Creating a secure clinical 'Bring Your Own Device' BYOD photography service to document and monitor suspicious lesions in the lid oncology clinic.

BACKGROUND: Ophthalmic examinations are mostly documented using sketches and written descriptions. Improvements in app security and IT infrastructure mean that high-quality anterior segment photographs can be routinely collected with smartphones alone. The lid oncology team relied on pre-operative formal slit-lamp imaging in the one-stop biopsy clinic, a lengthy process with capacity limitations, that risked delays to care. METHODS: A Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) photography service was developed through a series of iterations and collaborations. Healthcare Assistants took photographs on iPhone SE with Quikvue lens attachments in Pando app. Lesions requiring a slit lamp were photographed by the doctor. Images were uploaded to the patient record twice weekly. The service was evaluated using time-motion studies, imaging quality and utility grading, and patient feedback. RESULTS: BYOD photography saved lid oncology patients 41 min (one-third of total appointment time) and reduced delays to treatment to zero. A patient survey reflected the acceptability of the service, with 100% feeling photography was important at every visit. In terms of utility, 97.5% of smartphone images were suitable for monitoring lesions and making management decisions. The management plan based on the smartphone photographs was consistent with the management plan formulated face-to-face in clinic in 92.5% images. CONCLUSION: BYOD photography has replaced formal slit-lamp imaging in the lid oncology service. This sustainable, cost-effective BYOD solution requires little training and can be adapted, reproduced, and scaled globally. BYOD photography can offer detailed records to monitor progress, contribute to remote care models, improve patient experience, and reducing medical error.

MicroShunt versus Trabeculectomy for Surgical Management of Glaucoma: A Retrospective Analysis.

This case-control study aims to compare the efficacy, safety, and postoperative burden of MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy. The first consecutive cohort of MicroShunt procedures (n = 101) was matched to recent historical trabeculectomy procedures (n = 101) at two London hospital trusts. Primary endpoints included changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) and glaucoma medications. Secondary outcome measures included changes in retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness, rates of complications, further theatre interventions, and the number of postoperative visits. From the baseline to Month-18, the median [interquartile range] IOP decreased from 22 [17-29] mmHg (on 4 [3-4] medications) to 15 [10-17] mmHg (on 0 [0-2] medications) and from 20 [16-28] mmHg (on 4 [3-4] medications) to 11 [10-13] mmHg (on 0 [0-0] medications) in the MicroShunt and trabeculectomy groups, respectively. IOP from Month-3 was significantly higher in the MicroShunt group (p = 0.006), with an increased number of medications from Month-12 (p = 0.024). There were greater RNFL thicknesses from Month-6 in the MicroShunt group (p = 0.005). The rates of complications were similar (p = 0.060) but with fewer interventions (p = 0.031) and postoperative visits (p = 0.001) in the MicroShunt group. Therefore, MicroShunt has inferior efficacy to trabeculectomy in lowering IOP and medications but provides a better safety profile and postoperative burden and may delay RNFL loss.

Pituitary Macroadenoma Presenting With Monocular Temporal Hemianopia.

ABSTRACT: A 35-year-old primigravida woman presented to the eye emergency department with reduced visual acuity in the right eye. Humphrey visual field testing showed a monocular right eye temporal hemianopia before delivery. An MRI after delivery revealed a largely symmetrical pituitary macroadenoma with chiasmal compression. This is a rare presentation of a pituitary macroadenoma especially when the tumor is largely symmetrical.