A novel autotransfusion device saving erythrocytes and platelets used in a 72 h survival swine model of surgically induced controlled blood loss.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to develop a swine model of surgically induced blood loss to evaluate the performances of a new autotransfusion system allowing red blood cells and platelets preservation while collecting, washing and concentrating hemorrhagic blood intraoperatively. METHODS: Two types of surgically induced blood loss were used in 12 minipigs to assess system performance and potential animal complications following autotransfusion: a cardiac model (cardiopulmonary bypass) and a visceral model (induced splenic bleeding). Animal clinical and hematological parameters were evaluated at different time-points from before bleeding to the end of a 72-hour post-transfusion period and followed by a post-mortem examination. System performances were evaluated by qualitative and quantitative parameters. RESULTS: All animals that received the autotransfusion survived. Minimal variations were seen on the red blood cell count, hemoglobin, hematocrit at the different sampling times. Coagulation tests failed to show any hypo or hypercoagulable state. Gross and histologic examination didn't reveal any thrombotic lesions. Performance parameters exceeded set objectives in both models: heparin clearance (≥ 90%), final heparin concentration (≤ 0.5 IU/mL), free hemoglobin washout (≥ 90%) and hematocrit (between 45% and 65%). The device treatment rate of diluted blood was over 80 mL/min. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, both animal models succeeded in reproducing clinical conditions of perioperative cardiac and non-cardiac blood loss. Sufficient blood was collected to allow evaluation of autotransfusion effects on animals and to demonstrate the system performance by evaluating its capacity to collect, wash and concentrate red blood cells and platelets. Reinfusion of the treated blood, containing not only concentrated red blood cells but also platelets, did not lead to any postoperative adverse nor thrombogenic events. Clinical and comparative studies need to be conducted to confirm the clinical benefit of platelet reinfusion.

Combined Platelet and Erythrocyte Salvage: Evaluation of a New Filtration-based Autotransfusion Device.

BACKGROUND: The SAME device (i-SEP, France) is an innovative filtration-based autotransfusion device able to salvage and wash both red blood cells and platelets. This study evaluated the device performances using human whole blood with the hypothesis that the device will be able to salvage platelets while achieving a erythrocyte yield of 80% and removal ratios of 90% for heparin and 80% for major plasma proteins without inducing signification activation of salvaged cells. METHODS: Thirty healthy human whole blood units (median volume, 478 ml) were diluted, heparinized, and processed by the device in two consecutive treatment cycles. Samples from the collection reservoir and the concentrated blood were analyzed. Complete blood count was performed to measure blood cell recovery rates. Flow cytometry evaluated the activation state and function of platelets and leukocytes. Heparin and plasma proteins were measured to assess washing performance. RESULTS: The global erythrocyte yield was 88.1% (84.1 to 91.1%; median [25th to 75th]) with posttreatment hematocrits of 48.9% (44.8 to 51.4%) and 51.4% (48.4 to 53.2%) for the first and second cycles, respectively. Ektacytometry did not show evidence of erythrocyte alteration. Platelet recovery was 36.8% (26.3 to 43.4%), with posttreatment counts of 88 × 109/l (73 to 101 × 109/l) and 115 × 109/l (95 to 135 × 109/l) for the first and second cycles, respectively. Recovered platelets showed a low basal P-selectin expression at 10.8% (8.1 to 15.2%) and a strong response to thrombin-activating peptide. Leukocyte yield was 93.0% (90.1 to 95.7%) with no activation or cell death. Global removal ratios were 98.3% (97.8 to 98.9%), 98.2% (96.9 to 98.8%), and 88.3% (86.6 to 90.7%) for heparin, albumin, and fibrinogen, respectively. The processing times were 4.4 min (4.2 to 4.6 min) and 4.4 min (4.2 to 4.7 min) for the first and second cycles, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the performance of the SAME device. Platelets and red blood cells were salvaged without significant impact on cell integrity and function. In the meantime, leukocytes were not activated, and the washing quality of the device prevented reinfusion of high concentrations of heparin and plasma proteins.

Role of Membrane Lipid Rafts in MRP4 (ABCC4) Dependent Regulation of the cAMP Pathway in Blood Platelets.

BACKGROUND: Platelet cytosolic cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels are balanced by synthesis, degradation, and efflux. Efflux can occur via multidrug resistant protein-4 (MRP4; ABCC4) present on dense granule and/or plasma membranes. As lipid rafts have been shown to interfere on cAMP homeostasis, we evaluated the relationships between the distribution and activity of MRP4 in lipid rafts and cAMP efflux. METHODS: Platelet activation and cAMP homeostasis were analyzed in human and wild-type or MRP4-deleted mouse platelets in the presence of methyl-ß-cyclodextrin (MßCD) to disrupt lipid rafts, and of activators of the cAMP signalling pathways. Human platelet MRP4 and effector proteins of the cAMP pathway were analyzed by immunoblots in lipid rafts isolated by differential centrifugation. RESULTS: MßCD dose dependently inhibited human and mouse platelet aggregation without affecting per se cAMP levels. An additive inhibitory effect existed between the adenylate cyclase (AC) activator forskolin and MßCD that was accompanied by an overincrease of cAMP, and which was significantly enhanced upon MRP4 deletion. Finally, an efflux of cAMP out of resting platelets incubated with prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) was observed that was partly dependent on MRP4. Lipid rafts contained a small fraction (≈15%) of MRP4 and most of the inhibitory G-protein Gi, whereas Gs protein, AC3, and phosphodiesterases PDE2 and PDE3A were all present as only trace amounts. CONCLUSION: Our results are in favour of part of MRP4 present at the platelet surface, including in lipid rafts. Lipid raft integrity is necessary for cAMP signalling regulation, although MRP4 and most players of cAMP homeostasis are essentially located outside rafts.

Epinephrine restores platelet functions inhibited by ticagrelor: A mechanistic approach.

Ticagrelor, an antagonist of the platelet adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-P2Y12 receptor is recommended for patients with acute coronary syndromes. However, ticagrelor exposes to a risk of bleeding, the management of which is challenging because platelet transfusion is ineffective, and no antidote is yet available. We hypothesized that the vasopressor drug epinephrine could counter the antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor and restore platelet functions. We assessed in vitro the efficiency of epinephrine in restoring platelet aggregation inhibited by ticagrelor and investigated the underlying mechanisms. Washed platelet aggregation and secretion were measured upon stimulation by epinephrine alone or in combination with ADP, in the presence or absence of ticagrelor. Mechanistic investigations used P2Y1 and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors and included vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) and Akt phosphorylation assays as well as measurement of Ca2+ mobilisation. We found that epinephrine restored ADP-induced platelet aggregation, but not dense granule release. Epinephrine alone failed to induce aggregation whereas it fully induced VASP dephosphorylation and Akt phosphorylation regardless of the presence of ticagrelor. In the presence of ticagrelor, blockage of the P2Y1 receptor prevented restoration of platelet aggregation by the combination of epinephrine and ADP, as well as intracellular Ca2+ mobilisation. In combination with ADP, epinephrine induced platelet aggregation of ticagrelor-treated platelets through inhibition of the cAMP pathway and activation of the PI3K pathway, thus enabling the P2Y1 receptor signalling and subsequent Ca2+ mobilisation. This proof-of-concept study needs to be challenged in vivo for the management of bleeding in ticagrelor-treated patients.

Evaluation of commonly used tests to measure the effect of single-dose aspirin on mouse hemostasis.

Discrepancies in preclinical studies of aspirin (ASA) antiplatelet activity in mouse models of bleeding and arterial thrombosis led us to evaluate commonly reported methods in order to propose a procedure for reliably measuring the effects of single dose ASA on mouse hemostasis. FVB and C57Bl6 mice received 100 mg/kg of ASA or vehicle orally 30 min or 3 h prior to investigate either hemostasis using the tail bleeding assay or carotid thrombosis induced by FeCl3, or to blood sampling for isolated platelet aggregation and TXB2 generation. Expected inhibition of COX1 by ASA was ascertained by a strong decrease in TXB2 production, and its effect on platelet function and hemostasis, by decreased collagen-induced aggregation and increased bleeding time, respectively. Strikingly, we determined that anti-hemostatic effects of ASA were more predictable 30 min after administration than 3 h later. Conversely, ASA did not alter time to arterial occlusion of the carotid upon FeCl3-induced thrombosis, suggesting ASA not to be used as reference inhibitor drug in this model of arterial thrombosis.

Murine platelet production is suppressed by S1P release in the hematopoietic niche, not facilitated by blood S1P sensing.

The bioactive lipid mediator sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) was recently assigned critical roles in platelet biology: whereas S1P1 receptor-mediated S1P gradient sensing was reported to be essential for directing proplatelet extensions from megakaryocytes (MKs) toward bone marrow sinusoids, MK sphingosine kinase 2 (Sphk2)-derived S1P was reported to further promote platelet shedding through receptor-independent intracellular actions, and platelet aggregation through S1P1 Yet clinical use of S1P pathway modulators including fingolimod has not been associated with risk of bleeding or thrombosis. We therefore revisited the role of S1P in platelet biology in mice. Surprisingly, no reduction in platelet counts was observed when the vascular S1P gradient was ablated by impairing S1P provision to plasma or S1P degradation in interstitial fluids, nor when gradient sensing was impaired by S1pr1 deletion selectively in MKs. Moreover, S1P1 expression and signaling were both undetectable in mature MKs in situ, and MK S1pr1 deletion did not affect platelet aggregation or spreading. When S1pr1 deletion was induced in hematopoietic progenitor cells, platelet counts were instead significantly elevated. Isolated global Sphk2 deficiency was associated with thrombocytopenia, but this was not replicated by MK-restricted Sphk2 deletion and was reversed by compound deletion of either Sphk1 or S1pr2, suggesting that this phenotype arises from increased S1P export and S1P2 activation secondary to redistribution of sphingosine to Sphk1. Consistent with clinical observations, we thus observe no essential role for S1P1 in facilitating platelet production or activation. Instead, S1P restricts megakaryopoiesis through S1P1, and can further suppress thrombopoiesis through S1P2 when aberrantly secreted in the hematopoietic niche.

Platelet and Erythrocyte Sources of S1P Are Redundant for Vascular Development and Homeostasis, but Both Rendered Essential After Plasma S1P Depletion in Anaphylactic Shock.

RATIONALE: Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) signaling is essential for vascular development and postnatal vascular homeostasis. The relative importance of S1P sources sustaining these processes remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To address the level of redundancy in bioactive S1P provision to the developing and mature vasculature. METHODS AND RESULTS: S1P production was selectively impaired in mouse platelets, erythrocytes, endothelium, or smooth muscle cells by targeted deletion of genes encoding sphingosine kinases -1 and -2. S1P deficiency impaired aggregation and spreading of washed platelets and profoundly reduced their capacity to promote endothelial barrier function ex vivo. However, and in contrast to recent reports, neither platelets nor any other source of S1P was essential for vascular development, vascular integrity, or hemostasis/thrombosis. Yet rapid and profound depletion of plasma S1P during systemic anaphylaxis rendered both platelet- and erythrocyte-derived S1P essential for survival, with a contribution from blood endothelium observed only in the absence of circulating sources. Recovery was sensitive to aspirin in mice with but not without platelet S1P, suggesting that platelet activation and stimulus-response coupling is needed. S1P deficiency aggravated vasoplegia in this model, arguing a vital role for S1P in maintaining vascular resistance during recovery from circulatory shock. Accordingly, the S1P2 receptor mediated most of the survival benefit of S1P, whereas the endothelial S1P1 receptor was dispensable for survival despite its importance for maintaining vascular integrity. CONCLUSIONS: Although source redundancy normally secures essential S1P signaling in developing and mature blood vessels, profound depletion of plasma S1P renders both erythrocyte and platelet S1P pools necessary for recovery and high basal plasma S1P levels protective during anaphylactic shock.

MRP4 (ABCC4) as a potential pharmacologic target for cardiovascular disease.

This review focuses on multidrug resistance protein 4 (MRP4 or ABCC4) that has recently been shown to play a role in cAMP homeostasis, a key-pathway in vascular biology and in platelet functions. In vascular system, recent data provide evidence that inhibition of MRP4 prevents human coronary artery smooth muscle cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo, as well as human pulmonary artery smooth muscle cell proliferation in vitro and pulmonary hypertension in mice in vivo. In the heart, MRP4 silencing in adult rat ventricular myocytes results in an increase in intracellular cAMP levels leading to enhanced cardiomyocyte contractility. However, a prolonged inhibition of MRP4 can promote cardiac hypertrophy. In addition, secreted cAMP, through its metabolite adenosine, prevents adrenergically induced cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis. Finally, MRP4 inhibition in platelets induces a moderate thrombopathy. The localization of MRP4 underlines the emerging concept of cAMP compartmentalization in platelets, which is a major regulatory mechanism in other cells. cAMP storage in platelet dense granules might limit the cAMP cytosolic concentration upon adenylate cyclase activation, a necessary step to induce platelet activation. In this review, we discuss the therapeutic potential of direct pharmacological inhibition of MRP4 in atherothrombotic disease, via its vasodilating and antiplatelet effects.

The effectiveness of platelet supplementation for the reversal of ticagrelor-induced inhibition of platelet aggregation: An in-vitro study.

BACKGROUND: Management of ticagrelor-induced bleeding is challenging, as no antidote is currently available. Platelet transfusion, usually proposed to reverse antiplatelet drugs, has been suggested to be ineffective but few data are available. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of platelet supplementation to restore platelet aggregation inhibited by ticagrelor. DESIGN: In vitro study. SETTING: Blood samples were obtained from the French Blood Bank Institute. PARTICIPANTS: Healthy blood donors. INTERVENTIONS: Whole blood from healthy donors was spiked with ticagrelor or aspirin (used as a positive control). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Platelet aggregation was investigated with impedance aggregometry on whole blood [expressed in ohms (V)] and light transmission aggregometry (expressed in %) on platelet-rich plasma using ADP or arachidonic acid as agonists for ticagrelor or aspirin, respectively. Platelet supplementation was defined as the addition of washed platelet suspension increasing at least 60% of whole blood platelet count. RESULTS: Ticagrelor (3.25 mM) inhibited ADP-induced platelet aggregation compared with control either in whole blood (2 vs. 13 V, P < 0.05) or in platelet-rich plasma (15 vs. 75% P < 0.05). Aspirin (25 mM) inhibited arachidonic acid-induced aggregation (1 vs. 7.5 V, P < 0.05 in whole blood and 5 vs. 77.5%, P = 0.01 in platelet-rich plasma). Platelet supplementation completely restored arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation in whole blood (10 vs. 1 V, P = 0.008) and platelet-rich plasma (73 vs. 5%, P < 0.01) in aspirin-treated samples, whereas it failed to correct ADP-induced aggregation (2 vs. 2 V in whole blood and 13.5 vs. 15% in platelet-rich plasma, P > 0.05) in ticagrelor-treated samples. We also report a case of a ticagrelor-treated patient in whom platelet transfusion failed to restore ADP-induced platelet aggregation. CONCLUSION: Platelet supplementation restored platelet aggregation in aspirin-spiked but not in ticagrelor-spiked samples. These results do not support the use of platelet transfusion to reverse the effects of ticagrelor.

Impaired platelet activation and cAMP homeostasis in MRP4-deficient mice.

Molecules that reduce the level of cyclic adenosine 5'-monophosphate (cAMP) in the platelet cytosol, such as adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP) secreted from dense granules, trigger platelet activation. Therefore, any change in the distribution and/or availability of cyclic nucleotides or ADP may interfere with platelet reactivity. In this study, we evaluated the role of multidrug resistance protein 4 (MRP4, or ABCC4), a nucleotide transporter, in platelet functions in vivo and in vitro by investigating MRP4-deficient mice. MRP4 deletion resulted in a slight increase in platelet count but had no impact on platelet ultrastructure. In MRP4-deficient mice, the arterial occlusion was delayed and the tail bleeding time was prolonged. In a model of platelet depletion and transfusion mimicking a platelet-specific knockout, mice injected with MRP4(-/-) platelets also showed a significant increase in blood loss compared with mice injected with wild-type platelets. Defective thrombus formation and platelet activation were confirmed in vitro by studying platelet adhesion to collagen in flow conditions, integrin αIIbß3 activation, washed platelet secretion, and aggregation induced by low concentrations of proteinase-activated receptor 4-activating peptide, U46619, or ADP. We found no role of MRP4 in ADP dense-granule storage, but MRP4 redistributed cAMP from the cytosol to dense granules, as confirmed by increased vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation in MRP4-deficient platelets. These data suggest that MRP4 promotes platelet aggregation by modulating the cAMP-protein kinase A signaling pathway, suggesting that MRP4 might serve as a target for novel antiplatelet agents.