Burden of Disease and Treatment Patterns Amongst Patients With Vitiligo: Findings From a National, Longitudinal Retrospective Study in the United Kingdom.

This retrospective study, using UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episode Statistics databases, analysed 17,239 incident patients with vitiligo. Mean incidence of vitiligo was 0.16 (2010-2021) per 1000 person-years (range: 0.10 [2010-COVID] to 0.19 [2013/2018]); prevalence increased from 0.21% (2010) to 0.38% (2021). The most common comorbidities recorded after vitiligo diagnosis were diabetes (19.4%), eczema (8.9%), thyroid disease (7.5%), and rheumatoid arthritis (6.9%). Mental health diagnoses recorded at any time were most commonly depression and/or anxiety (24.6%), depression (18.5%), anxiety (16.0%), and sleep disturbance (12.7%); recorded after vitiligo diagnosis in 6.4%, 4.4%, 5.5%, and 3.9%, respectively. Mental health comorbidities were more common among White patients (eg, depression and/or anxiety, 29.0%) than Black (18.8%), Asian (16.1%), and other ethnicities (21.4%). In adolescents, depression and/or anxiety was most commonly diagnosed after vitiligo diagnosis (7.4% vs before, 1.8%). Healthcare resources were used most frequently in the first year after vitiligo diagnosis (incident cohort), typically dermatology-related outpatient appointments (101.9/100 person-years) and general practitioner consultations (97.9/100 person-years). In the year after diagnosis, 60.8% of incident patients did not receive vitiligo-related treatments (ie, topical corticosteroids, topical calcineurin inhibitors, oral corticosteroids, phototherapy), increasing to 82.0% the next year; median (95% CI) time from diagnosis to first treatment was 34.0 (31.6-36.4) months. Antidepressants and/or anxiolytics were recorded for 16.7% of incident patients in the year after diagnosis. In 2019, 85.0% of prevalent patients did not receive vitiligo-related treatments; 16.6% had a record of antidepressant and/or anxiolytic treatments. Most patients were not on vitiligo-related treatments within a year of diagnosis, with time to first treatment >2 years, suggesting that vitiligo may be dismissed as unimportant and not treated early, in part due to limited effectiveness of available treatments. New effective treatments, early initiation, and psychological intervention and support are needed to reduce vitiligo burden on patients.

Vitiligo patient population and disease burden in France: VIOLIN study results from the CONSTANCES cohort.

BACKGROUND: Vitiligo is a chronic autoimmune disease resulting in skin depigmentation. OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the prevalence, disease burden and treatment of vitiligo in France. METHODS: VIOLIN was a cross-sectional study nested in the national CONSTANCES cohort, which consists of randomly selected adults aged 18-69 years in France. In VIOLIN, longitudinal data were collected prospectively from 158,898 participants during 2012-2018 and linked to the National Health Data System (SNDS), a healthcare utilization database. Patients with physician-diagnosed vitiligo were matched (1:3) with control participants based on age, sex, geographic region, year of inclusion and skin phototype. Patients completed a questionnaire in 2022 to collect disease characteristics, disease burden and quality-of-life (QoL) data. RESULTS: Vitiligo prevalence was 0.71% (681/95,597) in 2018. The mean age in the vitiligo population was 51.2 years; 51.4% were women. Most patients (63%) were diagnosed before age 30 years, mainly by dermatologists (83.5%). Most patients (81.1%) had visible lesions (i.e. on face, hands). Vitiligo was limited to <10% of the body surface area (BSA) in 85.8% of patients. Comorbidities including thyroid disease (18.0% vs. 9.0%), psoriasis (13.7% vs. 9.7%), atopic dermatitis (12.4% vs. 10.3%), depression (18.2% vs. 14.6%) and alopecia areata (4.3% vs. 2.4%) were significantly more common in patients with vitiligo versus matched controls (n = 2043). QoL was significantly impaired in patients with >5% BSA involvement or visible lesions, particularly with ≥10% facial involvement. Vitiligo-specific instruments (i.e. Vitiligo Impact Patient scale and Vitiligo-specific QoL instrument) were more sensitive to QoL differences among subgroups versus general skin instruments, and generic instruments were least sensitive. Most patients (83.8%) did not receive any prescribed treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with vitiligo in France have a high disease burden, particularly those with visible lesions or higher BSA involvement. Most patients are not receiving treatment, highlighting the need for new effective treatments and patient/physician education.