Myocardial sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 expression and cardiac remodelling in patients with severe aortic stenosis: The BIO-AS study.

AIM: Cardiac remodelling plays a major role in the prognosis of patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and could impact the benefits of aortic valve replacement. Our study aimed to evaluate the expression of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) gene and protein in patients with severe AS stratified in high gradient (HG) and low flow-low gradient (LF-LG) AS and its association with cardiac functional impairments. METHODS AND RESULTS: Gene expression and protein levels of main biomarkers of cardiac fibrosis (galectin-3, sST2, serpin-4, procollagen type I amino-terminal peptide, procollagen type I carboxy-terminal propeptide, collagen, transforming growth factor [TGF]-ß), inflammation (growth differentiation factor-15, interleukin-6, nuclear factor-κB [NF-κB]), oxidative stress (superoxide dismutase 1 [SOD1] and 2 [SOD2]), and cardiac metabolism (sodium-hydrogen exchanger, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor [PPAR]-α, PPAR-γ, glucose transporter 1 [GLUT1] and 4 [GLUT4]) were evaluated in blood samples and heart biopsies of 45 patients with AS. Our study showed SGLT2 gene and protein hyper-expression in patients with LF-LG AS, compared to controls and HG AS (p < 0.05). These differences remained significant even after adjusting for age, gender, body mass index, history of diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, and coronary artery disease. SGLT2 gene expression was positively correlated with: (i) TGF-ß (r = 0.72, p < 0.001) and collagen (r = 0.73, p < 0.001) as markers of fibrosis; (ii) NF-κB (r = 0.36, p < 0.01) and myocardial interleukin-6 (r = 0.68, p < 0.001) as markers of inflammation: (iii) SOD2 (r = -0.38, p < 0.006) as a marker of oxidative stress; (iv) GLUT4 (r = 0.33, p < 0.02) and PPAR-α (r = 0.36, p < 0.01) as markers of cardiac metabolism. CONCLUSION: In patients with LF-LG AS, SGLT2 gene and protein were hyper-expressed in cardiomyocytes and associated with myocardial fibrosis, inflammation, and oxidative stress.

Minimally Invasive Pectus Excavatum Correction and Endoscopic Port Access Mitral Valve Surgery.

This case study describes the successful short-term outcome of staged minimally invasive pectus excavatum correction and endoscopic mitral valve repair in a patient with severe mitral valve regurgitation and pectus excavatum.

Outcomes in patients with moderate and asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis followed up in heart valve clinics.

BACKGROUND: Heart valve clinics (HVC) have been introduced to manage patients with valvular heart disease within a multidisciplinary team. OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcome benefit of HVC approach compared with standard of care (SOC) for patients with moderate and asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (mAS and asAS). METHODS: Single-centre, observational registry of patients with mAS and asAS with at least one cardiac ambulatory consultation at our Cardiovascular Centre. Based on the outpatient strategy, patients were divided into HVC group, if receiving at least one visit at HVC, and SOC group, if followed by routine cardiac consultations. RESULTS: 2129 patients with mAS and asAS were divided into those followed in HVC (n=251) versus SOC group (n=1878). The mean age was 76.5±12.4 years; 919 (43.2%) had asAS. During a follow-up of 4.8±1.8 years, 822 patients (38.6%) died, 307 (14.4%) were hospitalised for heart failure and 596 (28%) underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR). After propensity score matching, the number of consultations per year, exercise stress tests, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) determinations and CTs were higher in the HVC cohort (p<0.05 for all). A shorter time between indication of AVR and less advanced New York Heart Association class was reported in the HVC cohort (p<0.001 and p=0.032). Compared with SOC, the HVC approach was associated with reduced all-cause mortality (HR=0.63, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.98, p=0.038) and cardiovascular death (p=0.030). At multivariable analysis, the HVC remained an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (HR=0.54, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.85, p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with mAS and asAS, the HVC approach was associated with more efficient management and outcome benefit compared with SOC.

Aortic thoracic neuromodulation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

The inadequacy of medical therapies for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is driving the development of device-based solutions targeting underlying pathophysiologic abnormalities. The maladaptive autonomic imbalance with a reduction in vagal parasympathetic activity and increased sympathetic signalling contributes to the deterioration of cardiac performance, patient fitness, and the increased overall morbidity and mortality. Thoracic aortic vagal afferents mediate parasympathetic signalling, and their stimulation has been postulated to restore autonomic balance. In this first-in-man experience with chronic stimulation of aortic vagal afferents (Harmony™ System, Enopace, Israel), we demonstrate improved left atrial remodelling and function parallel with improved left ventricular performance. The observed favourable structural and functional cardiac changes remained stable throughout the 1 year follow-up and were associated with improved symptoms and physical fitness. The current experience warrants further validation of the endovascular stimulation of aortic thoracic afferents as a new interventional approach for device-based treatment in HFpEF.

Absolute coronary flow and microvascular resistance reserve in patients with severe aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Development of left ventricle (LV) hypertrophy in aortic stenosis (AS) is accompanied by adaptive coronary flow regulation. We aimed to assess absolute coronary flow, microvascular resistance, coronary flow reverse (CFR) and microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) in patients with and without AS. METHODS: Absolute coronary flow and microvascular resistance were measured by continuous thermodilution in 29 patients with AS and 29 controls, without AS, matched for age, gender, diabetes and functional severity of epicardial coronary lesions. Myocardial work, total myocardial mass and left anterior descending artery (LAD)-specific mass were quantified by echocardiography and cardiac-CT. RESULTS: Patients with AS presented a significantly positive LV remodelling with lower global longitudinal strain and global work efficacy compared with controls. Total LV myocardial mass and LAD-specific myocardial mass were significantly higher in patients with AS (p=0.001). Compared with matched controls, absolute resting flow in the LAD was significantly higher in the AS cohort (p=0.009), resulting into lower CFR and MRR in the AS cohort compared with controls (p<0.005 for both). No differences were found in hyperaemic flow and resting and hyperaemic resistances. Hyperaemic myocardial perfusion (calculated as the ratio between the absolute coronary flow subtended to the LAD, expressed in mL/min/g), but not resting, was significantly lower in the AS group (p=0.035). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe AS and non-obstructive coronary artery disease, with the progression of LV hypertrophy, the compensatory mechanism of increased resting flow maintains adequate perfusion at rest, but not during hyperaemia. As a consequence, both CFR and MRR are significantly impaired.

Importance of In-Hospital Prospective Registry and Infectious Endocarditis Heart Team to Monitor and Improve Quality of Care in Patients with Infectious Endocarditis.

AIM: To investigate the value of prospective in-hospital registry data and the impact of an infectious endocarditis heart team approach (IEHT) on improvement in quality of care and monitor outcomes in hospitalized patients with IE. METHODS: Between December 2014 and the end of 2019, 160 patients were hospitalized in one centre with the definite diagnosis of infectious endocarditis (IE) and entered in a prospective registry. From 2017, an IEHT was introduced. Propensity score matching was used to assess the impact of an IEHT approach on clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Median age was 72.5 y (62.75-80.00), diabetes was present in 33.1%, chronic kidney disease in 27.5%, COPD in 17.5%, and a history of ischaemic heart disease in 30.6%. Prosthetic valve IE was observed in 43.8% and device-related IE in 16.9% of patients. Staphylococcus (37.5%) was the most frequent pathogen followed by streptococcus (24.4%) and enterococcus (23.1%). Overall, 30-day and 1-year mortality were 19.4% and 37.5%, respectively. The introduction of prospective data collection and IE heart team was associated with a trend towards reduction of adjusted 1-year mortality (26.5% IEHT vs. 41.2% controls, p = 0.0699). An IEHT clinical decision-making approach was independently associated with a shorter length of stay (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Use of a prospective registry of IE coupled with a heart team approach was associated with more efficient patient management and a trend towards lower mortality. Prospective data collection and dedicated IEHT have the potential to improve patient care and clinical outcomes.

Reasons for Conversion and Adverse Intraoperative Events in Robotically Enhanced Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Revascularization.

OBJECTIVE: The transition from sternotomy access to minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting is associated with steep learning curves. This study reports the reasons for sternotomy conversions from robotically enhanced minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (RE-MIDCAB) and describes potential risk reduction strategies. METHODS: The perioperative data of 759 RE-MIDCAB patients (mean age 65.9 ± 10 years, 25.5% female, 30.2% multivessel disease) operated between July 1, 2002 and November 30, 2018 were reviewed for the reasons of conversion and adverse intraoperative events. Hybrid revascularization was planned in 204 (26.9%) patients. RESULTS: Sternotomy conversion occurred in 30 (4.0%) patients. Lung adhesions and unsuccessful single-lung ventilation prohibited safe RE-MIDCAB internal thoracic artery (ITA) harvesting in 11 (36.7%) and 1 (3.3%) patients, respectively. ITA dysfunction (n = 11, 36.7%) and inadequate target vessel visualization (n = 3, 10.0%) were among the anatomical reasons for conversions. Adverse intraoperative events included ventricle perforation (n = 1, 3.3%) and sustained ventricular arrhythmia (n = 1, 3.3%). The in-hospital mortality and mean length of hospitalization for sternotomy conversion were 3.3% (n = 1 of 30) and 13.4 ± 14.5 days, respectively. Perioperative morbidities included pneumonia (n = 4, 13.3%). Premorbid renal dysfunction predicted sternotomy conversion at the 5% level of significance. CONCLUSIONS: RE-MIDCAB provides an attractive surgical platform for primary- or hybrid coronary artery procedures. The progressive increase in patient risk profiles, strict quality control, and focus on clinical governance require awareness of reasons that potentially contribute RE-MIDCAB to sternotomy conversion to ensure safe and sustainable programs.

Percutaneous Transfemoral TAVR With Direct Puncture and Successful Closure of Aortobifemoral Bypass Graft.

Two successful cases of percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with previous aortobifemoral bypass graft surgery are presented. Both cases demonstrate feasibility of this strategy after careful preprocedural planning and suggest transfemoral TAVR can also be considered for patients when alternative access and/or general anaesthesia is excluded.

Les auteurs présentent deux cas de remplacement valvulaire aortique par cathéter (RVAC) réalisé par voie transfémorale percutanée chez des patients ayant déjà subi un pontage aorto-bifémoral. Ces deux cas montrent la faisabilité d'une telle intervention après une planification minutieuse et portent à croire qu'un RVAC transfémoral pourrait aussi être envisagé lorsqu'il n'y a pas d'autre accès possible et/ou qu'une anesthésie générale est contre-indiquée.

Fractional flow reserve in patients with reduced ejection fraction.

AIMS: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has never been investigated in patients with reduced ejection fraction and associated coronary artery disease (CAD). We evaluated the impact of FFR on the management strategies of these patients and related outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: From 2002 to 2010, all consecutive patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤50% undergoing coronary angiography with ≥1 intermediate coronary stenosis [diameter stenosis (DS)% 50-70%] treated based on angiography (Angiography-guided group) or according to FFR (FFR-guided group) were screened for inclusion. In the FFR-guided group, 433 patients were matched with 866 contemporary patients of the Angiography-guided group. For outcome comparison, 617 control patients with LVEF >50% were included. After FFR, stenotic vessels per patient were significantly downgraded compared with the Angiography-guided group (1.43 ± 0.98 vs. 1.97 ± 0.84; P < 0.001). This was associated with lower revascularization rate (52% vs. 62%; P < 0.001) in the FFR-guided vs. the Angiography-guided group. All-cause death at 5 years of follow-up was significantly lower in the FFR-guided as compared with Angiography-guided group [22% vs. 31%. HR (95% CI) 0.64 (0.51-0.81); P < 0.001]. Similarly, rate of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, revascularization, and stroke) was significantly lower in the FFR-guided group [40% vs. 46% in the Angiography-guided group. HR (95% CI) 0.81 (0.67-0.97); P = 0.019]. Higher rates of death and MACCE were observed in patients with reduced LVEF compared with the control cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with reduced LVEF and CAD, FFR-guided revascularization was associated with lower rates of death and MACCE at 5 years as compared with the Angiography-guided strategy. This beneficial impact was observed in parallel with less coronary artery bypass grafting and more patients deferred to percutaneous coronary intervention or medical therapy.

Six-Year Follow-Up of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery has been associated with lower number of graft anastomoses, lower rate of on-pump surgery, and higher graft patency rate as compared with angiography-guided CABG surgery. However, no clinical benefit has been reported to date. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients (n=627) treated by CABG between 2006 and 2010 were retrospectively included. In 198 patients, at least 1 stenosis was grafted according to FFR (FFR-guided group), whereas in 429 patients all stenoses were grafted based on angiography (angiography-guided group). The 2 coprimary end points were overall death or myocardial infarction and major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of overall death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) up to 6-year follow-up. In the FFR-guided group, patients were significantly younger (66 [57-73] versus 70 [63-76]; P<0.001), more often male (82% versus 72%; P=0.008), and less often diabetic (21% versus 30%; P=0.023). Clinical follow-up (median, 85 [66-104] months) was analyzed in 396 patients after 1:1 propensity-score matching for these 3 variables. The rate of overall death or myocardial infarction was significantly lower in the FFR-guided (n=31 [16%] versus n=49 [25%]; hazard ratio, 0.59 [95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.93]; P=0.020) as compared with the angiography-guided group. Major adverse cardiovascular events rate was also numerically lower in the FFR-guided than in the angiography-guided group (n=42 [21%] versus n=52 [26%]; hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% confidence interval, 0.51-1.16]; P=0.21). CONCLUSIONS: FFR-guided CABG is associated with a significant reduction in the rate of overall death or myocardial infarction at 6-year follow-up as compared with angiography-guided CABG.

Endoscopic port access surgery for isolated atrioventricular valve endocarditis.

OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to report the clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of endoscopic port access surgery for isolated active and convalescent atrioventricular valve endocarditis (AVVE). METHODS: Our current surgical team performed endoscopic port access surgery in 66 consecutive patients with isolated AVVE (mean age, 65.5 ± 12.7 years, 37.9% women, mean EuroSCORE II 31.2 ± 24.9%, 45.5% prosthetic AVVE, Staphylococcus aureus 22.2%), between 1 May 2004 and 31 July 2015. Isolated mitral valve endocarditis was present in 53 (80.4%) patients, including 11 (16.7%) with periannular abscesses. RESULTS: Procedures performed included mitral valve repair (n = 15, 22.7%) and left ventricular septal myomectomy (n = 1, 1.5%). Reasons for sternotomy conversion (n = 6, 9.1%) included lung adhesions (n = 3, 4.5%). The mean cardiopulmonary bypass and ischaemic times were 167.2 ±48.7 and 112.6 ± 33.3 min, respectively. In-hospital morbidities included revision for bleeding (n = 6, 9.1%). The 30-day survival rate was 87.9%. Causes of in-hospital deaths (n = 12) included low cardiac output syndrome (n = 3, 4.5%). Age, critical preoperative status and EuroSCORE II score predicted deaths individually at the 5% level of significance. The Kaplan-Meier analyses (mean 63.2 ± 42.5 months) for survival and freedom from AVVE reintervention at 10 years were 69.4% and 98.4%, respectively. Of the mid-term survivors (n = 50, 93.9% complete), 94.0% (n = 47) classified as New York Heart Association (NYHA) II or less with no mitral valve regurgitation greater than Grade I. CONCLUSIONS: Complex atrioventricular valve surgery in the context of AVVE can be endoscopically performed in experienced centres and should not deter surgeons from offering patients with AVVE the potential benefits of minimally invasive cardiac surgery.

Reasons for conversion and adverse intraoperative events in Endoscopic Port Access™ atrioventricular valve surgery and minimally invasive aortic valve surgery.

OBJECTIVES: This study reports the factors that contribute to sternotomy conversions (SCs) and adverse intraoperative events in minimally invasive aortic valve surgery (MI-AVS) and minimally invasive Endoscopic Port Access™ atrioventricular valve surgery (MI-PAS). METHODS: In total, 3780 consecutive patients with either aortic valve disease or atrioventricular valve disease underwent minimally invasive valve surgery (MIVS) at our institution between 1 February 1997 and 31 March 2016. MI-AVS was performed in 908 patients (mean age 69.2 ± 11.3 years, 45.2% women, 6.2% redo cardiac surgery) and MI-PAS in 2872 patients (mean age 64.1 ± 13.3 years, 46.7% women, 12.2% redo cardiac surgery). RESULTS: A cumulative total of 4415 MIVS procedures (MI-AVS = 908, MI-PAS = 3507) included 1537 valve replacements (MI-AVS = 896, MI-PAS = 641) and 2878 isolated or combined valve repairs (MI-AVS = 12, MI-PAS = 2866). SC was required in 3.0% (n = 114 of 3780) of MIVS patients, which occurred in 3.1% (n = 28 of 908) of MI-AVS patients and 3.0% (n = 86 of 2872) of MI-PAS patients, respectively. Reasons for SC in MI-AVS included inadequate visualization (n = 4, 0.4%) and arterial cannulation difficulty (n = 7, 0.8%). For MI-PAS, SC was required in 54 (2.5%) isolated mitral valve procedures (n = 2183). Factors that contributed to SC in MI-PAS included lung adhesions (n = 35, 1.2%), inadequate visualization (n = 2, 0.1%), ventricular bleeding (n = 3, 0.1%) and atrioventricular dehiscence (n = 5, 0.2%). Neurological deficit occurred in 1 (0.1%) and 3 (3.5%) MI-AVS and MI-PAS conversions, respectively. No operative or 30-day mortalities were observed in MI-AVS conversions (n = 28). The 30-day mortality associated with SC in MI-PAS (n = 86) was 10.5% (n = 9). CONCLUSIONS: MIVS is increasingly being recognized as the 'gold-standard' for surgical valve interventions in the context of rapidly expanding catheter-based technology and increasing patient expectations. Surgeons need to be aware of factors that contribute to SC and adverse intraoperative outcomes to ensure that patients enjoy the maximum potential benefit of MIVS and to apply effective risk reduction strategies that encourage safer and sustainable MIVS programmes.

Endoscopic Port Access Surgery for Late Orthotopic Cardiac Transplantation Atrioventricular Valve Disease.

BACKGROUND: The study aim was to present details of the perioperative and long-term outcomes of redo-endoscopic port access surgery (REPAS) for late atrioventricular valve disease (AVVD) in orthotopic cardiac transplant (OCT) patients. METHODS: Between February 2004 and October 2015, REPAS was performed for late AVVD in seven consecutive OCT patients (mean age 57.9 ± 17.2 years; EuroSCORE II 21.2 ± 14.7%) at the authors' institution. The mean OCT-REPAS time interval was 7.8 ± 4.6 years (range: 1.3-13.8 years). NYHA class III or IV symptoms were present in four patients (57%). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 52.9 ± 3.9%, and surgical indications included severe mitral valve (MV) and tricuspid valve (TV) regurgitation in three patients (44%) and six patients (86%), respectively. Etiological factors included endomyocardial biopsy trauma (n = 6; 86%), degenerative disease (n = 2; 29%), and fungal endocarditis (n = 1; 14%). RESULTS: Procedures performed included MV repair (n = 3; 43%) and TV replacement (n = 3; 43%). There were no sternotomy conversions or revisions for any cause. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass and ischemic times were 178.4 ± 48.6 min and 118.3 ± 39.5 min, respectively. In-hospital morbidities included hospital-acquired pneumonia (n = 2; 29%). There were no wound infections or 30-day mortalities. The mean duration of hospitalization was 18.3 ± 11.0 days. A mean of 29.2 ± 45.6 patient-months (total 204.3 patient-months) was available for long-term clinical and echocardiographic analysis (n = 7; 100% complete). No MV or TV reinterventions were required. NYHA class ≤II was achieved in five patients (71%). No patient presented with residual MV regurgitation greater than grade I. CONCLUSIONS: REPAS for late AVVD in OCT patients is a safe and durable procedure with favorable technique-related mortality, in-hospital morbidity, and long-term cardiac-specific outcomes at experienced centers. The present technique provided an attractive benchmark against which emerging percutaneous interventions may be measured, and earlier referral of patients should be considered.

Robotic-enhanced coronary surgery in octogenarians.

Objectives: Robotic-enhanced minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (RE-MIDCAB) is based on the use of a robotic console and instrumentation for the dissection of the left internal thoracic artery (LITA). The LITA to left anterior descending (LAD) artery anastomosis is subsequently constructed through a mini thoracotomy. The purpose of this study is to present our experience of RE-MIDCAB outcomes in elderly patients. Methods: From 2002 until 2015, 44 octogenarians (the mean age of 82.9 years) underwent RE-MIDCAB. The mean logistic EuroSCORE was 9.2. The majority of the patients were male with a medical history of hypertension, dyslipidaemia and previous coronary interventions. Of these patients 25% underwent RE-MIDCAB combined with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the treatment of multi-vessel disease (hybrid revascularization). Results: All RE-MIDCABs and combined 'hybrid' PCI procedures were successfully completed. The mean intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay were 1.6 days and 10.9 days, respectively. There was 1 in-hospital mortality (2.3%). After an average follow-up period of 29.2 months, 5 patients required repeat revascularization procedures (9.1%). Mortality on follow-up was estimated at 25.6%. Conclusions: Our report suggests that considering the age and frailty of the octogenarian population, RE-MIDCAB is a feasible and safe procedure which is associated with acceptable mid-term results.

Endoscopic atrioventricular valve surgery in adults with difficult-to-access uncorrected congenital chest wall deformities.

OBJECTIVES: This study presents the first report on in-hospital and long-term outcomes of endoscopic port access atrioventricular valve surgery (EPAAVVS) in adult patients with uncorrected congenital chest wall deformities (CCWDs). METHODS: Our current surgical team performed EPAAVVS in 7 consecutive adult patients (mean age 51.3 ± 16.4 years, 14.3% female, 50% older than 60 years, mean EuroSCORE II 0.8 ± 0.1%) with uncorrected CCWDs between 1 November 2009 and 30 November 2015. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 66.0 ± 8.5%. Surgical indications included isolated or combined symptomatic mitral valve (MV) regurgitation (n = 7, 100%), left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction (n = 1, 14.3%) and patent foramen ovale (n = 3, 42.9%). Fibro-elastic deficiency accounted for 57.1% of MV pathology and 5 patients (74.1%) presented with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III symptoms. CCWDs included isolated pectus excavatum (n = 5, 71.4%) and mixed pectus excavatum and carinatum (n = 2, 28.6%). The mean Haller-index and correction index scores were 2.7 ± 0.5 and 21.4 ± 10.2%, respectively. RESULTS: Procedures performed included MV repair (n = 7, 100%), tricuspid valve (TV) repair (n = 1, 14.3%) and left ventricular septal myomectomy (n = 1, 14.3%). There were no sternotomy conversions or complications with chest wall entry or atrioventricular valve exposure. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times were 162.1 ± 48.1 and 113.7 ± 33.5 min, respectively. No patient required mechanical ventilation or intensive care treatment longer than 24 h. There were no surgical revisions, in-hospital respiratory or chest wall morbidities. The mean length of hospital stay was 7.4 ± 1.0 days. A total of 208 patient-months (mean 29.7 ± 26.5) were available for long-term clinical and echocardiographic analysis. There were no 30-day or long-term mortalities and no patient required reintervention for residual atrioventricular valve pathology. All patients were classified as NYHA I during recent consultations, and echocardiographic follow-up confirmed no residual MV regurgitation greater than Grade 1 in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: EPAAVVS in adults with uncorrected CCWD is safe, feasible and durable and can successfully be performed by experienced teams to achieve Haller index and correction index scores of up to 3.3 and 38.3%, respectively, with favourable long-term clinical and echocardiographic outcomes. The mere presence of uncorrected CCWDs should not deter surgeons from offering these patients the full benefits of minimally invasive cardiac surgery.

Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Revascularization in Patients With Aortic Stenosis.

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has never been investigated in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). From 2002 to 2010, we identified 106 patients with AS and coronary artery disease with at least one intermediate lesion treated according to FFR guidance. We matched 212 contemporary control patients with AS in which revascularization was decided on angiography only. More patients in the FFR-guided group underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (24% vs 13%; p = 0.019), whereas there was a trend toward less coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) performed. After FFR, the number of diseased vessels was downgraded within the FFR-guided group (from 1.85 ± 0.97 to 1.48 ± 1; p <0.01) and compared with the angio-guided group (1.48 ± 1 vs 1.8 ± 0.97; p <0.01). Less aortic valve replacement was reported in the FFR-guided group (46% vs 57%; p = 0.056). In patients who underwent CABG, less venous conduits (0.5 ± 0.69 vs 0.73 ± 0.76; p = 0.05) and anastomoses (0.61 ± 0.85 vs 0.94 ± 1; p = 0.032) were necessary in the FFR-guided group. Up to 5 years, we found no difference in major adverse cardiac events (38% vs 39%; p = 0.98), overall death (32% vs 31%; p = 0.68), nonfatal myocardial infarction (2% vs 2%; p = 0.79), and revascularization (8% vs 7%; p = 0.76) between the 2 groups. In conclusion, FFR guidance impacts the management of selected patients with moderate or severe AS and coronary artery disease by resulting into deferral of aortic valve replacement, more patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention, and in patients treated with CABG, into less venous grafts and anastomoses without increasing adverse event rates up to 5 years.

Clinical Outcome of Patients with Aortic Stenosis and Coronary Artery Disease Not Treated According to Current Recommendations.

We evaluated the clinical outcome of patients with moderate/severe aortic stenosis and significant coronary disease not treated according to guidelines, recommending combined aortic valve replacement (AVR) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). From 2002 to 2010, we assessed death up to 5 years in 650 patients with moderate/severe aortic stenosis and at least one coronary lesion (>50 %): 23 % were treated conservatively (MT), 17 % with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), 11 % with AVR, and 49 % with combined CABG and AVR. At a median follow-up of 58 months, overall death decreased over the groups (MT, 68 % vs. PCI, 44 % vs. AVR, 34 % vs. CABG and AVR, 23 %, p < 0.01). Compared to the MT group, Cox regression analysis adjusted for potential confounders showed significantly reduced mortality in the PCI, AVR, and CABG and AVR groups. When combined CABG and AVR is not feasible, PCI or AVR alone still improves significantly long-term survival as compared with MT alone.

Late redo-port access surgery after port access surgery.

OBJECTIVES: This study presents the first report on short- and long-term outcomes in redo-port access surgery after previous port access surgery (redo-PAS-PAS) for new or recurrent mitral valve (MV) and tricuspid valve (TV) disease. METHODS: Our current surgical team performed redo-PAS-PAS in 26 consecutive patients who had previous port access surgery (mean age 65.8 ± 13.3 years, 46.2% female, 42.3% older than 70 years, mean logistical EuroSCORE 22.5 ± 21.6%) between 1 February 1997 and 30 June 2014. Surgical indications included among others MV prosthesis dysfunction (n = 8, 30.8%), endocarditis (n = 10, 38.5%) and TV dysfunction (n = 3, 11.5%). The mean time interval between primary PAS and redo-PAS-PAS was 70.32 ± 57.4 months. RESULTS: Redo-PAS-PAS procedures included MV replacement (n = 19, 73.1%), MV repair (n = 5, 19.2%), and TV repair (n = 2, 7.7%). Sternotomy conversion was required in 5 patients (19.2%), of which 4 (15.4%) were early conversions due to lung adhesion and 1 (3.8%) due to a late intraoperative complication. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times were 163.3 ± 57.9 and 101.2 ± 43.8 min, respectively. Postoperative mechanical ventilation longer than 72 h was required in 4 patients (15.4%). In-hospital morbidities included hospital-acquired pneumonia (n = 3, 11.5%), postoperative air leaks (n = 2, 7.7%) and revision for bleeding (n = 1, 3.8%). The mean length of hospital stay was 16.1 days. Long-term clinical and echocardiographic follow-up were 48.3 ± 39.2 and 44.6 ± 32.9 months, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier analyses for survival and freedom from mitral and tricuspid valve reintervention (n = 26) at 5 years were 83.9 and 95.8%, respectively, with 91.3% of surviving patients classified as being NYHA II or less. Echocardiographic follow-up showed no residual mitral regurgitation more than grade I in all redo mitral valve repairs and no paravalvular leak post-valve replacement. CONCLUSIONS: Redo-PAS-PAS is our routine approach and we apply this strategy in the majority of patients who had previous port access surgery. The predicted procedure-related mortality, morbidities, patient satisfaction and long-term outcomes are favourable.

Unrecognized anomalous left circumflex coronary artery arising from right sinus of Valsalva: a source of perioperative complication.

: In this article we provide a very interesting and challenging PCI of unrecognized anomalous left circumflex coronary artery (LCx) arising from right sinus of Valsalva (RSV) after aortic valve replacement (AVR).This case presentation focuses the attention on important criteria for recognition of abnormal LCx coronary artery, that is the most frequent congenital coronary variant. Failure to demonstrate the anomaly can lead to erroneous interpretation of coronary anatomy with fatal complication in case of aortic valve replacement, as a consequence of accidental ligation or compression of the anomalous vessel. This procedure, especially in the presence of a bioprosthesis aortic valve just implanted, constitutes a challenge for the interventional cardiologist and at the same time a question mark regarding the strategy, choice of guiding catheter, guide wire, and type of stent to use.