Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Vet Res ; 14(1): 312, 2018 Oct 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30326885

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prevention of Lyme disease in dogs in North America depends on effective vaccination against infection by the tick vector-born spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi. Most vaccines effectively prevent spirochete transmission to dogs during tick feeding based on immunization with the outer-surface lipoprotein A (OspA) of B. burgdorferi. More recently, vaccines containing additional OspC protein moieties have been introduced. These are designed to enhance protection by forming a second line of defense within the vertebrate host, where OspC expression replaces OspA as the dominant surface antigen. However, supportive data for demonstration of OspC mediated protection is still lacking. Since OspA immunogenicity is of paramount importance to protection against spirochete transmission; this study was designed to compare the immunogenicity of two commercially available vaccines against the Borrelia burgdorferi OspA. We further characterized OspA antigen fractions of these vaccines with respect to their biochemical and biophysical properties. RESULTS: Two groups of beagle dogs (n = 9) were administered either: (1) a nonadjuvanted/monovalent, recombinant OspA vaccine (Recombitek® Lyme) or (2) an adjuvanted, recombinant OspA /OspC chimeric fusion vaccine (Vanguard® crLyme). The onset of the anti-OspA antibody response elicited by the nonadjuvanted/monovalent OspA vaccine was significantly earlier than that for the bivalent OspA /OspC vaccine and serum borreliacidal activity was significantly greater at all post-vaccination time points. As expected, only dogs inoculated with the bivalent OspA/OspC vaccine mounted a humoral anti-OspC response. However, only three out of nine dogs in that group had a positive response. Comparison of the OspA vaccine structures revealed that the OspA in the nonadjuvanted/monovalent vaccine was primarily in the lipidated form, eluting (SEC-HPLC) at a high molecular weight, suggestive of micelle formation. Conversely, the OspA moiety of the OspA/OspC vaccine was found to be nonlipidated and eluted as the monomeric protein. CONCLUSIONS: We hypothesize that these structural differences may account for the superior immunogenicity of the nonadjuvanted monovalent recombinant OspA vaccine in dogs over the adjuvanted OspA fraction of the OspA/OspC vaccine.


Assuntos
Antígenos de Bactérias/imunologia , Antígenos de Superfície/imunologia , Proteínas da Membrana Bacteriana Externa/imunologia , Vacinas Bacterianas/imunologia , Borrelia burgdorferi/imunologia , Doenças do Cão/prevenção & controle , Lipoproteínas/imunologia , Doença de Lyme/veterinária , Animais , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Formação de Anticorpos , Antígenos de Bactérias/administração & dosagem , Antígenos de Superfície/administração & dosagem , Proteínas da Membrana Bacteriana Externa/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Bacterianas/administração & dosagem , Doenças do Cão/imunologia , Doenças do Cão/microbiologia , Cães , Feminino , Imunização , Lipoproteínas/administração & dosagem , Doença de Lyme/imunologia , Doença de Lyme/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Vacinas Sintéticas
2.
J Control Release ; 239: 19-26, 2016 10 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27524283

RESUMO

Because humans get rabies primarily through dog bites, stray dog population control and mass or mandatory vaccination of domestic dogs and other animals has virtually eliminated human rabies in industrialized countries. However, thousands of people in developing countries die of rabies each year due to the inability to control dog populations and implement mass vaccination because of financial, logistical and other challenges. The availability of an easier-to-administer and more cost-effective vaccine may help to address some of these issues. Here, we propose the use of dissolving microneedle patches for simple and potentially cost-effective rabies vaccination, and assess the safety and immunogenicity of microneedle patch vaccination using a rabies DNA vaccine in dogs. The vaccine was stable upon formulation and storage for at least 3weeks at 4°C in a microneedle patch. For vaccination, the patches were applied to the inner ear by hand without an applicator. Microneedle patches were well tolerated in the skin, with mild erythema, minimal wheal formation and complete resolution of skin reactions within 7days, and generated no systemic adverse events. Microneedle patches were at least as immunogenic as intramuscular injection at the same dose, as demonstrated by similar serum neutralizing antibody titers. A ten-fold lower vaccine dose administered by microneedle patch generated a weaker immune response compared to full-dose intramuscular vaccination. We conclude that dissolving microneedle patches may provide an innovative approach to mass vaccination of dogs.


Assuntos
Microinjeções/métodos , Agulhas , Vacina Antirrábica/administração & dosagem , Adesivo Transdérmico , Vacinação/métodos , Animais , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Células CHO , Cricetinae , Cricetulus , Cães , Feminino , Masculino , Microinjeções/instrumentação , Raiva/metabolismo , Raiva/prevenção & controle , Vacina Antirrábica/metabolismo , Absorção Cutânea/efeitos dos fármacos , Absorção Cutânea/fisiologia , Vacinas de DNA/administração & dosagem , Vacinas de DNA/metabolismo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA