Implementation of a national nuchal translucency education and quality monitoring program.

In 2004, leaders in first-trimester aneuploidy screening and a multidisciplinary group of experts established the Nuchal Translucency Quality Review Program, a national program to standardize education, credentialing, and quality monitoring of nuchal translucency. Since its inception, the program has credentialed more than 6,600 physician and ultrasonographer participants and collected more than 2.4 million nuchal translucency measurements. Ongoing quality monitoring is conducted through statistical analysis comparing the distribution and standard deviation of participants' nuchal translucency measurements against those obtained from a standard referent curve. Results of these analyses are distributed to participants quarterly and are used to track each participant's performance and to trigger performance improvement activities or mandatory remediation. This program could serve as a template for future education and credentialing programs that include partnerships with academic leaders, national professional organizations, and industry.

The case for an electronic fetal heart rate monitoring credentialing examination.

The Perinatal Quality Foundation has created an examination containing both knowledge-based and judgment questions relating to the interpretation of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring for credentialing all medical and nursing personnel working on a labor and delivery floor. A description of the examination and the rationale for its use throughout the United States is presented.

Minimizing perinatal neurologic injury at term: is cesarean section the answer?

Despite advances in obstetric and neonatal care, the last several decades have not witnessed an improvement in the prediction or prevention of term cerebral palsy. Obstetric interventions such as electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and cesarean delivery, although biologically plausible as intervention strategies, do not improve perinatal outcomes in clinical practice. In reaction to mounting medicolegal pressure, obstetricians continue to increase the number of cesarean deliveries they perform as a form of defensive medicine, despite evidence that this practice is not associated with improved perinatal outcomes. The current standard for expeditious delivery in a case of potential fetal compromise is described by the "30-minute rule." However, obstetricians' determinations of the need for expedited delivery may be a preferable guide for appropriate delivery timing.