RESUMO
Diazoxide is the only medication approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of hyperinsulinism-induced hypoglycemia. Overdose is infrequently reported. This case describes a preterm four-week-old male who was prescribed diazoxide and chlorothiazide for perinatal stress-induced hyperinsulinism. The patient presented to the emergency department with feeding intolerance and abdominal distension following an accidental 10-fold diazoxide overdose. On presentation, vital signs were remarkable for tachycardia and intermittent tachypnea. Physical exam revealed a grossly distended abdomen. Laboratory abnormalities included a glucose of 216 mg/dL, sodium of 132 mmol/L, and chloride of 98 mmol/L. Abdominal X-ray interpretation found moderate gaseous distension suggestive of generalized ileus. The patient was admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and a nasogastric tube was placed. He received intravenous dextrose fluids, and enteral feeds were resumed as serial X-rays showed interval improvement. The patient remained in the NICU for several days to monitor bowel movements and resolution of ileus and he was discharged after improvement. While diazoxide overdose is rarely reported, and ileus due to such is documented even less frequently, 10-fold medication dose errors are common among infants. The source of the 10-fold mistake is often decimal points, leading zeros, or trailing zeros. Utilizing the smallest possible syringe for the prescribed dose may reduce the incidence of medication errors.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Acute pain is a leading reason for Emergency Department (ED) evaluation, accounting for nearly half of all ED visits. Therefore, providing effective non-opioid analgesics in the ED is critical. Oral acetaminophen (APAP) is commonly administered in the ED but is limited to patients tolerating oral intake. Intravenous (IV) APAP provides significant pain reduction parenterally. The purpose of this quality assessment project was to evaluate the frequency of opioid use in patients receiving IV APAP, the safety of IV APAP, and compliance with an ED IV APAP protocol. METHODS: This study included all patients who received IV APAP in the ED of a tertiary care, level I trauma center, during a three-month period. The protocol required ED patients to be NPO (nil per os), 18 years or older, and administered with a single 1000 mg dose. The adverse reactions within 24 hours post-IV APAP, ED length of stay (LOS), and opioid administration within four hours post-IV APAP were assessed. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients received IV APAP. All patients received a 1000 mg dose. One patient received more than one dose, but this patient had a 22-hour ED LOS. Two patients received oral medications within one hour of IV APAP (one received an antacid, and the other received carbamazepine and lamotrigine). An opioid was administered to 22 of the 94 (23.4%) patients during the four-hour protocol period. There were no reports of adverse reactions. CONCLUSIONS: The results show excellent compliance with the protocol. IV APAP was safe and well-tolerated. Notably, most patients did not receive an opioid within four hours of IV APAP. IV APAP can be safely and effectively utilized as an analgesic and lessen ED opioid use.