Lymphovascular invasion as a criterion for adjuvant chemotherapy for FIGO stage I-IIa clear cell carcinoma, mucinous, low grade serous and low grade endometrioid ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients managed for stage I-IIa clear cell carcinoma, mucinous, low-grade serous and low-grade endometrioid ovarian cancer MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective multicentre study of the research group FRANCOGYN between January 2001 and December 2018. All patients managed for stage I-IIa clear cell carcinoma, mucinous /low grade serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer and for whom the presence of histological slides for the review of LVSI was available, were included. Patient's characteristics with LVSI (LVSI group) were compared to those without LVSI (No LVSI group). A cox analysis for OS and RFS analysis were performed in all population. RESULTS: Over the study period, 133 patients were included in the thirteen institutions. Among them, 12 patients had LVSI (9%). LVSI was an independent predictive factor for poorer Overall and recurrence free survivals. LVSI affected OS (p < 0.001) and RFS (p = 0.0007), CONCLUSION: The presence of LVSI in stage I-IIa clear cell carcinoma, mucinous /low grade serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer has an impact on OS and RFS and should put them at high risk and consider the option of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Negative estrogen receptors and positive progesterone receptors breast cancers.

CONTEXT: Hormone receptors (estrogen receptor ER and progesterone receptor PR) are prognostic and predictive factors of outcome for invasive breast cancer. Some tumors only express one of these hormone receptors (ER or PR). ER negative/PR positive breast cancer is a rare subtype (1-4 %) and its existence still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate characteristics of this group of tumors. METHODS: We collected data of all consecutive patients managed in our institution for invasive breast cancer between the 1st January 2007 and 31 December 2013. The aim of the study was to compare data of patients with ER-/PR+tumors with the three other subgroups. RESULTS: Of the 2071 patients included during the study period, 1.2 % were ER-/PR+. These patients were younger than those with the two ER+groups (p<0.0001). The ER-/PR+tumors differed from the ER+groups for several histological prognostic factors: greater histological size (p=0.0004), higher histological grade, more HER2 overexpression/amplification, more association with ductal carcinoma in situ, more lymphovascular invasion, more nodal metastasis (p<0.0001). Chemotherapy was more often used as an adjuvant treatment in addition of endocrine therapy. Survival was equivalent for patients with ER-/PR+tumors and ER+tumors and significantly higher than patients with ER-/PR- tumors (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Women with ER-/PR+breast cancer have worse prognostic factors than women with ER+cancers but have better overall survival than women with ER-/PR- tumors. We may think that the more frequent association of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy is responsible for this better outcome.

Accuracy of peritoneal carcinomatosis extent diagnosis by initial FDG PET CT in epithelial ovarian cancer: A multicentre study of the FRANCOGYN research group.

INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal carcinomatosis extent in ovarian cancer is difficult to evaluate by imaging techniques even though it determines the surgical complexity and survival. The aim of this study was to estimate the accuracy of 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG)-PET CT (Positron-emission tomography coupled with Computerised Tomography) performed before any treatment, in the diagnosis of the extent of peritoneal carcinomatosis. We compared these results to per-operative observations/ histology samples obtained during surgery (laparotomy/ laparoscopy). MATERIAL AND METHODS: All women managed for an epithelial ovarian cancer between 1st January 2000 and 30th June 2016 were included if they had a FDG PET CT, before initiation of any treatment (neoadjuvant chemotherapy or frontline cytoreductive surgery). The extent of disease on histology samples from cytoreductive surgery/observations during exploratory laparoscopy were compared with the PET CT results. RESULTS: Over the study period, 980 women were managed for epithelial ovarian cancer, among them 90 (9.2 %) had a PET CT before any treatment. The diagnostic reliability of an ovarian lesion was 67.8 %, a colon lesion was 61.25 %, a small intestine lesion was 50.6 %, an epiploic lesion was 41.7 %, a pelvic ganglionic invasion was 62.9 % and a paraortic lymph node invasion was 61.5 %. PET CT was less effective than a standard CT examination. CONCLUSION: PET CT is not the most effective imaging examination to estimate the extent of peritoneal carcinomatosis during the initial management of an epithelial ovarian cancer.

Isolated lymph node recurrence in epithelial ovarian cancer: Recurrence with better prognosis?

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare overall survival (OS) between women with isolated lymph node recurrence (ILNR) and those with isolated peritoneal localization of recurrence (ICR), in patients managed for epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: Data from 1508 patients with ovarian cancer were collected retrospectively from1 January 2000 to 31 December 2016, from the FRANCOGYN database, pooling data from 11 centres specialized in ovary treatment. Median overall survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to define prognostic factors of overall survival. Patients included had a first recurrence defined as ILNR or ICR during their follow up. RESULTS: 79 patients (5.2 %) presented with ILNR, and 247 (16.4 %) patients had isolated carcinomatosis recurrence. Complete lymphadenectomy was performed more frequently in the ILNR group vs. the ICR group (67.1 % vs. 53.4 %, p = 0.004) and the number of pelvic lymph nodes involved was higher (2.4 vs. 1.1, p = 0.008). The number of involved pelvic LN was an independent predictor of ILNR (OR = 1.231, 95 % CI [1.074-1.412], p = 0.0024). The 3-year and 5-year OS rates in the ILNR group were 85.2 % and 53.7 % respectively, compared to 68.1 % and 46.8 % in patients with ICR. There was no significant difference in terms of OS after initial diagnosis (p = 0.18). 3- year and 5-year OS rates after diagnosis of recurrence were 62.6 % and 15.6 % in the ILNR group, and 44 % and 15.7 % in patients with ICR (p = 0.21). CONCLUSION: ILNR does not seem to be associated with a better prognosis in terms of OS.