Evaluation of COVID-19 impact on DELAYing diagnostic-therapeutic pathways of lung cancer patients in Italy (COVID-DELAY study): fewer cases and higher stages from a real-world scenario.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 has disrupted the global health care system since March 2020. Lung cancer (LC) patients (pts) represent a vulnerable population highly affected by the pandemic. This multicenter Italian study aimed to evaluate whether the COVID-19 outbreak had an impact on access to cancer diagnosis and treatment of LC pts compared with pre-pandemic time. METHODS: Consecutive newly diagnosed LC pts referred to 25 Italian Oncology Departments between March and December 2020 were included. Access rate and temporal intervals between date of symptoms onset and diagnostic and therapeutic services were compared with the same period in 2019. Differences between the 2 years were analyzed using the chi-square test for categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. RESULTS: A slight reduction (-6.9%) in newly diagnosed LC cases was observed in 2020 compared with 2019 (1523 versus 1637, P = 0.09). Newly diagnosed LC pts in 2020 were more likely to be diagnosed with stage IV disease (P < 0.01) and to be current smokers (someone who has smoked more than 100 cigarettes, including hand-rolled cigarettes, cigars, cigarillos, in their lifetime and has smoked in the last 28 days) (P < 0.01). The drop in terms of new diagnoses was greater in the lockdown period (percentage drop -12% versus -3.2%) compared with the other months included. More LC pts were referred to a low/medium volume hospital in 2020 compared with 2019 (P = 0.01). No differences emerged in terms of interval between symptoms onset and radiological diagnosis (P = 0.94), symptoms onset and cytohistological diagnosis (P = 0.92), symptoms onset and treatment start (P = 0.40), and treatment start and first radiological revaluation (P = 0.36). CONCLUSIONS: Our study pointed out a reduction of new diagnoses with a shift towards higher stage at diagnosis for LC pts in 2020. Despite this, the measures adopted by Italian Oncology Departments ensured the maintenance of the diagnostic-therapeutic pathways of LC pts.

MicroRNA-based signatures impacting clinical course and biology of ovarian cancer: a miRNOmics study.

BACKGROUND: In Western countries, ovarian cancer (OC) still represents the leading cause of gynecological cancer-related deaths, despite the remarkable gains in therapeutical options. Novel biomarkers of early diagnosis, prognosis definition and prediction of treatment outcomes are of pivotal importance. Prior studies have shown the potentials of micro-ribonucleic acids (miRNAs) as biomarkers for OC and other cancers. METHODS: We focused on the prognostic and/or predictive potential of miRNAs in OC by conducting a comprehensive array profiling of miRNA expression levels in ovarian tissue samples from 17 non-neoplastic controls, and 60 tumor samples from OC patients treated at the Regina Elena National Cancer Institute (IRE). A set of 54 miRNAs with differential expression in tumor versus normal samples (T/N-deregulated) was identified in the IRE cohort and validated against data from the Cancer Genoma Atlas (TCGA) related to 563 OC patients and 8 non-neoplastic controls. The prognostic/predictive role of the selected 54 biomarkers was tested in reference to survival endpoints and platinum resistance (P-res). RESULTS: In the IRE cohort, downregulation of the 2 miRNA-signature including miR-99a-5p and miR-320a held a negative prognostic relevance, while upregulation of miR-224-5p was predictive of less favorable event free survival (EFS) and P-res. Data from the TCGA showed that downregulation of 5 miRNAs, i.e., miR-150, miR-30d, miR-342, miR-424, and miR-502, was associated with more favorable EFS and overall survival outcomes, while miR-200a upregulation was predictive of P-res. The 9 miRNAs globally identified were all included into a single biologic signature, which was tested in enrichment analysis using predicted/validated miRNA target genes, followed by network representation of the miRNA-mRNA interactions. CONCLUSIONS: Specific dysregulated microRNA sets in tumor tissue showed predictive/prognostic value in OC, and resulted in a promising biological signature for this disease.

The lung immuno-oncology prognostic score (LIPS-3): a prognostic classification of patients receiving first-line pembrolizumab for PD-L1 ≥ 50% advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: To stratify the prognosis of patients with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) ≥ 50% advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) treated with first-line immunotherapy. METHODS: Baseline clinical prognostic factors, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), PD-L1 tumour cell expression level, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and their combination were investigated by a retrospective analysis of 784 patients divided between statistically powered training (n = 201) and validation (n = 583) cohorts. Cut-offs were explored by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and a risk model built with validated independent factors by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: NLR < 4 was a significant prognostic factor in both cohorts (P < 0.001). It represented 53% of patients in the validation cohort, with 1-year overall survival (OS) of 76.6% versus 44.8% with NLR > 4, in the validation series. The addition of PD-L1 ≥ 80% (21% of patients) or LDH < 252 U/l (25%) to NLR < 4 did not result in better 1-year OS (of 72.6% and 74.1%, respectively, in the validation cohort). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 2 [P < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) 2.04], pretreatment steroids (P < 0.001, HR 1.67) and NLR < 4 (P < 0.001, HR 2.29) resulted in independent prognostic factors. A risk model with these three factors, namely, the lung immuno-oncology prognostic score (LIPS)-3, accurately stratified three OS risk-validated categories of patients: favourable (0 risk factors, 40%, 1-year OS of 78.2% in the whole series), intermediate (1 or 2 risk factors, 54%, 1-year OS 53.8%) and poor (>2 risk factors, 5%, 1-year OS 10.7%) prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: We advocate the use of LIPS-3 as an easy-to-assess and inexpensive adjuvant prognostic tool for patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50% aNSCLC.

Corrigendum to "Circulating Cancer Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles as a Novel Biomarker for Clinical Outcome Evaluation".

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1155/2019/5879616.].

Osimertinib beyond disease progression in T790M EGFR-positive NSCLC patients: a multicenter study of clinicians' attitudes.

BACKGROUND: In most cases, T790M EGFR-positive NSCLC patients receiving osimertinib developed "non-drugable" progression, as the patients with common EGFR-sensitizing mutations were treated with first-line osimertinib. In both settings, chemotherapy represents the standard treatment and local ablative treatments (LATs) are potential useful options in the case of oligo-progression. METHODS: We conducted a study on "post-progression" (pp) outcomes of T790M EGFR-positive NSCLC patients treated with osimertinib, according to the therapeutic strategy applied: osimertinib beyond progression (± LATs), "switched therapies" or best supportive care only (BSC). RESULTS: 144 consecutive patients were evaluated: 53 (36.8%) did not received post-progression treatments (BSC), while 91 (63.2%) patients received at least 1 subsequent treatment; 50 patients (54.9%) received osimertinib beyond disease progression [19 (20.9%) of them with adjunctive LATs] and 41 (45.1%) a switched therapy. Median ppPFS (progression-free survival) and median ppOS (overall survival) of patients who received osimertinib beyond progression vs. switched therapies were 6.4 months vs. 4.7 months, respectively [HR 0.57 (95% CI 0.35-0.92), p = 0.0239] and 11.3 months vs 7.8 months, respectively [HR 0.57 (95% CI 0.33-0.98), p = 0.0446]. Among patients who received osimertinib beyond progression with and without LATs median ppPFS was 6.4 months and 5.7 months, respectively [HR 0.90 (95% CI 0.68-1.18), p = 0.4560], while median ppOS was 20.2 months and 9.9 months, respectively [HR 0.73 (95% CI 0.52-1.03), p = 0.0748]. At the univariate analysis, the only factor significantly related to the ppPFS was the therapeutic strategy in favor of osimertinib beyond progression (± LATs). Moreover, the only variable which was significantly related to ppOS at the multivariate analysis was osimertinib beyond progression (± LATs). CONCLUSION: Our study confirmed that in clinical practice, in case of "non-druggable" disease progression, maintaining osimertinib beyond progression (with adjunctive LATs) is an effective option.

Circulating Cancer Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles as a Novel Biomarker for Clinical Outcome Evaluation.

The recent introduction of the "precision medicine" concept in oncology pushed cancer research to focus on dynamic measurable biomarkers able to predict responses to novel anticancer therapies in order to improve clinical outcomes. Recently, the involvement of extracellular vesicles (EVs) in cancer pathophysiology has been described, and given their release from all cell types under specific stimuli, EVs have also been proposed as potential biomarkers in cancer. Among the techniques used to study EVs, flow cytometry has a high clinical potential. Here, we have applied a recently developed and simplified flow cytometry method for circulating EV enumeration, subtyping, and isolation from a large cohort of metastatic and locally advanced nonhaematological cancer patients (N = 106); samples from gender- and age-matched healthy volunteers were also analysed. A large spectrum of cancer-related markers was used to analyse differences in terms of peripheral blood circulating EV phenotypes between patients and healthy volunteers, as well as their correlation to clinical outcomes. Finally, EVs from patients and controls were isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting, and their protein cargoes were analysed by proteomics. Results demonstrated that EV counts were significantly higher in cancer patients than in healthy volunteers, as previously reported. More interestingly, results also demonstrated that cancer patients presented higher concentrations of circulating CD31+ endothelial-derived and tumour cancer stem cell-derived CD133 + CD326- EVs, when compared to healthy volunteers. Furthermore, higher levels of CD133 + CD326- EVs showed a significant correlation with a poor overall survival. Additionally, proteomics analysis of EV cargoes demonstrated disparities in terms of protein content and function between circulating EVs in cancer patients and healthy controls. Overall, our data strongly suggest that blood circulating cancer stem cell-derived EVs may have a role as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in cancer.

Real world treatment practice in patients with advanced melanoma in the nivolumab era: five novel Italian case reports and a literature review.

OBJECTIVE: The approval of the anti-PD1 antibody nivolumab has provided a significant therapeutic opportunity in the landscape of metastatic melanoma. In pivotal clinical trials, nivolumab improved clinical outcomes with a great safety profile. However, in real-world practice, the majority of the population with metastatic melanoma does meet one or more eligibility criteria of pivotal trials, since they have an ECOG-PS ≥ 2 or active/untreated known brain metastases. Waiting for larger real-wold studies that are currently lacking, but would be crucial to confirm the efficacy of nivolumab in challenging patients and to detect rare adverse events that could not be noticed in pivotal trials, this review collects both literature and unpublished case reports on nivolumab treatment in metastatic melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Case reports, published from 2016 to February 2018, and five, unpublished case reports, representative of Italian clinical practice, were reported and potential issues that physicians could face with the use of nivolumab in the real world were discussed. RESULTS: Among Italian cases, one patient had a huge retro-nuchal mass, which significantly decreased with few cycles of nivolumab; two patients were affected by cardiovascular comorbidities and one had brain metastasis; the last had a long history of disease, firstly diagnosed in 1997. A literature review was mainly focused on the experience in the management of rare immune adverse events related to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab confirmed its efficacy and safety in real-world; the decision-making process on starting and scheduling the treatment, even in the management of adverse events, should consider multiple factors related to both patient (i.e., BRAF status, ECOG PS, comorbidities) and disease (burden, metastasis).

Peritonectomy and hyperthermic chemotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent ephitelial ovarian cancer: a single center cohort study.

AIM: The present study reports our experience concerning with the advanced cancer treatment (cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer ephitelial (AEOS) or recurrent ovarian cancer ephitelial (REOC). METHODS: In a period from October 2006 to December 2009, we observed 25 patients affected by advanced ephitelial ovarian cancer or recurrent ephitelial ovarian cancer. All patients underwent CRS + HIPEC procedures. Peritoneal involvement was valued according to the Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) and the remaining postoperative disease according to the Completeness of Cytoreduction score (CC). HIPEC was always performed with closed technique for 60 min, with an average inflow temperature of 42.5 °C. The drugs were administered in combination according two schemes: 1) cisplatin 60 mg/m2/L and caelyx 20 mg/m2/L; 2) 60 mg/m2/L taxotere and caelyx 20 mg/m2/L. Morbidity and mortality were evaluated in accordance with the NCI CTCAE v. 3.0 (USA). Finally, the Disease Free Survival and Overall Survival by the Kaplan-Meier method was rated. RESULTS: The average age observed was 64 years (range 46-76). Fourteen patients (56%) were affected by AEOC. From this group, 12 (48%) were subjected to neoadjuvant therapy and 2 (8%) to surgery as a first; 11 (44%) patients had REOC and all of them had previously undergone to surgery and adjuvant CHT. The average PCI was 12.63 (range 2-27). In 22 patients (88%), cytoreduction was considered total or almost total (CC-0 in 14 patients, CC-1 in 8); in 3 patients (12%), it had not been optimal (CC-2 or CC-3). In all 18 patients with PCI less than 15, it was possible to achieve an optimal cytoreduction, and this was possible only in 3 of the 7 patients who had a PCI greater than 15. The average operative time, including HIPEC, was of 612 min (range 425 min-840 min). In 9 patients (36%), the postoperative course was uncomplicated, in 10 patients (40%) complications were minor (G1-G2) and in 4 patients (16%) morbidity was important (G4). Mortality rate was 8%. The average OS was 30.8 months and the median OS was 30.8 months (respectively 36.5 months for AEOC and 27 months for REOC). The median DFS total (calculated from the day of surgery or from the day of the beginning of the CHT) was 12months (respectively 12.9 months for AEOC, 11.9 months for REOC). CONCLUSION: Although the CRS and HIPEC procedure in the treatment of advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer represents now a reliable method with good results both in terms of morbidity and of distance results, there are still many controversial aspects that may in the future be better clarified only with a randomized phase III study, which is in progress, involving international working groups and experts on the procedure.

A phase II study of dose-dense epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel plus capecitabine and pegfilgrastim support as preoperative therapy for patients with stage II, IIIA breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: This phase II study was conducted to evaluate tumor response rate and safety profile of dose-dense epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel plus capecitabine given preoperatively to patients with stage II or IIIA breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients underwent four cycles of dose-dense cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) and epirubicin 90 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks followed by two cycles of docetaxel 36 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 plus capecitabine 1250 mg/m(2) on days 5-18 every 4 weeks, with prophylactic pegfilgrastim. The primary objective of the study was to determine the incidence of pathologic complete response defined as the absence of invasive or in situ cancer in the breast and the axillary nodes at definitive surgery. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were enrolled in the study and 41 (93%) were assessable for response to chemotherapy. An objective clinical response was observed in 38 (93%) patients. Seven patients (17.1%) exhibited a pathologic complete response. Breast-conserving surgery was carried out in 36 (88%) patients. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 4.3% of 252 administered chemotherapy cycles. No febrile neutropenia, cardiac toxicity, thrombocytopenia or other serious adverse event was registered. CONCLUSION: The sequential combination of dose-dense epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel plus capecitabine is an effective and well-tolerated neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II, IIIA breast cancer.

Increased tolerability of bimonthly 12-hour timed flat infusion 5-fluorouracil/irinotecan regimen in advanced colorectal cancer: A dose-finding study.

A dose-finding study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a bimonthly 12-h (10:00 p.m to 10:00 a.m), timed flat infusion (TFI) of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus irinotecan (CPT-11), without leucovorin (LV), for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (CRC). A total of 33 patients were treated. Seven dose levels included a fixed CPT-11 dose of 180 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 (d(1,15)) and escalating doses of 5-FU 600-1200 mg/m2 on days 1-4 and 15-18 (d(1-4,15-18)). Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were: grade 3-4 non-hematologic, grade 4 hematologic and any toxicity causing a more than a 2-week delay in treatment. The MTD was reached at the seventh dose level. DLTs were observed in 5/8 patients (63%): G3 diarrhea, 2 patients, associated with G3 mucositis in one instance; G4 neutropenia, 2 patients, associated with severe asthenia in 1 patient; G3 hand-foot syndrome, 1 patient. The recommended doses (RDs) were established at the sixth dose level: 5-FU, 1100 mg/m2/d(1-4,15-18); CPT-11 180 mg/m2/d(1,15) [5-FU and CPT-11 dose intensity (DI), 2200 and 90 mg/m2 per week (w), respectively]. At the recommended dose, the DLTs in 38 cycles were: mucositis, 2 cycles (5%); afebrile G4 neutropenia and hand-foot syndrome, 1 cycle (3%). In 24 assessable patients, the overall response rate was 37.5%. The present CPT-11/5-FU schedule is highly tolerable in an outpatient setting using the highest recommended 5-FU dose effective in advanced CRC.

Chronomodulated infusion of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid: lack of activity in advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The chronomodulated infusion of 5-FU, FA and oxaliplatin allows a significant increase in dose intensity and antitumor efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Here we investigated if substitution of oxaliplatin with cisplatin produced a similar antitumor activity in previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer. METHODS: We enrolled 21 consecutively evaluated ambulatory patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Each treatment cycle consisted of a 5-day course of continuous chronomodulated venous infusion of drugs. Daily doses were 600 mg/m2 5-FU, 150 mg/m2 FA (L-form), and 12 mg/m2 cisplatin. The cycles were repeated every 21 days. RESULTS: All patients completed at least 3 cycles. Overall a total number of 105 cycles were administered. One partial response (lasting 3 months) and 13 stable disease (lasting from 3 to 12 months) were observed. The remaining 7 patients had progression of the disease. Hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicity was always < or = G2 in all cycles. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study discourage the substitution of cisplatin for the more active compound, oxaliplatin, in a chronomodulated schedule of infusion with 5-FU and FA in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.