Detection and incidence of drug-induced agranulocytosis in hospital: a prospective analysis from laboratory signals.

AIMS: Our objectives were to assess the detection and incidence of drug-induced agranulocytosis in two university hospitals using hematology laboratory data. METHODS: A prospective study was undertaken at Toulouse University Hospital (France) and Navarra University Hospital (Spain) for 1 year (from 1 May 2004 to 30 April 2005). Using a computerized process and hematology laboratory data, all neutrophil counts with a value less than 500/mm(3) were registered, allowing identification of inpatients suffering from agranulocytosis during the period of the study. Medical records of all selected patients were then consulted. Cytostatic drugs were excluded from this study. RESULTS: During the period of the study, 225,659 neutrophil counts were performed in both hospitals, of which 2,835 (1.26%) had a neutrophil count less than 500/mm(3), corresponding to 739 patients. Seventeen patients were excluded because of lack of data, and 20 cases of infants younger than 3 months were excluded. Among the remaining patients (n = 702), 23 cases of drug-induced agranulocytosis (excluding cytostatic drugs) were suspected. All cases were classified as "serious" since they led to death in 2 cases, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization in 19 cases and threatening of vital prognosis in 2 cases. Withdrawal of suspected drugs was done in all cases with regression of neutropenia in 21 cases. According to hospitalization data, the annual incidence of drug-induced agranulocytosis was 1.62 (1.0-2.6) per 10,000 inpatients in Toulouse University hospital (based on 534 cases) and 3.24 (0.9-8.3) per 10,000 inpatients in Navarra University Hospital (based on 168 cases). The involved drugs were mainly antibacterial (30.4%), immunosuppressive (17.4%), antithyroid (13.0%), antiplatelet (8.7%) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory (8.7%) ones. Only seven cases from Toulouse University Hospital were spontaneously reported by physicians during the same period. Thus, the underreporting coefficient (U) was 2.71 (63.2%) in France. CONCLUSION: Our survey allowed us to identify the suspected drug-induced agranulocytosis through a prospective study in a large sample of inpatients using only laboratory data analysis. We also note an important underreporting rate of this serious adverse drug reaction (ADR) to the official French pharmacovigilance system. Laboratory data analysis could be used for identifying serious ADRs.

Sleep disruption, daytime somnolence and 'sleep attacks' in Parkinson's disease: a clinical survey in PD patients and age-matched healthy volunteers.

Recent case reports of 'sleep attacks' (SA) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) generated concerns about drug-induced daytime somnolence in this population. However, there are nearly no comparative data on sleep and vigilance problems between PD patients and normal controls. We performed a cross-sectional survey in PD patients and age-matched controls using a structured questionnaire on PD history, treatments, co-morbidity, activities of daily living, habits, exercise, sleep pattern, driving, pre-existing nocturnal problems, daytime somnolence, episodes of SA and the circumstances in which such episodes occurred. Daytime somnolence was also measured with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and sleep quality with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). 176 PD patients and 174 controls were included. The same proportion of PD patients (27%) and controls (32%) reported episodes of SA, but these were more frequent in PD patients and occurred more frequently during situations requiring attention (10.8% vs. 1.7%, p<10(-3)). More PD patients had abnormal daytime somnolence (ESS) and poor sleeping quality (PSQI). The most consistent factor associated with SA was the duration of levodopa therapy and the predictive value of an abnormal ESS score was rather poor (40.7%). Abnormal daytime somnolence and poor sleep quality at night are more frequent in PD patients than in normals. However, SA are reported in both groups, although less frequently in the normals during activities that requires attention.

[Cost-effectiveness in diagnosis and treatment of carcinomas of unknown primary origin]. / Analyse Coût/efficacité de la prise en charge diagnostique et thérapeutique des carcinomes d'origine indéterminée.

The aim was to compare, in terms of cost-effectiveness, two diagnostic strategies for finding out the primary site of tumors revealed by metastasis, adopting the hospital's perspective. The observed strategy reflected the usual practices of doctors at the Regional Cancer Center in Toulouse (France), and was based on a sample of 202 patients of this Center. The standardized strategy, which reflected limited diagnostic investigation, was simulated using the same sample of patients to whom we applied the recommendations of local experts. In the low assumption regarding the effectiveness of the standardized strategy, the observed strategy compared to the standardized one raised the life expectancy from 407 to 418 days at an incremental cost of $US 1,236 per patient (1996 values). In this case, one day of additional life induced a cost of $US 112 per patient. In the high assumption, the incremental effectiveness was null and the incremental cost was $US 1,236 per patient. In conclusion, the effectiveness of the observed strategy as compared to the standardized strategy was highly questionable, given that the patients' quality of life was not taken into account.

Long-term mortality results of the randomized controlled study comparing bromocriptine to which levodopa was later added with levodopa alone in previously untreated patients with Parkinson's disease.

The present paper compares, in terms of mortality, two treatment regimens for Parkinson's disease (PD), i.e., bromocriptine later combined with levodopa versus levodopa only. Between 1982 and 1989, 60 PD patients (29 treated with levodopa alone [group D] and 31 receiving first bromocriptine followed by an association of bromocriptine + levodopa [group B/D]) were recruited. Data were updated in January 2000. Survival functions were estimated using Kaplan Meier product-limit method and comparison between the two groups with the log-rank test. Mortality was also compared with that of the general French population using standardized mortality ratios (SMRs). The mean duration of follow-up was 10.3 +/- 3.0 years. Seventeen patients died during the follow-up: nine in the group B/D and eight in the group D. The probability of survival at 10 years was 79.0% [95% confidence interval [CI]: 71.4-86.6] in group B/D and 72.9% [95% CI: 63.3-82.6] in group D. In comparison with the general French population, SMRs were not statistically different from 1, in the whole sample of PD patients (1.21, 95 % CI [0.71-1.95]), in group D (0.98 [0.42-1.93]), or in group B/D (1.53 [0.70-2.92]). In this population, we were unable to find any favourable effect of an early use of bromocriptine on mortality in PD in comparison with levodopa alone.

Adverse drug reactions to selegiline: a review of the French pharmacovigilance database.

The present pharmacoepidemiologic study was performed to characterize the profile of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported with selegiline, a monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitor used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease and previously reported to induce an excess of mortality. The analysis was performed with use of the French Pharmacovigilance Database between 1989 and 1997. This database includes all ADRs reported by French practitioners (and especially "serious" and "unexpected" ADRs). Three different analyses were performed: identification of ADRs reported with selegiline, comparison with the ADR profile observed with other antiparkinsonian drugs, and a case/non-case study investigating the occurrence of cardiovascular ADRs with selegiline in comparison with other drugs in general and other antiparkinsonian drugs (e.g., levodopa [L-Dopa], dopamine agonists) in particular. The most often reported ADRs with selegiline were psychiatric (delirium, hallucinations, agitations), cardiovascular (orthostatic hypotension, arterial hypertension, etc.) and neurologic (sedation, abnormal movements, etc.). Psychiatric and cardiovascular ADRs were more frequently reported with selegiline than with L-Dopa or dopamine agonists. The case/ non-case study found an increased risk of cardiovascular ADRs (OR = 1.72; 95% Cl = 1.16-2.55)when selegiline was associated with L-Dopa. These data show that the profile of selegiline-induced ADRs differs from that of other antiparkinsonian drugs (L-Dopa, dopamine agonists) with more psychiatric and cardiovascular ADRs. We suggest that the higher frequency of cardiovascular ADRs could explain, at least partially, the previously reported increase in mortality rate.

[Midodrine (Gutron) prescription practice at a University Hospital Center]. / Etude des pratiques de prescriptions de midodrine (Gutron) dans un Centre Hospitalier Universitaire.

A historical study of the prescription of midodrine was carried out at the university hospital of Toulouse (France) between 1994 and 1998. The aim was to compare the observed prescriptions and the ideal prescriptions in accordance with the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC). The analysis of 97 consecutive medical reports found discrepancies in prescription concerning the non-respect of contraindications and of potentially hazardous drug associations. Fifty-four (55.7 per cent) patients would have been excluded from prescription if the physicians had strictly respected the SPC. The inappropriate prescription of midodrine was associated with an increase in adverse drug reactions (ADRs). ADRs occurred in 34.0 per cent of cases overall and required drug discontinuation in 15.5 per cent.

[Calcium inhibiting drugs and the risk of gastrointestinal hemorrhage. A pharmaco-epidemiologic case-non-case study]. / Médicaments inhibiteurs calciques et risque hémorragique gastro-intestinal. Etude pharmaco-épidémiologique cas-non cas.

Calcium antagonists were found to be associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal haemorrhage (GIH) in hypertensive patients over 67 years old (Pahor et al. Lancet 1996; 347 : 1061). This unexpected result led us to investigate this question using the French pharmacovigilance system database. We use the case/non case methodology (Moore et al. Br J Pharmacol 1997; 44 : 513) where cases and non cases were both identified from the spontaneous adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting database. Cases were reports of the reaction of interest (i.e. GIH as recorded in the database). Non cases were all reports of reactions other than being studied. Exposure was considered as the presence in a report of the drug of interest (calcium antagonists), whether or not it was suspected of causing the reaction. We calculated Odds ratios (OR) as the ratio of the Odds of the association of reports of GIH with calcium antagonists in cases and in non cases. Calcium antagonists included in the present study were dihydropyridines, diltiazem, verapamil and bepridil. Salicylates and non steroidal antiinflammatory drugs were used as positive controls. Among the 112,792 ADRs recorded in the database between January 1985 and December 1996, 864 (0.8%) were GIH. There was no association between GIH and the exposure to calcium antagonists whatever the class of the drugs (OR = 1.2, 95% CI: [0.9; 1.6]. A subgroup analysis among the GIH reported in patients over 65 years old (470 GIH from 37,462 ADRs) also failed to find any association (OR = 0.7, 95% CI: [0.5-1.0%]). The present results failed to confirm the hypothesis of an association between GIH and use of calcium antagonists.

A comparative survey of antidepressant drug prescribing habits of general practitioners and psychiatrists.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical experience suggests important differences in prescriptions from general practitioners and specialists. This study investigated these differences and their determinants for antidepressant drug prescribing intentions by general practitioners and psychiatrists in France. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: In May 1995, a mail questionnaire was sent to a representative panel of 300 general practitioners and 100 psychiatrists from the Midi-Pyrenees area (South West France). Two types of questions were asked: the first concerned the type of antidepressants prescribed according to the characteristics of depression ('severe', with insomnia, anxiety, etc.) and the second, the factors influencing prescriptions (personal experience, adverse effects, clinical trials, cost, etc.). RESULTS: 151 general practitioners (51%) and 63 psychiatrists (63%) answered the questionnaire. The analysis showed large differences between the two groups of physicians. Serotoninergic antidepressants were reported to be the most common first-line drugs of choice in both groups of practitioners. General practitioners claimed to prescribe serotoninergic antidepressants more frequently than psychiatrists (74 vs 59%, p < 0.05). Psychiatrists were reported to prescribe higher dosages of antidepressants than general practitioners in 'severe' depression (109.7 vs 85.6mg daily, p < 0.001). General practitioners were reported to prescribe anxiolytic agents more frequently than psychiatrists (73 vs 54%, p < 0.05), and neuroleptic agents less frequently (1 vs 11%, p < 0.001). The factors reported to influence antidepressant prescription differed in the two groups of physicians. Postuniversity teaching, hospital specialist information and registered indication were considered more important by general practitioners than psychiatrists, who reported to be more influenced by patients' and colleagues' opinions. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrated that the differences in intention in prescribing between psychiatrists and general practitioners can be explained by a different approach to prescription since psychiatrists place more importance on human and clinical factors (patients' and colleagues' opinions) than general practitioners, who referred more to 'official' data (university, hospital and registered indications).