When a Patient Is at Foreseeable Risk of Losing Decisional and Functional Capacity.

The four-skills model of decisional capacity for providing informed consent for medical treatment developed by Appelbaum and Grisso is codified into most state statutes in articulating the legal criteria for establishing capacity. Decisional capacity is traditionally determined at a point in time based on a narrow clinical question; however, there are clinical scenarios in which patients may currently have decisional capacity but their recurrent nonadherence to care places them at foreseeable risk of being acutely incapacitated, both decisionally and functionally, in the near future. There is a gap in terms of how these four skills ought to be adapted when applied to a patient with recurrent altered mental status, especially delirium, because of nonadherence. To describe this clinical situation, we introduce a new risk factor, "foreseeable risk of losing decisional and functional capacity," and discuss the clinical evaluation of a patient who currently has capacity but for whom this risk factor applies. We consider the implications of being at foreseeable risk of losing capacity and how foreseeable risk can be translated into a capacity determination in the present. We also describe interventions that can serve to protect the patient's rights and safety.

A Source Control Model for Treatment-Resistant Substance Use Disorder.

ABSTRACT: We propose applying the "source control" model of infectious disease treatment to the management of treatment-resistant substance use disorder (SUD). We believe that this conceptual framework complements other models for understanding SUD, fills a gap in our current understanding of treatment-resistant SUD, and advances the destigmatization of SUD by reinforcing SUD as a disease similar to other medical conditions. The model also harmonizes the need for multimodal treatment and novel interventions for both acute supportive care and long-term treatment of SUD. In this manuscript, we discuss the justification for, as well as the strengths and limitations of, the "source control" model for the management of treatment-resistant SUD. We also discuss the model's potential to direct innovative research questions and therapeutic interventions.

Black Cohosh Interactions with Prescription Medications Associated with Serotonin Toxicity and Rhabdomyolysis: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Serotonin toxicity is a well-described phenomenon that is commonly attributed to a variety of drug-drug combinations. Some unregulated herbal supplements have been implicated in the onset of serotonin toxicity, however, there is currently minimal literature available on the potential for black cohosh to contribute to rhabdomyolysis and serotonin toxicity, in spite of its known serotonergic properties. CASE REPORT: A middle-aged woman presented to the emergency department with serotonin toxicity and rhabdomyolysis shortly after taking black cohosh supplements in the setting of long-term dual antidepressant use. The serotonin toxicity and rhabdomyolysis resolved with IV fluids, benzodiazepines, and discontinuation of the offending drugs. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Patients are sometimes not aware of how over-the-counter supplements might interact with their prescription medications. Female patients taking black cohosh to manage hot flashes and menopausal symptoms could be at risk for developing rhabdomyolysis and serotonin toxicity if they are also taking other serotonergic agents.

Prescribing Stimulants for Children and Adolescents With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Co-occurring Cannabis Use: Considerations for Managing a Clinical Dilemma.

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is highly prevalent in the pediatric population, with 11% of children and adolescents having ever been diagnosed with the disorder.1 The management of ADHD in the setting of co-occurring cannabis use, which is more prevalent in adolescents with ADHD than in the general population, is an increasingly common dilemma facing clinicians, in part due to recent changes in social acceptability, access, usage, and state-level legal status of cannabis.2 Clinicians face several considerations, including the following: the confounding effects of cannabis use on assessment and management of ADHD symptoms; the potential reduction in risk of substance use when ADHD symptoms are well managed; and the increased risk of misuse and diversion of stimulants in patients with ongoing cannabis use.2.