Treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: Analysis of treatment patterns in adult and paediatric patients across four European countries.

OBJECTIVE: Multiple treatment options are recommended for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) by clinical guidelines. This study aimed to explore SLE treatment patterns as there is limited real-world data of SLE medication utilisation, especially in childhood-onset SLE (cSLE). METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal cohort study using five routinely collected healthcare databases from four European countries (United Kingdom, France, Germany, and Spain). We described the characteristics of adult and paediatric patients at time of SLE diagnosis. We calculated the percentage of patients commencing SLE treatments in the first month and year after diagnosis, reported number of prescriptions, starting dose, cumulative dose, and duration of each treatment, and characterised the line of therapy. RESULTS: We characterised 11,255 patients with a first diagnosis of SLE and included 5718 in our medication utilisation analyses. The majority of adult SLE patients were female (range 80-88 %), with median age of 49 to 54 years at diagnosis. In the paediatric cohort (n = 378), 66-83 % of SLE patients were female, with median age of 12 to 16 years at diagnosis. Hydroxychloroquine and glucocorticoids were common first-line treatments in both adults and children, with second-line treatments including mycophenolate mofetil and methotrexate. Few cases of monoclonal antibody use were seen in either cohort. Initial glucocorticoid dosing in paediatric patients was often higher than in adults. CONCLUSION: Treatment choices for adult SLE patients across four European countries were in line with recent therapeutic consensus guidelines. High glucocorticoid prescriptions in paediatric patients suggests the need for steroid-sparing treatment alternatives and paediatric specific guidelines.

A48G polymorphism in the D1 receptor genes associated with bipolar I disorder.

Several lines of evidence point to a role for dopamine in mood disorders and, in particular, in bipolar disorders. In line with a considerable amount of evidence, the dopamine D1 receptor gene (DRD1) is considered to be a good candidate gene for bipolar disorders. Several studies did not find any association between bipolar 1 patients and DRD1. In this study, we investigate a possible association between BP disorder and -48A/G polymorphism of the DRD1. We genotyped 107 bipolar 1 patients and 129 healthy control subjects of exclusively Sardinian descent. A statistically significant difference in genotype (chi2 = 6.29, df = 2, P = 0.042) and allele (chi2 = 5.46, df=1, P = 0.019; OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.08-2.16) frequencies was found, suggesting an association between the DRD1 gene and bipolar I disorder (BP I) in the Sardinian population.

Adverse reactions during imatinib and lansoprazole treatment in gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

OBJECTIVE: To report the case of a patient affected by gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) who developed cutaneous adverse drug reactions during treatment with imatinib and lansoprazole. CASE SUMMARY: After 2 months of treatment with imatinib 400 mg/day, a 60-year-old white female affected by GIST developed bilateral palpebral edema with hyperemic conjunctivae and labial edema when lansoprazole 15 mg/day was introduced to treat dyspeptic symptomatology. Treatment was discontinued, and on reintroduction of both drugs, the patient developed Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Two months later, generalized cutaneous reactions appeared immediately following reintroduction of low-dose imatinib with corticosteroid plus lansoprazole treatment. After discontinuation of all drugs, with the exception of the corticosteroid, the progression of cutaneous lesions stopped. DISCUSSION: The use of imatinib is commonly associated with a high dose-dependent rate of rash and edema. Several cases of Stevens-Johnson syndrome have also been described, although not in patients affected by GIST. Severe skin reactions have been reported for lansoprazole including erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Applying Naranjo's algorithm, the adverse events were considered possible due to imatinib and probable due to lansoprazole. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the data reported, we conclude that the adverse reactions described may be attributed to either drug alone. However, combined use of drugs may increase the risk of onset of these adverse reactions due to a potential drug interaction involving CYP3A4.