Modeled estimates of HIV-serodifferent couples in tuberculosis-affected households in four sub-Saharan African countries.

Household-based tuberculosis (TB) contact evaluation may be an efficient strategy to reach people who could benefit from oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) because of the epidemiological links between HIV and TB. This study estimated the number of HIV serodifferent couples in TB-affected households and potential HIV acquisitions averted through their PrEP use in 4 TB-HIV high-burden countries. We conducted a model-based analysis set in Ethiopia, Kenya, South Africa, and Uganda using parameters from population-based household surveys, systematic literature review and meta-analyses, and estimates from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2019. We parameterized the nonlinear relationship between the proportion of serodifferent couples among people living with HIV and population-level HIV prevalence using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. We integrated all parameters in a mathematical model and propagated uncertainty using a Monte Carlo approach. We estimated the HIV prevalence among adults aged 15-49 living in TB-affected households to be higher than in the general population in all 4 countries. The proportion of serodifferent couples among all couples in TB-affected households was also higher than in the general population (South Africa: 20.7% vs. 15.7%, Kenya: 15.7% vs. 5.7%, Uganda: 14.5% vs. 6.0%, Ethiopia: 4.1% vs. 0.8%). We estimated that up to 1,799 (95% UI: 1,256-2,341) HIV acquisitions in South Africa could be prevented annually by PrEP use in serodifferent couples in TB-affected households, 918 (95% UI: 409-1,450) in Kenya, 686 (95% UI: 505-871) in Uganda, and 408 (95% UI: 298-522) in Ethiopia. As couples in TB-affected households are more likely to be serodifferent than couples in the general population, offering PrEP during household TB contact evaluation may prevent a substantial number of HIV acquisitions.

Using group norms to promote acceptance of HIV testing during household tuberculosis contact investigation: A household-randomized trial.

Background: HIV status awareness and linkage to care are critical for ending the HIV epidemic and preventing tuberculosis (TB). Among household contacts of persons with TB, HIV greatly increases the risk of incident TB and death. However, almost half of household contacts in routine settings decline HIV test offers during routine contact investigation. We evaluated a brief social-behavioral norming intervention to increase acceptance of HIV testing during household TB contact investigation. Methods: We carried out a household-randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the effect of the norming strategy among household contacts of persons with pulmonary TB in Kampala, Uganda ( ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT05124665 ). Community health workers (CHW) visited homes of persons with TB to screen contacts for TB symptoms and offer free, optional, oral HIV testing. Households were randomized (1:1) to usual care or the norming strategy. Contacts were eligible if they were ≥ 15 years old, self-reported to be HIV-negative, and living in a multi-contact household. The primary outcome, the proportion of contacts accepting HIV testing, was analyzed using an intention-to-treat approach, using a mixed-effects model to account for clustering by household. We assessed HIV testing yield as a proportion of all contacts tested. Results: We randomized 328 contacts in 99 index households to the norming strategy, of whom 285 (87%) contacts were eligible. We randomized 224 contacts in 86 index households to the usual strategy, of whom 187 (84%) contacts were eligible. Acceptance of HIV testing was higher in the intervention arm (98% versus 92%, difference +6%, 95%CI +2% to +10%, p=0.004). Yield of HIV testing was 2.1% in the intervention arm and 0.6% in the control arm (p=0.22). Conclusion: A norming intervention significantly improved uptake of HIV testing among household contacts of persons with TB. Funding/Support: This work was supported by the Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS (P30MH062294) and the Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health (R21TW011270). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or other sponsors.

Sex and HIV Differences in Preserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry (PRISm) Among Ugandans Postpneumonia.

Background: Preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm), defined as a normal ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) to forced vital capacity (≥0.70) with low FEV1 (<80% predicted), has been associated with increased mortality in the general population. Female sex has been associated with increased odds of PRISm in people without HIV. People with HIV (PWH) are at increased risk for lung function abnormalities, but whether HIV modifies the effect of sex on PRISm development is largely unknown. Methods: Adults with and without HIV underwent baseline followed by serial spirometry after completing therapy for pneumonia, predominantly tuberculosis (TB), in Kampala, Uganda. Using generalized estimating equations adjusted for age, body mass index, smoking, biomass fuel exposure, HIV, and TB status, we compared individuals with PRISm with those with normal spirometry. These models were stratified by HIV status. Results: Of 339 baseline participants, 153 (45%) were women; 129 (38%) had HIV, of whom 53% were women. Overall, 105/339 participants (31%) had PRISm at baseline. HIV was associated with lower odds of PRISm (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.38; 95% CI, 0.21-0.68; P = .001). Female sex trended toward increased odds of PRISm among all participants (aOR, 1.65; 95% CI, 0.99-2.75; P = .052). The association between female sex and PRISm tended to be stronger among PWH (aOR, 3.16; 95% CI, 1.14-8.76; P = .03) than among those without HIV (aOR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.73-2.45; P = .34); this study was underpowered to detect an HIV-sex interaction of this magnitude (P = .30). Conclusions: Among Ugandan adults who recovered from pneumonia, female sex was associated with increased odds and HIV with decreased odds of PRISm, suggesting independent sex and HIV effects on PRISm pathogenesis.

Efficacy and Impact of Peer-Led Education for Persons with Tuberculosis in Kampala, Uganda: A Pre-Post Implementation Study.

Introduction: Universal TB education and counseling (TEC) is routinely recommended for promoting knowledge and medication adherence, but the quality of delivery often varies because of inadequate clinic space, time, and health worker training. Peer-led counseling is a promising but understudied solution to these challenges. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of a peer-led TEC strategy among newly diagnosed adults initiating TB treatment in Kampala, Uganda. Methods: We conducted a longitudinal, pre-post implementation study comparing the routine, healthcare-worker-led and peer-led strategies for delivery of TEC to consecutive adult persons with TB at a large, public primary-care clinic. Trained staff administered a standardized TB knowledge survey to all persons with TB immediately following TEC. We compared TB knowledge by type of TEC received using t-tests. Results: We enrolled 161 persons with TB, 80 who received conventional TEC from health workers between June and July 2018, and 81 who received peer-led TEC between August and November 2019. The proportions of women (28% vs. 31%, p = 0.64) and persons living with HIV (36% vs 30%, p = 0.37) were similar in the pre- and post-implementation periods. Peer-led TEC was associated with a more significant increase in disease-specific (difference +21%, 95% CI +18% to + 24%, p < 0.0001) and treatment-specific TB knowledge scores (difference +14%, 95% CI + 10% to + 18%, p< 0.0001) than routine healthcare worker-delivered TEC. All TB knowledge constructs were significantly higher for those in the post-implementation period than those in the pre-implementation period. Nine participants met our threshold for adequate knowledge (score ≥ 90%) for disease-specific TB knowledge in the pre-implementation period compared to 63 (78%) in the post-implementation period (+67%, 95% CI + 55% - +78%, p < 0.001). Twenty-eight (35%) met the adequate knowledge threshold for TB treatment-specific knowledge in the pre-implementation period compared to 60 (74%) in the post-implementation period (+ 39%, 95% CI + 25 to + 53%, p < 0.0001). Finally, the proportion achieving TB treatment success (cure or completed) increased substantially from the pre-implementation period (n = 49, 68%) to the post-implementation period (n = 63, 88%), a difference of + 19% (95% CI + 6% to + 33%, p = 0.005). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that peer-led TEC is more efficacious than routine TEC at improving TB knowledge and treatment outcomes. Future studies should evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the peer-led TEC strategy when scaled to a larger number of clinics.