Heparinase enables reliable quantification of circulating tumor DNA from heparinized plasma samples by droplet digital PCR.

BACKGROUND: Heparin is often used as a blood anticoagulant for tumor marker analysis but results in the inhibition of PCR detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), which has been deemed a potential "liquid biopsy". We aimed to evaluate the impact of heparinase addition on heparinized plasma samples to allow ctDNA analysis. METHODS: Plasma samples were collected in heparinized (n=194) and EDTA (n=8) tubes from hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (HR+MBC) (n=144) and pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) patients (n=50). Circulating ESR1 and KRAS mutations were detected with or without heparinase by digital PCR in HR+MBC and PA patients, respectively. Patients were classified into 2 subgroups i) inhibition, I+ and ii) no inhibition, I- based on a threshold of 200copies/µL for PCR inhibition by heparin. RESULTS: In the I+ subgroup (91/144 HR+MBC and 26/50 PA), heparinase treatment significantly improved PCR efficacy, enabling ctDNA detection in 22/91 and 13/26 patients. Moreover, comparable results for ctDNA detection (4/8) were obtained with heparinized and EDTA PA samples. In the I- subgroup, heparinase addition did not quantitatively and qualitatively alter ctDNA detection. CONCLUSION: Heparinase addition removes the heparin inhibition and allows accurate ctDNA detection in heparinized samples. These findings could make the samples from heparinized blood suitable for ctDNA analysis.

Kinetics, prognostic and predictive values of ESR1 circulating mutations in metastatic breast cancer patients progressing on aromatase inhibitor.

PURPOSE: To assess the prognostic and predictive value of circulating ESR1 mutation and its kinetics before and after progression on aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ESR1 circulating D538G and Y537S/N/C mutations were retrospectively analyzed by digital droplet PCR after first-line AI failure in patients treated consecutively from 2010 to 2012 for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed according to circulating mutational status and subsequent lines of treatment. The kinetics of ESR1 mutation before (3 and 6 months) and after (3 months) AI progression were determined in the available archive plasmas. RESULTS: Circulating ESR1 mutations were found at AI progression in 44/144 patients included (30.6%). Median follow-up from AI initiation was 40 months (range 4-94). The median OS was decreased in patients with circulating ESR1 mutation than in patients without mutation (15.5 versus 23.8 months, P=0.0006). The median PFS was also significantly decreased in patients with ESR1 mutation than in patients without mutation (5.9 vs 7 months, P=0.002). After AI failure, there was no difference in outcome for patients receiving chemotherapy (n = 58) versus non-AI endocrine therapy (n=51) in patients with and without ESR1 mutation. ESR1 circulating mutations were detectable in 75% of all cases before AI progression, whereas the kinetics 3 months after progression did not correlate with outcome. CONCLUSION: ESR1 circulating mutations are independent risk factors for poor outcome after AI failure, and are frequently detectable before clinical progression. Interventional studies based on ESR1 circulating status are warranted.

Short report: Monitoring ESR1 mutations by circulating tumor DNA in aromatase inhibitor resistant metastatic breast cancer.

Acquired estrogen receptor gene (ESR1) mutations have been recently reported as a marker of resistance to aromatase inhibitors in hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer. We retrospectively considered seven patients treated for metastatic breast cancer with available samples from the primary tumor before any treatment, cryopreserved metastasis removed during progression and concomitant plasmas. All these seven patients were in disease progression after previous exposure to aromatase inhibitors for at least 6 months, and were assessed for ESR1 mutations detection in tumor and circulating DNA. For these patients, Sanger sequencing identified four metastases with clear ESR1 mutation and one possible, whereas digital PCR identified six mutated metastases. Then, under blind conditions and using digital PCR, corresponding circulating ESR1 mutations were successfully detected in four of these six metastatic breast cancer patients. Moreover, in two patients with serial blood samples following treatments exposure, the monitoring of circulating ESR1 mutations clearly predicted disease evolution. In the context of high interest for ESR1 mutations, our results highlight that these acquired recurrent mutations may be tracked in circulating tumor DNA and may be of clinical relevance for metastatic breast cancer patient monitoring.