Does Emergency Medical Services Blood Collection Shorten Time to Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Ischemic Stroke?

Background: Ischemic stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability in the United States. To reduce the likelihood of debilitating outcomes, early treatment with fibrinolytics is necessary; however, many struggle to identify strategies that limit time to treatment. The purpose of this study is to identify if implementing a process for obtaining laboratory blood draws by emergency medical services (EMS) prior to patient arrival at the hospital will reduce the door-to-needle time for patients arriving with acute ischemic stroke. Objectives: To compare the door-to-needle time for patients with acute ischemic stroke who had blood drawn via EMS versus in hospital. Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted from 2015 to 2017 at a 433-bed designated Level II Trauma Center and Comprehensive Stroke Center community hospital. A comprehensive chart review was done via stroke coordinator binders and electronic medical record. Adult patients ≥18 years of age with an acute ischemic stroke diagnosis who met criteria for and received alteplase were included in the study. Patients were excluded if they did not arrive via EMS. The primary end point assessed time to fibrinolytic treatment via door-to-needle times. Results: A total of 66 patients were included with 28 in the EMS laboratory drawn group and 38 in the usual group. Median door-to-needle time was 57.5 ± 19.0 minutes in the EMS group and 55.0 ± 31.9 minutes in the usual care group (p = 0.818). Conclusions: Collection of blood for laboratories by EMS personnel did not significantly shorten door-to-needle time.

Leveraging Technology in Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Programs.

Description Medication safety is improved through REMS programs. Multidisciplinary teams and front-line staff are vital in setting up a REMS program and should be included in any discussions surrounding REMS programs. Certain components of the REMS requirements may be replaced with CDS screens. Utilizing technology can help advance patient safety and aid in regulatory compliance.

Comparison of new-onset post-operative atrial fibrillation between patients receiving carvedilol and metoprolol after off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Previous studies suggest carvedilol is more effective than metoprolol in preventing POAF in on-pump CABG. This study investigated if the same benefit would be seen in off-pump CABG. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective review compared rates of new-onset POAF between adult patients who received carvedilol and metoprolol after off-pump CABG surgery. Safety endpoints included hypotension, bradycardia, dyspnea, and the composite. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to identify associations between demographics, potential confounders, and beta-blocker dose and POAF. Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional-hazards models examined differences in time-to-event for POAF. RESULTS: 134 patients were included (34 carvedilol and 100 metoprolol). The mean age was 63 years, 70.9% were male, 85% had history of hypertension, 3.7% had history of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, and 38.8% were taking beta blockers prior to admission. POAF developed in 2 patients (5.8%) in the carvedilol group and 24 patients (24.0%) in the metoprolol group (odds ratio 0.17 [95% CI 0.03-0.83], p = 0.023). Safety endpoints occurred in 10 carvedilol (29.4%) and 44 metoprolol (44.0%) patients (p = 0.134). Hypotension and dyspnea rates were similar between groups; bradycardia occurred more commonly among metoprolol-treated patients (p = 0.040). Time-to-event analyses revealed a hazard ratio = 0.22 (95% CI 0.05-0.93, p = 0.040) for carvedilol use. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center, retrospective study of off-pump CABG patients, carvedilol was associated with reduced POAF risk and enhanced safety compared to metoprolol.

Safety and Efficacy of Indomethacin for Reducing Chest Tube Duration After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery.

Background: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) contain a boxed warning for use in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery due to increased risk of thrombotic events, but recent research has challenged the assumption that these risks are a class effect. One anecdotal indication for NSAIDs in CABG is reducing chest tube output. Objective: The primary objective of this retrospective study was to determine whether indomethacin was associated with reduced duration of chest tube insertion after CABG surgery, defined as total chest tube duration in controls versus duration of chest tube insertion after the first dose of indomethacin in the treatment group. Secondary objectives were comparisons of daily reductions in chest tube output volume, length of stay, and safety between groups. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center case-control review, adult patients who received indomethacin after CABG were matched 1:1 to control patients based on age, sex, concomitant valve surgery, and, when possible, diabetes status. Results: Thirty-two patients were included. The mean age was 56 years and 75% were men. The primary outcome measure was 94 hours among control patients and 82.8 hours among indomethacin patients (P = 0.041). Insignificant mean reductions in daily chest tube output were observed prior to and after indomethacin initiation (38.7 vs 87.7 mL/day, P > 0.05). Conclusion: In this small, single-center study, indomethacin appeared safe and possibly effective for reducing chest tube duration after CABG surgery. Future large, prospective, randomized studies should be conducted to confirm the results.

Health-system pharmacist preceptor development and educational needs for accessible resources.

INTRODUCTION: Skilled preceptors are crucial to the pharmacy profession as they contribute to the growth and development of student pharmacists and resident pharmacists. As a result, providing education and further growth for preceptors is vital. The purpose of this survey was to determine preceptor development topics of interest and preferred platforms for receiving education. METHODS: A survey was conducted by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists Section Advisory Group on Pharmacy Practice Experience Precepting. The survey was designed to identify preceptor needs based on experience and background. Professional development opportunities, tools needed to assist preceptors, and the preferred method of delivery were also determined. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-two pharmacists completed the entire 30 question survey. On demand webinars were identified as the preferred method of education delivery. A preceptor tip of the week email was selected as the most favored type of online education resource for preceptors. There was no major difference on the types of online resources for students that preceptors would use. A survey to assist in self-identifying areas for developmental improvement was favored by 81% of respondents. CONCLUSIONS: This needs assessment identified that preceptor development materials are in high demand for all surveyed topic areas provided via live and/or on demand webinars or other virtual means. Accessibility of resources should be highlighted in multiple forums in order to ensure the information reaches all preceptors.

Comparison of two escalated enoxaparin dosing regimens for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in obese hospitalized patients.

Standard fixed-dose enoxaparin dosing regimens may not provide adequate prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism among obese hospitalized patients. While several escalated doses have been shown to result in more frequent attainment of target anti-factor Xa levels than standard doses, few studies compare escalated doses to each other. In this prospective, multi-center trial, enoxaparin 0.5 mg/kg daily (weight-based dosing) and enoxaparin 40 mg twice daily were compared to determine if either dose resulted in more frequent attainment of anti-factor Xa levels within the goal range of 0.2-0.5 IU/mL. Eighty patients with a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 were enrolled. There was no difference in the percent of patients achieving goal anti-factor Xa levels (72.5% vs. 70.0%, respectively; p = 0.72). Patients were more likely to attain anti-factor Xa levels below goal range than above. No bleeding or thrombotic events occurred. Either weight-based or twice-daily escalated enoxaparin dosing regimens appear effective at achieving target anti-factor Xa levels among hospitalized patients, and no safety events were noted. Future studies are needed to determine the clinical significance of this result.

Assessment of Apixaban Prescribing Patterns for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation in Hospitalized Patients.

BACKGROUND: Apixaban is a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Other DOACs require renal dose adjustments based solely on creatinine clearance. Apixaban differs in that its dose adjustments are more complex, potentially leading to prescribing errors. OBJECTIVE: To determine if adherence to Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved dosing for apixaban is maintained in hospitalized patients with NVAF. METHODS: Patients ≥18 years old with NVAF who received apixaban during admission to 1 of 3 hospitals were evaluated. The primary outcome was to determine if providers order apixaban in accordance with FDA-approved dosages. Secondary outcomes included determining if pharmacist review increased the number of orders in accordance with FDA-approved dosing, which of the 3 criteria (age ≥80 years, body weight ≤60 kg, or serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL) were met in patients receiving off-label dosing, and the rationale for off-label prescribing. RESULTS: A total of 556 patients met inclusion criteria. Apixaban was dosed according to FDA labeling by providers in 83.4% (n = 464) of orders. After pharmacist review, 87.0% (n = 484) of orders were at the approved dose, 12.2% (n = 68) were underdosed, and 0.7% (n = 4) were overdosed. Most patients who were underdosed met only 1 dose reduction criterion-most commonly age ≥80 years (56.0%). Reasons for off-label dosing included home dose continuation (39.0%), history of or perceived bleeding risk (30.5%), or unspecified/other (30.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of apixaban orders for NVAF were based on FDA-approved dosages after provider entry and pharmacist review.

Examining the Use of Sodium Nitroprusside in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Is the Benefit Worth the Cost?

Purpose: Sodium nitroprusside is a vasodilator frequently used in the coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) setting. However, the price of a 50-mg vial of sodium nitroprusside increased from $5.00 in 2003 to up to $900 in 2016. The purpose of this review is to help health systems balance high-quality patient care with economic responsibility. Methods: A MEDLINE literature search was performed using the search terms "nitroprusside" and "coronary artery bypass." All English-language trials in human subjects assessing the use of sodium nitroprusside in the setting of CABG were evaluated. The references of these studies were also reviewed. Results: In the setting of CABG, sodium nitroprusside attenuates conduit vasospasm and reduces the incidence of inflammation, atrial fibrillation, and acute kidney injury after surgery. However, other vasodilators are more effective at maintaining postoperative blood pressure at goal. Conclusions: Despite its cost, sodium nitroprusside may be an appropriate agent to use during CABG operations, but other agents should be considered for treatment of postoperative hypertension.

Navigating the New Antimicrobial Stewardship Regulations.

Purpose: Many health care facilities are navigating their way through the new antimicrobial stewardship standards and guidelines. The purpose of this article is to provide information for health care facilities to improve patient care. Summary: New regulations and guidelines surrounding antimicrobial stewardship have prompted facilities to review their process related to antimicrobial stewardship. In setting up a program, there are many factors to consider including involving key personnel, obtaining leadership support, identifying an infectious disease physician to chair or cochair the committee, and meeting agenda, metrics, and educational needs. Conclusion: Antimicrobial stewardship plays a vital role in both our hospital and community setting. Pharmacists are uniquely positioned to improve optimal patient care through rounding, review of patients' chart, and contribute to the improvement of antimicrobial stewardship by working with a multidisciplinary team. These efforts may improve the utilization of antimicrobial agents.

Comparison of Insulin Detemir and Insulin Glargine for Hospitalized Patients on a Basal-Bolus Protocol.

BACKGROUND: The primary purpose of this study is to determine whether insulin detemir is equivalent to insulin glargine in controlling hyperglycemia for the adult hospitalized patient on a basal-bolus treatment regimen. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at two acute care hospitals within the same health system. Patients from both facilities who were initiated on a basal-bolus subcutaneous insulin regimen were included in the study. The basal-bolus regimen consisted of three components: basal, bolus, and corrective insulin with only the data from the first seven days analyzed. Once the basal-bolus protocol was initiated, all previous glycemic agents were discontinued. The target glycemic goal of the study was 100-180 mg/dL. RESULTS: In both groups, 50% of the patients had achieved the target glycemic control goal (100-180 mg/dL) by day 2 (p = 0.3). However, on the seventh or last day of basal-bolus treatment, whichever came first, 36.36% of patients receiving insulin detemir (n = 88) achieved the blood glucose reading goal compared to 52.00% in patients receiving insulin glargine (n = 100) (p = 0.03). This corresponded to an adjusted odds ratio of 2.12 (1.08 to 4.15), p = 0.03. The adjusting variables were provider type, whether the patient was hospitalized within 30 days prior and diagnosis of stroke. The mean blood glucose readings for the insulin glargine and the insulin detemir groups while on basal-bolus therapy were 200 mg/dL and 215 mg/dL, respectively (p = 0.05). The total number of blood glucose readings less than 70 mg/dL and less than 45 mg/dL was very low and there were no differences in number of episodes with hypoglycemia between the two groups. CONCLUSION: There was not a statistical difference between the two groups at 2 days, however there was on the seventh day or the last day of basal-bolus treatment. There were nonsignificant hypoglycemia events between basal insulin groups and the results for the last or seventh day of treatment may not be clinically significant in practice.