RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy complicate about 10% of pregnancies and are a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. PURPOSE: The purpose of this quality improvement project was to evaluate a program to provide a home blood pressure monitor to all postpartum patients who had a hypertensive diagnosis and elevated blood pressure. METHODS: The program includes a blood pressure monitor, instructions for its use, education about hypertension, and a guidance grid with standardized blood pressure parameters reviewed prior to discharge from the hospital. Patients are taught about potential adverse outcomes during postpartum. Patients are instructed to follow-up with their care provider based on the parameters. A retrospective medical record review was used to evaluate clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Medical records of 185 patients indicated that 20% ( n = 36) who received the home BP monitor reported one or more mild-to-severe range blood pressure(s) during postpartum. Twenty-eight percent ( n = 52) had outpatient medication adjustments, including decreasing, increasing, starting, and discontinuing medications. Nine percent ( n = 17) of patients returned to the obstetric triage for evaluation. There was patient overlap between those experiencing elevated blood pressures, medication adjustments, and those who returned to hospital for evaluation. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Ongoing monitoring may improve identification and management of postpartum hypertension and potentially prevent progression to hypertensive-related adverse events.
Assuntos
Hipertensão Induzida pela Gravidez , Hipertensão , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Monitorização Ambulatorial da Pressão Arterial , Hipertensão Induzida pela Gravidez/diagnóstico , Hipertensão Induzida pela Gravidez/terapia , Melhoria de Qualidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Período Pós-Parto , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Hipertensão/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy are one of the most common causes of readmission in the postpartum period. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, early hospital discharge was encouraged for patients who were medically stable, because hospitalization rates among SARS-CoV-2-infected patients steadily increased in 2020. The impact of an early discharge policy on postpartum readmission rates among patients with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the postpartum readmission rates of patients with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy before and after implementation of an early discharge policy owing to the COVID-19 pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: This was a quality improvement, retrospective cohort study of postpartum patients with antenatal hypertensive disorders in pregnancy who delivered and were readmitted because of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy at the New York University Langone Health medical center from March 1, 2019 to February 29, 2020 (control cohort) and from April 1, 2020 to March 31, 2021 (COVID-19 cohort). During the pandemic, our institution introduced an early discharge policy for all postpartum patients to be discharged no later than 2 days postpartum during the delivery admission if deemed medically appropriate. The reduction in postpartum length of stay was accompanied by the continuation of patient education, home blood pressure monitoring, and outpatient follow-up. The primary outcome was the comparison of the readmission rates for patients with postpartum hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Data were analyzed using Fisher's Exact tests, chi-square tests, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests with significance defined as P<.05. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the readmission rates for patients with postpartum hypertensive disorders in pregnancy before vs after implementation of an early discharge policy (1.08% for the control cohort vs 0.59% for the COVID-19 cohort). The demographics in each group were similar, as were the median times to readmission (5.0 days; interquartile range, 4.0-6.0 days vs 6.0 days; interquartile range, 5.0-6.0 days; P=.13) and the median readmission length of stay (3.0 days; interquartile range, 2.0-4.0 days vs 3.0 days; interquartile range, 2.0-4.0 days; P=.45). There was 1 intensive care unit readmission in the COVID-19 cohort and none in the control cohort (P=.35). There were no severe maternal morbidities or maternal deaths. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that policies calling for a reduced postpartum length of stay, which includes patients with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, can be implemented without impacting the hospital readmission rate for patients with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Continuation of patient education and outpatient surveillance during the pandemic was instrumental for the outpatient postpartum management of the study cohort. Further investigation into best practices to support early discharges is warranted.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In October 2018, a measles (rubeola) outbreak was identified in New York City and Rockland County, and a public health campaign and hospital policy changes were made to increase awareness of the importance of vaccination and increase vaccination rates. OBJECTIVE: We describe the prevalence of rubeola immunity in pregnant women and the change in uptake of postpartum measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination before and during the measles outbreak. STUDY DESIGN: A multipronged intervention was developed by the health system with the intent of raising awareness of the outbreak, identifying patients at risk of contracting measles during pregnancy, and limiting exposure of inpatients to the disease. This was a quality improvement study to assess the impact of the intervention and public health policy on the rates of documentation of rubeola immunity and rubeola vaccination rates in nonimmune women. Women who delivered at New York University Langone Health before the outbreak July 1, 2016 to July 1, 2017 were compared with women who delivered during the outbreak July 1, 2018 to July 1, 2019. The primary outcome was acceptance of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination in nonimmune women during the postpartum period. Analysis was conducted using logistic regression and chi-square tests, and alpha was set at 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 19,585 patients were analyzed; 9162 women delivered before the outbreak and 10,423 delivered during the outbreak. Of these, 2589 (13.2%) were documented as living in a high-risk zone improvement plan code, which were areas at the epicenter of the measles outbreak. Notably, 14,731 women (75.2%) were tested for rubeola immunity and 3270 of those tested (22.2%) were not immune. In the year of the outbreak, a higher proportion of women had rubeola immunity documented with serum titers than in the year before the outbreak (81% vs 69%; P<.001). Inpatient compliance with postpartum measles, mumps, and rubella administration was greater during the outbreak than before it (76% vs 59%; P<.001) for patients from both low-risk and high-risk zone improvement plan codes. CONCLUSION: The New York City and Rockland County measles outbreak, together with the implementation of a health system-wide education program and a change in public health policy, led to an increase in the proportion of pregnant women being screened for rubeola immunity. It also led to an increase in uptake of the immediate postpartum measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine.
Assuntos
Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola , Sarampo , Surtos de Doenças , Feminino , Humanos , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Período Pós-Parto , Gravidez , VacinaçãoRESUMO
Communication and teamwork improved on this labor and delivery unit.