[Congenital hemangiomas: Report on ten patients]. / Hémangiomes congénitaux : à propos de dix cas.

INTRODUCTION: Congenital hemangiomas (CHs) are rare congenital vascular tumors seldom mentioned in the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study of all the cases of CH diagnosed and treated at Besançon Hospital from 2008 to 2014. The clinical, radiological, and histological data of each case were collected. All the children were seen again in 2014. RESULTS: Ten CHs (seven rapidly involuting CHs, RICH and three non-involuting CH, NICH), predominantly full-term eutrophic male infants, were enrolled. RICHs were located on the head (n=2), trunk (n=2), and lower limbs (n=3), and NICHs were found on the hands. Diagnosis was clinical for all ten infants. All CHs resembled "tumor" congenital lesions: single, oval-shaped, nonpulsatile, and well delimited, and their size did not increase after birth. Two RICHs were warm, one had phlebolites, and two had draining veins at the first visit. The mean age of the RICH involution onset was 1.7 months and the mean time to complete involution was 10.4 months. One CH was classified as a PICH (partially involuting CH) due to partial regression, two RICHs were still in the involution process at the age of 10 and 15 months, and one regressed very quickly within 7 days. No complications were observed in the NICH. Two RICHs presented benign complications (ulcerations and bleeding). Two RICHs regressed entirely, and five regressed with sequelae: lipoatrophy (n=3), cutaneous excess (n=2), dysplastic veins (n=3), a pigmented area (n=1), and an anemic halo (n=2). DISCUSSION: The small number of patients in our cohort, in spite of the length of the study, confirms the rarity of CH. The sex-ratio in favor of male infants and the location of NICH on the hands have not been reported. The most discriminating element remained the follow-up over 1 year. The initial clinical aspect of the NICH and the progression of one RICH into a NICH suggested possible overlapping forms between RICH and NICH. Some CHs, including one PICH, presented clinical and radiological criteria similar to those of vascular malformations (warm lesion, dysplastic veins, and echo-Doppler results in favor of vascular malformation). RICH regressed with sequelae in most cases. CONCLUSION: This study reveals a polymorphous clinical presentation of CH and provides a thorough description of their progression. It underlines the existence of overlapping phenomena between RICH and NICH, and between CH and vascular malformations, thus suggesting a possible link between proliferation and malformation phenomena at the origin of these lesions.

[Vulvar oedema revealing systemic mastocytosis]. / Œdème vulvaire révélant une mastocytose systémique.

BACKGROUND: Systemic mastocytosis is characterised by abnormal proliferation of mast cells in various organs. We report an original case of systemic mastocytosis revealed by vulvar oedema. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 24-year-old patient was examined in the dermatology department for vulvar oedema appearing during sexual intercourse. She presented vasomotor dysfunction of the lower limbs, urticaria on the trunk on exertion, diarrhoea and bone pains. Laboratory tests showed serum tryptase of 29.7µg and plasma histamine at twice the normal value. Myelogram results showed infiltration by dysmorphic mast cells. Screening for c-kit D816V mutation was positive. Duodenal biopsies revealed mast-cell clusters with aggregation involving over 15 mast cells. CD2 staining was inconclusive and CD25 staining could not be done. Trabecular osteopenia was found, and we thus made a diagnosis of indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM variant Ia) as per the WHO 2008 criteria. Symptomatic treatment was initiated (antiH1, H2, antileukotrienes) and clinical and laboratory follow-up was instituted. DISCUSSION: The cutaneous signs leading to diagnosis in this patient of systemic mastocytosis involving several organs were seemingly minimal signs associated with mastocyte degranulation. This is the third recorded case of mastocytosis revealed by vulvar oedema and the first case revealing systemic involvement. The two previously reported cases of vulvar oedema revealed cutaneous mastocytosis alone. Mastocytosis, whether systemic or cutaneous, must be included among the differential diagnoses considered in the presence of vulvar oedema.