Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) as a prognostic marker in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the usefulness of suPAR as a prognostic marker in non-critical COVID-19 patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out a literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science using the following keywords: ("soluble urokinase receptor" OR "urokinase plasminogen activator receptor" OR "suPAR" OR "soluble uPAR" OR "soluble uPA receptor") AND ("COVID-19" OR "SARS-CoV-2"). We included observational studies (descriptive or analytic) that measured plasma suPAR on COVID-19 patients 18 years old or older, with non-critical disease at the beginning of the study. RESULTS: After screening and eligibility assessment, a total of 16 articles were included in the review. Most studies that measured mean differences found that suPAR levels were higher in patients with worse outcomes. The studies that measured diagnostic accuracy concluded that suPAR was highly sensitive and moderately specific to predicting bad outcomes. Studies that performed a survival analysis found that patients with high suPAR levels were more at risk of bad outcomes. Most of the studies included in this review were performed before extensive vaccination and omicron wave. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 patients with moderate initial disease and elevated suPAR levels are more at risk of poor outcomes. Larger prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm the results obtained in this review.

Exposure to biologic therapy before and during pregnancy in patients with psoriasis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Biologicals have transformed the management of severe disease phenotypes in psoriasis and are often prescribed in women of childbearing age. However, information on safety of biologicals in pregnancy are lacking. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to describe the characteristics and pregnancy outcomes in women with psoriasis exposed to biologics within 3 months before or during pregnancy, and to estimate the pooled prevalence of spontaneous, elective and total abortions, and congenital malformations in their newborns. Bibliographic searches were performed in the PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science databases up to 14 April 2022. No restrictions on sample size or publication date were applied. Review performance complied with PRISMA guidelines, and two reviewers assessed randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies reporting pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to biologics indicated for psoriasis during the pre-gestational and/or gestational period. Studies focusing on rheumatologic or gastroenterological immune-mediated inflammatory diseases were excluded. Regardless of data heterogeneity, a random-effects model was used to pool prevalence estimates. We included 51 observational studies, involving 739 pregnancies exposed to approved biologics for psoriasis. Administration was mostly (70.4%) limited to the first trimester, and the most common drug was ustekinumab (36.0%). The estimated prevalence of miscarriage was 15.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.7-18.0) and elective abortions, 10.8% (95% CI 7.7-14.3). Congenital malformations occurred in about 3.0% (95% CI 1.6-4.8) of live births exposed to biologics during pregnancy. Altogether, exposure to biologics for psoriasis during pregnancy and/or conception does not seem to be associated with an increased risk of miscarriage/abortion or congenital malformations, showing similar rates to the general population. These results suggest that biologic drugs are safe and pose an acceptable risk to the foetuses/neonates.

Are the chilblain-like lesions observed during the COVID-19 pandemic due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2? Systematic review and meta-analysis.

The expansion of the COVID-19 pandemic has been accompanied by numerous reports of chilblain-like lesions (CLL) in different countries; however, the pathogenesis of these lesions is still unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the prevalence of COVID-19 (diagnosed using PCR and/or serology) in patients with CLL. We undertook a literature search in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus (to 15 March 2021), including studies that reported on the number of patients with CLL with positive PCR and/or serology for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or with a clinical suspicion of COVID-19. Regardless of data heterogeneity, a random-effects model was used to pool prevalence estimates. The meta-analysis included 63 original studies, involving 2919 cases of CLL. A subgroup of these patients underwent diagnostic tests for COVID-19 (PCR: n = 1154, 39.5%; serology: n = 943, 32.3%). The pooled prevalence of COVID-19 in the overall sample and in the subgroup who were tested for COVID-19 was, respectively: (i) positive PCR: 2.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9% to 3.4%] and 5.5% (95% CI, 3.7-7.7%); (ii) positive serology for SARS-CoV-2: 7.2% (95% CI, 4.7-10.2%) and 11.8% (95% CI, 7.9-16.3%); and (iii) positive PCR and/or serology, 15.2% (95% CI, 10.4-20.7%) and 7.5% (95% CI, 5.1-10.3%). Altogether, a small proportion of diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2, both PCR and serologies, show positive results in patients with CLL.

Can we still consider treatment with colchicine effective in SARS-COV-2 infection? Systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of colchicine, compared with standard of care, for reducing mortality, admission to intensive care, and use of mechanical ventilation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review, meta-analysis, and sequential trial analysis. The terms (SARS-CoV-2 OR COVID-19 OR coronavirus) AND (colchicine) were searched in MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and preprint repositories (February 2020 to April 2021, extended to June 2021). Risk of bias for randomised controlled trials and observational studies were assessed using the tools RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I, respectively. We performed subgroup analyses based on study design and sensitivity analyses based on time of colchicine administration. RESULTS: We included six observational studies (1329 patients) and five clinical trials (16,048 patients). All studies but one were conducted in the hospital setting. Colchicine treatment was not associated with a significant decrease in mortality (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87 to 1; p=0.06, I2=72%) with a significant subgroup effect (p<0.001) depending on the design of the studies. The drug was effective in observational studies (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.70, p<0.001, I2=50%) but not in clinical trials (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.07, p=0.89, I2=21%). The effect of colchicine on intensive care admissions and the need for mechanical ventilation could not be confirmed. Trial sequential boundaries for cumulative meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials suggested no significant effect on mortality (p=0.182) beyond the optimal information size (13,107 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that colchicine treatment has no effect on mortality in hospitalised patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, and that no further confirmatory clinical trials are needed owing to futility.

Radiological iodinated contrast-induced nephropathy. / Nefropatía inducida por contrastes iodados radiológicos.

The use of iodinated contrast media can cause renal toxicity. Whether contrast media are exclusively responsible for kidney damage is currently the subject of debate, given that in most cases, other potential causes of the renal failure are present. With current low-osmolar and iso-osmolar contrast media, the incidence rate of contrast-induced nephropathy is estimated to be <1% in the low-risk population but can increase to 37% in patients who are administered contrast by an intra-arterial administration and/or who have renal failure with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30mL/min/1.73m2. To minimize the risk of renal toxicity, the recommendation is to administer the least amount of contrast possible and ensure appropriate volume expansion by infusing 0.9% saline solution.

Routine invasive strategy in acute coronary syndrome patients with renal dysfunction. Results of the ARIAM-SEMICYUC registry. / Estrategia invasiva de rutina en el síndrome coronario agudo sin elevación del segmento ST con disfunción renal. Resultados del registro ARIAM-SEMICYUC.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use and effectiveness of a routine invasive strategy (RIS) in patients with acute coronary syndrome without persistent ST-segment elevation with renal dysfunction in the real world scenario. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study based on the ARIAM-SEMICYUC Registry (2011-2014) was carried out. Renal dysfunction was defined as GFR (Cockroft-Gault)<60ml/min (moderate dysfunction) or<30ml/min (severe dysfunction). Patients in which early angiography (<72h) was performed due to cardiogenic shock or recurrent myocardial ischemia were excluded. The primary endpoint was hospital mortality. Confounding factors were controlled using propensity score analysis. RESULTS: A total of 4,279 patients were analyzed, of which 26% had moderate renal dysfunction and 5% severe dysfunction. Patients with renal dysfunction had greater severity and comorbidity, higher hospital mortality (8.6 vs. 1.8%), and lesser use of the RIS (40 vs. 52%). The adjusted OR for mortality in patients without/with renal dysfunction were 0.38 (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.17 to 0.81) and 0.52 (95%CI 0.32 to 0.87), respectively (interaction P-value=.4779). The impact (adjusted risk difference) of RIS was higher in the group with renal dysfunction (-5.1%, 95%CI -8.1 to -2.1 vs. -1.6%, 95%CI -2.6 to -0.6; interaction P-value=.0335). No significant interaction was detected for the other endpoints considered (ICU mortality, 30-day mortality, myocardial infarction, acute renal failure or moderate/severe bleeding). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the effectiveness of IRS is similar in patients with normal or abnormal renal function, and alert to the under-utilization of this strategy in such patients.

[Accessibility to health care of diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome ST-segment elevation]. / Accesibilidad al sistema sanitario de los pacientes diabéticos con síndrome coronario agudo con elevación del segmento ST.

OBJECTIVES: To measure accessibility to health care among diabetic patients and analyze whether differences in delay explain differences in hospital mortality. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome with ST-segment elevation included in the ARIAM-SEMICYUC registry (2010-2013). Crude and adjusted analyses were performed using unconditional logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 4817 patients were analyzed, of whom 1070 (22.2%) were diabetics. No differences were found in access to health care between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Diabetic patients presented with longer patient delay (90 min vs. 75 min; p=.004) and prehospital delay (150 min vs. 130 min; p=.002). Once the health system was contacted, diabetic patients had a lower reperfusion rate (50% vs. 57.7%; p<.001), but no longer delay in treatment was observed compared with the non-diabetic individuals. Diabetic patients have greater in-hospital mortality (12.5 vs. 6%; p <.001), though neither patient delay nor prehospital delay were identified as independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic patients had a longer delay in access to health care, though such delay was not independently related to increased mortality.

[Predictors of the use of the early invasive strategy in women with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome]. / Predictores del uso de la estrategia invasiva precoz en mujeres con síndrome coronario agudo sin elevación de ST.

OBJECTIVE: To identify determinants associated to an early invasive strategy in women with acute coronary syndromes without ST elevation (NSTE-ACS). DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was made. Crude and adjusted analysis of the performance of the early invasive strategy using logistic regression. SETTING: Coronary Units enrolled in 2010 - 2011 in the ARIAM-SEMICYUC registry. PATIENTS: A total of 440 women with NSTE-ACS were studied. Sixteen patients were excluded due to insufficient data, together with 58 patients subjected to elective coronary angiography (> 72 h). VARIABLES ANALYZED: Demographic parameters, coronary risk factors, previous medication, comorbidity. Clinical, laboratory, hemodynamic and electrocardiographic data of the episode. RESULTS: Women treated conservatively were of older age, had oral anticoagulation, diabetes, previous coronary lesions, and heart failure (p<0.005), increased baseline bleeding and ischemic risk (p=0.05) and a higher heart rate upon admission (p<0.05). After adjustment, only age > 80 years (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.82, p=0.009), known coronary lesions (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.26-0.84, p=0.011), and heart rate (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99, p=0.003) were independently associated to conservative treatment. Smoking (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.20 to 5.19, p=0.013) and high-risk electrocardiogram (OR 2.96, 95% CI 1.72 to 4.97, p<0.001) were associated to the early invasive strategy. The exclusion of early deaths (<24 h) did not alter these results. CONCLUSIONS: In women with NSTE ACS, smoking and a high-risk electrocardiogram upon admission were independent factors associated to the early invasive strategy. Previous coronary lesions, age > 80 years and increased heart rate were independent factors associated to conservative treatment.

[Effectiveness and safety of triple antiaggregation in patients undergoing coronary intervention]. / Efectividad y seguridad de la "triple antiagregación" en pacientes sometidos a intervencionismo coronario.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors) effectiveness and safety in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) or stable coronary disease referred for percutaneous coronary revascularization pre-treated with aspirin and thienopyridines by means of a systematic review. SOURCE OF DATA: Electronic search using Medline, Embase, Pascal, Cochrane Library and ISI Proceedings and manual review of the articles found. STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized controlled trials that assessed the clinical efficacy (risk of death or infarction) and safety (bleeding and thrombocytopenia) of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients pretreated with thienopyridines. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were obtained by duplicate. RESULTS: Nine randomized controlled trials (8,604 patients) were included. Addition of GPIIb/ IIIa inhibitors reduced the risk of death or myo-cardial infarction at 30 days in those trials that included patients with NSTEACS (RR 0.67; 95%CI 0.56-0.80) but not in studies that excluded NSTEACS patients (RR 1.07; 95%CI 0.75-1.53) (p test of interaction 0.0175), As a counterpart, GPIIb/ IIIa inhibitors increased the risk of bleeding and thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: Use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors reduces the risk of adverse cardiac events in NSTEACS patients pre-treated with aspirin and thienopyridines but increases the risk of severe bleeding and thrombocytopenia. Its utilization in stable coronary patients does not seem justified.