Role of CYP24A1, VDR and GC gene polymorphisms on deferasirox pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes.

ß-Thalassemia patients develop deficiency in vitamin D absorption and liver hydroxylation, resulting in extremely low calcitriol levels. We explored the role of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) involved in vitamin D metabolism, transport and activity on deferasirox pharmacokinetics and outcomes (effectiveness trough levels (Ctrough) and the area under the curve (AUC) cutoffs of 20 µg ml-1 and 360 µg ml-1 h-1, respectively; nonresponse AUC limit of 250 µg ml-1 h-1). Ninety-nine ß-thalassemic patients were enrolled. Drug plasma Ctrough and AUC were measured by the high-performance liquid chromatography system coupled with an ultraviolet determination method. Allelic discrimination for VDR, CYP24A1, CYP27B1 and GC gene SNPs was performed by real-time PCR. CYP24A1 22776 TT significantly influenced Cmin and negatively predicted it in regression analysis. CYP24A1 3999 CC was associated with Ctrough and Cmin and was a negative predictor of Tmax, whereas CYP24A1 8620 GG seemed to have a role in Ctrough, AUC, t1/2 and Cmin, and was an AUC negative predictor factor. Considering treatment outcome, Cdx2 and GC 1296 were retained in regression analysis as AUC efficacy cutoff negative predictors.

Influence of single-nucleotide polymorphisms on deferasirox C trough levels and effectiveness.

Deferasirox (DFX) is the only once-daily oral chelator for iron overload and its pharmacokinetic has been related with response to therapy. Our aim was to evaluate DFX plasma concentrations according to single-nucleotide polymorphisms in genes involved in its metabolism (UGT1A1, UGT1A3, CYP1A1, CYP1A2 and CYP2D6) and elimination (MRP2 and BCRP1). Further aim was to define a plasma concentration cutoff value predicting an adequate response to therapy. Plasma concentrations were determined at the end of dosing interval (C trough) using an high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet method. Allelic discrimination was performed by real-time PCR. C trough levels were influenced by UGT1A1C>T rs887829, CYP1A1C>A rs2606345, CYP1A2A>C rs762551, CYP1A2C>T rs2470890 and MRP2G>A rs2273697 polymorphisms. A DFX plasma efficacy cutoff value of 20,000 ng ml(-1) was identified; CYP1A1C>A rs2606345 AA and CYP1A2C>T rs2470890 TT genotypes may predict this value, suggesting a negative predictive role in therapy efficacy. Our data suggest the feasibility of a pharmacogenetic-based DFX dose personalization.

Mitotane levels predict the outcome of patients with adrenocortical carcinoma treated adjuvantly following radical resection.

CONTEXT: Mitotane plasma concentrations ≥ 14 mg/l have been shown to predict tumor response and better survival in patients with advanced adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). A correlation between mitotane concentrations and patient outcome has not been demonstrated in an adjuvant setting. OBJECTIVE: To compare recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients who reached and maintained mitotane concentrations ≥ 1 4 mg/l vs patients who did not. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective analysis at six referral European centers. PATIENTS: Patients with ACC who were radically resected between 1995 and 2009 and were treated adjuvantly with mitotane targeting concentrations of 14-20 mg/l. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: RFS (primary) and overall survival (secondary). RESULTS: Of the 122 patients included, 63 patients (52%) reached and maintained during a median follow-up of 36 months the target mitotane concentrations (group 1) and 59 patients (48%) did not (group 2). ACC recurrence was observed in 22 patients of group 1 (35%) and 36 patients in group 2 (61%). In multivariable analysis, the maintenance of target mitotane concentrations was associated with a significantly prolonged RFS (hazard ratio (HR) of recurrence: 0.418, 0.22-0.79; P=0.007), while the risk of death was not significantly altered (HR: 0.59, 0.26-1.34; P=0.20). Grades 3-4 toxicity was observed in 11 patients (9%) and was managed with temporary mitotane discontinuation. None of the patients discontinued mitotane definitively for toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Mitotane concentrations ≥ 14 mg/l predict response to adjuvant treatment being associated with a prolonged RFS. A monitored adjuvant mitotane treatment may benefit patients after radical removal of ACC.

Steroid resistance in nasal polyposis: role of glucocorticoid receptor and TGF-beta1.

BACKGROUND: Glucocorticoids (GCs) are considered drugs of choice for treating nasal polyps (NPs). However, a subset of patients shows a limited clinical response even to high doses of GCs. Altered expression of glucocorticoid receptors (GRs), namely GR-alpha; and GR-beta;, is a potential mechanism underlying GC insensitivity. GCs modulate the expression of several cytokines, including transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta), which may contribute to cellular proliferation in NPs. The study investigates some biomolecular features of GC-resistant NPs, and examines possible differences from normal mucosa (NM). METHODOLOGY: Radioligand binding assay (binding) was used to determine GR-alpha; binding capacity; Western blotting was used to evaluate GR-alpha;, GR-beta;, and TGF-beta; expression and GR-alpha; subcellular distribution. NPs were sampled in 32 patients during ethmoidectomy; NM was taken from 15 healthy patients during rhinoplasty. RESULTS: GR-alpha; was present in NPs and NM, with lower affinity for the ligand in NPs. GR-alpha; was prevalent in the cytosol of NPs that were GR-alpha-negative to the binding assay. GR-beta was expressed in NPs and absent in the majority of NM. TGF-beta1 expression was higher in NPs than in NM. CONCLUSIONS: GR-beta and TGF-beta1 might be involved in NP pathogenesis, but their role in modulating GC sensitivity is still unclear.

Management of adjuvant mitotane therapy following resection of adrenal cancer.

Whenever adrenal cancer (ACC) is completely removed we should face the dilemma to treat by means of adjuvant therapy or not. In our opinion, adjuvant mitotane is the preferable approach in most cases because the majority of patients following radical removal of an ACC have an elevated risk of recurrence. A better understanding of factors that influence prognosis and response to treatment will help in stratifying patients according to their probability of benefiting from adjuvant mitotane, with the aim of sparing unnecessary toxicity to patients who are likely unresponsive. However, until significant advancements take place, we have to deal with uncertainty using our best clinical judgement and personal experience in the clinical decision process. In the present paper, we present the current evidence on adjuvant mitotane treatment and describe the management strategies of patients with ACC after complete surgical resection. We acknowledge the limit that most recommendations are based on personal experience rather than solid evidence.

Mitotane treatment for adrenocortical carcinoma: an overview.

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare aggressive endocrine neoplasm characterized by a 5-year survival of less than 50%. Due to the widespread use of imaging techniques in clinics, ACC is increasingly recognized as an incidentally discovered tumor. Mostly characterized by poor prognosis, ACC is often diagnosed at an advanced stage of disease. Early diagnosis is uncommon; when diagnosed, ACCs are usually large and have invaded adjacent organs, even if metastatic spread to distant sites can be absent. Complete surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment for patients with localized disease; however, due to a recurrence rate of 50-70% after apparent radical surgery, there is a strong rationale for a concomitant systemic treatment. Adrenolytic therapy with mitotane (o,p>-DDD), administered alone or in combination with others antineoplastic agents, is the primary treatment for patients with advanced ACC and is increasingly used also in an adjuvant setting, even if controversy exists on this issue due to the limitations of the available literature. Despite being in use for many years, the rarity of ACC precluded the organization of randomized trials; thus, many areas of uncertainty and controversy remain regarding the role of this old drug in the clinical management of patients with ACC. The purpose of this paper is to review the current evidence on mitotane treatment in patients with advanced disease and in ACC patients after complete surgical resection as adjuvant treatment.