RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Restrictive cardiomyopathy is rare and is generally associated with worse clinical outcomes compared to other cardiomyopathies. Ventricular assist device (VAD) support for these children is seldom applied and often hampered by the surgical difficulties. METHODS: All paediatric (<19 years) patients with a restricted cardiomyopathy supported by a VAD from the EUROMACS database were included and compared to patients with a dilated cardiomyopathy (retrospective database analyses). Participating centres were retrospectively contacted to provide additional detailed echo and Swan Ganz measurements to analyse the effect of VAD support on pulmonary artery pressure and right ventricular function. RESULTS: Forty-four paediatric VAD-supported patients diagnosed with restricted cardiomyopathy were included, with a median age at implantation of 5.0 years. Twenty-six of the 44 patient with a restricted cardiomyopathy survived to transplantation (59.1%), 16 died (36.4%) and 2 are still on ongoing VAD support (4.5%) after a median duration of support of 95.5 days (interquartile range 33.3-217.8). Transplantation probability after 1 and 2 years of VAD support in patients with a restricted cardiomyopathy were comparable to patients with a dilated cardiomyopathy (52.3% vs 51.4% and 59.5% vs 60.1%, P = 0.868). However, mortality probability was higher in the restricted cardiomyopathy cohort (35.8% vs 17.0% and 35.8% vs 19.0%, P = 0.005). Adverse event rates were high (cerebrovascular accident in 31.8%, pump thrombosis in 29.5%, major bleeding 25.0%, eventual biventricular support in 59.1%). In the atrially cannulated group, cerebrovascular accident and pump thrombosis occurred in twice as much patients (21.1% vs 40.0%, P = 0.595 and 15.8% vs 40.0%, P = 0.464; probably non-significant due to the small numbers). Pulmonary arterial pressures improved after implantation of a VAD, and 6 patients who were initially labelled as ineligible due to pulmonary hypertension could eventually be transplanted. CONCLUSIONS: VAD support in children with a restricted cardiomyopathy is rarely performed. Mortality and adverse event rates are high. On the other hand, survival to cardiac transplantation was 59.1% with all patients surviving the 1st 30 days after cardiac transplantation. Pulmonary arterial pressures improved while on support, potentially making cardiac transplantation a viable option for previously ineligible children.
Assuntos
Cardiomiopatia Restritiva , Coração Auxiliar , Hemodinâmica , Humanos , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Cardiomiopatia Restritiva/cirurgia , Masculino , Criança , Feminino , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Retrospectivos , Hemodinâmica/fisiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adolescente , Lactente , Transplante de Coração , Cardiomiopatia Dilatada/cirurgia , Cardiomiopatia Dilatada/fisiopatologia , Cardiomiopatia Dilatada/complicações , Cardiomiopatia Dilatada/mortalidadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The use of ventricular assist devices (VADs) in children is increasing. However, absolute numbers in individual centres and countries remain small. Collaborative efforts such as the Paedi-European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS) are therefore essential for combining international experience with paediatric VADs. Our goal was to present the results from the fourth Paedi-EUROMACS report. METHODS: All paediatric (<19 years) patients from the EUROMACS database supported by a VAD were included. Patients were stratified into a congenital heart disease (CHD) group and a group with a non-congenital aetiology. End points included mortality, a transplant and recovery. Cox proportional hazard models were used to explore associated factors for mortality, cerebrovascular accident and pump thrombosis. RESULTS: A total of 590 primary implants were included. The congenital group was significantly younger (2.5 vs 8.0 years, respectively, P < 0.001) and was more commonly supported by a pulsatile flow device (73.5% vs 59.9%, P < 0.001). Mortality was significantly higher in the congenital group (30.8% vs 20.4%, P = 0.009) than in the non-congenital group. However, in multivariable analyses, CHD was not significantly associated with mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.285; confidence interval (CI) 0.8111-2.036, P = 0.740]. Pump thrombosis was the most frequently reported adverse event (377 events in 132 patients; 0.925 events per patient-year) and was significantly associated with body surface area (HR 0.524, CI 0.333-0.823, P = 0.005), CHD (HR 1.641, CI 1.054-2.555, P = 0.028) and pulsatile flow support (HR 2.345, CI 1.406-3.910, P = 0.001) in multivariable analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This fourth Paedi-EUROMACS report highlights the increasing use of paediatric VADs. The patient populations with congenital and non-congenital aetiologies exhibit distinct characteristics and clinical outcomes.
Assuntos
Coração Auxiliar , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Coração Auxiliar/estatística & dados numéricos , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Masculino , Feminino , Lactente , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Cardiopatias Congênitas/cirurgia , Cardiopatias Congênitas/mortalidade , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Recém-NascidoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to explore characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) in the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS). METHODS: This is a retrospective study of EUROMACS participants receiving MCS as bridge-to-transplant, possible bridge-to-transplant, or rescue therapy/bridge-to-recovery from 2011 to 2023 (n = 5340). Adult and paediatric cohorts were analysed separately. The primary outcome was mortality on MCS; secondary outcomes included recovery, transplant and complications including bleeding, cerebrovascular events, and sepsis. RESULTS: Among adult patients, mortality at 1-year was 33.3% among the CHD cohort vs 22.1% in the non-CHD cohort. Adult CHD patients had higher hazards of mortality within the first year after MCS implantation [hazard ratios 1.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.35-2.91, P < 0.001] and bleeding events (subdistribution hazard ratios 2.10, 95% CI 1.40-3.16, P < 0.001) compared with non-CHD patients. Both associations remained significant after accounting for multiple mediators. Among paediatric patients, mortality at 1 year was 22.1% in the CHD cohort vs 17.3% in the non-CHD cohort (hazard ratios 1.39, 95% CI 0.83-2.32, P = 0.213). CONCLUSIONS: Adult and paediatric patients with CHD on MCS have higher adverse event risk compared with non-CHD MCS patients, though children did not have greater risk of mortality. As the number of CHD patients requiring advanced heart failure management continues to grow, these findings can enhance informed decision-making. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Registry name: EUROMACS.
Assuntos
Cardiopatias Congênitas , Coração Auxiliar , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Cardiopatias Congênitas/cirurgia , Cardiopatias Congênitas/mortalidade , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Criança , Coração Auxiliar/estatística & dados numéricos , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Pré-Escolar , Lactente , Transplante de Coração/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Myocardial recovery in children supported by a durable left ventricular assist device is a rare, but highly desirable outcome because it could potentially eliminate the need for a cardiac transplant and the lifelong need for immunosuppressant therapy and the risk of complications. However, experience with this specific outcome is extremely limited. METHODS: All patients < 19 years old supported by a durable left ventricular assist device from the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support database were included. Participating centres were approached for additional follow-up data after explantation. Associated factors for explantation due to myocardial recovery were explored using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: The incidence of recovery in children supported by a durable left ventricular assist device was 11.7% (52/445; median duration of support, 122.0 days). Multivariable analyses showed body surface area (hazard ratio 0.229; confidence interval 0.093-0.565; P = 0.001) and a primary diagnosis of myocarditis (hazard ratio 4.597; confidence interval 2.545-8.303; P < 0.001) to be associated with recovery. Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter in children with myocarditis was not associated with recovery. Follow-up after recovery was obtained for 46 patients (88.5%). Sustained myocardial recovery was reported in 33/46 (71.7%) at the end of the follow-up period (28/33; >2 year). Transplants were performed in 6/46 (11.4%) (in 5 after a ventricular assist device was reimplanted). Death occurred in 7/46 (15.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial recovery occurs in a substantial portion of paediatric patients supported with durable left ventricular assist devices, and sustainable recovery is seen in around three-quarters of them. Even children with severely dilated ventricles due to myocarditis can show recovery. Clinicians should be attentive to (developing) myocardial recovery. These results can be used to develop internationally approved paediatric weaning guidelines.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Transplante de Coração , Coração Auxiliar , Miocardite , Humanos , Criança , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Miocardite/cirurgia , Miocárdio , Diástole , Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Purpose: The withdrawal of HVAD in 2021 created a concern for the pediatric population. The alternative implantable centrifugal blood pump HeartMate 3 has since been used more frequently in children. This paper analyses the outcome of children on LVAD support provided with an HVAD or HM3. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the EUROMACS database on children supported with VAD < 19 years of age from 1 January 2009 to 1 December 2021 was conducted. All patients with an LVAD and either an HVAD or HM3 were included. Patients with missing data on VAD status and/or missing baseline and/or follow up information were excluded. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to evaluate survival differences. Analyses were performed using Fisher's exact test. Results: The study included 150 implantations in 142 patients with 128 implants using an HVAD compared to 28 implants using an HM3. Nine patients (6%) needed temporary right ventricular mechanical support, which was significantly higher in the HM3 group, with 25% (p: 0.01). Patients in the HVAD group were significantly younger (12.7 vs. 14.5 years, p: 0.01), weighed less (45.7 vs. 60 kg, p: <0.000) and had lower BSA values (1.3 vs. 1.6 m2, p: <0.000). Median support time was 204 days. Overall, 98 patients (69%) were discharged and sent home, while 87% were discharged in group HM3 (p: ns). A total of 123 children (86%) survived to transplantation, recovery or are ongoing, without differences between groups. In the HVAD group, 10 patients (8%) died while on support, whereas in 12% of HM3 patients died (p: 0.7). Conclusions: Survival in children implanted with an HM3 was excellent. Almost 90% were discharged and sent home on the device.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: A small percentage of paediatric patients supported with a ventricular assist device (VAD) can have their device explanted following myocardial recovery. The goal of this systematic review is to summarize the current literature on the clinical course in these children after weaning. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed on 27 May 2022 using Embase, Medline ALL, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar to include all literature on paediatric patients supported by a durable VAD during the last decade. Overlapping study cohorts and registry-based studies were filtered out. RESULTS: Thirty-seven articles were included. Eighteen of them reported on the incidence of recovery in cohort studies, with an overall incidence rate of 8.7% (81/928). Twenty-two of the included articles reported on clinical outcomes after VAD explantation (83 patients). The aetiologies varied widely and were not limited to diseases with a natural transient course like myocarditis. Most of the patients in the included studies (70; 84.3%) were supported by a Berlin Heart EXCOR, and in 66.3% (55/83), only the left ventricle had to be supported. The longest follow-up period was 19.1 years, and multiple studies reported on long-term myocardial recovery. Fewer than half of the reported deaths had a cardiac cause. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial recovery during VAD support is dependent on various contributing components. The interactions among patient-, device-, time- and hospital-related factors are complex and not yet fully understood. Long-term recovery after VAD support is achievable, even after a long duration of VAD support, and even in patients with aetiologies different from myocarditis or post-cardiotomy heart failure. More research is needed on this favourable outcome after VAD support.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Coração Auxiliar , Miocardite , Criança , Humanos , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Miocardite/complicações , Resultado do Tratamento , Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etiologia , Coração , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Early right-sided heart failure (RHF) was seen in 22% of recipients of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS). However, the optimal treatment of post-LVAD RHF is not well known. Levosimendan has proven to be effective in patients with cardiogenic shock and in those with end-stage heart failure. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of levosimendan on post-LVAD RHF and 30-day and 1-year mortality. METHODS: The EUROMACS Registry was used to identify adults with mainstream continuous-flow LVAD implants who were treated with preoperative levosimendan compared to a propensity matched control cohort. RESULTS: In total, 3661 patients received mainstream LVAD, of which 399 (11%) were treated with levosimendan pre-LVAD. Patients given levosimendan had a higher EUROMACS RHF score [4 (2- 5.5) vs 2 (2- 4); P < 0.001], received more right ventricular assist devices (RVAD) [32 (8%) vs 178 (5.5%); P = 0.038] and stayed longer in the intensive care unit post-LVAD implant [19 (8-35) vs 11(5-25); P < 0.001]. Yet, there was no significant difference in the rate of RHF, 30-day, or 1-year mortality. Also, in the matched cohort (357 patients taking levosimendan compared to an average of 622 controls across 20 imputations), we found no evidence for a difference in postoperative severe RHF, RVAD implant rate, length of stay in the intensive care unit or 30-day and 1-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of the EUROMACS registry, we found no evidence for an association between levosimendan and early RHF or death, albeit patients taking levosimendan had much higher risk profiles. For a definitive conclusion, a multicentre, randomized study is warranted.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Coração Auxiliar , Adulto , Humanos , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Simendana , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Sistema de Registros , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Data on the use and outcome of children on ventricular assist device (VAD) support provided with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) remains poor. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the EUROMACS database on children supported with VAD < 19 years of age from January 1, 2009 to April 1, 2020. Patients with missing data on status of ICD, missing baseline and/or follow up information were excluded. The primary independent variable of interest was the concomitant presence or absence of an ICD at the time of VAD placement. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to evaluate survival differences between children on VAD with and without an ICD. RESULTS: Out of 303 patients provided with a VAD, 7% (7â, 15â) had an ICD implanted and formed the study group. Median age was 14 years, median weight was 43.5 kg, and median BSA was 1.39. Median Intermacs stage was 2 (range: 1-7). Seventeen patients (77%) were transplanted, 4 (18%) died while on support, and 1 (5%) was weaned from device after myocardial recovery. Median time on support was 68 days compared to 361 days in the control group (p: 0.01). Three patients underwent device exchange due to thrombus formation in the pump. There was no difference in survival between groups (p = 0.342). CONCLUSION: The presence of ICD in pediatric patients supported with a VAD is low (7%). Children on VAD support provided with an ICD do not have a survival benefit compared to children without an ICD.
Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Coração Auxiliar , Humanos , Criança , Adolescente , Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Mitral regurgitation (MR) is frequently observed in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation. We investigated the impact of preoperative MR on left ventricular assist device patients. METHODS: A retrospective propensity score-matched analysis of adult patients enrolled in the EUROMACS registry between 1 January 2011 and 30 November 2021 was performed. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the grade of preoperative MR: none-to-mild (MR 0-II) or moderate-to-severe (MR III-IV). RESULTS: Following 1:1 propensity score matching, each group consisted of 914 patients. Incidence of postoperative temporary right ventricular support, reoperation for bleeding and dialysis was similar. MR III-IV demonstrated shorter median intensive care unit stay [14 days (6; 27.8) vs 10 days (5; 22), P = 0.004] and ventilation time [72 h (22, 320) vs 31 h (18, 150), P < 0.001]. Mortality was lower for MR III-IV patients [subdistribution hazard ratio: 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59-0.73, P < 0.001]. The 1-year survival was 68.1% (95% CI: 65.1-71.3%) in MR 0-II and 75% (95% CI: 72.1-78%) in MR III-IV. A lower incidence of total complications [odds ratio (OR): 0.93 (0.89-0.98), P = 0.003] and trend towards a lower risk of neurological dysfunction (subdistribution hazard ratio: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.61-1.01, P = 0.063) and sustained ventricular tachycardia [OR: 0.93 (0.54-1.03), P = 0.074] were demonstrated for MR III-IV. The risk of fatal stroke and pump thrombosis was similar. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate-to-severe MR in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation is associated with better mid-term survival and lower incidence of total major adverse events and complications. The incidence of severe postoperative complications including fatal stroke and device thrombosis was similar.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Coração Auxiliar , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral , Adulto , Humanos , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pontuação de Propensão , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The Berlin Heart EXCOR (BHE) offers circulatory support across all paediatric ages. Clinically, the necessary care and the outcomes differ in various age groups. The EUROMACS database was used to study age- and size-related outcomes for this specific device. METHODS: All patients <19 years of age from the EUROMACS database supported with a BHE between 2000 and November 2021 were included. Maximally selected rank statistics were used to determine body surface area (BSA) cut-off values. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression using ridge penalization was performed to identify factors associated with outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 303 patients were included [mean age: 2.0 years (interquartile range: 0.6-8.0, males: 48.5%)]. Age and BSA were not significantly associated with mortality (n = 74, P = 0.684, P = 0.679). Factors associated with a transplant (n = 175) were age (hazard ratio 1.07, P = 0.006) and aetiology other than congenital heart disease (hazard ratio 1.46, P = 0.020). Recovery rates (n = 42) were highest in patients with a BSA of <0.53 m2 (21.8% vs 4.3-7.6% at 1 year, P = 0.00534). Patients with a BSA of ≥0.73 m2 had a lower risk of early pump thrombosis but a higher risk of early bleeding compared to children with a BSA of <0.73 m2. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality rates in Berlin Heart-supported patients cannot be predicted by age or BSA. Recovery rates are remarkably high in the smallest patient category (BSA <0.53 m2). This underscores that the BHE is a viable therapeutic option, even for the smallest and youngest patients.
Assuntos
Cardiopatias Congênitas , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Transplante de Coração , Coração Auxiliar , Masculino , Criança , Humanos , Pré-Escolar , Berlim , Superfície Corporal , Resultado do Tratamento , Cardiopatias Congênitas/epidemiologia , Cardiopatias Congênitas/cirurgia , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etiologia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: In patients supported by a durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD), infections are a frequently reported adverse event with increased morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to investigate the possible association between infections and thromboembolic events, most notable cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs), in LVAD patients. METHODS: An analysis of the multicentre European Registry for Patients Assisted with Mechanical Circulatory Support was performed. Infections were categorized as VAD-specific infections, VAD-related infections and non-VAD-related infections. An extended Kaplan-Meier analysis for the risk of CVA with infection as a time-dependent covariate and a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model were performed. RESULTS: For this analysis, 3282 patients with an LVAD were included with the majority of patients being male (83.1%). During follow-up, 1262 patients suffered from infection, and 457 patients had a CVA. Cox regression analysis with first infection as time-dependent covariate revealed a hazard ratio (HR) for CVA of 1.90 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.55-2.33; P < 0.001]. Multivariable analysis confirmed the association for infection and CVAs with an HR of 1.99 (95% CI: 1.62-2.45; P < 0.001). With infections subcategorized, VAD-specific HR was 1.56 (95% CI: 1.18-2.08; P 0.002) and VAD-related infections [HR: 1.99 (95% CI: 1.41-2.82; P < 0.001)] remained associated with CVAs, while non-VAD-related infections (P = 0.102) were not. CONCLUSIONS: Infection during LVAD support is associated with an increased risk of developing an ischaemic or haemorrhagic CVA, particularly in the setting of VAD-related or VAD-specific infections. This suggests the need of a stringent anticoagulation management and adequate antibiotic treatment during an infection in LVAD-supported patients.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Coração Auxiliar , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Antibacterianos , Anticoagulantes , Feminino , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The objective was to analyse associations between obesity and outcomes after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the EUROMACS Registry was performed. Adult patients undergoing primary implantation of a continuous-flow LVAD between 2006 and 2019 were included (Medtronic HeartWare® HVAD®, Abbott HeartMate II®, Abbott HeartMate 3™). Patients were classified into 4 different groups according to body mass index at the time of surgery (body mass index <20 kg/m2: n = 254; 20-24.9 kg/m2: n = 1281; 25-29.9 kg/m2: n = 1238; ≥ 30 kg/m2: n = 691). RESULTS: The study cohort was comprised of 3464 patients. Multivariable Cox proportional cause-specific hazards regression analysis demonstrated that obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2) was independently associated with significantly increased risk of mortality (body mass index ≥30 vs 20-24.9 kg/m2: hazard ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 1.18-1.57, overall P < 0.001). Moreover, obesity was associated with significantly increased risk of infection and driveline infection. The probability to undergo heart transplantation was significantly decreased in obese patients (body mass index ≥30 vs 20-24.9 kg/m2: hazard ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.48-0.74, overall P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Obesity at the time of LVAD implantation is associated with significantly higher mortality and increased risk of infection as well as driveline infection. The probability to undergo heart transplantation is significantly decreased. These aspects should be considered when devising a treatment strategy before surgery.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Coração Auxiliar , Adulto , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Ventricular assist device support as a bridge to transplant or recovery is a well-established therapy in children on the cardiac transplant waiting list. The goal of this study was to investigate the incidence of and the associated factors for cerebrovascular accidents in paediatric patients supported by a Berlin Heart EXCOR. METHODS: All patients <19 years of age supported by a Berlin Heart EXCOR between January 2011 and January 2021 from the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support were included. RESULTS: In total, 230 patients were included. A total of 140 (60.9%) patients had a diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy. 46 patients (20.0%) sustained 55 cerebrovascular accidents, with 70.9% of the episodes within 90 days after the ventricular assist device was implanted. The event rate of cerebrovascular accidents was highest in the first era (0.75). Pump thrombosis and secondary need for a right ventricular assist device were found to be associated with a cerebrovascular accident (hazard ratio 1.998, P = 0.040; hazard ratio 11.300, P = 0.037). At the 1-year follow-up, 44.4% of the patients had received a transplant, 13.1% were weaned after recovery and 24.5% had died. Event rates for mortality showed a significantly decreasing trend. CONCLUSIONS: Paediatric ventricular assist device support is associated with important adverse events, especially in the early phase after the device is implanted. Pump thrombosis and the need for a secondary right ventricular assist device are associated with cerebrovascular accidents. Furthermore, an encouragingly high rate of recovery in this patient population was shown, and death rates declined. More complete input of data into the registry, especially concerning anticoagulation protocols, would improve the data.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Transplante de Coração , Coração Auxiliar , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Criança , Transplante de Coração/efeitos adversos , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Incidência , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
AIMS: Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) have become a standard of care in end-stage heart failure. Limited data exist comparing outcomes of HeartMate3 (HM3) and HeartWare HVAD (HW). We aimed to compare midterm outcomes of these devices. METHODS AND RESULTS: Investigator-initiated retrospective-observational comparative analysis of all patients who underwent primary LVAD implantation of either HM3 or HW at our centre between January 2010 and December 2020. Data were derived from a prospective registry. Primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and heart transplantation. Secondary endpoints included device-related major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, which included major bleeding, major neurological dysfunction (defined as persisting neurological impairment for ≥24 h), device-related major infection (excluding driveline infections), major device malfunctions leading to re-intervention or partial device exchange (pump failure, outflow-graft twist or failure, controller failure, battery failure, patient cable failure, but excluding pump thrombosis), and pump thrombosis. Further secondary endpoints included right heart failure, gastrointestinal bleeding, driveline infections, and surgical re-interventions. The secondary outcomes were analysed not only for the first event but also for recurrent events. The analysis included competing risks analysis and recurrent event regression analysis, with adjustment for confounders age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) level. Out of 106 primary CF-LVAD implantations, 36 (34%) received HM3 and 70 (66%) received HW. Median follow-up was 1.48 years [interquartile range 0.67, 2.41]. HM3 was more often implanted in men (91.7% vs. 72.9%, P = 0.024); patients were older (median 61 years [54, 66.5] vs. 52.5 years [43, 60], P < 0.001), had a higher BMI (median 26.7 kg/m2 [23.4, 29.0] vs. 24.3 kg/m2 [20.7, 27.4], P = 0.013), had more comorbidities, and were more likely targeted for destination therapy (36.1% vs. 14.3%, P = 0.010). Death occurred in 33.3% of HM3 patients, compared with 22.9% of HW patients, P = 0.247 (probability of survival at 4 years, 54.7% vs. 74.1%, P = 0.296). After adjustment for confounders, we observed a significant six-fold risk increase in device malfunctions for HW [hazard ratio (HR) 6.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.89, 22.32], P = 0.003], but no significant differences in pump thrombosis (P = 0.173) or overall survival (P = 0.801). CONCLUSIONS: Comparing midterm outcomes between HM3 and HW for LVAD support from a prospective registry, HW patients had a significantly higher risk of device malfunctions. No significant differences were evident between devices in overall survival and in respect to most outcomes.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Coração Auxiliar , Trombose , Masculino , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Ventrículos do Coração , Trombose/etiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: A third paediatric report has been generated from the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS). The purpose of EUROMACS, which is operated by the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, is to gather data related to durable mechanical circulatory support for scientific purposes and to publish reports with respect to the course of mechanical circulatory support therapy. Since the first report issued, efforts to increase compliance and participation have been extended. Additionally, the data provided the opportunity to analyse patients of younger age and lower weight. METHODS: Participating hospitals contributed pre-, peri- and long-term postoperative data on mechanical circulatory support implants to the registry. Data for all implants in paediatric patients (<19 years of age) performed from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2020 were analysed. This report includes updates of patient characteristics, implant frequency, outcome (including mortality rates, transplants and recovery rates) as well as adverse events including neurological dysfunction, device malfunction, major infection and bleeding. RESULTS: Twenty-five hospitals contributed 537 registered implants in 480 patients. The most frequent aetiology of heart failure was any form of cardiomyopathy (59%), followed by congenital heart disease and myocarditis (15% and 14%, respectively). Competing outcomes analysis revealed that a total of 86% survived to transplant or recovery or are ongoing; at the 2-year follow-up examination, 21.9% died while on support. At 12 months, 45.1% received transplants, 7.5% were weaned from their device and 20.8% died. The 3-month adverse events rate was 1.59 per patient-year for device malfunction including pump exchange, 0.7 for major bleeding, 0.78 for major infection and 0.71 for neurological events. CONCLUSIONS: The overall survival rate was 79.2% at 12 months following ventricular assist device implant. The comparison of survival rates of the early and later eras shows no significant difference. A focus on specific subgroups showed that survival was less in patients of younger age (<1 year of age; P = 0.01) and lower weight (<20 kg; P = 0.015). Transplant rates at 6 months continue to be low (33.2%).
Assuntos
Cardiopatias Congênitas , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Coração Auxiliar , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Torácicos , Criança , Cardiopatias Congênitas/epidemiologia , Cardiopatias Congênitas/cirurgia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: In the third report of the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, outcomes of patients receiving mechanical circulatory support are reviewed in relation to implant era. METHODS: Procedures in adult patients (January 2011-June 2020) were included. Patients from centres with <60% follow-ups completed were excluded. Outcomes were stratified into 3 eras (2011-2013, 2014-2017 and 2018-2020). Adverse event rates (AERs) were calculated and stratified into early phase (<3 months) and late phase (>3 months). Risk factors for death were explored using univariable Cox regression with a stepwise time-varying hazard ratio (<3 vs >3 months). RESULTS: In total, 4834 procedures in 4486 individual patients (72 hospitals) were included, with a median follow-up of 1.1 (interquartile range: 0.3-2.6) years. The annual number of implants (range: 346-600) did not significantly change (P = 0.41). Both Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support class (classes 4-7: 23, 25 and 33%; P < 0.001) and in-hospital deaths (18.5, 17.2 and 11.2; P < 0.001) decreased significantly between eras. Overall, mortality, transplants and the probability of weaning were 55, 25 and 2% at 5 years after the implant, respectively. Major infections were mainly noted early after the implant occurred (AER<3 months: 1.44 vs AER>3 months: 0.45). Bilirubin and creatinine levels were significant risk factors in the early phase but not in the late phase after the implant. CONCLUSIONS: In its 10 years of existence, EUROMACS has become a point of reference enabling benchmarking and outcome monitoring. Patient characteristics and outcomes changed between implant eras. In addition, both occurrence of outcomes and risk factor weights are time dependent.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Coração Auxiliar , Cirurgia Torácica , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Torácicos , Adulto , Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Sistema de Registros , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite recent advances in management of patients with advanced heart failure, mortality remains high. Aim of this study was to compare impact of different aetiology of ischaemic and idiopathic cardiomyopathy on early outcomes and long-term survival of patients after left ventricular assist device implantation. METHODS: European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS) gathers clinical data and follow-up parameters of LVAD recipients. Patients enrolled in the EUROMACS registry with primary diagnosis of either ischaemic (n = 1190) or idiopathic (n = 812) cardiomyopathy were included. Primary Endpoints were early mortality as well as long-term survival. Secondary endpoint were major postoperative adverse events, such as need for rethoracotomy. Additionally, a propensity-score matching analysis was performed for patients with ischaemic (n = 509) and idiopathic (n = 509) cardiomyopathy. RESULTS: In terms of basic demographics and baseline parameters the two groups significantly differed as expected before propensity-score matching due to different aetiology of cardiomyopathy. Seven-day (52 (4.4%) versus 18 (2.2%); p = 0.009), 30-day (153 (12.9%) versus 73 (9.0%); p = 0.008) and in-hospital mortality (253 (19.7%) versus 123 (15.1%); p = 0.009) were significantly lower in the idiopathic cardiomyopathy group compared to the ischaemic cardiomyopathy group, whereas after propensity-score matching 30-day (p = 0.169) was comparable and in-hospital mortality (p = 0.051) was almost significant. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed no significant difference in regard of long-term survival after propensity-score matching (Breslow-test p = 0.161 and LogRank-test p = 0.113). CONCLUSION: Though patients with ischaemic and idiopathic cardiomyopathy suffer from different cardiomyopathy aetiologies, 30-day-mortality and long-term survival of both groups were similar leading to the conclusion that covariates predominately influence mortality and survival of ischaemic and idiopathic cardiomyopathies.
Assuntos
Cardiomiopatias , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Coração Auxiliar , Cardiomiopatias/etiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a risk factor for mortality and cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs) and is common in patients with heart failure. This study evaluated survival and adverse events in patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and a history of AF in the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support. METHODS: Patients with a continuous-flow LVAD, AF or sinus rhythm (SR) and a follow-up were included. Kaplan-Meier analyses for survival (including a propensity-scored matched analysis), freedom from CVA, pump thrombosis, bleeding and a composite of pump thrombosis/CVA were performed. To correct for covariate imbalance, a Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis was performed after propensity score (PS) matching the groups. Finally, a Cox regression was performed for predictors of lower survival. RESULTS: Overall, 1821 patients (83% male) were included, with a median age of 57 years and a median follow-up of 13.1 months (interquartile range: 4.3-27.7). Preoperative Electrocardiogram (ECG) rhythm was AF in 421 (23.1%) and SR in 1400 (76.9%) patients. Patients with pre-LVAD AF had a lower ≤90-day (81.9% vs 87.1%, P = 0.0047) and 4-year (35.4% vs 44.2%, P = 0.0083) survival compared to SR. KM analysis with PS matching groups revealed a trend (P = 0.087) towards decreased survival. Univariable analyses confirmed pre-LVAD AF as a predictor for mortality, but the multivariable analysis did not. No difference in the rate of adverse events was found. An analysis of patients at 24 months revealed a higher rate of CVAs for pre-LVAD AF patients (77% vs 94.3%, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pre-LVAD AF undergoing LVAD implantation had a worse survival. However, after performing a multivariate analysis, and PS matching analysis, AF was no longer significant, indicating a worser preoperative condition in these patients. Concerning thrombo-embolic events, only patients with pre-LVAD AF alive beyond 24 months have a higher risk of CVAs.
Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Coração Auxiliar , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Trombose , Fibrilação Atrial/complicações , Feminino , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Trombose/etiologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We investigated the clinical outcomes after cardiac valvular surgery procedures concomitant (CCPs) with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation compared to propensity score (PS) matched controls using the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS) data. METHODS: Between 2006 and 2018, 2760 continuous-flow LVAD patients were identified. Of these, 533 underwent a CCP during the LVAD implant. RESULTS: Cardiopulmonary bypass time (p < 0.001) and time for implant (p < 0.001) were both significantly longer in the LVAD+CCP group. Hospital mortality was comparable between the two groups from the unmatched population (15.7% vs. 14.1%, p = 0.073). Similarly, short-to-mid-term survival was similar in both groups, with 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates of 67.9%, 48.2%, and 27.7% versus 66.4%, 46.1%, and 26%, respectively (log-rank, p = 0.25). The results were similar in the PS-matched population. Hospital mortality was comparable between the two groups (18.9% vs. 17.4%, p = 0.074). The short-to-mid-term Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was similar for both groups, with 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates of 63.4%, 49.2%, and 24.7% versus 66.5%, 46%, and 25.1%, respectively (log-rank, p = 0.81). In the unmatched population, LVAD+CCP patients had longer intensive care unit (ICU) stays (p < 0.0001), longer mechanical ventilation time (p = 0.001), a higher rate of temporary right ventricular assist device (RVAD) support (p = 0.033), and a higher rate of renal replacement therapy (n = 35, 6.6% vs. n = 89, 4.0%, p = 0.014). In the PS-matched population, the LVAD+CCP patients had longer ICU stays (p = 0.019) and longer mechanical ventilation time (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The effect of additive valvular procedures (CCPs) does not seem to affect short-term survival, significantly, based on our registry data analysis. However, the decision to perform CCPs should be balanced with the projected type of surgery and preoperative characteristics. LVAD+CCP patients remain a delicate population and adverse device-related events should be strictly monitored and managed.