The Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Ovarian Cancer Tumor Microenvironment: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Immunotherapy, particularly the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has shown limited efficacy in treating ovarian cancer (OC), possibly due to diverse T cell infiltration patterns in the tumor microenvironment. This review explores how neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) impacts the immune landscape of OC, focusing on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), PD-1/PD-L1 expression, and their clinical implications. A comprehensive literature search across four databases yielded nine relevant studies. These studies evaluated stromal (sTILs) and intra-epithelial (ieTILs) TILs before and after NACT. sTIL responses varied, impacting prognostic outcomes, and ieTILs increased in some patients without clear survival associations. PD-L1 expression after NACT correlated with improved overall survival (OS), and increases in granzyme B+ and PD-1 correlated with longer progression-free survival (PFS). Remarkably, reduced FoxP3+ TILs post-NACT correlated with better prognosis. NACT often increases sTIL/ieTIL and CD8+ subpopulations, but their correlation with improved PFS and OS varies. Upregulation of co-inhibitory molecules, notably PD-L1, suggests an immunosuppressive response to chemotherapy. Ongoing trials exploring neoadjuvant ICIs and chemotherapy offer promise for advancing OC treatment. Standardized measurements assessing TIL density, location, and heterogeneity are crucial for addressing genetic complexity and immunological heterogeneity in OC.

Laparoscopic en-bloc pelvic resection for advanced ovarian cancer.

Introduction: Ovarian cancer (OC) exhibits an aggressive behavior, wherein the therapeutic approach always involves both surgery and chemotherapy. Survival outcomes are still related to comprehensive surgical excision of all macroscopic lesions (Rauh-Hain et al., 2017), increasing gynecologic oncologists' efforts to achieve the highest possible complete resection rate (Tozzi et al., 2024). The peritoneum serves as both a dissemination pathway and a barrier that restricts tumor spread beyond its confines. This understanding has prompted the adoption of en-bloc resection strategy for the entire pelvis, involving the removal of pelvic organs along with the surrounding peritoneum. The en-bloc pelvic resection procedure allows for the removal of pelvic disease in all cases of advanced ovarian cancer (Tozzi et al., 2017).Endeavors should be also directed towards minimizing surgical morbidity, by the adoption of minimally invasive surgery for debulking procedures (Tozzi et al., 2023). Case: This video demonstrates a laparoscopic en-bloc pelvic resection with creation of an end-to-end transanal anastomosis. The surgical specimen extraction and the placement of the anvil were performed through the vaginal route.A 75 year-old patient presented with FIGO stage IIIC OC with a 12 cm pelvic mass involving the whole pelvis. The patient was enrolled in the ULTRA-LAP trial and underwent laparoscopic primary debulking surgery with en-bloc pelvic resection. No protective ileostomy was performed and bowel opening occurred on the fifth postoperative day. The patient was discharged on the 11th postoperative day, thereafter completing a regimen of 6 cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy. Conclusions: The en-bloc resection of the pelvis is a standardized procedure that consists of ten reproducible steps.

Peritonectomy and resection of mesentery during Visceral-Peritoneal Debulking (VPD) in patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer: A phase I-II trial.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the surgical technique, assess feasibility, efficacy, and safety of peritonectomy and/or resection of mesentery (P-Rme) during Visceral-Peritoneal Debulking (VPD) in patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer (OC). METHODS: In April 2009 we registered a protocol study on the safety and feasibility of P-Rme. In the period April 2009-December 2022, 687 patients with FIGO stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer underwent VPD. One hundred and twenty-nine patients (18.7%) had extensive disease on the mesentery and underwent P-Rme. Feasibility was assessed as the number of procedures completed. Efficacy was measured as the rate of Complete Resection (CR). Safety was defined by the intra- and post-operative morbidity rate specifically associated with these procedures. RESULTS: In all patients P-Rme was successfully completed. P-me was performed in 82 patients and R-me in 47, both procedures in 23 patients. CR was achieved in all 129 patients with an efficacy of 100%. Intra-operatively 5 patients out of 129 experienced small bowel loop surgical devascularization. They required small bowel resection and anastomosis. The procedure specific morbidity was 3.8%. No post-operative complication was related to P-Rme. At 64 months median follow-up, survival outcomes in the study group were similar to patients in the control group. CONCLUSION: Overall, almost 20% of the VPD patients needed P-Rme to obtain a CR. P-Rme was a safe and effective step during VPD. The rate of CR in the study group was 100% achieved thanks to the addition of the P-Rme. No procedure specific post-operative complications occurred but 3.8% of the patients had unplanned additional surgery related to these procedures.

Feasibility of laparoscopic Visceral-Peritoneal Debulking (L-VPD) in patients with stage III-IV ovarian cancer: the ULTRA-LAP trial pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: A non-randomized prospective clinical trial (ULTRA-LAP) was registered to test safety, side effects and efficacy of laparoscopic Visceral-Peritoneal Debulking (L-VPD) in patients with stage III-IV ovarian cancer (OC). A pilot study was designed to identify which OC patients are suitable to undergo L-VPD. METHODS: Between March 2016 and October 2021, all consecutive patients with OC underwent exploratory laparoscopy (EXL). All patients whose disease was deemed amenable for a complete resection (CR) at imaging review and EXL, underwent VPD. In all patients a consistent attempt was made at completing L-VPD. RESULTS: Two hundred and eight OC had EXL in the study period: 121 underwent interval VPD and 87 up-front VPD. Overall, 158 patients had VPD by laparotomy (75.9%) and 50 (24.1%) had L-VPD, of which 34 patients as interval (iL-VPD) and 16 as up-front (uL-VPD). Intra- and post-operative morbidity was very low in the L-VPD group. CR rate was 98% in L-VPD group and 94% in VPD. Most common reason for conversion was diaphragmatic disease extending dorsally. CONCLUSION: In the pilot study of ULTRA-LAP, L-VPD was completed in 24,1% of OC. Initial analysis supports the feasibility of L-VPD in 2 groups of OC: those with no gross disease at interval surgery and those with gross visible disease at upfront or interval surgery, but limited to: pelvis (including recto-sigmoid), gastro colic omentum, peritoneum and diaphragm, the latter not requiring dorsal liver mobilization. Both groups had 100% feasibility and have been thus forth recruited to ULTRA-LAP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05862740.

Simple rules, O-RADS, ADNEX and SRR model: Single oncologic center validation of diagnostic predictive models alone and combined (two-step strategy) to estimate the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses and ovarian tumors.

OBJECTIVE: To compare performance of Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX model), Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS), Simple Rules Risk (SRR) assessment and the two-step strategy based on the application of Simple Rules (SR) followed by SRR and SR followed by ADNEX in the pre-operative discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses (AMs). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study from January-2018 to December-2021 in which consecutive patients with at AMs were recruited. Accuracy metrics included sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for ADNEX, O-RADS and SRR. When SR was inconclusive a "two-step strategy" was adopted applying SR + ADNEX model and SR + SRR assessment. RESULTS: A total of 514 women were included, 400 (77.8%) had a benign ovarian tumor and 114 (22.2%) had a malignant tumor. At a threshold malignancy risk of >10%, the SE and SP of ADNEX model, O-RADS and SRR were: 0.92 (95% CI, 0.86-0.96) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85-0.91); 0.93 (95% CI, 0.87-0.97) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.96-0.92); 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80-0.93) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.80-0.87), respectively. When we applied SR, 109 (21.2%) cases resulted inconclusive. The SE and SP of two-step strategy SR + SRR assessment and SR + ADNEX model were 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80-0.93) and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.94), SR + ADNEX model 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83-0.95) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90-0.96), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: O-RADS presented the highest SE, similar to ADNEX model and SR + ADNEX model. However, the SR + ADNEX model presented the higher performance accuracy with the higher SP and PPV. This two-step strategy, SR and ADNEX model applicated to inconclusive SR, is convenient for clinical evaluation.

Patient Derived Organoids (PDOs), Extracellular Matrix (ECM), Tumor Microenvironment (TME) and Drug Screening: State of the Art and Clinical Implications of Ovarian Cancer Organoids in the Era of Precision Medicine.

Ovarian cancer (OC) has the highest mortality rate of all gynecological malignancies due to the high prevalence of advanced stages of diagnosis and the high rate of recurrence. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of OC tumors contributes to the rapid development of resistance to conventional chemotherapy. In recent years, in order to overcome these problems, targeted therapies have been introduced in various types of tumors, including gynecological cancer. However, the lack of predictive biomarkers showing different clinical benefits limits the effectiveness of these therapies. This requires the development of preclinical models that can replicate the histological and molecular characteristics of OC subtypes. In this scenario, organoids become an important preclinical model for personalized medicine. In fact, patient-derived organoids (PDO) recapture tumor heterogeneity with the possibility of performing drug screening. However, to best reproduce the patient's characteristics, it is necessary to develop a specific extracellular matrix (ECM) and introduce a tumor microenvironment (TME), which both represent an actual object of study to improve drug screening, particularly when used in targeted therapy and immunotherapy to guide therapeutic decisions. In this review, we summarize the current state of the art for the screening of PDOs, ECM, TME, and drugs in the setting of OC, as well as discussing the clinical implications and future perspectives for the research of OC organoids.

Utero-cutaneous fistula after caesarean section delivery: diagnosis and management of a rare complication.

Utero-cutaneous fistula is an extremely rare condition characterized by an abnormal communication between the anterior wall of the uterus and the abdominal wall. The causes include multiple caesarean sections, incomplete hysterorrhaphy, miscarriages, uterine cavity revision, retention of placental material after delivery, use of drains, post-operative infections, or injuries. Herein, we report a case of a 38-year-old female, who underwent caesarean section 42 days earlier and presented to the emergency room complaining of fever, abdominal pain, and purulent discharge from the abdominal wall from 6 days. Her medical history included 2 previous term caesarean section deliveries and an hysteroscopic polypectomy 2 years earlier. A pelvic computed tomography scan with contrast medium showed fluid/super-fluid phlogistic collection reported at the anterior wall of the uterus with a continuous solution of the uterine wall itself. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated the presence of a probable hyperintense fistula, extended for 30 mm and 16 mm of thickness, which ended in the subcutaneous area with an abscess joint without continuous solution with the skin. A laparotomic surgical procedure was successfully performed. Histopathology confirmed the surgical suspect of utero-cutaneous fistula. Although utero-cutaneous fistula is an extremely rare complication, it should be considered if after caesarean section delivery signs and symptoms of skin inflammation and/or infection persist.