The effect of cranioplasty on outcomes and complications of unresponsive wakefulness syndrome and minimally responsive state.

Background Studies that have shown neurological improvement following cranioplasty (CP) after decompressive craniectomy (DC) in patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) and minimally conscious state (MCS) did not include control groups. The aim of this study was to assess the justification of CP for these patients. Methods Data were collected from medical records of inpatients with UWS and MCS admitted between 2002 and 2018. Results Of the 144 participants (mean age 40 years, 76% males, 75% in UWS), 37% had CP following DC. The Loewenstein Communication Scale (LCS) gain was 12±17 and 16±17 for the control and study patients, respectively. The corresponding consciousness recovery rate (based on Coma Recovery Scale-Revised scores) was 51% and 53%, respectively. One-year survival rates were 0.80 and 0.93, and 5-year survival rates were 0.67 and 0.73, respectively. Mean outcome values were higher for the study group, but the differences between the groups did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions The study did not demonstrate that CP increases brain recovery or survival. Nevertheless, it showed that CP did not decrease them either, and it did not increase complications rate. The findings, therefore, support offering CP to patients with UWS and MCS as CP does not increase risks and can achieve additional goals for these patients.

Responses to stimuli in the 'snoezelen' room in unresponsive wakefulness or in minimally responsive state.

BACKGROUND: Sensory stimulation in Snoezelen room increased responsiveness after brain injury and dementia. OBJECTIVE: To explore the physiological and clinical effects of Snoezelen stimulation in persons with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome or minimally conscious state (UWS or MCS). DESIGN: A comparative prospective observational cohort study. METHODS: Ten patients with UWS and 25 in MCS were exposed to consecutive stimuli involving the 5 senses in a Snoezelen room. Heart rate (HR) and cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV), and scores of the Loewenstein communication scale (LCS) were obtained before and during or after the stimuli. RESULTS: The stimuli increased HR values and decreased left hemisphere CBFV values in patients with MCS (p < 0.05). Stimulation increased LCS scores (from 28.48 ± 6.55 to 31.13 ± 7.14; p < 0.001) in patients with MCS, but not in the UWS group. LCS gain correlated with HR and right hemisphere CBFV gains in patients with MCS (r = 0.439 and 0.636 respectively, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Snoezelen stimulation induced immediate improvement in communication and physiological changes in patients with MSC, and had a minor physiological effect in patients with UWS. If additional studies support these findings, it will be possible to suggest that Snoezelen stimulation can affect arousal, and possibly improve functioning.