Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acta Paediatr ; 102(10): 961-4, 2013 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23799976

RESUMO

AIM: To compare current practice of cuff size selection for noninvasive blood pressure measurement in a single-centre, tertiary-level neonatal intensive care unit (visual assessment of bladder width/limb length closest to 2/3) with common recommendations for appropriate cuff selection. METHODS: Visual assessment of the appropriate cuff size ('2/3 rule') for upper arm, forearm and calf in 103 neonates (309 cuff selections) was compared with the following recommendations: (i) Method A - guidelines of the cuff manufacturer, (ii) Method B - cuff width/limb circumference ratio 0.44-0.60 and (iii) Method C - cuff width/limb length ratio closest to 0.66. RESULTS: The upper arm cuff size was correctly chosen in 84% of cases (Method A), 43% (Method B) and 56% (Method C). The forearm cuff size was correctly chosen in 94% of cases (Method A), 68% (Method B) and 54% (Method C). The calf cuff size was correctly chosen in 96% of cases (Method A), 72% (Method B) and 63% (Method C). CONCLUSION: The accuracy of selecting cuff size by visual assessment is low. Further research on accurate cuff selection for neonates, including at the forearm and calf, is warranted.


Assuntos
Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/métodos , Esfigmomanômetros , Braço/anatomia & histologia , Determinação da Pressão Arterial/instrumentação , Determinação da Pressão Arterial/normas , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Esfigmomanômetros/normas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA