RESUMO
Root-knot nematode host status of hemp cultivars of different uses (fiber, dual, CBD/CBG) and from different regions (Europe, China, US) were evaluated in five different greenhouse trials. None of the tested cultivars showed resistance to any of the tested root-knot nematode species, and all tested hemp cultivars were good hosts for root-knot nematodes, especially to mixed populations of M. javanica and M. incognita. Root gall symptoms on hemp were less severe than on cucumber (and tomato), but reproduction rates were similar. Lower infection and reproduction rates were noted for M. hapla and M. enterolobii, which were probably due to the colder temperatures at the time of the trial, as the same effect was noted for the cucumber control plants. While no negative impact on hemp shoot growth was seen in trials where nematodes were added to pasteurized soil, a significant and visible negative effect on hemp growth was noted when two CBG hemp cultivars were planted in heavily naturally root-knot infested soil. This result indicates that hemp is not only a good host to root-knot nematodes, but also that root-knot can be a limiting factor for hemp production in Florida and other places with high abundance and pressure of root-knot nematodes.
RESUMO
The subtropical climate of Florida allows for a wide range of crops to be grown. With the classification of hemp (Cannabis sativa L., <0.3% delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol) as an agricultural commodity, hemp has become a potential alternative crop in Florida. Hemp cultivars of different geographies (Europe, China, and North America), and uses (fiber, oil and CBD), were evaluated in three field experiments. The field experiments evaluated a total of 26 cultivars and were conducted for two consecutive seasons at three different locations (soil types) in North (sandy loam), Central (fine sand), and South Florida (gravelly loam). Nematode soil populations were measured at the end of each season. A diverse population of plant-parasitic nematodes was found, with reniform nematodes (RN, Rotylenchulus reniformis) the dominant species in North and South Florida (up to 27.5 nematodes/cc soil), and RKN (Meloidogne javanica) the main species in central Florida (up to 4.7 nematodes/cc soil). Other nematodes that were commonly found in south Florida (and to a lesser extent north Florida) were spiral (Helicotylenchus spp.), stunt (Tylenchorhynchus spp.) and ring nematodes (Criconemoids), while in central Florida, stubby root (Nanidorus minor) and sting nematodes (Belonolaimus longicaduatus) were found. No significant difference among hemp cultivars was noted at any of the locations. RKN were found in all three regions and soils, while RN were only found in North and South Florida. This is the first report on plant-parasitic nematodes associated with hemp in Florida fields. Natural nematode populations varied greatly, depending on where in Florida hemp was grown. Growers who wish to include hemp in their crop rotation need to be aware of potential pest pressure from nematodes. More research is needed to determine to what extent nematodes, especially RKN and RN, can reduce hemp growth and yield.
RESUMO
Root-knot nematodes (RKN; Meloidogyne spp.) are among the most damaging pests to tomato production in the USA and worldwide, with yield losses ranging from 25 to 100%. Host resistance conferred by the Mi gene in tomato is effective against some species of RKN (e.g. M. incognita, M. javanica, and M. arenaria); however, there are virulent species and lines including M. hapla and M. eterolobii that break Mi-mediated resistance. Plant innate immunity is another possible form of defense against pathogen attack and is known to be induced by chemical elicitors. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) is one such chemical elicitor that regulates plant defense responses to multiple biotic stresses. In this study, we investigated the role of NAD in the context of induced tomato innate immunity and RKN pathogenicity in two tomato cultivars; VFN and Rutgers, with and without Mi, respectively. Single soil drench application of NAD 24 hr before nematode inoculation significantly induced defense response pathways, reduced infective-juveniles penetration, number of galls, and increased plant mass in both cultivars. Importantly, we observed no direct toxic effects of NAD on nematode viability and infectivity. The results presented here suggest that NAD induces resistance against RKN pathogenicity likely through the accumulation of tomato basal defense responses rather than the direct effect on the infective-juveniles behavior.Root-knot nematodes (RKN; Meloidogyne spp.) are among the most damaging pests to tomato production in the USA and worldwide, with yield losses ranging from 25 to 100%. Host resistance conferred by the Mi gene in tomato is effective against some species of RKN (e.g. M. incognita, M. javanica, and M. arenaria); however, there are virulent species and lines including M. hapla and M. eterolobii that break Mi-mediated resistance. Plant innate immunity is another possible form of defense against pathogen attack and is known to be induced by chemical elicitors. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) is one such chemical elicitor that regulates plant defense responses to multiple biotic stresses. In this study, we investigated the role of NAD in the context of induced tomato innate immunity and RKN pathogenicity in two tomato cultivars; VFN and Rutgers, with and without Mi, respectively. Single soil drench application of NAD 24 hr before nematode inoculation significantly induced defense response pathways, reduced infective-juveniles penetration, number of galls, and increased plant mass in both cultivars. Importantly, we observed no direct toxic effects of NAD on nematode viability and infectivity. The results presented here suggest that NAD induces resistance against RKN pathogenicity likely through the accumulation of tomato basal defense responses rather than the direct effect on the infective-juveniles behavior.
RESUMO
Combination treatments of chisel-injected fumigants (methyl bromide, 1,3-D, metam sodium, and chloropicrin) on a first crop, followed by drip-applied fumigants (metam sodium and 1,3-D +/- chloropicrin) on a second crop, with and without oxamyl drip applications were evaluated for control of Meloidogyne incognita in three different tests (2002 to 2004) in Tifton, GA. First crops were eggplant or tomato, and second crops were cantaloupe, squash, or jalapeno pepper. Double-cropped vegetables suffered much greater root-knot nematode (RKN) pressure than first crops, and almost-total yield loss occurred when second crops received no nematicide treatment. On a first crop of eggplant, all fumigants provided good nematode control and average yield increases of 10% to 15 %. On second crops, higher application rates and fumigant combinations (metam sodium and 1,3-D +/- chloropicrin) improved RKN control and increased yields on average by 20% to 35 % compared to the nonfumigated control. Oxamyl increased yields of the first crop in 2003 on average by 10% to 15% but had no effect in 2004 when RKN failed to establish itself. On double-cropped squash in 2003, oxamyl following fumigation provided significant additional reduction in nematode infection and increased squash yields on average by 30% to 75%.