Influenza vaccination rates, knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of healthcare workers in Turkey: A multicentre study.

AIM: Influenza vaccination is the most effective method in prevention of influenza disease and its complications. Our study aimed to investigate the rates of vaccination and the behaviours and attitudes against the vaccine in healthcare workers in Turkey. METHODS: This multicentre national survey is a descriptive study in which 12 475 healthcare workers. Healthcare workers were asked to answer the questionnaire consisting of 12 questions via the survey. RESULTS: It was found that 6.7% of the healthcare workers regularly got vaccinated each year and that 55% had never had the influenza vaccine before. The biggest obstacle against getting vaccinated was determined as not believing in the necessity of the vaccine (53.1%). CONCLUSION: The rates of influenza vaccination in healthcare workers in Turkey are quite low. False knowledge and attitudes on the vaccine and disease are seen as the most important reasons to decline vaccination. It is important to detect reasons for anti-vaccination and set a course in order to increase the rates of vaccination.

Importance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing for the management of eradication in Helicobacter pylori infection.

The management of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection treatment differs from the common treatment protocol for other infectious diseases. Because culture- or molecular-guided approaches face several practical issues, such as the invasive procedures required to obtain gastric biopsy specimens and the lack of availability of routine laboratory testing in some places, H. pylori treatment includes the administration of two or three empirically selected antibiotics combined with a proton pump inhibitor rather than evidence-based eradication treatment. The efficacy of empirical therapy is decreasing, mostly due to increasing multiple resistance. Multiresistance to levofloxacin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole, which are commonly used in empirical treatments, appears to have increased in many countries. Mutations play a primary role in the antimicrobial resistance of H. pylori, but many different mechanisms can be involved in the development of antibiotic resistance. Determining and understanding these possible mechanisms might allow the development of new methods for the detection of H. pylori and the determination of antimicrobial resistance. A treatment based on the detection of antimicrobial resistance is usually more effective than empirical treatment. Nevertheless, such an approach before treatment is still not recommended in the Maastricht guidelines due to the difficulty associated with the routine application of available culture- or molecular-based susceptibility tests, which are usually administered in cases of treatment failure. The management of first and rescue treatments requires further research due to the steadily increase in antimicrobial resistance.

Rapid identification of Helicobacter pylori and assessment of clarithromycin susceptibility from clinical specimens using FISH.

Helicobacter pylori remains one of the most common bacterial infections worldwide. Clarithromycin resistance is the most important cause of H. pylori eradication failures. Effective antibiotic therapies in H. pylori infection must be rapidly adapted to local resistance patterns. We investigated the prevalence of clarithromycin resistance due to mutations in positions 2142 and 2143 of 23SrRNA gene of H. pylori by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), and compared with culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing in 234 adult patients with dyspepsia who were enrolled. Antrum and corpus biopsy specimens were obtained for rapid urease test, histopathology and culture. Epsilometer test was used to assess clarithromycin susceptibility. H. pylori presence and clarithromycin susceptibility were determined by FISH in paraffin-embedded biopsy specimens. We found that 164 (70.1%) patients were positive for H. pylori based on clinical criteria, 114 (69.5% CI 62.5-76.6%) were culture positive, and 137 (83.5% CI 77.8-89.2%) were FISH positive. Thus the sensitivity of FISH was significantly superior to that of culture. However specificity was not significantly different (91.4 versus 100.0%, respectively). The resistance rate to clarithromycin for both antrum and corpus was detected in H. pylori-positive patients; 20.2% by FISH and 28.0% by E-test.The concordance between E-test and FISH was only 89.5% due to the presence of point mutations different from A2143G, A2142G or A2142C. We conclude that FISH is significantly more sensitive than culture and the E-test for the detection of H. pylori and for rapid determinination of claritromycin susceptibility. The superior hybridisation efficiency of FISH is becoming an emerging molecular tool as a reliable, rapid and sensitive method for the detection and visualisation of H. pylori, especially when the management of H. pylori eradication therapy is necessary. This is particularly important for the treatment of patients with H. pylori eradication failure.

Miocamycin-containing triple therapy for H. pylori infection.

INTRODUCTION: In Northern Sardinia, one-week triple standard therapies containing a proton-pump inhibitor and two antibiotics for H. pylori infection have an average cure rate of 57% largely due to a high prevalence of antimicrobial resistance. The efficacy of miocamycin-containing treatment for 10 days was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients referred to the endoscopy service for dyspeptic symptoms were enrolled. H. pylori infection was defined as a positive rapid urease test, presence of the bacteria on gastric biopsies, and a positive 13C-UBT. Treatment consisted of 10 days with omeprazole 20 mg, miocamycin water-soluble 900 mg, and tinidazole 500 mg all bid. Success was evaluated 40-50 days after the end of therapy and defined by a negative 13C-UBT. Compliance was considered good if at least 90% of the total number of the pills were taken. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) technique was applied on paraffin-embedded gastric tissue sections to test susceptibility to clarithromycin of the bacteria. RESULTS: 50 patients were enrolled (mean age; 52, 36% men). Miocamycin-containing therapy cured 86% (42/49; 95% CI = 72-94%) of infected patients by PP analysis. Susceptibility data (FISH) was available for 38 patients. Cure rates for the 28 with clarithromycin-susceptible infection was 96% vs 50% for those with resistant or mixed infection, (p = .003). Good compliance was recorded in 48 patients. None of the patients discontinued therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Miocamycin appears to be a valid alternative for clarithromycin for H. pylori eradication. Head-to-head studies will be needed to ascertain whether it is superior.

The diagnostic accuracy of urine IgG antibody tests for the detection of Helicobacter pylori infection in Turkish dyspeptic patients.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: There is increasing interest in noninvasive tests for the assessment of Helicobacter pylori infection, and urine-based tests have been widely used as noninvasive tests to detect Helicobacter pylori infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adaptation and usefulness of urine antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and urine card tests in the clinical setting to detect anti-Helicobacter pylori IgG antibody excreted into urine in Turkish adult patients with dyspepsia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-hundred twenty-four patients who were admitted and referred for upper endoscopy to Dokuz Eylül University Hospital, Gastroenterology Clinic were studied. Antrum and corpus biopsies were taken, and Helicobacter pylori status was defined in the presence of at least two positive results of rapid urease test, histopathology and culture. Urine and serum specimens of 124 patients were collected and examined for anti-Helicobacter pylori IgG antibody by URINELISA, RAPIRUN (Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan) and anti-Helicobacter pylori enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Euroimmun, Lübeck, Germany) tests, respectively. RESULTS: Helicobacter pylori infection was positive in 82 (66.1%) patients according to the gold standard methods. Among 82 Helicobacter pylori infection-positive patients, 69 patients were positive by both URINELISA and RAPIRUN; 109 of 124 patients were positive by anti-Helicobacter pylori IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The sensitivity and specificity of URINELISA, RAPIRUN and anti-Helicobacter pylori IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were 74.4%, 73.2%, 100% and 81.0%, 78.6%, 35.7%, respectively. However, the urine antibody test cut-off values were searched for the best concordance with the results of gold standard methods. This yielded that the sensitivity and specificity of URINELISA with our new cut-off value (0.530) were 90.2% and 71.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: As a first study among Turkish adult patients with dyspepsia, the efficacy of URINELISA was related with the determination of a new cut-off value for pretreatment as a screening test value. We suggest that the cut-off value of the URINELISA test should be evaluated and considered for each patient group and each country. The URINELISA (OD 0.530) and RAPIRUN tests were found useful for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in our patients with dyspepsia.