RESUMO
Rationale: Millions of people are diagnosed with incidental pulmonary nodules every year. Although most nodules are benign, it is universally recommended that all patients be assessed to determine appropriate follow-up and ensure that it is obtained. Objectives: To determine the degree of concordance and adherence to 2005 Fleischner Society guidelines among radiologists, clinicians, and patients at two Veterans Affairs healthcare systems with incidental nodule tracking systems. Methods: Trained researchers abstracted data from the electronic health records of patients with incidental pulmonary nodules as identified by interpreting radiologists from 2008 to 2016. We classified radiology reports and patient follow-up into three categories. Radiologist-Fleischner adherence was the agreement between the radiologist's recommendation in the computed tomography (CT) report and the 2005 Fleischner Society guidelines. Clinician/patient-Fleischner concordance was agreement between patient follow-up and the guidelines. Clinician/patient-radiologist adherence was agreement between the radiologist's recommendation and patient follow-up. We evaluated whether the recommendation or follow-up was more (e.g., sooner) or less (e.g., later) aggressive than recommended. Results: After exclusions, 4,586 patients with 7,408 imaging tests (n = 4,586 initial chest CT scans; n = 2,717 follow-up chest CT scans; n = 105 follow-up low-dose CT scans) were included. Among radiology reports that could be classified in terms of Fleischner Society guidelines (n = 3,150), 80% had nonmissing radiologist recommendations. Among those reports, radiologist-Fleischner adherence was 86.6%, with 4.8% more aggressive and 8.6% less aggressive. Among patients whose initial scans could be classified, clinician/patient-Fleischner concordance was 46.0%, 14.5% were more aggressive, and 39.5% were less aggressive. Clinician/patient-radiologist adherence was 54.3%. Veterans whose radiology reports were adherent to Fleischner Society guidelines had a substantially higher proportion of clinician/patient-Fleischner concordance: 52.0% concordance among radiologist-Fleischner adherent versus 11.6% concordance among radiologist-Fleischner nonadherent. Conclusions: In this multi-health system observational study of incidental pulmonary nodule follow-up, we found that radiologist adherence to 2005 Fleischner Society guidelines may be necessary but not sufficient. Our results highlight the many facets of care processes that must occur to achieve guideline-concordant care.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Nódulos Pulmonares Múltiplos , Radiologia , Nódulo Pulmonar Solitário , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Achados Incidentais , Nódulos Pulmonares Múltiplos/diagnóstico por imagem , Nódulo Pulmonar Solitário/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Two models, the Help with the Assessment of Adenopathy in Lung cancer (HAL) and Help with Oncologic Mediastinal Evaluation for Radiation (HOMER), were recently developed to estimate the probability of nodal disease in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as determined by endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA). The objective of this study was to prospectively externally validate both models at multiple centers. RESEARCH QUESTION: Are the HAL and HOMER models valid across multiple centers? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This multicenter prospective observational cohort study enrolled consecutive patients with PET-CT clinical-radiographic stages T1-3, N0-3, M0 NSCLC undergoing EBUS-TBNA staging. HOMER was used to predict the probability of N0 vs N1 vs N2 or N3 (N2|3) disease, and HAL was used to predict the probability of N2|3 (vs N0 or N1) disease. Model discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC-AUC), and calibration was assessed using the Brier score, calibration plots, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. RESULTS: Thirteen centers enrolled 1,799 patients. HAL and HOMER demonstrated good discrimination: HAL ROC-AUC = 0.873 (95%CI, 0.856-0.891) and HOMER ROC-AUC = 0.837 (95%CI, 0.814-0.859) for predicting N1 disease or higher (N1|2|3) and 0.876 (95%CI, 0.855-0.897) for predicting N2|3 disease. Brier scores were 0.117 and 0.349, respectively. Calibration plots demonstrated good calibration for both models. For HAL, the difference between forecast and observed probability of N2|3 disease was +0.012; for HOMER, the difference for N1|2|3 was -0.018 and for N2|3 was +0.002. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was significant for both models (P = .034 and .002), indicating a small but statistically significant calibration error. INTERPRETATION: HAL and HOMER demonstrated good discrimination and calibration in multiple centers. Although calibration error was present, the magnitude of the error is small, such that the models are informative.
Assuntos
Biópsia por Agulha Fina/métodos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Endossonografia/métodos , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Metástase Linfática , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/métodos , Broncoscopia/métodos , Calibragem , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Metástase Linfática/diagnóstico por imagem , Metástase Linfática/patologia , Masculino , Mediastino/diagnóstico por imagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seleção de Pacientes , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Rationale: Because of improvements in screening, there is an increasing number of patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are making treatment decisions.Objectives: Among patients with suspected stage I NSCLC, we evaluated longitudinal patient-centered outcomes (PCOs) and the association of changes in PCOs with treatment modality, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) compared with surgical resection.Methods: We conducted a multisite, prospective, observational cohort study at seven medical institutions. We evaluated minimum clinically important differences of PCOs at four time points (during treatment, 4-6 wk after treatment, 6 mo after treatment, and 12 mo after treatment) compared with pretreatment values using validated instruments. We used adjusted linear mixed models to examine whether the association between treatment and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer global and physical quality-of-life (QOL) scales differed over time.Results: We included 127 individuals with stage I NSCLC (53 surgery, 74 SBRT). At 12 months, approximately 30% of patients remaining in each group demonstrated a clinical deterioration on global QOL from baseline. There was a significant difference in slopes between treatment groups on global QOL (-12.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], -13.34 to -12.37) and physical QOL (-28.71; 95% CI, -29.13 to -28.29) between baseline and during treatment, with the steeper decline observed among those who underwent surgery. Differences in slopes between treatment groups were not significant at all other time points.Conclusions: Approximately 30% of patients with stage I NSCLC have a clinically significant decrease in QOL 1 year after SBRT or surgical resection. Surgical resection was associated with steeper declines in QOL immediately after treatment compared with SBRT; however, these declines were not lasting and resolved within a year for most patients. Our results may facilitate treatment option discussions for patients receiving treatment for early-stage NSCLC.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/radioterapia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Prospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Limited data exist about patient-centered communication (PCC) and patient-centered outcomes among patients who undergo surgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to examine the relationship between PCC and decision-making processes among NSCLC patients, using baseline data from a prospective, multicenter study. METHODS: Patients with stage 1 NSCLC completed a survey prior to treatment initiation. The survey assessed sociodemographic characteristics, treatment decision variables, and patient psychosocial outcomes: health-related quality of life (HRQOL), treatment self-efficacy, decisional conflict, and PCC. RESULTS: Fifty-two percent (n = 85) of 165 individuals planned to receive SBRT. There were no baseline differences detected on patient psychosocial outcomes between those who planned to receive SBRT or surgery. All participants reported high HRQOL (M = 72.5, SD = 21.3) out of 100, where higher scores indicate better functioning; high self-efficacy (M = 1.5, SD = 0.5) out of 6, where lower numbers indicate higher self-efficacy; minimal decisional conflict (M = 15.2, SD = 12.7) out of 100, where higher scores indicate higher decisional conflict; and high levels of patient-centered communication (M = 2.4, SD = 0.8) out of 7 where higher scores indicate worse communication. Linear regression analyses adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical variables showed that higher quality PCC was associated with higher self-efficacy (ß = 0.17, p = 0.03) and lower decisional conflict (ß = 0.42, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Higher quality PCC was associated with higher self-efficacy and lower decisional conflict. Self-efficacy and decisional conflict may influence subsequent health outcomes. Therefore, our findings may inform future research and clinical programs that focus on communication strategies to improve these outcomes.
Assuntos
Comunicação , Neoplasias Pulmonares/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Idoso , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Relações Médico-Paciente , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: While surgical resection is recommended for most patients with early stage lung cancer, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is being increasingly utilized. Provider-patient communication regarding risks/benefits of each approach may be a modifiable factor leading to improved patient-centered outcomes. Our objective was to determine a framework and recommended strategies on how to best communicate with patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the post-treatment setting. We qualitatively evaluated the experiences of 11 patients with early clinical stage NSCLC after treatment, with a focus on treatment experience, knowledge obtained, communication, and recommendations. We used conventional content analysis and a patient-centered communication theoretical model to guide our understanding. RESULTS: Five patients received surgery and six received SBRT. Both treatments were generally well-tolerated. Few participants reported communication deficits around receiving follow-up information, although several had remaining questions about their treatment outcome (mainly those who underwent SBRT). They described feeling anxious regarding their first surveillance CT scan and clinician visit. Overall, participants remained satisfied with care because of implicit trust in their clinicians rather than explicit communication. Communication gaps remain but may be addressed by a trusting relationship with the clinician. Patients recommend clinicians give thorough explanations and personalize when possible.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/psicologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/psicologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Idoso , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/cirurgia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Satisfação do Paciente , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Qualidade de Vida , RadiocirurgiaRESUMO
RATIONALE: Many patients are diagnosed with small pulmonary nodules for which professional societies recommend subsequent imaging surveillance. Adherence to these guidelines involves many steps from both clinicians and patients but has not been well studied. OBJECTIVES: In a health care setting with a nodule tracking system, we evaluated the association of communication processes and distress with patient and clinician adherence to recommended follow up and Fleischner Society guidelines, respectively. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, longitudinally assessed, cohort study of patients with incidentally detected nodules who received care at one Veterans Affairs Medical Center. We measured patient-centered communication with the Consultation Care Measure and distress with the Impact of Event Scale. We abstracted data regarding participant adherence to clinician recommendations (defined as receiving the follow-up scan within 30 d of the recommended date) and clinician adherence to Fleischner guidelines (defined as planning the follow-up scan within 30 d of the recommended interval) from the electronic medical record. We measured associations of communication and distress with adherence using multivariable-adjusted generalized estimating equations. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 138 veterans, 39% were nonadherent at least once during follow up. Clinicians were nonadherent to Fleischner guidelines for 27% of follow-up scans. High-quality communication (adjusted odds ratio, 3.65; P = 0.02) and distress (adjusted odds ratio, 0.38; P = 0.02) were associated with increased and decreased participant adherence, respectively. Neither was associated with clinician adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and clinicians often do not adhere to nodule follow-up recommendations. Interventions designed to improve communication quality and decrease distress may also improve patient adherence to nodule follow-up recommendations.
Assuntos
Comunicação , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/normas , Nódulo Pulmonar Solitário/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Comorbidade , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Hospitais de Veteranos , Humanos , Achados Incidentais , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Estados Unidos , VeteranosRESUMO
RATIONALE: While surgical resection is recommended for most patients with early stage lung cancer according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, stereotactic body radiotherapy is increasingly being used. Provider-patient communication regarding the risks and benefits of each approach may be a modifiable factor leading to improved patient-centered outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To qualitatively describe the experiences of patients undergoing either surgery or stereotactic body radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: We qualitatively evaluated and used content analysis to describe the experiences of 13 patients with early clinical stage non-small cell lung cancer before undergoing treatment in three health care systems in the Pacific Northwest, with a focus on knowledge obtained, communication, and feelings of distress. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Although most participants reported rarely having been told about other options for treatment and could not readily recall many details about specific risks of recommended treatment, they were satisfied with their care. The patients paradoxically described clinicians as displaying caring and empathy despite not explicitly addressing their concerns and worries. We found that the communication domains that underlie shared decision making occurred infrequently, but that participants were still pleased with their role in the decision-making process. We did not find substantially different themes based on where the participant received care or the treatment selected. CONCLUSIONS: Patients were satisfied with all aspects of their care, despite reporting little knowledge about risks or other treatment options, no direct elicitation of worries from providers, and a lack of shared decision making. While the development of effective communication strategies to address these gaps is warranted, their effect on patient-centered outcomes, such as distress and decisional conflict, is unclear.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/psicologia , Comunicação , Tomada de Decisões , Neoplasias Pulmonares/psicologia , Participação do Paciente , Satisfação do Paciente , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/terapia , Conflito Psicológico , Feminino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Radiocirurgia , Estresse Psicológico , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Screening for lung cancer in high-risk individuals with annual low-dose computed tomography has been shown to reduce lung cancer mortality by 20% and is recommended by multiple health care organizations. Lung cancer screening is not a specific test; it is a process that involves appropriate selection of high-risk individuals, careful interpretation and follow-up of imaging, and annual testing. Screening should be performed in the context of a multidisciplinary program experienced in the diagnosis and management of lung nodules and early-stage lung cancer.
Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Biópsia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/efeitos adversos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Humanos , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Pulmão/patologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Doses de Radiação , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/efeitos adversosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Narrow PTV margins and steep dose gradients underscore the importance of evaluating breathing-associated tumor motion for lung SBRT. The specific aim of this study was to determine the impact of anatomic tumor location on inter-fraction tumor motion. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-one patients underwent standard free-breathing 4DCT simulation and daily image-guidance 4DCTs during lung SBRT. Absolute tumor motion amplitude in the mediolateral (ML), anterior-posterior (AP), and superior-inferior (SI) directions was analyzed from 159 total 4DCT scans (simulation and daily pre-treatment). RESULTS: Overall, the inter-fraction tumor motion amplitude in the ML, AP, and SI directions was small (mean ≤2.5 mm). Similarly, while both upper lobe (UL) and lower lobe (LL) tumors exhibited limited inter-fraction motion in both the ML and AP directions (mean ≤2.2 mm), tumors in the LL had increased inter-fraction motion in the SI direction compared to UL tumors (mean 4.3±4.0 mm vs. 1.7±1.7 mm, p=0.008). Moreover, 28.6% (n=4) of LL tumors exhibited mean inter-fraction motion along the SI direction >5 mm (all of which resided in the supra-diaphragmatic basal segments of the LL). CONCLUSIONS: Mean inter-fraction tumor motion amplitude along the SI direction exceeded our PTV margins (an isotropic 5 mm expansion of the ITV) in 28.6% of LL tumors (all of which resided in the basal segments). These results suggest that typical ITV-to-PTV margins may be insufficient for a subset of LL lesions and that increased PTV margins, daily breathing motion re-assessment and/or adaptive re-planning may benefit patients with supra-diaphragmatic tumors in the LL.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Embolization coils as fiducial markers for pulmonary stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) are perceived to be the optimal marker type, given their ability to conform and anchor within the small airways. The aim of our study was to assess retention, placement, migration, feasibility, and safety of electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy (ENB)-guided embolization coil markers throughout courses of SBRT. METHODS: Thirty-one patients with 34 nodules underwent ENB-guided fiducial placement of several 4 mm fibered platinum embolization coils before SBRT. Patient and nodule positioning was confirmed with daily pretreatment cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Fiducial positional characteristics were analyzed utilizing radiation treatment-planning software comparing the simulation CT with daily CBCTs. RESULTS: Of 105 fiducials placed, 103 were identifiable on simulation CT (retention rate: 98.1%). Incidence of asymptomatic pneumothoraces was 6%. One patient experienced hemoptysis requiring hospitalization. Eighty-six percent of fiducials were placed within 1 cm of the nodule, with 52% of fiducials placed directly on the nodule surface. Throughout a 5-fraction SBRT course, fiducial displacement was <7, 5, and 2 mm in 98%, 96%, and 67% of pretreatment CBCTs. CONCLUSIONS: ENB placement of embolization coils as fiducials for lung SBRT image guidance is associated with a low rate of iatrogenic pneumothoraces, and resulted in reliable placement of the fiducials in close proximity to the lung nodule. Embolization coils retained their relative position to the nodule throughout the course of SBRT, and provide an excellent alternative to linear gold seeds.
Assuntos
Broncoscopia/métodos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/cirurgia , Marcadores Fiduciais , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Embolização Terapêutica/instrumentação , Desenho de Equipamento , Estudos de Viabilidade , Migração de Corpo Estranho/epidemiologia , Humanos , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Imãs , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumotórax/epidemiologia , Pneumotórax/etiologia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Radiocirurgia/instrumentação , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Because early-stage lung cancer is associated with lower mortality than late-stage disease, early detection and treatment may be beneficial. PURPOSE: To update the 2004 review of screening for lung cancer for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, focusing on screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (2000 to 31 May 2013), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (through the fourth quarter of 2012), Scopus, and reference lists. STUDY SELECTION: English-language randomized, controlled trials or cohort studies that evaluated LDCT screening for lung cancer. DATA EXTRACTION: One reviewer extracted study data about participants, design, analysis, follow-up, and results, and a second reviewer checked extractions. Two reviewers rated study quality using established criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: Four trials reported results of LDCT screening among patients with smoking exposure. One large good-quality trial reported that screening was associated with significant reductions in lung cancer (20%) and all-cause (6.7%) mortality. Three small European trials showed no benefit of screening. Harms included radiation exposure, overdiagnosis, and a high rate of false-positive findings that typically were resolved with further imaging. Smoking cessation was not affected. Incidental findings were common. LIMITATIONS: Three trials were underpowered and of insufficient duration to evaluate screening effectiveness. Overdiagnosis, an important harm of screening, is of uncertain magnitude. No studies reported results in women or minority populations. CONCLUSION: Strong evidence shows that LDCT screening can reduce lung cancer and all-cause mortality. The harms associated with screening must be balanced with the benefits. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagem , Programas de Rastreamento/efeitos adversos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/efeitos adversos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Reações Falso-Positivas , Humanos , Achados Incidentais , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Programas de Rastreamento/psicologia , Doses de Radiação , Medição de Risco , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/psicologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Identifying factors associated with stage of diagnosis can improve our understanding of biologic and behavioral pathways of lung cancer development and detection. We used data from a prospective cohort study to evaluate associations of demographic, health history, and health behaviors with early versus late stage at diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: We calculated odds ratios (ORs) for the association of patient-level characteristics with advanced stage of diagnosis for NSCLC. The OR's were then adjusted for age, gender, race/ethnicity, smoking status, income, education, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and a comorbidity index. RESULTS: We identified 612 cases of NSCLC among 77,719 adults, aged 50 to 76 years from Washington State recruited in 2000-2002, with followup through December 2007. In univariate analyses, subjects who quit smoking <10 years (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.17 - 5.60) and were college graduates (OR 1.67, 95% CI, 1.00 - 2.76) had increased risks of being diagnosed with advanced stage NSCLC, compared to never smokers and non-college graduates, respectively. Receipt of sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy, compared to no receipt, was associated with a decreased risk of advanced stage (OR 0.65, 95% CI, 0.43 - 0.99). The adjusted OR for receipt of sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.36 - 0.86). There was evidence that increasing the number of screening activities was associated with a decreased risk of advanced stage NSCLC (P for trend = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Smoking status, education, and a screening activity were associated with stage at diagnosis of NSCLC. These results may guide future studies of the underlying mechanisms that influence how NSCLC is detected and diagnosed.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Idoso , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Análise Fatorial , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
We describe 2 cases of mediastinal abscess developing after endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in patients with thoracic malignancies. The first case was that of a 68-year-old male patient with a history of colon cancer presenting with new mediastinal adenopathy. EBUS-TBNA confirmed metastatic colon adenocarcinoma; however, he developed fever and atrial fibrillation 32 days after the procedure and was diagnosed with mediastinal abscess. The patient was successfully treated with antibiotics. The second case was that of a 66-year-old previously healthy male who presented for evaluation of cough. Imaging showed a right paratracheal mass and he underwent EBUS-TBNA sampling, which showed malignant cells. Eight days after the procedure the patient developed fever and was diagnosed with mediastinal abscess. The second patient was treated with antibiotics and several debridements; however, he was eventually transitioned to hospice care because of a continued spread of his cancer. Although rare, mediastinal infection is a complication of endoscopic mediastinal needle aspiration.
RESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To describe our 5-year experience with a clinical pathway used to ensure the timely communication and evaluation of unsuspected radiologic findings (URFs) noted on clinically requested chest imaging. DESIGN: Prospective data collection on clinical practice. SETTING: Academically affiliated Veterans Affairs medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Pulmonary physicians, nurses, and radiologists. RESULTS: Over a period of 5 years, 1,629 URFs were referred to the pathway (from chest radiographs, 1,359 [83.4%]; from CT scans, 270 [16.6%]). Most URFs (78%) were nodules, with a specific diagnosis made in one third of URFs, and with a specific diagnosis thought to be clinically significant in another one third of URFs. The most common diagnosis was neoplasm, with over two thirds of these diagnoses being lung cancer. One third of lung cancers detected were either stage 1 or 2, with 1 in 17 of all URFs being stage IA lung cancer. The cost of the pathway was estimated at 28,600 dollars per year. CONCLUSIONS: URFs noted on chest imaging are frequently clinically significant, and a systematic approach to managing URFs, such as a clinical pathway, can significantly improve care in a large teaching hospital.