C1-inhibitor treatment in patients with severe complement-mediated autoimmune hemolytic anemia.

Complement-mediated (CM) autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is characterized by the destruction of red blood cells (RBCs) by autoantibodies that activate the classical complement pathway. These antibodies also reduce transfusion efficacy via the lysis of donor RBCs. Because C1-inhibitor (C1-INH) is an endogenous regulator of the classical complement pathway, we hypothesized that peritransfusional C1-INH in patients with severe CM-AIHA reduces complement activation and hemolysis, and thus enhances RBC transfusion efficacy. We conducted a prospective, single-center, phase 2, open-label trial (EudraCT2012-003710-13). Patients with confirmed CM-AIHA and indication for the transfusion of 2 RBC units were eligible for inclusion. Four IV C1-INH doses (6000, 3000, 2000, and 1000 U) were administered with 12-hour intervals around RBC transfusion. Serial blood samples were analyzed for hemolytic activity, RBC opsonization, complement activation, and inflammation markers. Ten patients were included in the study. C1-INH administration increased plasma C1-INH antigen and activity, peaking at 48 hours after the first dose and accompanied by a significant reduction of RBC C3d deposition. Hemoglobin levels increased briefly after transfusion but returned to baseline within 48 hours. Overall, markers of hemolysis, inflammation, and complement activation remained unchanged. Five grade 3 and 1 grade 4 adverse event occurred but were considered unrelated to the study medication. In conclusion, peritransfusional C1-INH temporarily reduced complement activation. However, C1-INH failed to halt hemolytic activity in severe transfusion-dependent-CM-AIHA. We cannot exclude that posttransfusional hemolytic activity would have been even higher without C1-INH. The potential of complement inhibition on transfusion efficacy in severe CM-AIHA remains to be determined.

Iron-Driven Alterations on Red Blood Cell-Derived Microvesicles Amplify Coagulation during Hemolysis via the Intrinsic Tenase Complex.

Hemolytic disorders characterized by complement-mediated intravascular hemolysis, such as autoimmune hemolytic anemia and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, are often complicated by life-threatening thromboembolic complications. Severe hemolytic episodes result in the release of red blood cell (RBC)-derived proinflammatory and oxidatively reactive mediators (e.g., extracellular hemoglobin, heme, and iron) into plasma. Here, we studied the role of these hemolytic mediators in coagulation activation by measuring factor Xa (FXa) and thrombin generation in the presence of RBC lysates. Our results show that hemolytic microvesicles (HMVs) formed during hemolysis stimulate thrombin generation through a mechanism involving FVIII and FIX, the so-called intrinsic tenase complex. Iron scavenging during hemolysis using deferoxamine decreased the ability of the HMVs to enhance thrombin generation. Furthermore, the addition of ferric chloride (FeCl3) to plasma propagated thrombin generation in a FVIII- and FIX-dependent manner suggesting that iron positively affects blood coagulation. Phosphatidylserine (PS) blockade using lactadherin and iron chelation using deferoxamine reduced intrinsic tenase activity in a purified system containing HMVs as source of phospholipids confirming that both PS and iron ions contribute to the procoagulant effect of the HMVs. Finally, the effects of FeCl3 and HMVs decreased in the presence of ascorbate and glutathione indicating that oxidative stress plays a role in hypercoagulability. Overall, our results provide evidence for the contribution of iron ions derived from hemolytic RBCs to thrombin generation. These findings add to our understanding of the pathogenesis of thrombosis in hemolytic diseases.

It takes two to thrombosis: Hemolysis and complement.

Thromboembolic events represent the most common complication of hemolytic anemias characterized by complement-mediated hemolysis such as paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria and autoimmune hemolytic anemia. Similarly, atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome is characterized by hemolysis and thrombotic abnormalities. The main player in the development of thrombosis in hemolytic diseases is suggested to be the complement system. However, the release of extracellular hemoglobin and heme by hemolysis itself can also drive procoagulant responses. Both, complement activation and hemolysis promote the activation of neutrophils resulting in the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps and induce inflammation and vascular damage which all together might (synergistically) lead to hypercoagulability. In this review we aim to summarize the current knowledge on the role of complement activation and hemolysis in the onset of thrombosis in hemolytic diseases. This review will discuss the interplay between different biological systems and neutrophil activation contributing to the pathogenesis of thrombosis. Finally, we will combine this fundamental knowledge and address the pathophysiology of hemolysis in prototypical complement-driven diseases.

α1-Antichymotrypsin Present in Therapeutic C1-Inhibitor Products Competes with Selectin-Sialyl LewisX Interaction.

BACKGROUND: C1-inhibitor (C1-inh) therapeutics can reduce neutrophil activity in various inflammatory conditions. This 'novel' anti-inflammatory effect of C1-inh is attributed to the tetrasaccharide sialyl LewisX (SLeX) present on its N-glycans. Via SLeX, C1-inh is suggested to interact with selectins on inflamed endothelium and prevent neutrophil rolling. However, C1-inh products contain plasma glycoprotein α1-antichymotrypsin (ACT) as a co-purified protein impurity. OBJECTIVE: This article investigates the contribution of ACT to the effects observed with C1-inh. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have separated C1-inh and ACT from a therapeutic C1-inh preparation and investigated the influence of these proteins on SLeX-selectin interactions in a specific in vitro model, which makes use of rolling of SLeX-coated beads on immobilized E-selectin. RESULTS: We find that ACT and not C1-inh, shows a clear sialic acid-dependent interference in SLeX-selectin interactions, at concentrations present in C1-inh therapeutics. Furthermore, we do not find any evidence of SLeX on C1-inh using either Western blotting with anti-SLeX antibodies (CSLEX1 and KM93) or by mass spectrometric analysis of N-glycans. C1-inh reacts weakly to antibody HECA-452, which detects a broad range of selectin ligands, but ACT gives a much stronger signal, suggesting the presence of a selectin ligand on ACT. CONCLUSION: The 'novel' anti-inflammatory effects of C1-inh are unlikely due to SLeX on C1-inh and can in fact be due to SLeX-like glycans on ACT, present in C1-inh products. In view of our results, it is important to assess the role of ACT in vivo and revisit past studies performed with commercial C1-inh.