, participants felt that they received poor counseling about contraception, fertility, folic acid, and teratogenic medications, which impacted their reproductive decision-making. 2) WWE report fragmented care between their neurologist and other SRH providers. 3) WWE prefer that their neurologists initiate routine comprehensive discussions about SRH. 4) Conversations about SRH should begin in adolescence and include private confidential discussions between neurologists and WWE. 5) Successful SRH conversations between neurologists and WWE involve detailed information, reassurance, and support for the patient's reproductive goals. CONCLUSION: WWE desire comprehensive, coordinated counseling and care regarding SRH and epilepsy, and often experience suboptimal SRH care. Better understanding of the SRH needs, preferences, and experiences of WWE will help inform interventions to optimize patient-centered SRH counseling and care by healthcare professionals, especially during adolescence.

Maternal morbidity after preterm premature rupture of membranes at <24 weeks' gestation.

BACKGROUND: After preterm premature rupture of membranes at <24 weeks' gestation, pregnant women may choose continuation (expectant management) or termination of pregnancy, via either dilation and evacuation or labor induction. Neonatal outcomes after expectant management are well described. In contrast, limited research addresses maternal outcomes associated with expectant management compared to termination of pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare maternal morbidity after preterm premature rupture of membranes at <24 weeks' gestation in women who choose either expectant management or termination of pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study included women with preterm premature rupture of membranes between 14 0/7 and 23 6/7 weeks' gestation with singleton or twin pregnancies at 3 institutions from 2011 to 2018. We excluded pregnancies complicated by fetal anomalies, rupture of membranes immediately after obstetrical procedures (chorionic villus sampling, amniocentesis, cerclage placement, fetal reduction), spontaneous delivery <24 hours after membrane rupture, and contraindications to expectant management. Our primary outcome was the difference in composite maternal morbidity between women choosing expectant management and women choosing termination of pregnancy. We defined composite maternal morbidity as at least 1 of the following: chorioamnionitis, endometritis, sepsis, unplanned operative procedure after delivery (dilation and curettage, laparoscopy, or laparotomy), injury requiring repair, unplanned hysterectomy, unplanned hysterotomy (excluding cesarean delivery), uterine rupture, hemorrhage of >1000 mL, transfusion, admission to the maternal intensive care unit, acute renal insufficiency, venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, and readmission to the hospital within 6 weeks. We compared the demographic and antenatal characteristics of women choosing expectant management with that of women choosing termination of pregnancy and used logistic regression to quantify the association between initial management decision and composite maternal morbidity. RESULTS: We identified 350 women with pregnancies complicated by preterm premature rupture of membranes at <24 weeks' gestation, and 208 women were eligible for the study. Of the 208 women, 108 (51.9%) chose expectant management as initial management, and 100 (48.1%) chose termination of pregnancy as initial management. Among women selecting termination of pregnancy, 67.0% underwent labor induction, and 33.0% underwent dilation and evacuation. Compared to women who chose termination of pregnancy, women who chose expectant management had 4.1 times the odds of developing chorioamnionitis (38.0% vs 13.0%; 95% confidence interval, 2.03-8.26) and 2.44 times the odds of postpartum hemorrhage (23.1% vs 11.0%; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-5.26). Admissions to the intensive care unit and unplanned hysterectomy only occurred after expectant management (2.8% vs 0.0% and 0.9% vs 0.0%). Of women who chose expectant management, 36.2% delivered via cesarean delivery with 56.4% non-low transverse uterine incisions. Composite maternal morbidity rates were 60.2% in the expectant management group and 33.0% in the termination of pregnancy group. After adjusting for gestational age at rupture, site, race and ethnicity, gestational age at entry to prenatal care, preterm premature rupture of membranes in a previous pregnancy, twin pregnancy, smoking, cerclage, and cervical examination at the time of presentation, expectant management was associated with 3.47 times the odds of composite maternal morbidity (95% confidence interval, 1.52-7.93), corresponding to an adjusted relative risk of 1.91 (95% confidence interval, 1.35-2.73). Among women who chose expectant management, 15.7% avoided morbidity and had a neonate who survived to discharge. CONCLUSION: Expectant management for preterm premature rupture of membranes at <24 weeks' gestation was associated with a significantly increased risk of maternal morbidity when compared to termination of pregnancy.

A pilot study of levonorgestrel concentrations and bleeding patterns in women with epilepsy using a levonorgestrel IUD and treated with antiepileptic drugs.

OBJECTIVES: We explored levonorgestrel (LNG) concentrations, bleeding patterns and endometrial thickness in women with epilepsy (WWE) initiating an LNG-intrauterine device (IUD) co-administered with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). STUDY DESIGN: This pilot study included 20 WWE ages 18 to 45 years with well-controlled seizures and stable AED regimens initiating a 52-mg LNG-IUD (20 mcg/d initial release). We collected blood and measured endometrial thickness before IUD placement and 21 days, 3 months and 6 months thereafter. Participants recorded bleeding/spotting daily. We measured total LNG (radioimmunoassay), serum hormone binding globulin (SHBG, immunoassay) and calculated the free LNG index. We compared total LNG, free LNG index, SHBG and endometrial thickness over time using a linear mixed-effects model. RESULTS: Total LNG, free LNG index and SBHG levels remained stable from day 21 throughout. Endometrial thickness decreased from a median of 5.9 mm [interquartile range (IQR) 4.6-7.5] at day 21 to 3.3mm (2.8-4.9) by month 6 (p=0.02). Bleeding and spotting days decreased from a median of 16 (IQR 13-23) in month 1 to 6.5 (IQR 4-8.5) in month 6 regardless of AED regimen. CONCLUSION: Like women without epilepsy, WWE initiating the LNG-IUD experience stable total LNG concentrations and decreasing endometrial thickness and bleeding over the first 6 months of use. IMPLICATIONS: Like women without epilepsy, WWE using antiepileptic drugs can expect a stable LNG concentration and decreasing bleeding during the first 6 months of LNG-IUD use. Our data can be useful for guidance of WWE considering use the LNG-IUD.

A noninferiority randomized controlled trial to compare transabdominal and transvaginal sonography for eligibility assessment prior to medical abortion.

OBJECTIVES: To compare transabdominal sonography (TAS) to transvaginal sonography (TVS) in medical abortion eligibility assessment, specifically to measure how often clinicians chose to order additional testing for eligibility assessment following TAS and TVS, and to look for differences by patient and clinician characteristics. Also, to compare patient acceptability between the two modalities. STUDY DESIGN: This pragmatic multisite randomized noninferiority trial compared TAS to TVS at 10 New York City and New Jersey health centers that provide medical abortion. Women seeking medical abortion were randomized 1:1 to receive TAS or TVS. Following the study ultrasound examination, clinicians determined whether participants were eligible for medical abortion based on these results or warranted further testing. All participants completed an acceptability questionnaire. We compared additional testing and acceptability between TAS and TVS. RESULTS: Of those randomized to TAS, 63/317 (19.9%) received additional testing compared to 15/312 (4.8%) randomized to TVS. After TAS, most additional testing consisted of a same-day TVS. Other tests included ß-hCG testing, scheduled repeat sonography or return visit. After TAS, 13.4% seen by physicians and 27.6% seen by advanced practice nurses (APNs) received additional testing (p<.01). Additional testing was more common in early gestational ages for both groups. We enrolled too few women with a body mass index (BMI) >35 kg/m2 to make comparisons. Participants found TAS more acceptable than TVS, and two thirds preferred TAS for future care. CONCLUSIONS: TAS provided sufficient information for clinicians to assess medical abortion eligibility without additional tests for most patients. However, the frequency of additional testing was exceedingly close to our predefined noninferiority boundary. Why APNs ordered substantially more additional testing than physicians is unclear. TAS was more acceptable to patients than TVS. IMPLICATIONS: TVS use requires high-level disinfection, which is resource-intensive and thus can be a barrier to care. Instead, TAS can be first-line for most women, reducing resources needed to provide medical abortion. Further research could help to establish gestational age and BMI thresholds beyond which TVS would be a more informative first test. We also need to evaluate whether additional training in using TAS would decrease additional testing.

SMFM Special Report: Putting the "M" back in MFM: Addressing education about disparities in maternal outcomes and care.

At the 36th Annual meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM), leaders in the field of maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) convened to address maternal outcome and care inequities from 3 perspectives: (1) education, (2) clinical care, and (3) research. Meeting attendees identified knowledge gaps regarding disparities within the provider community; reviewed possible frameworks to address these knowledge gaps; and identified models with which to address key clinical issues. Collaboration and communication between all stakeholders will be needed to gain a better understanding of these prevailing disparities and formulate strategies to eliminate them.

Evaluating the role of Pleistocene refugia, rivers and environmental variation in the diversification of central African duikers (genera Cephalophus and Philantomba).

BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the role that Pleistocene refugia, rivers and local habitat conditions may have played in the evolutionary diversification of three central African duiker species (Cephalophus dorsalis, C. callipygus and Philantomba monticola). Genetic data from geo-referenced feces were collected from a wide range of sites across Central Africa. Historical patterns of population genetic structure were assessed using a ~ 650 bp fragment of the mitochondrial control region and contemporary patterns of genetic differentiation were evaluated using 12 polymorphic microsatellite loci. RESULTS: Mitochondrial analyses revealed that populations of C. callipygus and P. monticola in the Gulf of Guinea refugium are distinct from other populations in west central Africa. All three species exhibit signatures of past population expansion across much of the study area consistent with a history of postglacial expansion. There was no strong evidence for a riverine barrier effect in any of the three species, suggesting that duikers can readily cross major rivers. Generalized dissimilarity models (GDM) showed that environmental variation explains most of the nuclear genetic differentiation in both C. callipygus and P. monticola. The forest-savanna transition across central Cameroon and the Plateaux Batéké region in southeastern Gabon show the highest environmentally-associated turnover in genetic variability. A pattern of genetic differentiation was also evident between the coast and forest interior that may reflect differences in precipitation and/or vegetation. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study highlight the historical impact of Pleistocene fragmentation and current influence of environmental variation on genetic structure in duikers. Conservation efforts should therefore target areas that harbor as much environmentally-associated genetic variation as possible in order to maximize species' capacity to adapt to environmental change.

Folic acid use by women with epilepsy: Findings of the Epilepsy Birth Control Registry.

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence and predictors of folic acid (FA) use by women with epilepsy (WWE) at risk of unintended pregnancy. METHODS: These retrospective data come from the Epilepsy Birth Control Registry (EBCR) web-based survey of 1144 WWE in the community, 18-47years, who provided demographic, epilepsy, AED, contraception, pregnancy, healthcare visits and FA data. We report prevalence and predictors of FA use in relation to risk of pregnancy (not at risk, at risk, seeking pregnancy, pregnant), demographics, seizure types and AED and contraception categories. RESULTS: 368 (47.6%) of the 773 WWE at risk of unintended pregnancy in the EBCR took FA supplement. Being at risk was a significant predictor in comparison to WWE not at risk (OR=1.464 [1.103-1.944], p=0.008). In comparison to WWE at risk, FA use trended greater for WWE actively seeking pregnancy (29/47, 61.7% v 368/773, 47.6%; p=0.0605) and was greater for pregnant WWE (17/19, 89.5% v 368/773, 47.6%; p=0.0007). Demographic predictors for WWE at risk were race (p=0.003), education (p=0.012) and income (0.043) with significantly greater FA use by Caucasians than minorities and direct correlations between FA use and levels of education and household income. Seizure type, AED use, category and dosage, polytherapy and contraceptive category were not predictors. A healthcare provider visit during the year prior to the survey was not a predictor. Prevalence of FA use was similar following visits with gynecologists - 51.7%, neurologists - 48.7% and primary care - 48.6%. FA supplementation by prescription was greater for WWE at risk on AED versus no AED (190/355, 53.5% v 3/13, 23.1%; p=0.045). CONCLUSION: Low prevalence of preconception FA use may reflect a need for more education. In addition, further research is needed to provide definitive evidence that FA reduces congenital malformations in the offspring of WWE.

Reasons for discontinuation of reversible contraceptive methods by women with epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: To report the reasons for discontinuation of contraceptive methods by women with epilepsy (WWE). METHODS: These retrospective data come from a web-based survey regarding the contraceptive practices of 1,144 WWE in the community, ages 18-47 years. We determined the frequencies of contraceptive discontinuations and the reasons for discontinuation. We compared risk ratios for rates of discontinuation among contraceptive methods and categories. We used chi-square analysis to test the independence of discontinuation reasons among the various contraceptive methods and categories and when stratified by antiepileptic drug (AED) categories. RESULTS: Nine hundred fifty-nine of 2,393 (40.6%) individual, reversible contraceptive methods were discontinued. One-half (51.8%) of the WWE who discontinued a method discontinued at least two methods. Hormonal contraception was discontinued most often (553/1,091, 50.7%) with a risk ratio of 1.94 (1.54-2.45, p < 0.0001) compared to intrauterine devices (IUDs), the category that was discontinued the least (57/227, 25.1%). Among all individual methods, the contraceptive patch was stopped most often (79.7%) and the progestin-IUD was stopped the least (20.1%). The top three reasons for discontinuation among all methods were reliability concerns (13.9%), menstrual problems (13.5%), and increased seizures (8.6%). There were significant differences among discontinuation rates and reasons when stratified by AED category for hormonal contraception but not for any other contraceptive category. SIGNIFICANCE: Contraception counseling for WWE should consider the special experience profiles that are unique to this special population on systemic hormonal contraception.

Pharmacokinetics of levonorgestrel and ulipristal acetate emergency contraception in women with normal and obese body mass index.

OBJECTIVE: This study compares the pharmacokinetics (PK) of levonorgestrel (LNG) emergency contraceptive (EC) and ulipristal acetate (UPA)-EC between normal-body mass index (BMI) and obese-BMI women. STUDY DESIGN: This prospective, randomized crossover study evaluates the PK of women after single doses of LNG-EC (1.5mg) and UPA-EC (30mg). Study procedures took place during clinical research unit admissions, where participants received a standardized meal and each study drug, in random order, during two separate 24-h admissions. Study staff collected 14 blood specimens (0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24 and 48h). We evaluated serum concentrations of LNG and UPA using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy and estimated the PK parameters of both drugs using noncompartmental analysis. The main outcome of this study was a comparison of between-group differences in AUC0-24. RESULTS: Thirty-two women completed the study (16 in each group). Among normal-BMI and obese-BMI participants, the mean BMIs were 22.0 (range 18.8-24.6) and 34.3 (range 30.6-39.9), respectively. After LNG-EC, mean AUC0-24 and maximum concentration (Cmax) were 50% lower among obese-BMI women than among normal-BMI women (AUC0-24 100.8 vs. 208.5ng*h/mL, IQRobese-BMI 35.8, IQRnormal-BMI 74.2, p≤.01; Cmax 10.8 vs. 18.2ng/mL, p=.01). After UPA-EC, AUC0-24 and Cmax were similar between obese-BMI and normal-BMI women (AUC0-24 362.5 vs. 293.5ng*h/mL, IQRobese-BMI 263.2, IQRnormal-BMI 112.5, p=.15; Cmax 95.6 vs. 89.3ng/mL, p=.70). CONCLUSION: After a single dose of EC, obese-BMI women are exposed to lower concentrations of LNG and similar concentrations of UPA, when compared to normal-BMI women. IMPLICATIONS: Differences in LNG-EC PK by BMI group may underlie and account for the lower LNG-EC efficacy reported among obese-BMI women, but modest differences in UPA-EC PK by BMI group provide less support for variable efficacy. A pharmacodynamic study may be able to clarify whether these PK differences account for observed differences in LNG-EC and UPA-EC efficacy.

Trends in gestational age at time of surgical abortion for fetal aneuploidy and structural abnormalities.

BACKGROUND: Screening for fetal aneuploidy has evolved over the past 2 decades. Whether these advances impact gestational age at abortion has received little study. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe trends in the gestational age at the time of abortion by fetal diagnosis over an 11-year study period. We hypothesized that gestational age at time of abortion would decrease for fetal aneuploidy but remain unchanged for structural abnormalities. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective case series of all women undergoing surgical abortion for fetal aneuploidy or structural abnormalities up to 24 weeks' gestation from 2004 through 2014 in a hospital operating room setting at a single, urban medical center. We excluded labor induction abortions (<1% of abortions at our medical center) and suction aspirations performed in the office practice. We performed suction aspiration up to 14 weeks and dilation and evacuation after that gestational age. We describe the median gestational age at abortion by fetal indication and year. RESULTS: For women undergoing abortion for fetal aneuploidy (n = 392), the median gestational age at time of abortion decreased from 19.0 weeks (interquartile range 18.0-21.0) in 2004 to 14.0 weeks (interquartile range 13.0-17.0) in 2014 (Kruskal-Wallis P < .0001). For women undergoing abortion for fetal structural abnormalities (n = 586), the median gestational age was ≥20 weeks for each year during the study interval (P = .1). As gestational age decreased in the fetal aneuploidy group, fewer women underwent dilation and evacuation and more became eligible for suction aspiration (<14 weeks). In 2004, >90% of women underwent dilation and evacuation for either indication. By 2014, 31% of women with fetal aneuploidy were eligible for suction aspiration compared to 11% of those with structural anomalies. CONCLUSION: Gestational age at the time of abortion for fetal aneuploidy decreased substantially from 2004 through 2014; earlier abortion is safer for women. In contrast, women seeking abortion for fetal structural abnormalities did not experience a change in timing. Legislation restricting gestational age at the time of abortion could disproportionately affect women with fetal structural abnormalities.

Women with epilepsy initiating a progestin IUD: A prospective pilot study of safety and acceptability.

OBJECTIVE: Effective contraception enables women with epilepsy (WWE) to plan their pregnancies and improve outcomes for themselves and their children. Although popular among all women, complex drug interactions limit the efficacy and safety of oral contraceptives (OCs) for WWE. We sought to explore the safety, acceptability, and pharmacokinetic impact of a progestin-containing intrauterine device (IUD) in WWE. METHODS: We enrolled 20 women with well-controlled epilepsy and a stable antiepileptic drug (AED) regimen and who were initiating a progestin-containing IUD (levonorgestrel 52 mg) in a prospective, observational study. For each AED, we compared the trough concentration before IUD insertion to the trough concentration 3 weeks, and 3 and 6 months later. Participants recorded seizures in a daily paper diary. We compared seizures that occurred during the month before IUD insertion to those occurring in the 6 months thereafter. Participants completed an acceptability questionnaire at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: Participants' average age was 28 years; 60% were nulligravid. They reported a history of multiple seizure types. During the baseline month, 75% were seizure-free and the remainder reported between one and three seizures. Fourteen received monotherapy and six received polytherapy. Lamotrigine use was most common (n = 12). AED trough concentrations remained stable during the 6 months after IUD insertion, without clinically meaningful deviations from baseline. Diary data showed that seizure frequency worsened in 3, and remained unchanged in 13 and improved in 4 after IUD insertion. Subjectively, no participant believed the IUD worsened her seizure control. All participants were either somewhat or very satisfied with the IUD throughout the study. All participants continued the IUD use at 6 months. No pregnancies occurred. SIGNIFICANCE: This pilot study suggests that the progestin-containing IUD is a safe and acceptable long-acting contraceptive for WWE.

Emergency Contraception: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back.

Emergency contraceptives can prevent pregnancy, when used after unprotected sex around the time of ovulation. In the past 15 years, access to emergency contraception (EC) in the United States has increased and more women use it. Emerging data may tailor EC prescribing based on patient weight and starting other contraception. There are several EC options-oral levonorgestrel and oral ulipristal acetate and the copper intrauterine device. Ideally, women should have EC access at low or no cost. Yet, several barriers-limited patient and provider knowledge about EC, cost, EC stocking practices, and state and federal laws exempting providers from supplying EC-make it difficult to integrate this time-sensitive treatment into women's reproductive health care.

Contraceptive practices of women with epilepsy: Findings of the epilepsy birth control registry.

OBJECTIVE: To report the contraceptive practices of women with epilepsy (WWE) in the community, predictors of highly effective contraception use, and reasons WWE provide for the selection of a particular method. METHODS: These cross-sectional data come from the Epilepsy Birth Control Registry (EBCR) web-based survey regarding the contraceptive practices of 1,144 WWE in the community, ages 18-47 years. We report demographic, epilepsy, and antiepileptic drug (AED) characteristics as well as contraceptive use. We determined the frequency of use of highly effective contraception use, that is, methods with failure rate <10%/year, and conducted binary logistic regression analysis to determine predictors of highly effective contraception use. We report frequencies of WWE who consult various health care providers regarding the selection of a method and the reasons cited for selection. RESULTS: Of the 796 WWE at risk of unintended pregnancy, 69.7% use what is generally considered to be highly effective contraception (hormonal, intrauterine device [IUD], tubal, vasectomy). Efficacy in WWE, especially for the 46.6% who use hormonal contraception, remains to be proven. Significant predictors of highly effective contraception use are insurance (insured 71.6% vs. noninsured 56.0%), race/ethnicity (Caucasian 71.3% vs. minority 51.0%), and age (38-47, 77.5%; 28-37, 71.8%; 18-27, 67.0%). Of the 87.2% who have a neurologist, only 25.4% consult them regarding selection of a method, although AED interaction is cited as the top reason for selection. SIGNIFICANCE: The EBCR web-based survey is the first large-scale study of the contraceptive practices of WWE in the community. The findings suggest a need for the development of evidence-based guidelines that address the efficacy and safety of contraceptive methods in this special population, and for greater discourse between neurologists and WWE regarding contraception.

Relationship between etonogestrel level and BMI in women using the contraceptive implant for more than 1 year.

Progestin-only contraceptive methods, including the 3-year, single-rod etonogestrel (ENG) implant, may be preferred for obese women to avoid additional estrogen-related thrombosis risk; however, whether obese women receive an ENG sufficient dose to suppress ovulation is understudied. Our analysis expands on the limited information currently available by studying ENG levels related to body mass index (BMI) in a community sample of primarily Hispanic women. This cross-sectional, descriptive study of 52 long-term implant users found comparable ENG levels across a wide BMI range (p=.1). These results further support that ENG levels are independent of BMI through 3 years of implant use and are thus reassuring that ENG implants will be effective for women of all BMIs.

IUDs at 1 year: predictors of early discontinuation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess baseline dysmenorrhea and insertion-related pain as predictors of intrauterine device (IUD) removal within 1 year following insertion. STUDY DESIGN: System-wide medical record abstraction 1 year after IUD insertion to identify removals and comparison of baseline characteristics (dysmenorrhea, insertion pain) among women with a removal versus women who continued IUD use was used. Baseline data came from a randomized trial of pain control during insertion. RESULTS: Among 199 insertions, we identified 21 removals and 7 expulsions, a continuation rate of 85.9%. Women with IUD removal had higher median dysmenorrhea scores before insertion than those who continued (42 vs. 25.5, p=.03). Insertion pain and other characteristics were not associated with removal. CONCLUSIONS: Preexisting dysmenorrhea may predict IUD removal within 1 year.

A randomized controlled trial of daily text messages versus monthly paper diaries to collect bleeding data after intrauterine device insertion.

OBJECTIVE: Bleeding data in contraceptive trials are often collected using daily diaries, but data quality may vary due to compliance and recall bias. Text messaging is a widespread and promising modality for data collection. STUDY DESIGN: This trial randomized participants 1:1 to use text messages or paper diaries to report on bleeding experienced during the 90 days after intrauterine device (IUD) insertion. Participants chose either the copper T380A or the 52-mg levonorgestrel IUD. Our primary outcome was number of days of reported bleeding data. We hypothesized that data gathered with daily text messages would have fewer missing values than paper diaries. Intention to treat analyses used the rank-sum test to compare medians. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty women enrolled, and randomization yielded groups similar in baseline characteristics. Twenty percent of participants provided no bleeding data; of these, 77% were assigned to paper diaries. With 90 days of reporting, approximately 20% in each group provided complete bleeding data. The text group reported a median of 82 days [interquartile range (IQR) 40-89] and the paper group reported a median of 36 days (IQR 0-88) (p≤.001). The number of responses received decreased gradually over the 90-day period but was always higher in the text group. Women who had attained higher levels of education did well regardless of data collection modality, while response rates of text messages were greater among those with a high school education or less (p<.01). CONCLUSIONS: Participants reporting bleeding via text messages provided more complete data than women using paper diaries. IMPLICATIONS: Depending on resources and population of interest, text messages may be a useful modality to improve data collection for patient-reported outcomes.

Landscape effects on gene flow for a climate-sensitive montane species, the American pika.

Climate change is arguably the greatest challenge to conservation of our time. Most vulnerability assessments rely on past and current species distributions to predict future persistence but ignore species' abilities to disperse through landscapes, which may be particularly important in fragmented habitats and crucial for long-term persistence in changing environments. Landscape genetic approaches explore the interactions between landscape features and gene flow and can clarify how organisms move among suitable habitats, but have suffered from methodological uncertainties. We used a landscape genetic approach to determine how landscape and climate-related features influence gene flow for American pikas (Ochotona princeps) in Crater Lake National Park. Pikas are heat intolerant and restricted to cool microclimates; thus, range contractions have been predicted as climate changes. We evaluated the correlation between landscape variables and genetic distance using partial Mantel tests in a causal modelling framework, and used spatially explicit simulations to evaluate methods of model optimization including a novel approach based on relative support and reciprocal causal modelling. We found that gene flow was primarily restricted by topographic relief, water and west-facing aspects, suggesting that physical restrictions related to small body size and mode of locomotion, as well as exposure to relatively high temperatures, limit pika dispersal in this alpine habitat. Our model optimization successfully identified landscape features influencing resistance in the simulated data for this landscape, but underestimated the magnitude of resistance. This is the first landscape genetic study to address the fundamental question of what limits dispersal and gene flow in the American pika.