Locally advanced NSCLC: a plea for sparing the ipsilateral normal lung-prospective, clinical trial with DART-bid (dose-differentiated accelerated radiation therapy, 1.8 Gy twice daily) by VMAT.

BACKGROUND: In radiation treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC), 'margins' from internal target volumes to planning target volumes in the range of 12 to 23 mm are reported, and avoiding exposure of the contralateral lung is common practice. We investigated prospectively an approach with tight margins (7 mm) and maximal sparing of the ipsilateral normal lung. Mature results for the first endpoint (pneumonitis) and further toxicities are reported. METHODS: Primary tumors were treated by VMAT with 73.8-90.0 Gy in positive correlation to tumor volumes, nodes with 61.2 Gy, a restricted volume of nodes electively with 45 Gy. Fractional doses of 1.8 Gy bid, interval 8 h. Before radiotherapy, two cycles platin-based chemotherapy were given. 12 patients finished maintenance therapy with Durvalumab. Median follow up time for all patients is 19.4 months, for patients alive 27.0 months (3.4-66.5 months). RESULTS: 100 consecutive, unselected patients with LA-NSCLC in stages II through IVA were enrolled (UICC/AJCC, 8th edition). No acute grade 4/5 toxicity occurred. Pneumonitis grade 2 and 3 was observed in 12% and 2% of patients, respectively; lowering the risk of pneumonitis grade ≥ 2 in comparison to the largest study in the literature investigating pneumonitis in LA-NSCLC, is significant (p < 0.0006). Acute esophageal toxicity grade 1, 2 and 3 occurred in 12%, 57% and 3% of patients, respectively. Two patients showed late bronchial stricture/atelectasis grade 2. In two patients with lethal pulmonary haemorrhages a treatment correlation cannot be excluded. Median overall survival for all stage III patients, and for those with 'RTOG 0617 inclusion criteria' is 46.6 and 50.0 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Overall toxicity is low. In comparison to results in the literature, maximal sparing the ipsilateral normal lung lowers the risk for pneumonitis significantly. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Ethics committee of Vorarlberg, Austria; EK-0.04-105, Registered 04/09/2017-Retrospectively registered. http://www.ethikkommission-vorarlberg.at.

Taxanes Plus Trastuzumab Compared To Oral Vinorelbine Plus Trastuzumab in HER2-Overexpressing Metastatic Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective analysis was planned as a direct comparison of taxanes plus trastuzumab to the less toxic combination of oral vinorelbine (OV) plus trastuzumab as a first-line therapy for metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 76) receiving either taxanes (group A) or OV (group B) in combination with trastuzumab were identified from a breast cancer database. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the primary study endpoint; secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), incidence of brain metastases, and brain metastases-free survival (BMFS). RESULTS: 36 patients received taxanes and 40 patients OV in combination with trastuzumab. At a median follow-up of 47.5 months, median PFS was 7 months (group A) and 9 months in group B (log-rank; non-significant), respective numbers for OS were 49 and 59 months (p = 0.033). The incidence of brain metastases did not differ significantly between the 2 treatment groups, whereas BMFS was significantly longer in patients receiving OV. CONCLUSIONS: OV plus trastuzumab yielded similar results in terms of PFS and RR and was superior in terms of OS and BMFS. These results add to the growing body of evidence that vinorelbine is a viable alternative to taxanes in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Predicting for activity of second-line trastuzumab-based therapy in her2-positive advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: In Her2-positive advanced breast cancer, the upfront use of trastuzumab is well established. Upon progression on first-line therapy, patients may be switched to lapatinib. Others however remain candidates for continued antibody treatment (treatment beyond progression). Here, we aimed to identify factors predicting for activity of second-line trastuzumab-based therapy. METHODS: Ninety-seven patients treated with > 1 line of trastuzumab-containing therapy were available for this analysis. Her2-status was determined by immunohistochemistry and re-analyzed by FISH if a score of 2+ was gained. Time to progression (TTP) on second-line therapy was defined as primary study endpoint. TTP and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. Multivariate analyses (Cox proportional hazards model, multinomial logistic regression) were applied in order to identify factors associated with TTP, response, OS, and incidence of brain metastases. p values < 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. RESULTS: Median TTP on second-line trastuzumab-based therapy was 7 months (95% CI 5.74-8.26), and 8 months (95% CI 6.25-9.74) on first-line, respectively (n.s.). In the multivariate models, none of the clinical or histopthological features could reliably predict for activity of second-line trastuzumab-based treatment. OS was 43 months suggesting improved survival in patients treated with trastuzumab in multiple-lines. A significant deterioration of cardiac function was observed in three patients; 40.2% developed brain metastases while on second-line trastuzumab or thereafter. CONCLUSION: Trastuzumab beyond progression showed considerable activity. None of the variables investigated correlated with activity of second-line therapy. In order to predict for activity of second-line trastuzumab, it appears necessary to evaluate factors known to confer trastuzumab-resistance.