Geographic factors and plasma selenium in uremia and dialysis.

The importance of selenium (Se) as an essential trace element for man has been increasingly recognized. Blood Se levels in chronic uremic patients are frequently reported to be lower than in controls. Definitive determination of the Se status in uremic patients, however, is hampered by the wide range of blood Se content in humans from different parts of the world. The present study was designed to assess and compare the Se status in two European populations from Rostock (Germany) and Chieti (Italy). Plasma Se levels were evaluated in healthy controls, chronic renal failure nondialyzed patients (CRF) and hemodialysis patients (HD). All Se determinations were performed in a single laboratory. The Se concentration was significantly higher (p < 0.005) in Italian healthy controls than in German healthy controls. In contrast, Se levels were similar in both CRF and HD patients from both cities. In both countries, the Se concentration in CRF and HD patients was significantly lower (p < 0.001) than in their corresponding controls, but no difference between CRF and HD was found. CRF and HD patients from the two countries showed quite similar laboratory and anthropometric data. In CRF patients in Chieti, a significant (p < 0.05) negative correlation between plasma Se and serum creatinine was found. In both HD groups, the length of time on HD and type of membrane dialyzer used did not influence the Se status. A significant positive correlation (p < 0.01) between Se levels and the protein catabolic rate was found in both HD groups. Uremia seems to be a strong factor which overrules the difference in Se levels that is present in healthy adults from different European countries. Uremia in itself may influence and level the Se concentration in patients with geographic diversity.

Hemodialysis with regenerated cellulosic membranes does not reduce plasma selenium levels in chronic uremic patients.

Selenium (Se) is considered an essential and very important trace element for humans. Se blood levels are frequently low in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, but very little has been established concerning the mechanisms that could modify Se status in uremia, including a supposed dialysis-mediated Se depletion. In order to verify whether hemodialysis (HD) can induce a loss of Se, thereby leading or contributing to a low plasma Se concentration, we investigated the effect of HD procedure with the most commonly used regenerated cellulosic membrane (Cuprophan) on plasma Se levels in 20 uremic patients on HD for 62.5 +/- 49.4 months. Plasma Se levels were also determined in 15 chronic renal failure (CRF) nondialyzed patients and in 28 age-matched healthy controls. Se concentration was determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Plasma Se levels of both HD patients (61.3 +/- 8.5 micrograms/L) and CRF nondialyzed patients (56.4 +/- 10.1 micrograms/L) were significantly lower than in normal subjects (78.3 +/- 9.7 micrograms/L, p < 0.001). In CRF nondialyzed patients, a significant (p < 0.05) negative correlation was found between the plasma Se concentration versus serum creatinine values. Within the HD group, plasma Se levels significantly increased after the HD procedure (72.8 +/- 17.2 micrograms/L, p < 0.02) together with hematocrit and total plasma protein values (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of selenium supplementation on immune parameters in chronic uraemic patients on haemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: The involvement of selenium (Se) in immune response has been increasingly recognized, cell-mediated immunity being principally affected by Se deficiency. Blood Se levels in chronic uraemic patients are frequently lower than in controls, and in these patients cellular immunity in generally impaired. METHODS: The present study was designed to assess the effects of Se supplementation over 6 consecutive months on immune parameters in haemodialysis (HD) patients from Rostock (Germany) and Chieti (Italy). In both cities, five patients were supplemented with Se (500 micrograms thrice weekly for 3 months, then 200 micrograms thrice weekly for the next 3 months), whereas another five patients received placebo. All Se determinations were performed in a single laboratory. RESULTS: In both cities, basic plasma Se levels were significantly lower in patients than in their corresponding normal controls. After beginning Se supplementation, plasma Se concentration promptly normalized and levelled off in the normal range throughout the study. Se administration was well tolerated by all patients, and no side-effects attributable to Se toxicity were observed. Although no major change in immunocompetent cells (white blood count, total lymphocyte count, lymphocyte subpopulations) was observed during Se therapy, an improvement in T-cell response to phytohaemoagglutinin (as evaluated in Rostock patients) and a significant progressive increase in delayed-type hypersensitivity (as evaluated in Chieti patients) was observed in supplemented patients. After 6 months of Se therapy, the increase in delayed-type hypersensitivity of supplemented patients proved to be significantly higher when compared to both presupplementation values and to the results found in non-supplemented patients. Three months after suspension of Se supplementation, plasma Se levels and delayed hypersensitivity significantly decreased in Chieti patients, with both parameters returning similar to presupplementation values. CONCLUSIONS: In accordance with previous studies done in non-uraemic subjects, our investigation demonstrates for the first time the immunostimulatory properties of Se in HD patients. Though several problems on Se metabolism in uraemia remain unresolved, in our opinion moderate and safe Se supplementation can be beneficial in chronic uraemic patients.