Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Transpl Int ; 37: 12686, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38911062

RESUMO

Optimizing graft preservation is key for ex-situ split grafts in pediatric liver transplantation (PSLT). Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion (HOPE) improves ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) and post-operative outcomes in adult LT. This study compares the use of HOPE in ex-situ partial grafts to static cold storage ex-situ partial grafts (SCS-Split) and to the gold standard living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). All consecutive HOPE-Split, SCS-Split and LDLT performed between 2018-2023 for pediatric recipients were included. Post-reperfusion syndrome (PRS, drop ≥30% in systolic arterial pressure) and reperfusion biopsies served as early indicators of IRI. We included 47 pediatric recipients (15 HOPE-Split, 17 SCS-Split, and 15 LDLT). In comparison to SCS-Split, HOPE-Split had a significantly shorter cold ischemia time (CIT) (470min vs. 538 min; p =0.02), lower PRS rates (13.3% vs. 47.1%; p = 0.04) and a lower IRI score (3 vs. 4; p = 0.03). The overall IRI score (3 vs. 3; p = 0.28) and PRS (13.3% vs. 13.3%; p = 1) after HOPE-Split were comparable to LDLT, despite a longer CIT (470 min vs. 117 min; p < 0.001). Surgical complications, one-year graft, and recipient survival did not differ among the groups. In conclusion, HOPE-Split mitigates early IRI in pediatric recipients in comparison to SCS-Split, approaching the gold standard of LDLT.


Assuntos
Transplante de Fígado , Doadores Vivos , Preservação de Órgãos , Perfusão , Traumatismo por Reperfusão , Humanos , Transplante de Fígado/métodos , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Traumatismo por Reperfusão/prevenção & controle , Traumatismo por Reperfusão/etiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Preservação de Órgãos/métodos , Perfusão/métodos , Adolescente , Lactente , Isquemia Fria , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fígado/irrigação sanguínea
2.
Trials ; 21(1): 55, 2020 Jan 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31915040

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the most common complications of neuraxial anaesthesia. It limits patients' general activity and increases the length of hospital stays and the use of care. It is particularly disabling during the postpartum period, when mothers have to take care of their child. Epidural blood patch is the standard treatment for PDPH. However, it is an invasive procedure that may result in rare but serious complications. Recent evidence has suggested that adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) is effective in the management of PDPH. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of tetracosactide (Synacthen®), a synthetic analogue of ACTH, for PDPH treatment in patients who receive neuraxial anaesthesia during labour. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm trial, is performed in two French university hospitals. Eligible patients are those suffering from postpartum PDPH, who are randomised to receive either 1 mg of tetracosactide intravenously over 20 min or to 0.9% saline (placebo). The primary endpoint is the rate of epidural blood patch within a 15-day follow-up period. Headache duration, pain intensity, reduction of general activity, increase in length of hospital stay, adverse events, analgesic use (type and duration) and number of blood patches per patient in each group are recorded. DISCUSSION: We expect a decrease in the use of epidural blood patch in those receiving tetracosactide, thus indicating a decrease in PDPH symptoms in these patients. This will define the therapeutic success of tetracosactide and the possibility to use this treatment as a non-invasive alternative to blood patch for PDPH treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Primary Registry ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System Date of Registration 24 June 2016 Unique Protocol ID 69HCL15_0429 Secondary IDs EudraCT Number 2015-003357-17 ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02813655 ANSM 160214A-31 Protocol version V4 28/09/2018.


Assuntos
Cosintropina/administração & dosagem , Hormônios/administração & dosagem , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Cefaleia Pós-Punção Dural/terapia , Administração Intravenosa , Adulto , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Anestesia Epidural/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Obstétrica/efeitos adversos , Placa de Sangue Epidural/efeitos adversos , Placa de Sangue Epidural/estatística & dados numéricos , Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como Assunto , Cosintropina/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Hormônios/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Medição da Dor , Cefaleia Pós-Punção Dural/diagnóstico , Cefaleia Pós-Punção Dural/etiologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA